Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg

File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 10:54:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A technically very good photo. HDR can be an advantage. But you can also overdo. I do not like the photos that look as if they had fallen into a paint pot. Je-str (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These are the colours,nothing is "over". Anyway thanks for opinion --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moderated support Nice colors, but overexposed windows. Anyway, beautiful interior and FP for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to Support, but with the same caveat Arion gave above. I wonder how a picture with a slightly shorter exposure would look, because it's not just the windows themselves but some surrounding areas that are overexposed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral but, what stuff are the craftsmen smoking? --Hubertl 23:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC) I changed to neutral, because I smoked some good stuff yesterday ;-), now I´m sober. It´s oversaturated IMO. Maybe you can change it, the rest doesn´t bother me so much. --Hubertl 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Long the exposure may have been, but the ringing around the lights and statues on the sides doesn't have to be there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I agree with opposers. + oversharpening white lines.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed, not natural colors. --Karelj (talk) 09:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]