Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Слепень (серия 1 из 2).jpg

File:Слепень (серия 1 из 2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2018 at 10:15:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info Head of the horsefly. A photo in visible light. Microscope Lumam R-8. Lens 9x, Panoramic image. / Сreated by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We need a resolution between 1,024 and 28,823 pixels JukoFF. 1,024 is too small and I can't open the big one. Charles (talk) 11:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1. For this photo to be of use, there also needs to be a size that anyone can download, not only a select few with powerful computers. Could someone please make a copy that is say about 30% = 5,765 x 8,647 px? Sort of like it's done with this photo. --Cart (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But how do we get that copy added to this file page?--Peulle (talk) 20:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peulle, we don't have to add it to the nomination page itself, it just has to exist and then get linked to under |other= on the file's page. Same way as File:Ryxö island nature reserve in Brofjorden.jpg or File:Krigsgiljan at Loddebo.jpg. Somebody who can open the file can downsize it and just upload that copy and add it to the file page. That way the rest of us can actually see it. If you can do this, it would be great. --Cart (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Done I just didn't want it to appear that it was my own photo. I uploaded it and copied the file info from the page of the original, also linking between the two. The downsizing was done in PS with maximum quality retained. I also took the liberty of cropping the bottom ever so slightly, as there was plenty of room available.--Peulle (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peulle, great thanks! If you upload via Upload Wizard, you normally click on the "This is not my image" button and fill in the facts about the original. I have fixed that on the file's page for you, take a look. Now I can examine it and vote. Also 'pinging the other users who had trouble opening this: Daniel Basile Charles. --Cart (talk) 11:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Outstanding. The level of detail here is completely off the hook. Truly one of the best images on Commons. If I'm nitpicking a bit, I'd say you could probably crop the bottom since the image is so large, and you could do a bit more work on the black areas near the borders between the eyes and the background. Also also, is there any chance of getting the categories even more accurate?--Peulle (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I asked the experts, as soon as I get the answer, I will prescribe a more accurate category. JukoFF (talk) 14:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! But could you please add a description above. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This looks great but I can't open the file (probably 553 Mpx is bit big ) and the interactive large-image-viewer is not working since a few days -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Hence my comment above. --Cart (talk) 09:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work. --Moahim (talk) 09:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 11:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Of course the level of detail is amazing, but the focus stacking and editing could be a lot better which is a shame. The image invites you to look close and you see the errors. Charles (talk) 12:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some focus stacking errors, but considering the difficulty, I find the result not too bad technically and impressive at this level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 18:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I just hope some day I can view this (and certainly without downloading it to my computer - I have limited space). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods