Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Looking up the center of the Eiffel Tower 2016.jpg

File:Looking up the center of the Eiffel Tower 2016.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2017 at 11:01:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very nice picture with an interesting composition. But Commons FPC is for outstanding pictures. And unfortunately for you, we have a large number of very similar images already (1, 2, 3 to name just a few in 1:1 aspect ratio; another FP). There are some that manage to stand out among the others, such as this night view, this diagonal composition or this zoomed-in VI. I don't see this candidate standing out in any kind of way, apart from some advantages in image quality maybe. Others have done it before, the wow is gone – that's the problem with FPs of major tourist attractions. Sorry, --El Grafo (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support "View to a kill." -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Has in fact better light and more detail than File:Sous la Tour Eiffel 1.jpg, but the symmetry is failed. A pity. --A.Savin 22:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per El Grafo. Also very uneven contrast brightness with some parts of the top half having high contrast and the bottom and centre very low. Almost like lens flare or lifting shadows too much. -- Colin (talk) 08:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the composition (it's a very refreshing original view IMO, and I'm a local). But it's not proper centered, has barrel distorsion and is blurry on the top part. - Benh (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally the barrel distortion there isn't ....--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No you just don't know what barrel distortion is, or you wouldn't write that. - Benh (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Totally invented ..... as your usual--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry to Benh, I'm a local too, and this view is not very original, per El Grafo. Nevertheless, I agree with opposers arguments. Not centered. Symmetry and wow has gone.--Jebulon (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mostly per El Grafo. Storkk (talk) 09:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]