Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duisitzkarsee0006.JPG

File:Duisitzkarsee0006.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2013 at 16:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Ewaldgabardi, nominated Christoph Braun (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, GerardM (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also cows need holidays ;-) --K@rl (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cow on the right has some overexposed parts, and I suppose the cows are the subject, because they are in focus and the background is not really in focus (maybe a narrower aperture should have been used, because of the long distance difference between the cows and the subject). However, the description and the filename tell that the subject is the lake and its environment. I also find the excrements disturbing to this scene. The crop of the hill (top left) is unfortunate. --Kadellar (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its the moment. Cows watching for jumping sea trouts! Summer vacations as its best! --Hubertl (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 09:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 11:13, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the lighting is really poor (shady cow on the left, blue area in the trees on the left in the background, overexposed and blown cow on the right) and I don't like the composition (two cut off cows, some water and trees; looks like a hasty snapshot. No inclusion of the landscape (esp. the mountains)) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 03:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition and the snapshot if it ever was one. De728631 (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the composition (how the animals are cut in half + there should be more background included in the upper side of the image) and there are overblown areas. Image is interesting but not a FP. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition! --Karelj (talk) 11:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too bad the good is the right half. Otherwise, I see the same as user Carschten. I can not give per voice, sorry --Böhringer (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For exactly the same reasons as Carschten. Regards. --Cayambe (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool looking picture!Trongphu (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting enough to be featured!--Earth100 (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Ivar (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is wow --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]