Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 28 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Basilica_di_San_Pietro_at_Night.jpg edit

 

File:Blacksheep_festival_2014_rs_SA_1376.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Larkin Poe, appearence at the 1st blacksheep festival in the castle yard / castle park of Bad Rappenau - Bonfeld (Germany) --Rs-foto 19:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Blue fringes, please see my note--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
      Comment pic was taken under stage conditions at a live concert. Blue seam is just an effect of the stage lighting. No postprocessing at all. ----Rs-foto 15:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   SupportPity the mic–err–the thing-erroneously-taken-for-a-microphone-by-still-too-many-people is covering half of the face but technically OK. Fringes are a result of the stage light here. --Kreuzschnabel 09:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Very good -- Spurzem 10:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support good--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:The A12 near Veenendaal by night.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The a30 near Veenendaal by night. --Abigor 08:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • The picture is not tilted?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
      Comment No, not titled, I was standing on a hill. Abigor 14:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    OK I ask other opinions--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    @Abigor: - even if the road is on a hill, the gantry supports would be vertical. It's pretty clearly tilted. Mattbuck 10:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    @Mattbuck: , @PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ: - whoopsie, didn't notice that before. I uploaded a beter version. Abigor 16:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    @Abigor: if anything, I'd say you've gone a bit too far there. Mattbuck 22:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support it's better for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 13:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kalvarienberg mit Kreuzberglkirche 29092014 9746.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Calvary group with calvary church on Kreuzbergl, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
    Some CA, see note Poco a poco 21:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Not done Mattbuck 22:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)   Done Finally I started an attempt and tried to fix the issue, I wonder if I succeeded. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    New, not reviewed version uploaded. Please discuss. --Hubertl 12:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice! and good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment CA is gone, thanks. I just noticed that buildings on the left are leaning to the right and on the right are also leaning to the right -> picture is tilted Poco a poco 16:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)   Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
      Support Poco a poco 12:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl (talk) 17:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Bust_of_Alaric_Silvestri_in_Amelia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Bust of Alaric Silvestri in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 20:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. But can't you retouch the ball? -- Spurzem 21:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
      Done Spurzem thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 21:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree not a good retouch --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC) – Why? Where do you see the lack? -- Spurzem 12:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC) I have made note to the picture. --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
    Struck by KTC given newer vote below. -- KTC 18:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Neutral Shame the ball wasn't spotted when the photo was taken, but I'm afraid I'll have to agree about the retouch. No longer reflect reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTC (talk • contribs) 03:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Villy Fink Isaksen,KTC --Livioandronico2013 21:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support - A ball is better than a less good retouch. --Villy Fink Isaksen 22:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose Not sharp and poor JPEG quality, strong compression artifacts visible around the head. @Villy Fink Isaksen: would you mind reconsidering your vote? It’s not just about the ball. The image has obviously been saved at a high compression rate before, causing artifacts and detail loss. --Kreuzschnabel 14:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blocky compression artifacts visible everywhere in 100% view, that means: without pixel peeping at 1000% magnification. Also somewhat dull colors resp. low contrast and sharpness. -- Smial 08:05, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Σπάρτακος 13:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Why "pro"? It is usual at QIC to provide a reasonable justification. -- Smial 11:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Low jpeg quality. --C messier 15:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --C messier 15:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:University Park MMB «P5 Students' Union Elections 2013.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination UoNSU elections. Mattbuck 07:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Darkish but quite good for that type of portrait --DXR 09:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Really too dark for me, sorry. Distractive elements at left. Quite bad crop.--Jebulon 18:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Not the most favourable lighting, and the half-cropped person on the left does not add to quality, but it’s crisp sharp and well detailed. I’d have chosen a different background but technically it’s OK. --Kreuzschnabel 10:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support nothing disturbing for the understanding --Christian Ferrer 20:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Christian Ferrer,what's wrong here? --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)