Commons:Discussions by language
This page serves as a centralised discussion board for deletion requests and categories for discussions that need help with minority languages.
Because sufficiently many active Commons users speak these languages, they are not listed here—Dutch, English, French, German and Spanish. Please raise your questions at the respective Village Pump.
If a language is not listed yet, please follow the steps:
- Identify the ISO-LANGUAGE-CODE (or find it from Category:Commons by language).
- Create the subpage
Commons:Discussions_by_language/Boards/langcodeby copying the format from another subpage. - Transclude the subpage (
{{Commons:Discussions_by_language/Boards/langcode}}) below.
See also edit
ja - 日本語 (1) edit
.jpeg){kind=link}
Category:Java Sea Memorial (Tokyo) edit
This Japanese monument, in Tokyo, is apparently a memorial to the Battle of the Java Sea. Translations of its inscriptions would be most helpful. If this is not, in fact, a memorial to the Battle of the Java Sea, please recategorize accordingly. Daderot (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @MSJapan: Would you please be so kind to check that? --Achim (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC
- I finally found this. It's this, which, since I can read this text much better than what's in the photos, I can translate. This, as I thought it might be from the address, is located at one of the gates of Yasukuni Shrine. It's not quite the "Battle of the Java Sea" so much as it seems to be the entire Indonesian campaign. I'm still digging, so I'm a bit weak on details, but the Battle of the Java Sea is called スラバヤ沖海戦, and as best as I can get so far, 濠北 is short for the naval division (size indeterminate) that was engaged in the entire Indonesian campaign (an area I'm not familiar with in English, so it's complicating matters in Japanese). The monument was erected by a veteran's association in 1964, not the government. The poem by Emperor Meiji really threw me off, but I can see the connection. The category is definitely incorrect and should be renamed to something else. I've removed Category:Battle of the Java Sea as well - it's not sufficiently pertinent to that battle. MSJapan (talk) 23:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I greatly appreciate your insights and your help in getting this right! with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I can't see where to put it, but as far as copyright goes, the memorial date is November 3, 1964, so it would be useful to state that - it makes it clear the monument is PD because it is outside the 50-year range given in the licensing. @Daderot: The images should be retitled, but I'm not sure what is best yet. The description is going to get retooled as well, but it should be standard to a certain extent across all the images so it is clear that this is all the same monument. We can discuss further on your talk. MSJapan (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. It's probably best to figure out the right name for the category, then make a clean-up pass through the images. What do you think? Daderot (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- @MSJapan: 濠北 is probably not a naval division. 濠洲 is Australia. 濠北方面 is probably the area to the north of Australia, since File:Memorial plaque with Java Sea map - Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan - DSC04772.jpg shows Indonesia.
- A rough translation would be Cenotaph of North of Australia War Dead. 戦歿者 = war dead. 慰霊碑 = cenotaph.--Roy17 (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- More background info: https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%B1%8A%E5%B6%8B%E6%88%BF%E5%A4%AA%E9%83%8E&oldid=93229294 . Roy17 (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think the best solution is a transliteration of the japanese name "濠北方面戦没者慰霊碑", but I dont speak japanese. Roy17 (talk) 17:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
ko - 한국어 (26) edit
File:2018소방공무원 박승균, 이건, 오영환.jpg edit
Although as new as 2018 I cannot reach the source. E4024 (talk) 19:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Roblox- 한국 프로필.jpg edit
Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. The image is categorized under Category:Roblox, implying that the image is from Roblox, a video game. However, Roblox allows users to create mods, so this image is probably not even part of the official game to begin with. Even if the image was an official artwork, its notability is suspect. FunnyMath (talk) 07:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:롯데월드타워 피난계단 IMG 0118.jpg edit
Derivative work of a copyrighted sign. There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.
ƏXPLICIT 03:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to suggest that we discuss the relevant content in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gocheok Sky Dome WBSC Premier 12 2019.jpg. --Trainholic (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in South Korea. --rubin16 (talk) 09:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File:손예진 싸인.jpg edit
COM:TOO South Korea seems low, and there's no fop. erring on the side of caution, i'd say delete. RZuo (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment a signature, not FOP-reliant underlying work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I think it could be kept per COM:SIG South Korea. --rubin16 (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 20.jpg edit
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 28.jpg edit
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 30.jpg edit
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:20150808최광모RX10DSC01599.JPG edit
Meaningless image Jjw (talk) 06:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's a guesthouse but there is e-mail adress etc at the description; probably a commercial call. --E4024 (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete - no obvious educational purpose, out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
File:문재인 대통령, 2018 평창패럴림픽대회 선수단 출정식 참석 2018-03-02.jpg edit
I have confirmed that this file is licensed as KOGL Type 4. This is a license that is prohibited from modification and commercial use and cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is a license violation. --Ox1997cow (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- This file is licensed under KOGL1 when it is uploaded to Commons. License is changed later. – Kwj2772 (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
File:20150209-20150214최광모C221.JPG edit
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:20150209-20150214최광모C222.JPG edit
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:TV조선 내일은 미스트롯.jpg edit
CC-BY-SA-4.0 라이선스로 공개된 파일이 아닙니다.(Not a file published with a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license) ※https://namu.wiki/w/요요미, https://namu.wiki/w/파일:미스트롯_요요미.jpg -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:TV조선 내일은 미스트롯1.jpg edit
CC-BY-SA-4.0 라이선스로 공개된 파일이 아닙니다.(Not a file published with a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license) ※https://namu.wiki/w/%EC%9A%94%EC%9A%94%EB%AF%B8 -- 메이 (토론) 05:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:남성의 생식 기관.png edit
삭제요청 합니다 나다사전 (talk) 07:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:남성의 생식기관.jpg edit
삭제요청 합니다 나다사전 (talk) 07:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:남성의 항문.jpg edit
삭제요청 합니다 나다사전 (talk) 07:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:똥꼬.jpg edit
삭제요청 합니다 나다사전 (talk) 07:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미-가요무대.jpg edit
관련된 유튜브 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 확인할 수 없습니다.(Can't find CC-BY-SA 4.0 License in relevant youtube page) ※10분 55초(10m55s) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGuEyyY8BFs -- 메이 (토론) 05:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미01.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미02.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) 요요미의 유튜브에 있는 파일이고 저작권과 출처를 밝혔음. 타 사이트에도 많이 퍼져있는 파일들임. 요요미를 위해 긍정적인 방향으로 저작권을 해석해야 함. 엄격하게 삭제요청을 하는건 위키백과의 흥미성 측면에서 부정적인 권리남용임.
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미03.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미04.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:요요미06.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_UKEsQBkJ9ZOJkKpJs_54g -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:항문(Anus).jpeg edit
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
삭제하고 싶음(내꺼) Minaco98 (talk) 07:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
File:혜은이01 haeeunlee.jpg edit
출처 페이지에서 CC-BY-SA 4.0 라이선스를 찾을 수 없습니다.(CC-BY-SA 4.0 license not found on source page.) ※https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=117&aid=0000043920 -- 메이 (토론) 05:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 김영훈80 (talk · contribs) edit
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
pl - polski (2) edit
File:Określenie Geometrycznego Środka Polski przez Instytut Geodezji i Kartografii w 2003 r.jpg edit
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Art Nouveau reliefs in Bydgoszcz edit
Kategoria ciekawa,lecz i tu znalazłem błędy:kamienica na Dworcowej 67 to piękny włoski neorenesans, z secesją nie ma to nic wspólnego,więc pliki 3+4 w sumie 7 nie mogą być w kategorii reliefy secesyjne(art nouveau).Pliki powinny być w kategorii reliefy neorenesansowe,kamienica na ul Cieszkowskiego 11 jest w stylach mieszanych,trochę neogotyku pomieszanego z neorenesansem,a ewentualnie na siłę to można tam podciągnąć pod secesję tylko te reliefy pod wykuszem,są też obecne reliefy neobarokowe,a nie secesyjne np Cieszkowskiego 17. Taktoperz77 Taktoperz77 10:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kamienica Dworcowa 67 w Bydgoszczy została zbudowana w latach 1912-1913. Według źródeł jej styl to modernizm klasycyzujący. Nie jestem przekonany, czy płaskorzeźby na tej kamienicy są neorenesansowe. --Pit1233 (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Tak konstrukcyjnie jest to modernizm,ale reliefy są neorenesansowe.Dlaczego? Otóż renesans zwłaszcza włoski czerpał wszystkie wzory motywów:ornamentów,fryzów,rzeźb,płaskorzeźb,kolumn,pilastrów,kartuszy,konsoli itd,itp z klasycyzmu antycznego,przykłady renesansowa Villa Rotonda w Vicenzy,posąg Dawida. Są to arcydzieła renesansu wzorowane na klasycyzmie antycznym.Być może dlatego użyto terminu Modernizm klasycyzujący(neorenesansowy).Jednak na pewno nie są to reliefy secesyjne.A jeszcze inny błąd ul Garbary 12,tam już secesyjnego nie ma absolutnie nic,co więcej nie ma tam nawet żadnych płaskorzeźb,a Pan plik z widokiem szczytu neorenesansowego z gzymsami zaliczył do kat.Art Nouveau reliefs.Dlaczego? Taktoperz77 Albo (2 pliki) z neogotycką ażurową balustradą balkonów nawiązującą do gotyckich maswerków -ul Cieszkowskiego 11 -to wg Pana secesyjne reliefy.Dlaczego? Nie wszystko co zbudowano na przełomie XIX I XX wieku to secesja.Neogotyk,neobarok,neorokoko,neorenesans,eklektyzm nie są secesją.Taktoperz77 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taktoperz77 (talk • contribs) 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Stale discussion. This discussion is about files, not about the nominated category. I propose to move this non-English discussion into Category talk:Art Nouveau reliefs in Bydgoszcz--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Done: This discussion is about files, not about the nominated category. --Emha (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Discussions by language/Boards/pt Commons:Discussions by language/Boards/zh