User talk:Andrew J.Kurbiko/Archive 21

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:J.L. Gerome - The Wailing Wall - Google Art Project.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:J.L. Gerome - The Wailing Wall - Google Art Project.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Map of Poland, LGBT ideology-free zones declared (as of January 2020).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Unbelievable. Useful, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomasz Wasilewski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mizrah - Israel Dov Rosenbaum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mizrah - Israel Dov Rosenbaum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ארז אשכנזי בריכת המשושים1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMHO in both photos the “smoothing” of the water surface is somewhat exagerrated, but this is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 08:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of Culture and Science during the Parada Równości 2018.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equality March 2018 in Kraków in front of the Saint Mary Basilica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Seems like a useful juxtaposition to me. Though I am thinking about whether we'd want to have a scope for this juxtaposition for every year. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equality March in Katowice participants.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kekek about 2018. Either this one or the other. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Info Palauenc05, I have updated --Andrei (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, but IMO the 2nd picture is redundant. Other opinions, please. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

   Info I think you are mistaking Krakow (promoted before) and Katowice. Those are different cities. If I'm wrong, can you clarify the "2nd picture"? --Andrei (talk) 08:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw- Kosciol sw. Elzbiety.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw- Kosciol sw. Elzbiety.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reclining Figure - Henry Moore (LH 608, Tel Aviv Museum of Art).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Peter in Prison ("Petrus in de gevangenis") by Rembrandt, 1631.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please identify the name of the artist in your scope and give its title in the original Dutch with English in parentheses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Done --Andrei (talk) 11:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and often used. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
• Andrei, your format is not the one that's been adopted here. See how User:Archaeodontosaurus does it. The original language is given first, with the English title when relevant in parentheses. It's not that big a deal, but I think it would be a bit odd if we had two dueling formats for these types of nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
• Yes this is a recommendation not a rule, but it is useful so that we can avoid future difficulties. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Kiss, "Der Kuß" by Peter Behrens, 1898.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, but can we use the format Archaeodontosaurus uses for these types of nominations? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Augustian Monastery in Wrocław, Portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. But a vertical correction would be nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Andrei and Agnes Monkelbaan, I tried to correct the verticals. Is it okay so? Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 08:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Andrei (talk) 08:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Well done! Thanks for that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Scribe- Menahem - The Birds' Head Haggadah - Google Art Project.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scribe- Menahem - The Birds' Head Haggadah - Google Art Project.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tatry - panorama z Polskiego Spiszu.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tatry - panorama z Polskiego Spiszu.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camille Pissarro - L'usine à Pontoise (The Factory at Pontoise), 1873, Israel Museum Collection.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info I hope this format looks good --Andrei (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Yep, and a useful photo of a beautiful painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Generali building בניין ג'נרלי.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rainbow at Zbawiciela Square in Warsaw, 7 October 2012, view from Nowowiejska Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the scope modifications.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
LGBT pride in Lublin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Not in the linked gallery but in a subgallery. However, I think it's the best of the two photos in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw - Biblioteka Uniwersytecka i Kosciol NMP na Piasku 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw - Biblioteka Uniwersytecka i Kosciol NMP na Piasku 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Klee - Angelus Novus, 1920, Israel Museum Collection.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Which has truer color, this photo or File:Klee-angelus-novus.jpg? In the other photo, his signature and date are more visible. I feel like this photo might be too dark, but I don't think I've seen this work in the flesh. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
• Im nominating this photo as it seems to have more natural lightning comparing to saturated versions (pixelized too) provided by the museum --Andrei (talk) 08:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

• So it's really this dark and hard to see the artist's signature and date? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • It is visible, although combination of dark paper can make such impression --Andrei (talk) 10:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

• I agree that it's visible. I'll take you at your word and  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Isidor Kaufmann - The Kabbalist (c. 1910-20).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Isidor Kaufmann - The Kabbalist (c. 1910-20).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krzysztof Jung.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylwia Chutnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02019 0086 Equality March 2019 in Częstochowa (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02018 0122 Das Queer Mai Festival 2018, die Kultur der LGBTQI in Krakau, Marsch der Gleichheit am 19. Mai 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Witold Sadowy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franciszek Sterczewski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poznan Pride, 2019.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arek Kluk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

River

Hello and thank you for creating the subdivisions of Dnipro picture you see on the right. But I do miss the river after whom Dnipro is named in the picture.... Would you mind if I add the river to the picture? Or would you rather do that yourself? — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

PS I have used the excellent picture for (handy, I say,) templates on English Wikipedia articles about the urban districts of (the city of) Dnipro, so it is quite extensively used on English Wikipedia now. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

PS2 This picture (on the left) can be used for reference. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

• Hi! It was such a long time ago that I do not remember that project. But feel free to modify it if you think it should be done. Unfortunately, I have no time to do it by myself. Thank you! --Andrei (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do it myself The practise I get while doing it could be handy for me in later projects anyway — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I did the job Actually it was a piece of cake (even with my limited skills) in Photoshop Dobranoc! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agnieszka Dziemianowicz-Bąk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question How should we choose what look is best in scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

  I am not choosing the best look, only which reflects a popular image of the person. --Andrei (talk) 09:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

• In other words, the current look is best in scope because it's how more people know her. That's clear, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support In that case, this photo is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

• You said it better than me! --Andrei (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anna Maria Żukowska.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --GRDN711 (talk) 15:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!

… very much for nominating this photo of mine on FPC, Andrei! I was not sure if this one would succeed, but it did; you are really good in finding good candidates for the FPC page. — You had already mentioned this photo earlier as a possible candidate, and asked for my opinion. I am sorry that I did not come back to you then! I was just too unsure myself if the photo was worth nominating. So, thank you again!

PS: I would be glad to create and upload some more good photographs of Jewish cemeteries/sites, and had already planned for some photo excursions last autumn, but then I went ill for some weeks, and later found no time anymore for taking photos. Only recently I have re-visited two near Jewish cemeteries, but both are wooded and therefore too dark in the summer. Maybe I will have more success this autumn. Wish you all the best and be safe, --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

• Dear Aristeas, thank you again for your excellent work and priceless documentation efforts. Nominating photos for FP is like a rollercoaster - sometimes very fun and enjoyable, sometimes very frustrating. I am glad that this photo was able to gain enough votes. I would be very happy to see more photos of, for example, synagogues, made by you, but I think that all your work is fascinating (no matter what is the topic). Hope to nominate more of them in the future . Also wish you to stay safe and enjoy summer. I hope Germany is sunny these days. --Andrei (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dominik Puchała.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question No Wikipedia article is linked from the category page. How notable is he? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

  As a local activist, organizer of the Equality March in Częstochowa. He is present in local media coveregre (some international too). --Andrei (talk) 07:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sufficiently notable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• I do not think it is a part of the official VIC criteria --Andrei (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm satisfied that he's notable enough, but your argument seems to be that "Portrait of Joe Schmoe" would be an acceptable scope and notability is irrelevant. That isn't logical, is it? Otherwise, have a look at Commons:Valued image scope#Examples of suitable scopes: "A portrait of a notable person" is given as an example of a suitable type of scope; "A portrait of an unknown person" is not. If you'd like to make more explicit that notability is a factor in judging the scopes of portraits, we can discuss the addition of new words, but claiming that it's not a basis for judgment at all, I submit, is something we can summarily dismiss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Per Ikan Kekek ; I do agree with him and especially with his long, accurate and relevant explanation. --PJDespa talk 11:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magdalena Biejat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ISS035-E-007148 Nile - Sinai - Dead Sea - Wide Angle View.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ISS035-E-007148 Nile - Sinai - Dead Sea - Wide Angle View.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wroclaw - Mlyny sw. Klary (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw - Mlyny sw. Klary (cropped).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Geography Lesson or "The Black Spot".jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Geography Lesson or "The Black Spot".jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2020 в Україні: залишилося два тижні! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Ukraine: two weeks are left!

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» триватиме ще два тижні, до 30 вересня!

За перші два тижні учасники завантажили понад 16 тисяч фото українських пам’яток. Це поки найбільший результат серед усіх 29 країн, які цьогоріч організовують конкурс. Свої роботи на українську частину конкурсу вже подали 239 авторів, половина із них вперше долучилися до змагання. На знімках представлені пам’ятки з усіх регіонів України. Загалом сфотографовано 5568 об’єктів із конкурсних списків.

Найменш представленими поки є Луганська (69 фото 45 об’єктів) і Херсонська (81 фото 38 об’єктів) області та місто Севастополь (136 фото 39 об’єктів). Якщо у вас (чи у ваших друзів та знайомих) є світлини з цих регіонів — без вагань долучайтеся до фотозмагання!

У рамках спеціальної номінації «Єврейська спадщина» завантажено понад 650 світлин 126 пам'яток, з яких знімки 42 — завантажено вперше. Якщо ваш населений пункт має об'єкти єврейської культурної спадщини, але їх нема у списках, напишіть нам, щоб ми їх додали до списків!

Спеціальна номінація «Млини» — понад 640 фото 144 об'єктів, знімки 44 — завантажено вперше. Загалом база млинів зараз нараховує понад 615 об'єктів, і вона постійно доповнюється.

Вперше цього року ми втілюємо спеціальну номінацію від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — на жаль, ще зовсім нема світлин із Бродів та Радомишля. І з Житомира є тільки 7 світлин, а з міста Рівного — 8 фото.

У спеціальній номінації «Відео» — понад 20 робіт.

Попереду ще два тижні конкурсу. Встигніть долучитися самі та запрошуйте друзів.

Чекаємо на ваші роботи!

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться тут: wlm.photo. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки» раніше чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цього конкурсу).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. 22:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)