File:POWERAMATS.jpg

edit
 
File:POWERAMATS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– Adrignola talk 14:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:AnitaPhilipovski.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AnitaPhilipovski.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:AnitaPhilipovski.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lugusto 03:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Mas vale trocar- juan del encina.ogg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mas vale trocar- juan del encina.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mas vale trocar- juan del encina.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Graham87 (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Ach gott vom himmel sieh darein Coral 1 mov- Bach - Amatnecks.ogg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ach gott vom himmel sieh darein Coral 1 mov- Bach - Amatnecks.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ach gott vom himmel sieh darein Coral 1 mov- Bach - Amatnecks.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Graham87 (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The sound files you've uploaded

edit

Hello, thanks for uploading sound files to Wikimedia Commons. However, performances of old works by composers such as Bach do not automatically enter the public domain just because their composer died a long time ago; their copyright is held by the performers of the works. In the cases of the sound files mentioned in the above two headings, you need evidence of written permission from Jayme Amatnecks to license the files appropriately for Wikimedia Commons. See the above messages for how to obtain and send this permission correctly. Graham87 (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Having said all that, these are beautiful recordings and I am sad to have to tag them for deletion ... but I must, per Commons policies. I would very much prefer it if you could help sort out the permission issues on these recordings. Graham87 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pedido de desbloqueio e abertura de DB

edit

Prezados colegas da Wikipédia,

Uma década transcorreu desde o momento em que recebi uma suspensão por tempo indeterminado... uma década! Toda essa trajetória está documentada e acessível a qualquer um, seja um administrador experiente ou um recém-chegado. O propósito desta mensagem é expressar meu mais profundo arrependimento e pedir desculpas, as mais sinceras que já formulei a alguém.

Cometi equívocos, errei. Agi de maneira imatura. Meu comportamento foi danado, inadequado e perturbador, sem dúvida. Nenhuma palavra pode desfazer os erros do passado, os quais reconheço plenamente. O que passou, já passou; não faz mal, o passado é imutável. Embora esteja banido, mantenho-me em conformidade com as normas, sem evadir o bloqueio, e desejo retomar minhas contribuições construtivas ao projeto.

Àqueles que magoei, apresento minhas sinceras desculpas. Em relação a qualquer dano que tenha causado ao projeto, expresso meu desejo genuíno de recomeçar, de editar de maneira construtiva. Nos países de língua portuguesa, não há pena de prisão perpétua, e nenhum bloqueio deveria ser eterno. Por gentileza, considerem meu humilde pedido de reintegração. Suplico-lhes.

Para toda a comunidade lusófona,

Jayme Amatnecks

@79a, !Silent, Albertoleoncio, Alchimista, Allice Hunter, Barão de Itararé, Biologo32, Chronus, Cléééston, ChristianH, Conde Edmond Dantès, and Cósmico: Amats (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DARIO SEVERI, DarwIn, Érico, EternamenteAprendiz, Fabiojrsouza, Fronteira, Ixocactus, JMagalhães, and Chronus:
@Cléééston, Cósmico, Editor D.S, Eric Duff, EuTuga, Eta Carinae, EVinente, Fabiojrsouza, FrancisAkio, Francisco Leandro, Fronteira, FSogumo, Gameiro, GoEThe, GRS73, He7d3r, and Hermógenes Teixeira Pinto Filho: Amats (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Hume42, HVL, Igor G.Monteiro, Ishiai, Ixocactus, Jbribeiro1, JMagalhães, Jo Lorib, KDL527, Lechatjaune, and Leefeni de Karik:
@Leytor, Maikê, Marquinhos, Mwaldeck, OnlyJonny, Opraco, Pedrassani, RadiX, Renato de carvalho ferreira, Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira, Rodrigo Padula, Saturnalia0, and SEPRodrigues: Amats (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Skartaris, Skyshifter, Stegop, Stanglavine, Stegop, Sturm, Teles, Tks4Fish, Tuga1143, Vanthorn, Victor Lopes, Waldyrious, WikiFer, Zdtrlik, André Koehne, Diego Queiroz, Duke of Winterfell, and Dux Praxis:
@El Descamisado, JMSilva, Joalpe, JoãoGuilherme68, Kacamata, Liquet, MachoCarioca, Manope2011, MayTheForce, Paz e concórdia, Pgnm, Yanguas, Kascyo, Kongs, and Editor Master Plus: Amats (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Meu caro maestro, de minha parte será bem-vindo. Não sei ao certo qual o procedimento, mas acredito que sendo o expert que é, somaria em muito no projeto. André Koehne TALK TO ME 15:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Consoante a este pedido, abri a discussão e solicitei o envio aos outros editores da Wikipédia lusófona para terem ciência. Saudações, Patrick (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Respostas

edit

Caro Rui,

O episódio ao qual se refere deu-se há sete anos! Nem mesmo me recordava de sua ocorrência para expressar o meu sincero arrependimento por tê-lo protagonizado.

O que solicito aqui ao corpo administrativo da Wikipédia lusófona é bondade, compaixão, piedade, enfim clemência. É tudo o que peço, clamo, imploro, suplico. Desejo retornar ao projeto, desta vez para contribuir com edições construtivas. O episódio ao qual se referiu, volto a mencioná-lo, ocorreu numa época em que até IPs podiam editar, para que se tenha uma ideia... Sete anos!

Perdoem-me, pelo amor de Deus...

Jayme Amatnecks (Amats (talk) 02:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC))Reply

Pgnm, pode colocar esse texto na minha defesa?


Caro Stuckkey,

Comprometo-me a não recriá-la. Como expus na minha defesa, quero contribuir construtivamente ao projeto. Peço então que reconsidere o seu posicionamento. Outrossim, aproveito o ensejo para solicitar que desbloqueiem minha DB, visto que a visibilidade das minhas manifestações pela Commons é prejudicada.

Jayme Amatnecks (Amats (talk) 02:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC))Reply

Ofensas...

edit

... peço que as evite, se possível, e que idealmente não as use, simplesmente. Como feito aqui, neste sumário de edição. Não é um "lixo". O precedente por mim mencionado na proposta de eliminação de seu ficheiro é muito bem-estabelecido por estas bandas. Passar bem, RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply