Open main menu

Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list

Pending Most valued review candidatesEdit

Pink-spotted hawkmothEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-11-06 11:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Agrius cingulata (Pink-spotted hawkmoth) dorsal

  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose compared to the other. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support This Image shows much more than the next. The legs and a part of the very colorful hindwing, which is important for this species. VI is not a question of esthetics but of value and utility. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-07-08 12:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Agrius cingulata (Pink-spotted hawkmoth) male dorsal
  •   Support - Much clearer with much more separation from the background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This image shows the insect in camouflage position it is very pretty but makes the identification very difficult. It has less value than the previous one. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg)Edit

   
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-06-11 11:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Couloir nord de la Gare de Strasbourg
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-07-17 10:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Couloir nord de la Gare de Strasbourg

  Comment other photo in the same place, the colors are better, the camera (up right) is less blurry, Gzen92 [discuter] 10:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Brown-throated three-toed slothEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-01-13 09:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Bradypus variegatus (Brown-throated three-toed sloth) female
  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-08-03 14:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Bradypus variegatus (Brown-throated sloth) female
  •   Comment This one is the best because it shows the brown throats. But there is a big problem of color, the yellow is supersaturated: the coat must be gray. Easy to correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done New version uploaded. Charles (talk) 22:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Meghla Park Lake‎Edit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2019-08-21 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Meghla Park Lake
Used in:
See global usage
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2019-08-21 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Meghla Park Lake
Used in:
See global usage
  •   Support Charles (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Better lighting. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Old World swallowtailEdit

   
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Fbnpch (talk) on 2013-08-22 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio machaon (Swallowtail) ventral side
Used in:
de:Schwalbenschwanz; en:Papilio machaon; fr:Papilio machaon

  Comment Several problems. There is already an image VI promoted for this scope. The binomial name is always in italics and should be followed in the scope of the common name in English in brackets. The image can be promoted if the scope is reduced to "ventral side". Overall, the scope would be good ''[[Papilio machaon]]'' (Swallowtail) ventral side . Problem with the caption does not give the location of the photograph, it also takes a geocoding.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-08-21 13:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio machaon gorganus (Old World swallowtail) underside
Reason:
existing VI is same subspecies -- Charles (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Enceintes médiévales de ColmarEdit

   
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2017-11-12 10:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Enceintes médiévales de Colmar
Reason:
National heritage site. -- Gzen92 [discuter]
  •   Comment please add heritage details to the image file information template (and a short description in English would be helpful too :) ). Thanks. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
It's good for the description. For the heritage details, the news is centralizes in a category, it's not enough ? Gzen92 [discuter] 11:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support, thanks - good for me now. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-09-11 06:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Enceintes médiévales de Colmar
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 18:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Caryatides - Château de ChenonceauEdit

   
 
View promotion
Nominated by:
Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-07-19 21:34 (UTC)
Scope:
South-western exposure of the Caryatids in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau
Used in:
fr:Château de Chenonceau
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-09-18 10:23 (UTC)
Scope:
South-western exposure of the Caryatids in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau
Open for review.


Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.