Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 13 2015

• 
  • Nomination Sürth, Cologne, Germany: Roman-catholic church Saint Remigius, exterior from West. --Cccefalon 00:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rösrath, Germany: Hauptstrasse 44 during renovation --Cccefalon 00:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Stora Spånsan, Sweden.--V-wolf 22:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 00:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terrace in Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 21:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 00:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main shopping street at the crater rim in Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 21:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yacht Vera and Nya in Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 21:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition and QI for me -- Spurzem 00:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Focus stack of a flower of Paphiopedilum exul at Gothenburg Botanical Garden. --Averater 21:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Focus stack of a flower of Epidendrum pseudoepidendrum at Gothenburg Botanical Garden in 2015. --Averater 21:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 21:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees Group to beach well of Nederhorst.
    Famberhorst 18:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hemispheric, City of Arts and Sciences, Valencia, SpainEnglish: The Hemisphere, City of Arts and Sciences, Valencia, Spain.English: The Hemisphere, City of Arts and Sciences, Valencia, Spain. --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality night shot! --NorbertNagel 21:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ad Deir (Monastery), Petra, Jordan --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buildings in Wapping High St., London, England --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Caminito, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Poco a poco 18:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right side altar with the statue of Saint Anthony of Padua of the roman catholic parish church Holy John the Baptist, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 18:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmstead on Gaisrueckenstrasse #51 at Winklern, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stack of firewood in front of the residential building on Gaisrueckenstrasse #69 at Winklern, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chucho Valdés & The Afro-Cuban Messengers at a concert in Teatro Circo Price, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 16:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Museumsinsel and the building of the Bode-Museum in Berlin --DXR 15:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A timber-framed building in Oestrich, Oestrich-Winkel. According to the number found at the facade, the building was built in 1592 --DXR 15:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiny Iron (brown man). --ComputerHotline 15:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 00:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paintings. Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Lykhny, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Lykhny, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sankt Botvids church. --ArildV 13:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 16:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of Bundeskunsthalle, Bonn, Germany (by Raymond)--Leit 12:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Trier, Maronenhain, "Wächter" von Guy Charlier --Berthold Werner 12:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diesel locomotive V 212 309-9 near Grenzau, Germany -- Spurzem 11:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The harbour of Nice as seen from a Corsica Ferries ferry boat, Nice, France. --Dnalor 01 11:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Left side of the images is blurred. See the note. Maybe a crop would be a good option. --Halavar 11:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for your review, I've done a crop. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Yes, now it's good. --Halavar 15:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hochfirstschanze --Taxiarchos228 11:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Billy69150 12:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Noriaki Kasai (Ski jumper) --Taxiarchos228 11:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Fridolin primary school --Taxiarchos228 11:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI -- Spurzem 00:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse training show --F. Riedelio 10:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information plates on the 8 Katedralny Square in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 15 Grodzka Street in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Weak  Support Good quality, but crop at the top to close. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 15 Grodzka Street in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 15 Grodzka Street in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14 Bracka Street in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 09:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two Welcome Swallows standing together photographed at Bradys lake --EurovisionNim 09:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: Left bird totally oof, bird in the middle not sufficient sharp. --Cccefalon 09:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kite-surfing in Bamburgh. Mattbuck 09:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River Thames and the Millennium Dome. Mattbuck 09:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 09:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion The buildings seem to tilt a bit back but weak QI -- Spurzem 12:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medieval fountain in Sutri --Livioandronico2013 09:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky. --Mattbuck 09:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    Sure....other please --Livioandronico2013 09:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    Clouds are completely blown. --Kadellar 16:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former ironworks in Ilsede, Germany --Rilegator 08:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Oversharpened (see the fine needle points). Perhaps you can try again with a reworked version in higher resolution as the motif is pretty good. --Cccefalon 10:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L’Etivaz AOP is a hard alpine cheese --Hubertl 07:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figures at the neue Burg, Vienna --Hubertl 07:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination -Archduke Carl Ludwig Johann Joseph Laurentius von Österreich, Duke of Teschen, in the background the spire of the Minoritenkirche --Hubertl 07:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very interesting view, perfect composition, QI. --Dnalor 01 12:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Location, hotel Weiss Horn (2337m). View Grimentz (1570 m) in the Valais Val d'Anniviers.
    Famberhorst 05:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO too much haze. --XRay 08:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    Answer. You are right.--Famberhorst 18:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apple Malus domestica Allington Pippin.
    Famberhorst 05:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrought iron gate to the Sentmaringer Park, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kaiserpfalz, Goslar, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overall good quality. The photo is leaning clockwise. Also I proposed another crop which avoids the half cut roof window. --Cccefalon 10:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
     Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 10:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    Well done, good quality. --Cccefalon 13:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kota Kinabalu, Sabah: A direction sign to Sembulan and Kota Kinabalu International Airport at the intersection Coastal Higway and Kemajuan Road (the one behind the direction sign). --Cccefalon 01:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia: North side of Centre Point Shopping Mall Tower, housing the car park and AlmaCrest Internation College --Cccefalon 01:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A soldier-head shaped rock formation at Midas ruins, Eskişehir, Turkey --Zeynel Cebeci 00:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Left lower side an area with very slight reddish fringing but below complaint level. --Cccefalon 01:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    Saturation was reduced. Thank you for your comment.--Zeynel Cebeci 08:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malus domestica blossom, Carinthia By User:Johann Jaritz --Hubertl 00:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwalbenschwanz - Papilio machaon. --Hockei 21:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwalbenschwanz - Papilio machaon. --Hockei 21:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Uoaei1 14:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Newark Castle. --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 18:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Distortion is too strong and not fixable. Sorry. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
• 
  • Nomination Max Goff supporting Tom Odell at Haldern Pop Festival 2013. By User:Smial --Achim Raschka 15:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Magenta CA. I left a note. --Halavar 16:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    *  Comment Erm... CA? Really? -- Smial 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I would call it a slight fringe and I would suggest to remove it from the arm (someone already added a note). It is not really a big issue, but this wonderful portrait deserves to be more perfect. Congrats for this very good event photo. --Cccefalon 07:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    *  Comment I don't know how to do remove lens errors (CA!) which are no lens errors. Please remember this is stage photography with quickly changing light sources mixed with ambient light where shadows or darker parts easily can show funny colors. -- Smial 10:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Good now. --Halavar 11:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Derrick Leon Green of Sepultura performing at the With Full Force Festival, July 2014. By User:Grywnn --Achim Raschka 15:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Very good composition, nice lighting, and catched the right moment. But sorry, I'm not convinced by sharpness and focus regarding the image has below 2.5 Mpix. --Smial 08:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grey heron in Parc de Bercy in winter --Dinkum 13:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment necessary cropping--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion : Done.--Dinkum 15:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    I think it's better, Ok for QI--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Too tight crop for me below. -- Spurzem 08:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterfall "Men's tears". Ritsa Relict National Park, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 15:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Full panoramic view from the war memorial tower over Langscheid at Sorpe Dam --Milseburg 19:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    Oh that is lovely. Mattbuck 00:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht, museum --Michielverbeek 21:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC))
  • Promotion  Comment Please check the image. On the right side it's leaning in.--XRay 10:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Done Is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 08:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment It's better, but the building at the right is still leaning in.--XRay 12:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Done Is this good enough for Q1? --Michielverbeek 20:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support IMO it's good for QI now.--XRay 06:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A due to flooding no longer accessible jetty on the Rhine. --Code 13:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lord of the Lost at Amphi Festival 2014, Cologne --Achim Raschka 09:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shadows Fall at Turock Open Air 2014 in Essen, Germany --Achim Raschka 09:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Weak oppose - the focus is a bit too far away - on the shirt, not the face or the leg closest to the camera. --Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building in Strelnieku Iela 6, Riga, Latvia --Poco a poco 09:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline The bottom is beautiful, but the top isn't nearly so sharp and shows unfortunate dither patterns. --Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Post Office building, Macau --Poco a poco 09:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, but: 1. Both sides leaning in (maybe fixable), 2. Top part very blurry (maybe fixable) 3. Crop too tight at the top (probably not fixable), 4. Light trails quite disturbing (not fixable). --Code 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    The light trails are clearly a part of the composition. If perspective, dust spots/flare and upper sharpness were fixed, I would support it. Mattbuck 00:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishermen in Câmara de Lobos, Madeira, Portugal --Sir James 08:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Image needs perspective correction and more sharpness. --Halavar 14:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
    I don't think sharpening can help here - it's just not in focus. Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stock image at the Halterner Straße, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 08:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline The red candle is my reason for declining. It's in the way if it's not the subject, but if it is part of the subject then it's out of focus. --Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European larch (Larix decidua) along the footpath between Grimentz and Vercorin.
    Famberhorst 05:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Heavy noise, I don't know if it can be reduced. Also, the picture looks oversaturated. --Code 20:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done Correctie.--Famberhorst 06:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Acceptable now IMO. --Code 08:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    @Famberhorst: could you reduce the red channel and sharpen please? Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scenery of Madison Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 15:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Bit red and oversharpened but ok. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-ASM - 20140927 - Tentative de placage sur Viliami Maafu --Pleclown 11:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Very noisy. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-Gloucester Rugby - 20141025 - James Hook carrying the ball --Pleclown 11:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Could probably do with a small crop at left and right to remove bright parts of the stand, and fairly noisy, but subject is ok. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-Gloucester Rugby - 20141025 - Maul --Pleclown 11:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Very noisy. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Stone Bag" Gorge on the Yupshara River. Ritsa Relict National Park, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Background lacks fine detail. --Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwarze Heidelibelle - Sympetrum danae, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 21:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-FCG - 20140913 - Tacle --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Very noisy. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-RCT - 20141003 - Plaquage --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline While interesting it suffers from posterisation (likely caused by noise reduction). --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traditional wooden house in Istebna, Upper Silesia, Poland --Halavar 11:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Quite noisy, lacking fine detail at edges. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Stara Łomnica 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue in Kirchhain --Hydro 10:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposure on the head. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile, Paris, France --XRay 04:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue “Saint Nepomuk” at the Große Teichsmühle, Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposure of the background draws the eye away. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Observation tower 'Raichberg in winter season --R-bitzer 01:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)*  Comment The sky is noisy, please check. --Hubertl 02:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion @Hubertl: I think this is acceptable.  Support Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination w:Little Fishing Creek. Jakec 00:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greenwood Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 00:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment The main motif is the field, not the township. IMO you should crop out most of the field.--XRay 18:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
    But the field is part of the township. Besides, the texture in the foreground is kind of nice. Jakec 19:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    A bit oversharpened but ok. Maybe a bit red? Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jaisalmer Panorama from top of Maharaja Palace --Imehling 18:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Neutral Not that bad. Quality is OK for me, but unfortunately I feel you cut too much below. --Hockei 13:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Sorry, that's the maximum I can get on the lower margin --Imehling 21:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    I think it's pretty good. Mattbuck 23:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination protesting the closure --Gnangarra 13:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Interesting way of licensing. --XRay 08:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-Gloucester Rugby - 20141025 - Maul --Pleclown 11:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality, background a little bit noisy. --XRay 09:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 5 Zamenhofa Street in Lądek-Zdrój 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment The cable an branches on the upper left side are dirsturbing. Perhaps you can remove them. --Berthold Werner 18:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done--Jacek Halicki 10:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good now. --Berthold Werner 18:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Juggernauts at Amphi Festival 2014 --Achim Raschka 09:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PCAPH vs CERN CC - 20140911 - batting --Pleclown 12:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline CA ans significant areas of overexposure. --Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-RCT - 20141003 - Maul --Pleclown 12:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice timing, but too noisy and you can crop the blurred arbitre IMO, see that, if you like you can revert on it --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose - high artifaction. Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterfall "Maiden Tears". The road towards the lake Ritsa, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't see any waterfall. Regards quality, the image is blurry on the left, generally unsharp. --Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L’Etivaz --Ailura 06:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMHO DOF is too small, half of the stamp is out of focus. --C messier 14:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    I'm inclined to agree. What is sharp is beautifully so, but there's just not enough of it. Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-FCG - 20140913 - Départ au ras --Pleclown 12:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
    Any chance of making the subjects brighter? Mattbuck 22:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done --Mattbuck 22:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Wiev_of_cathedral_of_Sutri.JPG

• Nomination View of Cathedral of Sutri --Livioandronico2013 19:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
• Minor perspective issue, but  Oppose on grounds of 50% of the image being empty sky. --Mattbuck 00:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO too much sky, missing part of the buildings at the bottom, perspective issues.--XRay 13:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor composition --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Dodge_Charger_Magnum_Six-Pack_de_1970,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_01.JPG

• Nomination Dodge Charger Magnum Six-Pack of 1970, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 19:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 12:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Comment. It is sharp but it is not a good image of a car for me. Once because of the short focal distance and further because of the disturbing information plate. The reflexes in the Gulf-plate are disturbing too. -- Spurzem 22:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Quite a bit of CA, noticably on the number plate, and aliasing. --Mattbuck 15:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment  New version with several improvements Poco a poco 20:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  That is indeed better. Shame about the rope though.  Support Mattbuck 23:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 17:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Berndie 11062014 443.jpg

• Nomination An adult York Chocolate male cat, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Code 04:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree - not really sharp, though I will admit that cats are annoying to photograph. --Mattbuck 15:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Contrast and saturation overdone for me, it looks pretty unnatural. The entirely blown central part of the largest whisker to the left is telling of overprocessing. Motion blur on the head. --Kreuzschnabel 13:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Christian Ferrer 17:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   Code 06:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Reliktowy_Park_Narodowy_Rica,_Mleczny_Wodospad_(03).jpg

• Nomination Milk Waterfall. Ritsa Relict National Park, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose unsharp/blurred, overexposed water --Christian Ferrer 18:22, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  

•  Comment Overexposed water? Could you tell we which software show you that? Maybe a printscreen? I would like to know on what base you said that the water is overexposed. Halavar 18:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  

• The water have been burned out (no visible details, only white) because of overexposition, maybe now the histograme is correct or acceptable, but it change nothing that the camera did not register any informations for these areas, hope it help --Christian Ferrer 19:16, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Christian. Overexposure is not the same as white. Mattbuck 00:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   Code 06:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Nádraží Náchod 7.jpg

• Nomination A ČSD Class 423.0 arrives from Náchod station (Czech Republic). --Daniel Holý CZ 14:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • It has CAs and IMO it's titled CW and perspective is not done.  Oppose Until it is fixed.--C messier 15:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    PS: is it a work of a wikimedian? --C messier 15:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
    •  CommentI have seen many photos that have been published by this author in Wikipedia--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
      •  Comment A wikipedian is not necessarily a wikimedian too. The Commons user account should be specified. --Kreuzschnabel 13:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
        •  Comment Thanks you. for this précision that I did not knew --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with C messier. Lots of CA and tilt. But both these flaws can be fixed. --Halavar 19:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Halavar. Mattbuck 00:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   Code 06:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Techelsberg Sankt Martin 3 Kaplanei 31012015 718.jpg

• Nomination Chaplain`s house at Saint Martin #3, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Fair amount of overexposure. --Mattbuck 23:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Code 08:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Spurzem 11:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Milseburg 18:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Dnalor 01 16:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   Code 06:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Тепе-Оба 03.JPG

• Nomination Crimean Feodosia winter scene (by Слава Леонтьев) –Be..anyone 23:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Breathtaking stunning photograph. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 04 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment ok but all the verticals are leaning to the left so it is tilted to the left --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment If a picture has got to turn and the autor is not available, why don´t you do it by yourself? It´s a wiki! I did it now.--Hubertl 17:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 06:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose with a second look I'm not abble to see any tilt?! however now I think it's too unsharp, blurred and with color noise --Christian Ferrer 18:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the colour noise needs fixing, and it needs to be bluer. Mattbuck 00:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 08:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Early in the morning at sunrise or befor sunset, even snow can be redish. --Hubertl 21:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   Code 06:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ebenthal Zell Gurnitz Freiwillige Feuerwehr 17112006 02.jpg

• Nomination Fire station at Zell-Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 03 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality.--NoRud 09:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Comment I disagree,there are reddish fringes on the left side and magenta fringes on the right side. Easy to fix. Beside that, it"s really a nice photo. As soon as the fringes are gone, you can consider to have my full support. --Cccefalon 14:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I´m sorry, but I am sure, it is not fixable. There are some other, severe distortions especially on the right side. (sensor lines from the old camera?)--Hubertl 22:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Hibertl is right, there is significant grain. Mattbuck 00:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

   Comment Interesting indeed, I haven´t seen this before...--Hubertl 21:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Chao_Say_Tevoda,_Angkor,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_03.JPG

• Nomination Chao Say Tevoda, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose Insufficient quality. Oversharpened and strong CAs at the left. --XRay 11:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
   Fixed Poco a poco 22:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry, there are still CAs. I put a note to the image.--XRay 05:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  I had now problems to see them, but maybe with this new version it is fine for you Poco a poco 20:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
   Support That's fine. :-) --XRay 17:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  Sorry Diego, not QI to me. Overexposure of the sky (albeit perhaps unavoidable), unsharpness at edges, and that tree top left looks rather odd (though that may be reality at fault). --Mattbuck 23:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mattbuck --Christian Ferrer 18:13, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support In my own experience, I know that overexposure of the sky is unavoidable in this place. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  I don't really like the "unavoidable" argument at QI. Just because we do everything right as photographer/editor, doesn't mean it's necessarily QI. (Feel free to use my words against me in future). Mattbuck 00:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  No doubt, but the photo was taken at 11:18, and the sun is already shining--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  And that is completely irrelevant. Reality can quite easily cause images to not be QI, at no fault of the photographer. Sometimes it is not possible to produce a QI given the conditions, but we do not take extenuating circumstances into account here. We're not awarding marks for effort but for result. Mattbuck 00:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have no interest in the sky so burnt out clods ain't an issue for me even if the original had a better looking sky. But the corners are unsharp, is it straigtened or due to the lens? - Averater 07:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Fountain_of_the_Garden_Square_in_Vatican.jpg

• Nomination Fountain of the Garden Square in Vatican --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  Not very sharp. Mattbuck 11:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support In my eyes the sharpness could be better but it's still acceptable considering the size of the image. Mattbuck is it ok for you if I promote this image or should we send it to CR? --Code 18:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose CR please - this isn't QI as is, and I'm not sure it's repairable. Mattbuck 23:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Distracting background. Hard to distinguish between the fountain and what's behind. - Averater 07:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Steindy 01:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   Code 08:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB F5 750MC Toyota MR2 Championship.jpg

• Nomination Castle Combe Toyota racing. Mattbuck 07:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
• Decline  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  Request for delisting
  Spurzem mentioned this on the talk page, as a sarcastic example of a quality image. Having looked at this photo again, I agree. With all respect to Pleclown Christian Ferrer, this should not have been promoted, and I request it be delisted. Mattbuck 19:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  @ Mattbuck: You are wrong. It is not this photo which I mentioned. -- Spurzem 20:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  Sorry, got it right now. Guess two images with similar names got promoted that day. Mattbuck 20:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment  Oppose Agreed, this does by no means comply with QI standards (never seen it before, but then you cannot follow all nominations here). Is there a delisting procedure at all? I thought it was once QI, forever QI. --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

  There is no delisting procedure, but it's always been part of my understanding of QI, it just never happens. I think I maybe recall it happening once before? Mattbuck 08:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agreed, according to image guidelines, the standards are missed. I added the oppose tag to Kreuzschnabels comment. --Cccefalon 15:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@ Kreuzschnabel: Ich habe das Bild nur „hervorgekramt“, weil sowohl der Bildautor als auch der Juror inzwischen (oder sogar schon länger?) äußerst hohe Maßstäbe an die Fotos anderer legen. Es geht mir keineswegs darum, die Auszeichnung aberkennen zu lassen, obwohl ich mich im Dezember 2013 schon sehr wunderte, dass dieses Bild ein Qualitätsbild sein sollte. Gruß -- Spurzem 15:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Das ist mir klar, deshalb ging meine Frage nach der delisting procedure auch an Matt, nicht an dich. Er hat das Bild ja hier zur Diskussion gestellt. --Kreuzschnabel 06:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose random snapshot and not QI for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Deux cigognes nid.JPG

• Nomination Two storks on their nest in winter 0x010C 13:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Very nice and good quality. -- Spurzem 13:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noticable CA in the nest, lacks sharpness on the rear bird. --Mattbuck 22:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Where do you see CA ? — 0x010C; ^~papotoire~ 14:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Perhaps it is not allowed to be good because of my vote above. But this image is very good! -- Spurzem 15:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sharpness not good enough to be a QI --Hockei 16:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mattbuck --Christian Ferrer 17:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Can not see CA, but very slight fringe at some small areas with high contrast, which is absolutely not disturbing in 100% view. Also sharpness acceptable in 100% view. Very nice composition, and colors. -- Smial 09:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support good for QI. CA is marginal or unvisible. --Alchemist-hp 09:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Palauenc05 08:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support awesome --Billy69150 11:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Palauenc05.- it's good for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It is 24 Mpixels, quite a lot more than the minimum 2. A dowsample would take care of the mentioned problems but wouldn't make it any better. --Averater 13:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 14:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Kirschblüte mit Biene (2007-04-06).JPG

• Nomination A bee at sweet cherry flower -- Spurzem 23:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 23:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose clipped whites are not quality for me --Christian Ferrer 09:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't understand what you mean. Would you kindly explain? -- Spurzem 10:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Yes I can, some of the white petals are overexposed and have burned out, it means that the camera did not register any details for these areas so it's not fixable. It's an issue for the quality level of the image but of course it's only my opinion, others can think and think it's acceptable. --Christian Ferrer 10:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
      •  Done -- Spurzem 12:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
•  weak oppose I quite like it but expect a nomination of less than 6 mpix to be crisp sharp, and this one isn’t. While the bee might be perfectly focused it still shows some motion blur. --Kreuzschnabel 07:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Schade! Die jetzt fehlenden Pixel gingen wahrscheinlich durch das Bildbearbeitungsprogramm von Microsoft verloren, mit dem ich einige Jahre arbeitete. Mein Pech! Und was die Unschärfe betrifft: Ich habe mir das Bild mit auf 10 cm vergrößerter Biene angeschaut – immerhin erscheint das Tierchen dann geringfügig größer als in Wirklichkeit – und sehe es tatsächlich nicht mehr ganz scharf. Aber bevor ich die Nominierung zurückziehe, will ich ein wenig warten, ob nicht vielleicht doch noch der eine oder andere die Aufnahme zwar nicht exzellent, aber doch brauchbar (QI) findet. Gruß -- Spurzem 10:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Die Meßlatte für Insektenaufnahmen liegt hier ganz schön hoch. Schau dir mal die existierenden QIs an. Beispiel: File:Andrena_savignyi_female_1.jpg ähnelt im Aufbau deiner Nomination etwas, zeigt das Tier jedoch in einer ganz anderen Detailfülle. Ich habe vor Jahren eher zufällig eine Biene im Anflug auf eine Löwenzahnblüte erwischt, glaube aber nicht, daß es hier durchkäme (abgesehen davon, daß es zu klein ist) --Kreuzschnabel 16:20, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Nun geht es hier aber nicht um die Featured Pictures, sodass man sich fragen darf, warum die Messlatte für Insektenfotos so viel höher liegen muss als in anderen Bereichen, in denen manch Schwaches bereitwillig durchgewinkt wird. Warum sollte zum Beispiel Dein Foto von der Biene im Anflug auf die Blüte nicht QI sein. Wer selbst versucht hat, ein solches Bild zu machen, wird die Qualität zu schätzen wissen. -- Spurzem 17:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Die Meßlatte wird ja von niemandem bewußt dahin gelegt. Sie legt sich durch die existierenden QIs selbst. Ich finde das gar nicht schlecht, weil es unseren Ehrgeiz befeuert, hier richtig gute Bilder hochzuladen :-) --Kreuzschnabel 04:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Overexposed, some CA. Mattbuck 08:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

@ Mattbuck: I did not await any other vote from you. But I can only say: Laughable! Flowers of cherries are even white and not black. -- Spurzem 09:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

You're right, cherry blossom is (generally) white, and I do not complain about the presence of pure white pixels, I complain about the fact there are areas of pure white, which means information is lost. Also there are significant haloes, and DOF means the bee is not fullt in focus. You have however corrected the CA. Mattbuck 00:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Please look to the new version. -- Spurzem 06:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support GQ. --Palauenc05 13:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support --LivioAndronico talk 16:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support GQ. ---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per opposers.--Jebulon 18:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

@Jebulon: Very interesting. You saw a new version and not the same as the other opposers but you have the same reasons for opposing as they. -- Spurzem 21:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The new version is still not convincing me, sorry.--Jebulon 23:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting --Σπάρτακος 22:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)