Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Broken tree against the sunset.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2014 at 06:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Norbert Nagel - uploaded by Norbert Nagel - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)- Support really great Tomer T (talk) 08:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support A good example of what is WOW ! --Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support bottom space could be more generous, nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --ArildV (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose You are kidding? Broken tree is "wow"?!! --Kikos (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)- Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kikos. If an image could be said to have "anti-wow", this would be a good example. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per above opposers. I feel that this picture lacks structure; there is too much going on, causing dilution of the composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, the composition lacks structure. Going close up to view only part of the tree stump with sunset background and some kind of geometric composition would likely have created a stronger picture. -- Colin (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for nominating, I wasn't aware. It is not so much the tree trunk itself, it's rather the back light of sunset and its reflection on the tree trunk and grass that make up the charm of the image. I curious how the voting ends. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)- Support Image has something special. • Richard • [®] • 15:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I could imagine this to work, but in this case, I have to say it's too chaotic. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 22:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry. 15 min trying underestand what is that, however, too abstract for me. IMHO could be better a more detailed explain about this composition. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose a bad cut and no wow for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Neither fish nor fowl; too objective for an abstract image and too abstract for a portrait of nature. Sorry. --P e z i (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose no "wow" to me. The trees in the back are disturbing the composition - there is no clear structure visible. BeBo86 (talk) 09:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
