Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/The Divine Comedy by Caetani

The Divine Comedy by Caetani, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2016 at 17:30:35 (UTC)

The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855 (FrontPage)
The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855,The Ordering of Hell
The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855,(Map of Hell)
The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855 (Cross Section of Hell)
The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855,(The Ordering of Purgatory)
The Divine Comedy Described in Six Plates, by Michelangelo Caetani, 1855,(The Ordering of Paradise)

InfoLa materia della Divina commedia di Dante Alighieri dichiarata in VI tavole da Michelangelo Caetani, 1855. - uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EVDiam (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It says "six plates" but there are only four here (+ cover). I see that File:Michelangelo Caetani, Overview of the Divine Comedy, 1855 Cornell CUL PJM 1071 01.jpg is already an FP. But The Ordering of Hell is missing. Question for Adam Cuerden, Jebulon, Yann -- would we expect the images to be restored/cleaned-up a little for FP? -- Colin (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment@@Hello. I just added the forgotten Plate II. Thanks for noticing thisEVDiam (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @EVDiam: I like this set very much, but there is a small technical problem: it was shot with a camera that has dust on its sensor, and the resulting dark spots are very much visible, and traceable to the camera as they are in the relative same position on the plates. I annotated the spots I noticed on the images, but there might be more. I think these should be remedied, by either retaking these after sensor cleaning, or if this is not possible, by editing these out. --Rftblr (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also, and I do not know if you can do that, based on the state and accessibility of the plates: the last plate has its backside shining through. This might be preventable by laying it on a black sheet when taking the photo. --Rftblr (talk) 23:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Rftblr: Hello, Thanks for your suggestions. I am working on restoration EVDiam (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very interesting set, but it could use some cleanup/restoration work. INeverCry 05:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Larger versions are available; I don't think this can count as the best work possible if it's downscaled. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Adam. Can EVDiam please upload the full size versions to Commons. -- Colin (talk) 13:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC) [WILL REVIEW TOMORROW][reply]
I will ask EVDiam (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ until we have the full size versions. Yann (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support We have now the full size versions, so no reason to oppose any more. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:34, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As long as the technical problems I mentioned above are not fixed. Rftblr (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support (I hope all those issues will be fixed). − Meiræ 08:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Clean up done. @Rftblr: @INeverCry: .
- Oppose I have to oppose as the clean ups have been reverted again. -- Rftblr (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Adam Cuerden: As far as the size is concerned: in these images I asked for permission and I uploaded them in high resolution. I don't think there are versions with higher resolution. However, in general, these images are not so easily replaceable, because of copyrights issues. see here. EVDiam (talk) 15:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media