Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titanium crystal-bars.jpg

File:Titanium crystal-bars.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2015 at 14:56:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me. -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico talk 07:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Our Alchemist is back !--Jebulon (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
--Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Surely! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When I compare to File:Titan-crystal bar.JPG this one is a much weaker composition. There's useless space in the top left. The bars are longer than necessary to achieve their purpose illustrating the crystal bar. The magnification on each bar is thus so low I can't see any surface detail even at 100% (compared to other FP). In most scenarios where this image could be used (illustrating wiki or a book) the crystals would be too small to see in any quality. The only thing this photo offers that isn't offered by our existing FP is that there are two bars with different crystal structure, but this isn't explained. The dark grey surface has an awful lot of chroma noise. -- Colin (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done additional image describtion added. "... that there are two bars with different crystal structure, but this isn't explained." my explanation: why we can see two exact same perhaps oak trees? Right: they grow simply differently, a chance ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 13:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, the cube as a scale is awesome. Hadn't seen that anywhere before. — Julian H.^✈ 19:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks and Minerals