Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenstein Dornhof Felder und Baumgruppe mit Magdalensberg dahinter 14122016 4663.jpg

File:Frauenstein Dornhof Felder und Baumgruppe mit Magdalensberg dahinter 14122016 4663.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2021 at 15:00:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
Info I find the multilayered composition of this landscape really compelling, and overall it seems like a sensitive and elegant photograph. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20's nomination reasoning. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe cropping a bit on the left will improve the composition, by making the trees a more effective counterweight to the church at the top right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very nice picture, but the asymetrical foreground spoils the composition for me. It would work nicely if the border between the two layers were horizontal. As is, maybe it should be cropped. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly think all the changes suggested so far would make the photo more boring, but we shall see how the consensus goes. Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Johann Jaritz: Given the disagreement, I think it is best that any revisions be presented as an alt rather than overwriting the original. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very beautiful and elegant, as already described by Cmao in the nomination. I would second King of Hearts’ idea to crop a (little!) bit on the left. – @Johann Jaritz: I have marked some dust spots in the sky and would suggest to remove them to make this excellent photo even better. --Aristeas (talk) 10:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While the foreground is interesting, the actual anchor i.e. the tree (per my guess) is rather ugly and ordinary looking. For a landscape, the composition does not provide enough depth either -- Dey.sandip (talk) 14:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I can see what the idea might have been here, but it just doesn't get over the bar. Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey, sorry. The focus should be on the trees instead of the foreground crop. Nice idea but the nail didn’t really get hit. --Kreuz schnabel 13:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Co mmon ists 23:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, i.e. Daniel C. above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]