Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:종묘 정전 신실 (2013).jpg

File:종묘 정전 신실 (2013).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2021 at 13:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created by en:Cultural Heritage Administration - uploaded by Sadopaul - nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 13:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 13:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I think it would look better cropped in on both sides (see note). Daniel Case (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: I cropped to alternative file. May I know a reason for your suggestion?— Sadopaul 💬 📁 00:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think by squaring it up more it focuses more on the space that gives us that tunnel perspective. Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for advising! I will substitute this with the alternative version when another one suggests the same. Hope you have a great weekend ;)— Sadopaul 💬 📁

Comment I like this picture, but the cropped version is better. I don't know which focal length was used, but for these kind of photographs a long focal length is suggested. --XRay 💬 06:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Colin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Change description: Crop according to Daniel Case. @Daniel Case and XRay: — Sadopaul 💬 📁 13:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it is obviously better than former one! Thanks for enhancing comment.— Sadopaul 💬 📁 13:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, obviously. Daniel Case (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the cropped version. --Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shame. There's potential for a great photo here. But the eye is led into a haze and out-of-focus area. Without that flaw, I'd likely support, though taking it to the next level, would be a person (not a tourist). -- Colin (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Henry39 (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Also not very big. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 12:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#South Korea

The chosen alternative is: File:종묘 정전 신실 (2013) (cropped).jpg