Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg

File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2011 at 22:15:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cayambe -- Cayambe (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info Wild Green Iguana (Iguana iguana) in the Botanical Garden at Portoviejo, Ecuador. This one is a female, as seen form the relatively short dorsal spines and the green body colouration.
Info I do not consider these two Iguana pictures to be alternatives of one single candidature, this because they illustrate the sexual dimorphism in ONE GIVEN population. --Cayambe (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cayambe (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support After checking the histogram. Very good technically.--Snaevar (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great pose and background. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Basvb (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even if I miss the tail...--Jebulon (talk) 16:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good posture and very sharpness.--Citron (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JovianEye (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A few distracting objects in the background, but I still prefer this over the other one. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- See? You just proved me right. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 08:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I prefer this one because the background is more blurry. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic shot! --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice, buts where's his tail?--Claus (talk) 08:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Same as Claus, and I would have loved the background a bit more blurred - Benh (talk)
Oppose Per neutrals, only for me it is an opposing reason. W.S. 14:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the quality is super, the DOF is good (even if the background is a bit disturbing in full resolution), but I really don't like the tail crop, too (per W.S.) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose，per Carschten--shizhao (talk) 13:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compromise between DOF on the subject and background blur, IMO. This sort of subject, with tail, generally gets lost in the frame and little information is added. Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —stay (sic)! 07:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tamba52 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles