Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 16 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Schleswig-Holstein,_Aukrug,_Tönsheider_Wald_NIK_9846.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Dies ist ein Foto des Schutzgebietes mit der WDPA-ID --Nightflyer 21:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough for QI. Sorry. --ElBute 16:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
    •   Done Noch einmal geschärft, obwohl ich es für unnötig halte Gruss --Nightflyer 21:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
      •   Comment Still not shatp. I'm afraid this kind of unsharpness is not fixable. Please use English in the review process.
  •   Support für mich scharf genug. --Ralf Roletschek 17:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. If you use perspective correction tools, you need to scale down the result by an appropriate amount to regain the sharpness of the unaltered image. In this case I would have chosen a resizing to about 80% to 90% of the original. -- Smial 08:29, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not quite QI for me: Several of the trees are unsharp, even though they're not moving and should be possible to focus on. --Peulle 13:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

  Comment New version --Nightflyer 18:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

  •   Oppose unsharp, sorry -Sujalajus 19:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 21:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)