Henry39

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Henry39!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Kazimierz Czekaj.jpg

File:Kazimierz Czekaj.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Masur (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

• Wg prawa autorskiego jego zastrzeżenie (z angielskiego "copyrights, (c)) nie musi być przywołane w żaden specjalny sposób, zatem wspomniany biuletyn jest objęty ochroną prawnoautorską domyślnie. Co więcej, ty podałeś siebie jako autora oraz źródło tego zdjęcia, co nawet zakładając, że biuletyn nie byłby objęty prawem autorskim, jest zwykłą nieprawdą i wciąż naruszeniem ww. praw. Masur (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
• Ah, nie odpowiedziałem na kolejne pytanie - tak, można poprosić o zdjęcie rodziny. Należy pamiętać by podać właściwe źródło/autora oraz koniecznie wdrożyć procedurę Commons:Pozwolenia. Masur (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Tylko przypomionam, że rodzina nei ma nic wspólnego z tym zdjęciem z biuletynu. Ww. zgody może udzielić właściciel majątkowych praw autorskich. Masur (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Robert Cena 1863-1945.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Robert Cena 1863-1945.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Robert Cena 1863-1945.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

• Tak, tylko książka jest z 2006, zatem dopóki nie jest wskazany autor fotografii i nie jest udowodnione że zmarł więcej niż 70 lat temu, to mamy do czynienia z dziełem osieroconym. Kwestia czy autor jest naprawdę nieznany? Bo jak naprawdę nieznany, to liczy się data publikacji fotki. Nie masz jakiejś książki sprzed 1992 które zawiera tę fotkę? Masur (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Zerknij na File:PD-schema pl.svg - oczywiście teraz graniczna data to 1946 (anie 1943). Masur (talk) 10:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Ale data śmierci podmiotu nie ma znaczenia. Przeceiż PA należą do fotografa. Masur (talk) 16:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

• • • • Nowa fotografia, zamieszczona 15 kwietnia 2017, pochodzi z archiwum Adama Serdecznego z Jarosławia, historyka Morawska i biografa polityków ludowych końca XIX wieku. - Henry39 (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Robert Cena 1900.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Cena 1900.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Cena 1900.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

WTM (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Ślij e-mail na adres info-pl@wikimedia.org albo na adres permissions-pl@wikimedia.org - tam ci najlepiej objaśnią co powinno być w takiej zgodzie. --WTM (talk) 23:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

• Some additional information that the discussants might find useful.

Robert Cena was in the last years of XIX century an important leader and deputy representing the Agrarian-Christian Party from the Polish part of Austria in the then Imperial Austrian parliament in Wien. Since 1900, this area (Jarosław, now in the South-Eastern corner of Poland) suffered two world wars and was invaded by Russians, then Germans, and Russians again. It is now (partly only) a part of Poland as it always was before the troubled years. There are very few archives left and available. The Polish archives (the Jagiellonian Library in Cracow in particular) are incomplete. Moreover, there are no successors to the XIX century photographers or publishers. Hence, it is practically impossible to locate the original source of the Robert Cena’s photograph. However, we know a lot about the image. First, it shows Robert as a young man, taken presumably at the peak of his political career. It means that the photo is about 120 years old. Second, the photo published by the local historian Adam Serdeczny (mentioned above) was already a rather poor copy/scan from, it may be assumed, some printed material and it was/is not one of those formal XIX century portraits produced in a photography atelier. Third, the image is that of Robert Cena, as we have the evidence from Adam Serdeczny and it agrees with the very detailed facial description in a article in newspaper Cracow Daily (30 March 1897) giving the news of Robert’s election. The description, in Polish, is in full in reference No. 6 in Robert Cena in the Polish Wikipedia. Adam Serdeczny, the local teacher/historian, as I know, has passed away. Robert Cena biograms have already been written and published independently in the Czech and the Polish Wikipedias. So, I rest my case. Regards - Henry39 (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ludwik Żurowski bros 1947.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ludwik Żurowski bros 1947.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ludwik Żurowski bros 1947.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• Fotografia i licencja dla File:Żurowski bros 1947.jpg jest na tej stronie: http://jerzmanowice.archiwa.org/zasoby.php?id=12575 . Pozdrawiam - Henry39 (talk) 18:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  You uploaded the file under a {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} license, but that page mentions a different license: {{cc-by-nc}}. That is a non-free license restricted to {{noncommercial}} use only. This site only hosts free content. Please read Commons:Licensing/pl#Akceptowane licencje to understand what you can and cannot upload here. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 19:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• I assumed that I can use it for Wikimedia purposes freely. - Wikimedia appears to be a "noncommercial use". Should I get a confirmatory email from the Jerzmanowice Library running the digital archives ? What formal phrase should I ask them to use/write to avoid further problems ? - Please advise. Regards - Henry39 (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  We only host content that is free for any purpose. If you think the copyright holder would be willing to publish the photo under a free license, the page linked above, Commons:OTRS, has information on how to proceed. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• Can the Jerzmanowice LIbrary issue such a document ? - From the initial talk I had with them over the phone I would think they will be willing but will you accept ? Regards - Henry39 (talk) 20:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  They can issue any license they like, as long as they are the copyright holder. I can't assess whether that's likely to be the case, and I'm not one of the volunteers who process permission e-mails, so I can't say for sure if it would be accepted. Sorry I can't give a more definitive answer. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• OK, this is what I wanted to know. For the benefit of Wikipedia, will try to get a suitable statement from the Library. And, I must admit, using Wikimedia is not easy just the contrary :-) Thanks and regards - Henry39 (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC
• I have just forwarded (to: permissions-pl@wikimedia.org ) the free licence statement received from http://jerzmanowice.archiwa.org . I have marked File:Ludwik Żurowski bros 1947.jpg with the appropriate template as advised. Regards - Henry39 (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Adam Harasowski with Polish Army Choir 1945.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Harasowski with Polish Army Choir 1945.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Adam Harasowski with Polish Army Choir 1945.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 07:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Elektrownia Siersza Wodna 1937.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Elektrownia Siersza Wodna 1937.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Elektrownia Siersza Wodna 1937.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 07:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

obraz

jest ok Masur (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Wacław Ciesielski, przed 1994? - konsultacja

O ile nie ma zastrzeżenia praw autorksich na fotografii, pod nią, czy w stopce redakcyjnej to tak - PD-PRL. Masur (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Kategoria:Maciej Stoksik

Kategoria:Maciej Stoksik is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD GA2 (gallery created by mistake) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

4nn1l2 (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Re:Konsultacja– File:Legnica,_ul._Wrocławska_-_procesja_Bożego_Ciała.jpg

Zrobione. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Re:Prośba

Niestety, ale ilustracja jest skanem zdjęcia z książki lub gazety i niewiele dało się z tym zrobić. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Janina Stoksik 1984.jpg

File:Janina Stoksik 1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powerek38 (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Andrzej Konarski 24.8.2020 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Andrzej Konarski 24.8.2020 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Andrzej Konarski 24.8.2020 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Andrzej Konarski 24.8.2020 1.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)