Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 04 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Coriander_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Coriander is an annual herb in the family Apiaceae. It is also known as Chinese parsley or dhania, and in the United States the stems and leaves are usually called cilantro.--ShahadatHossain 10:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient resolution (< 2 megapixels) --Qoan 12:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think something's wrong with your math there, User:Qoan. --Mdaniels5757 03:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Maybe he was looking at the file size instead of the resolution? I'm still seeing significant detail loss, though, so it's not a QI for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peulle (talk • contribs) 13:12, July 1, 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 23:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Сад-сиренгарий_на_Щелковском_шоссе_15.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Сирень, Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе, Москва --Ulaisaeva 18:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Beautiful composition and good quality -- Spurzem 19:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose ID missing --Poco a poco 20:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
    I forgot „Promotion“ -- Spurzem 14:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
    ID missing, as said, not a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 20:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
    Hallo Poco a poco, what is ID? And what exactly do you not like about the photo? I can't think of a better lilac flower. Or have you ever made a better one? -- Spurzem 18:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Spurzem: what we see here is a flower, not a garden, I asked for the identification of the flower, which has been provided, so now I move to   Neutral as indeed some areas are overexposed Poco a poco 21:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp and overexposed whites on flowers. --A.Savin 20:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 21:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 23:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Мечеть_Кул-Шариф_Казань_1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Мечеть Кул-Шариф. Кремль, Казань, Татарстан --Ulaisaeva 09:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree , too much noise --Berthold Werner 12:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It is noisy, but IMO just ok still. --MB-one 09:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective correction required, verticals are leaning in --Uoaei1 06:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I don't see really disturbing noise, but the perspective issue is easily fixable. --Smial 10:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'd support but for the verticals, well spotted by Uoaei1. Blood Red Sandman 17:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Mdaniels5757 00:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)