Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Early road to Lake Peipus.jpg

File:Early road to Lake Peipus.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 15:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created and uploaded by Taitss - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilt to the left (see reflections in the water) --Kreuz schnabel 16:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to notice any tilt. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support great mood but please do correct the tilt, see annotation --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done by author. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image with pretty nice colours. The tilt is not a big issue and can be easily fixed.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors and light. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - It's a nice photo, but I'm not convinced it should be featured. It's not all in focus at full size. However, it is pretty at full-page size, so I don't oppose a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Left side should be cropped perhaps, but clockwise turn for sure. --Mile (talk) 07:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love the mood and the lighting of the picture, but the composition is less-than-ideal. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hendric. INeverCry 20:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 01:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The colours of the picture looks irrealistic to me Jiel (talk) 11:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen similar colors so often that there isn't anything irrealistic to me. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A QI for sure, but per Hendric its different elements overcomplicate it compositionally speaking. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Over compression? --Laitche (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Haloes. I think it is overprocessed in general. Matter of taste, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]