Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lilly Walther. Mehe portree. 1909.TKMB0822.jpg

File:Lilly Walther. Mehe portree. 1909.TKMB0822.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2022 at 05:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
Info created by Lilly Walther - uploaded by Nele.Am - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 05:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 05:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should include the medium in the file description. Is it graphite on paper? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done I now updated the description. Yes, it is charcoal (graphite) on paper. Kruusamägi (talk) 01:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't think charcoal and graphite are the same thing, though they are two forms of carbon. I am still living with this composition and have not made a decision on a possible vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, but there is a small scratch on the lower left. Yann (talk) 12:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction. – I wonder whether we should remove that small scratch or not. On the one hand it irritates, on the other hand it seems to be on the original artwork, therefore one could argue it is an authentic part of the original. Hm … If you want, I can remove it. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd treat that scratch as part of the original artwork and keep it. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that, and it would be easy to remove. Are we talking about the same thing (see note)? Yann (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was unclear on my statement before. I meant that this thing would be visible when you would see this artwork in an exhibition and that repro should capture that. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition with the man's head and eyes looking up, past the artist, have grown on me, and I accept Kruusamägi's statement about how the work is exhibited. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The reason why we now have a lot of good quality artworks from Lilly Walther (1866–1946) is because Tartu Art Museum just had her exhibition in 2022. As the curator considered this specific work among one of her favorites, and as this is a very good repro, then it seemed suitable for me to nominate this as the best example of Walthers work. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits