Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Peterhof Palace.jpg

File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Peterhof Palace.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2016 at 05:09:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Aerial photo of Peterhof Palace and Upper Gardens. Created, uploaded, and nominated by Godot13 -- Godot13 (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Godot13 (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-done overall. Impressive sharpness for an aerial shot! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 05:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very valuable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 09:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very good indeed, however, I’d prefer less foreground to gain a bit more background. The main subject appears a bit squeezed towards the top frame. --Kreuz schnabel 12:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Partially with shadows, but IMO OK. --XRay ^talk 16:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support A great deal of aerial images get nominated here because the nominator is impressed with the idea of taking an aerial photograph of something. But this subject benefits greatly from an aerial photograph, making its grand plan apparent as effectively as any carefully-sketched SVG would. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 16:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the best light, but otherwise good quality and extremely valuable. @Godot13: , it would be interesting if a couple of words on "making of" would be added to the description. Was it taken from a helicopter (however the quality is much better than I would expect from a photo taken frm a helicopter), or was the camera set on a drone? --A.Savin 11:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support from a helicopter --The Photographer 23:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a helicopter... --Godot13 (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 22:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture