Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Essen - Thyssen-Krupp-Quartier - GT12897.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2016 at 14:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
- Info created by Hildefonz - uploaded by Hildefonz - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 14:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay talk 14:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very well done compositionally, especially the vignetting was well chosen in this case. Quality seems flawless to me. --Code (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Serene and really beautiful and pleasant to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Very nice. —Bruce1eetalk 17:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 19:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --cart-Talk 23:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene, plus nice exposure time. Although the camera said it was taken on 22:27, the sky still don't look night and this because of the 6.5 seconds exposure. --★ Poké95 01:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- It could also be because at that time of year, Essen has what I call "dark gray nights", in which it never gets darker than astronomical twilight; this picture's timestamp, in fact, indicates it was taken during late civil twilight. So, good thinking by the photographer to combine the advantages of both all-night blue hour and long exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 06:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jerrykim306 (talk) 12:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice! I think the vertical is OK though only the level is just a little bit tilted cw so I uploaded the derivative, what do you think? --Laitche (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Thanks Laitche, I was withholding my support for that reason, but I wasn't sure if the lean was an illusion. It looks better now. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Because of the weird colour profile this image looks fine on my pc but ridiculous on my laptop -- Thennicke (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Everything is now fine on my end. Nice image! -- Thennicke (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hildefonz can you save your photos with a colour profile please, as without this it will not display the correct colours for many users. See Set up color management. I think you want the "Always Optimize Colors For Computer Screens" option and to "ICC Profile in the Save As dialog box" (select an sRGB profile). (I don't use Elements so not expert at how it works). Laitche, your derivative has significantly shifted the colours. Was that deliberate or did you import/choose the wrong colour profile? -- Colin (talk) 11:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- That's weird, I knew the color space is uncalibrated then I did use the same setting of the original with Photoshop. --Laitche (talk) 11:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- What have you got Photoshop set to do with images that lack a profile? It should be set to default to sRGB but if you use e.g. ProPhotoRGB as your "working space" then you might have imported as that. It is always worth getting Photoshop to prompt you about what to do when opening an image without a colourspace. You might also need to "assign" a profile to this image, so that when you save your derivative, it is saved with a profile. -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Colin: The original has FujiXT1-Generic profile and I am using Google Chrome, seems Chrome is ignoring that profile so on my monitor(Chrome), the original and derivative look the same colors cause I nullified the profile when I edited it. And Photoshop's Camera RAW cannot handle FujiXT1-Generic profile hence I cannot correct the perspective with FujiXT1-Generic profile... So if they needed I would re-make the derivative after the author save the file as sRGB, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 12:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Laitche, I think I must have got confused about which image I was examining. Yes the original does have a colour profile, but it is an odd one with "Lab" ProfileConnectionSpace rather than "XYZ" and this may be why Chrome and ACR refuse to handle it. However, you can fix this. Open the original in Photoshop. If you try to add a Camera RAW filter then it refuses with that colour profile. However if you "Edit/Convert to profile" to sRGB, then you can add a Camera Raw filter and do your perspective correction. This will also save the image as sRGB. -- Colin (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Colin: I know that way but not sure the author is seeing this photo with the profile or without besides, of course I don't know the real colors of this scene therefore I cannot do that. And I guess most of voters (including me) are seeing profile-less colors since Firefox ignores this profile as well. --Laitche (talk) 15:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Well they are probably voting for the wrong colours then, which is double reason to oppose this JPG. My Firefox sees the profile fine, but I have gfx.color_management.enablev4 set to true (see about:config on Firefox), which is not the default. I guess this is a V4 colour profile. If you see a lovely bright "blue hour" image with orange-golden interior lights on the building, and green leaves on the trees, then you are seeing it correctly IMO; if you see a grey-blue sky with pale gold lights and olive-grey leaves, then I think that's wrong. The "blue hour" sky when photographed by a digital camera is often vivid, not dull. -- Colin (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Colin: Above comment is for me? if so, I can see that colors with Photoshop and thanks for the information of Firefox. --Laitche (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'll ask him. May it takes a couple of days because of christmas time. --XRay talk 11:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Laitche, Colin, and Thennicke: I added the sRGB Profile and did some small corrections on vertical alignment --Hildefonz talk 22:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose The embedded colour profile is not suitable. It should be saved in a display profile such as sRGB. Some browsers and programs will not apply this profile correctly. -- Colin (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)- Support Now the profile is a suitable one for display. -- Colin (talk) 10:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good compo, you didnt went into center of center. --Mile (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support − Meiræ 00:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 03:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany