Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 0x010C!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, 0x010C!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournesol en martinique.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me -- Spurzem 22:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boules de noël.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Chat à l'affut 2.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chat à l'affut 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Goutte sur une branche de pin 3.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Goutte sur une branche de pin 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horloge Notre Dame de L'Assomption 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. May be a touch of blue. --XRay 14:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylône électrique 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. The crop is a bit close at top for my liking, but still QI, I think. --Wsiegmund 16:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylône électrique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Impressive but contrast is too harsh. Snow on trees is overexposed, and so is the frost on the wires, pylon, and insulators. Sky looking over-saturated. Pity the rightmost insulator is cut off. Can you rework this? --Kreuzschnabel 06:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)   Done, thanks for the comment! 0x010C 12:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
OK for me. Mattbuck 10:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deux cigognes nid.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

File:Pylône électrique 2.jpgEdit

I think this shape is called „Pylône chat“ in French because it resembles a cat’s face with whiskers and ears. Maybe you want to add this to the French description. There’s no such name in English though (and it’s a rather uncommon pylon shape in English-speaking countries, they mainly use impressive barrel pylons such as this). --Kreuzschnabel 06:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@Kreuzschnabel: Thanks for this information, I added it to the French description  0x010C; ~talk~ 01:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cygne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition, good colors, QI for me. -- Spurzem 21:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TV Parabolic antenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ugly perspective: You took the parabol antenna from the side and during post processing you rotated the photo to get a horizontal roof ridge. This is not working for me, but I will give you a try to correct it. --Cccefalon 02:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Please see my note. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
A bit late I apologize, but it's   Done 0x010C 23:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC) now looks fine for me--Ezarate 01:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kayak de descente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
good quality.--ArildV 10:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tas de bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion de Belfort 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Óðinn 23:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion de Belfort 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Óðinn 23:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cygne passerelle des 3 pays.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me --Isiwal 08:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Location?Edit

Bonjour 0x010C - it would be nice if you could add locations to File:Green bird 01.jpg and File:Green bird 02.jpg. Merci! - MPF (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@MPF: Ow, I thought I had already did it... It's good now. Thanks  0x010C; ~talk~ 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup! - MPF (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi 0x010C, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1-month-old kittens 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. Something (minor) may be better, but it's difficult. For me it's QI. --XRay 06:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kayak robson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. QI for me. --XRay 06:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File(s) appeared in Category:Language templates with no text displayedEdit

Hello 0x010C, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) File:2015-12 Bas-relief perforé orné de scènes de banquet AO 31015.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Language templates with no text displayed. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

CatégoriesEdit

Bonjour,
Pour information. Cordialement. --83.204.211.196 21:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durance river 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 20:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vitaly repin 10:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Vitaly repin 10:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Óðinn 17:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Clear enough for an action shot, in my opinion. --Michael Barera 03:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08 playboating Durance 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Elrond 18:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2015-08 playboating Durance 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-08 playboating Durance 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please renameEdit

Hello, 0x010C. I, the original uploader, requests rename for this file. Please take a look. Thanks. --Radiomiles (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Radiomiles:,
It has already be done by @Armbrust:, thanks to him.
Regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 13:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Agaricus bisporus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Agaricus bisporus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Ocarina front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Radis vert 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournage WikiMOOC 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 20:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

are you interestedEdit

File:Logo tsk.png / moving page proposal. BurakOtto (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Rename request declined, there's a deletion request (see COM:FR). Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Agaricus bisporus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Ocarina back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Radis vert 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Agaricus bisporus 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-01 Radis vert 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-12 Bas-relief perforé orné de scènes de banquet AO 31015.jpgEdit

Hi 0x010C, in the description of the mentioned file i see "[[Category:Artworks with known accession number| AO31015 Info non-talk.svg]]". Is that correct this way? --Arnd (talk) 04:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Aschroet:!
No, it's clearly not correct. Hum, it seems that the accession number from the {{Art Photo}} template don't like very much the {{Louvre number}} template. If you have an idea of how to fix it, I'm interested, it seems that all my photos from the Louvre museum has the same problem...
Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 05:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, really seem that accession number requires plain text only. Howeve, the problem does not only exist for your files but for many more as for example File:Athena type Velletri.jpg. Would you mind to start a discussion about it at the at the page of {{Art Photo}}? If you do not want i could do as well. --Arnd (talk) 05:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
@Aschroet: It would be very nice if you can do it, I have quite little time to dedicate to commons those days...
Thanks! — 0x010C ~talk~ 07:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Permit use images in www.thaigov.go.th Ticket#: 2016112910016549Edit


Government Book Subject This is Office of the Prime Minister (Thailand) allow to use photo in thaigov.go.th. The Office of the Prime Minister (Thailand) allow to use photos in Wikicommon. please allow upload photos in thaigov.go.th please thank you. (Pitpisit (talk) 11:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC))

File:2017-02 Attributed to Thomas Ellerby - Portrait of Joseph Paxton, half length holding a copy of The Magazine of Botany, 1843.jpgEdit

Thanks for your uploads, but this file was previously uploaded in the same resolution in 2011. - PKM (talk) 05:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I nominated one of your picturesEdit

Hey 0x010C, i nominated this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016-02_City_of_London.jpg here ->Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list . I hope thats ok, and it gets a quality promotion. greetings--Joobo (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Joobo,
Thanks for it! Since several months, I have not the time anymore to nominate my picture, but that's totally fine if you do so  . Don't hesitate to do it for other of my picture.
Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 22:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-02 City of London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Slaunger 22:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-06 Lion de Belfort circumpolar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment - For this kind of image, I'd like to see exposure time. You don't have that information? -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --ComputerHotline 20:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I've added this information in the description of the image   0x010C 20:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Wow, what a long overall exposure! And the results are quite interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 03:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-02 circumpolar tignes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but 0x010C, could you please add exposure times for this photo, too? -- Ikan Kekek 07:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Ikan Kekek, done! --0x010C 07:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-09 Paragliding at the Mount Valin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-08 Tadoussac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Twitch BlackLogo.svgEdit

 
File:Twitch BlackLogo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brenr (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-09 Rue Price Chicoutimi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-09 pedestrian bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Thanks, could be a bit sharper, but imo okay given the size --DXR 09:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-09 la petite maison blanche Chicoutimi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-08 Tadoussac 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 10:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-09 Église du Sacré-coeur Chicoutimi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 09:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-08 Tadoussac bird beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
nice --Pudelek 10:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Locator-tool has been added to the gadgetsEdit

You can remove the importScript('User:Simon04/Gadget-locator-tool.js'); entry in common.js and enable it in your gadget preferences. – Simon04 (talk) 09:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello 0x010C, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-08 Kayak Grandes Bergeronnes Saint Lawrence River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please get rid of that vingetting, I don't think your camera is resposable for it and such effects are not desireble in a QI. That goes for the other photos as well. --W.carter 10:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, it's   Done 0x010C 18:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Good. With that out of the way we can now get to work on the photos. :) There is a dust spot and an ufo that need to be revoved, see notes. Please fix. --W.carter 10:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
It's   Fixed, thanks for your feedbacks! --0x010C 10:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Great! :) Good quality. --W.carter 12:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Photos à l’assemblée nationaleEdit

En un mot comme en mille, bravo ! Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Bravissimo! Encore merci! Enzino (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Magnifique travail ! Belle récompense avec cet article de Libé, c'est mérité ! F123 (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

File:20160401-0165-by-akirahasegawa.jpgEdit

Hello, 0x010C. Could you handle my OTRS request of this photo? Thank you. 長谷川明 (talk) 07:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

The problem has been handled. Thank you. 長谷川明 (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

JSON test fileEdit

Hi, Data:Sandbox/0x010C/test.map appears to be badly formatted. If it's not in use, can it be deleted? Thanks -- (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-10 Circumpolar Haut-Kœnigsbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 23:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-04 Circumpolar trails sunset at La Hague lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2017-04 Circumpolar trails sunset at La Hague lighthouse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017-04 Circumpolar trails sunset at La Hague lighthouse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07 Natural Games Paragliding 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A sky and sun rider, catchted by Light -Of course a QI --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07 Natural Games Paragliding 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade 02.jpgEdit

 
File:Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fannydevaux (talk) 14:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade 03.jpgEdit

 
File:Pieyre-Alexandre Anglade 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fannydevaux (talk) 14:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Merci !Edit

Bonjour,

Je viens de découvrir ces photos de ma conférence aux JDLL :

 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Oriane_Piquer-Louis

Et je voulais juste dire merci, parce qu'elles sont très cool <3

Quota atypique (talk) 23:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Artworks by Maxim SukharevEdit

Could you handle the OTRS ticket:2018031210013951?

It is for the following files:

Also see the previous discussion.

The author has sent his permission to upload them on 13 May. I can't understand why the case has not yet been processed while others, more recent ones, are quickly processed.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 12:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

If you can, please also handle the ticket:2018042710011656. Thank you.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 12:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

It has been done. Thank you.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

JavaEdit

Bonjour, I am a complete novice to Java - I am just trying to expand/repair some script code. My first question: sure there is a possibility to see who is executing a script, something like "if (user == Sarang) ..... ;" because different users need different actions. Can you tell me how to code such a statement? Merci -- sarang사랑 16:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

@Sarang: Yeah sure, you can use if ( mw.config.get( 'wgUserName' ) === 'Sarang' ) { ... }. I don't know what you're designing, but in hardly all the situations, there will be a better, less user specific way to do it. If you tell me a bit more about your script, maybe I can guide you a bit? — 0x010C ~talk~ 23:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, your answer was helpful. I had to care about User:Perhelion/simpleSVGcheck.js because Perhelion was absent for two months - but now he is back again; my knowlegde of Java is zero, but I intended to try some tests how to perform necessary changes, without disturbing too much other users of the script. I am glad that it seems no longer my duty to maintain that script; nevertheless I will start to learn Java. -- sarang사랑 05:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

{{Lingua Libre record}}Edit

Please do not create or use new infobox templates. We maintain only a handful of infobox templates listed in com:Infoboxes. If there is a need for a new template than one can propose its creation, but it will need proper documentation, internationalization and machine-readable encoding, before it is ready to use. We can also expend one of the existing templates, like for example Template:Spoken article, and that is preferred way of creating custom infobox templates. In the mean time your uploads populated Category:Pages with script errors. Can you fix? --Jarekt (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Jarekt:,
Sorry for the disturbance, I've fixed the script errors. I wasn't aware that the creation of new infobox templates was limited, but it makes sens. In fact, we realy need a dedicated template, but I think it could be derivate from the Information template. Would it be ok?
Concerning documentation and internationalization, it is planed but I just had not the time to do it yet (I'm traveling back from the Wikimedia Hackathon at the moment). But what do you mean by machine-readable encoding?
Again, sorry for the mess. Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 20:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
User:0x010C if you rewrite {{Lingua Libre record}} to be based on {{Information}}, the way Template:Spoken article is than big chunk of internationalization and all of machine-readable encoding would be taken care of. I can help you with that once you are back from your travels. You might also find some Commons users at the Hackathon to help you. --Jarekt (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Jarekt:,
I've just made the modifications I said, it should be better now. Can you take a look and tell me if it's fine like that?
Thanks — 0x010C ~talk~ 15:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:0x010C That looks good. I did not checked if it works but the code has all the elements I was expecting it to have. --Jarekt (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

„Abus d'utilisation de comptes multiples”Edit

Hello, Can you turn off ban of my account at French Wikipedia? I have never used multiple accounts. --Gower (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Gower:,
You are not blocked or banned on the French Wikipedia, see your blocklog there. But you may use the same IP range as a long term vandal, that's why you cannot edit the French Wikipedia. I've granted you the ipblock-exempt right, so you will now be able to bypass this IP block.
Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 08:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%93%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82_).jpg?uselang=ruEdit

переименуй пожалуйста файл в предложенное название!!! --87.226.217.178 12:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB.jpgEdit

переименуйте, пожалуйста --87.226.217.178 05:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Wikimedians mapEdit

Wie kann ich das benutzen? Zwiadowca 21 20:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Zwiadowca21:, hast du die erklärungen oberhalb der Karte befolgt? — 0x010C ~talk~ 22:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Naming audio filesEdit

Please follow the standard naming system for audio files, for example File:fr-Wellington.wav with just the language code and a hyphen before the entry. That allows bots to add the file to Wiktionary entries. Thank you! If you want me to respond, please ping me, or I will not see it. Metaknowledge (talk) 21:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

I have been corrected on my talk page that you are in fact running your own bot to add audio files, in which case my comment above was completely off the mark. However, I am now quite interested in having your bot add audio files on the English Wiktionary. Please tell me if you'd like to work with me on making that happen. If you want me to respond, please ping me, or I will not see it. Metaknowledge (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Metaknowledge:,
I'm quite busy at the moment so I've just seen your message today. In fact, we use a new naming convention so that several user can record the same word in the same language without overiding previous ones, and manage all edge cases (like languages which doesn't have a language code).
Yes! User:Lingua Libre Bot is currently operating on Wikidata (on both items and lexemes), on the French Wiktionary and Occitan Wiktionary. I'll be happy to adapt it to run also on the English Wiktionary if you want to, but as I didn't know very well the community rules there, your help will indeed be useful. Here are a couple of questions I'm just thinking of:
  1. if several audio recordings are available for the same word in the same language, would you like to have all of them (like on frwiktionary) or only one (like on ocwiktionary)?
  2. What information do you need alongside the audio file (we have most of the time the speaker's location, gender, language level, the date of the recording,...)?
  3. How do you currently deal with your bot to make the difference when there are several etymology sub-sections (like on wikt:fils#French)?
  4. If there is no pronunciation sub-section, is there a particular order to respect?
Thanks for your interest and your help! — 0x010C ~talk~ 06:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Responding to your questions: 1. We would like all of them. 2. We want location for sure; gender is rarely reported on en.wikt but would be good. If by "level" you mean how well the speaker knows the language, we only want native speakers (except for languages like Latin where that is not possible). 3. The bot is not expected to handle subsections; it should generate a list of all the entries it has audio for but cannot place, so that a human can do it. 4. The Pronunciation section comes immediately after Etymology. If there is no Etymology section, it should be fine to make it the first L3 section.
Please tell me if you have any other questions. What I recommend is that when you have time, run 25 to 50 test edits on en.wikt (more than that may cause your bot to be blocked). Leave me a message and I will go through them to make sure there are no problems. Then I can create a local vote to get you the bot flag at en.wikt. If you want me to respond, please ping me, or I will not see it. Metaknowledge (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for those answers @Metaknowledge:. Just to be sure I've undestood correctly, the bot currently just make a list of all new audio recordings available, and then users place them by hand in the entries? So I have two other questions:
  1. Where can I see this list?
  2. We currently have approximately 90.000 audio recordings available on Lingua Libre, growing at a rate of ~500 audio recordings per day ; if a part of the process is manual, would this not create a huge backlog for the contributors of enwiktionary to manage?
Thanks — 0x010C ~talk~ 20:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
No, the bot adds them to entries and only makes a list for those audio files that it cannot place due to subsections. If you want me to respond, please ping me, or I will not see it. Metaknowledge (talk) 01:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Just a reminder, if you have any more questions, or want to try a test run of the bot at en.wikt and have me look over the edits, you can always find me at en:wikt:User talk:Metaknowledge. Metaknowledge (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I'll ping you when it's ready :) — 0x010C ~talk~ 22:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé !Edit

Bonjour  ,

J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !

Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.

Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours


P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Image incomplèteEdit

Bonjour,
Merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Earth 2019.
Je vous signale que l'image File:2018-06 Réserve naturelle nationale de Sixt-Passy 17.jpg n'a pas été importée correctement.
Pmau (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 en France, Edit

 

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Earth,

Félicitations, votre photo « 2018-03 Gorges de la Loire Nature Reserve star trails.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 comme image du jour du .

 

Pmau (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Image PermissionEdit

Dear Antoine Lamielle,

I am a proffessor and currently redacting my compiled course notes into a book named "History of Interior Design and Furniture” which will be in turkish language and will be distributed in Turkey. It is a cultural and educational reference book. I would like to use your image which I think belongs to your copyrights and I reach from the link below,

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Mont-Saint-Michel#/media/File:2017-04_Mont_Saint-Michel_08.jpg

I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission. Your name will be indicated at the end of the book in the photo credits part.

Yours Sincerely Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --Mustidede (talk) 12:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Mustidede:,
As long as my name and the licence (cc-by-sa 4.0) are mentioned, it's fine for me. It would be great if you can add the reference of your book (name, author, ISBN number) and the page number where the photo is used on this page once it is published.
Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 21:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Poutine imageEdit

Hi! I want to use File:2016-10 Montreal - poutine 33.jpg in the en.wiki article en:Poutine and had a couple questions:

  • What is the topping on the poutine?
  • Was this poutine served at La Banquise?

Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Reidgreg:,
  • It is some Pulled pork ("porc effiloché" in French);
  • No, it was in a restaurant called 3 Brasseurs Saint-Paul;
I've updated the description of the file to add those information.
Best regards — 0x010C ~talk~ 21:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Ah, I thought the "La B" in the bottom left of the image might have been "La Banquise" but now that I look closer, I can just make out the 3 Brasseurs logo in the bottom right. Glad that I asked! Thanks for info and the great pictures! – Reidgreg (talk) 11:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

File:2015-08 playboating Durance 09.jpgEdit

Bonjour. Pour info, cette image a été repise dans le point colmarien n° 267 d'août 2019 en page 15, sans te citer. Elle est plus vraisemblament issue de www.apach.eu qui n'est pas cité non plus... Cordialement, Gzen92 [discuter] 08:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Salut @Gzen92:,
Tout d'abord, merci pour ta vigilance, je ne sais pas comment tu as reconnu que c'était ma photo mais bravo !
En fait, à côté de mon activité en informatique je suis moniteur de canoë-kayak dans le club de l'APACH Colmar Horbourg-Wihr. Et c'est moi-même qui ai fourni cette photo et permis son usage sans crédit dans les deux cas (toutes les photos du site https://www.apach.eu sont de moi par ailleurs).
Je serais par ailleurs encore en Alsace au moins jusqu'à la fin septembre, si tu as vent de rassemblements/sorties photo/... Wikimediens dans le coin, j'en suis  .
Je te souhaite une bonne semaine — 0x010C ~talk~ 21:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Merci pour ta réponse, c'est bon alors !
Je me souvenais avoir vu cette photo sur un profil, j'ai dû un peu chercher parmi les Wikimédiens ;)
Une sortie photo m'intéresserait aussi mais je ne connais pas d'autres contributeurs alsaciens, à part User:Jeriby qui n'est plus actif.
Cordialement, Gzen92 [discuter] 07:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
J'en profite pour te féliciter pour ton 1er prix Wiki Loves Earth, bravo. Gzen92 [discuter] 14:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC).
Return to the user page of "0x010C".