User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2016

Bitte melde Dich

Liebe(r) @Dirtsc:

Du bist unter den Preisträgern des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 Deutschland. Um Dir den Preis verleihen zu können brauchen wir Deine Anschrift und Deinen Preiswunsch. Wir haben Dir eine Mail geschickt, damit Du Deine Informationen eingeben kannst. Bitte schau auch in Deinem Spam-Ordner nach.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch und Alles Gute für 2016, Sebastian Wallroth (talk) für das Organisationskomittee

Habe ich mittlerweile erledigt. Schulligunk für die Verzögerung... --Dirtsc (talk) 08:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am lustberg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wacholderpark Fuhlsbüttel 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wacholderpark Fuhlsbüttel 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wacholderpark Fuhlsbüttel 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Billbrookdeich 167 bis 171 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am lustberg 18 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandshof 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit to much sharpening - unnecessarily! --Hubertl 12:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandshof 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandshof 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandshof 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alsterkrug ch 463 bis 467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alsterkrug ch 475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Dirtsc,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

FFH-Gebiet Peeneunterlauf, Peenestrom, Achterwasser und Kleines Haff

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Wittmoor FFH-Gebiet Nordteil 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good.--Jebulon 08:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Wittmoor FFH-Gebiet Nordteil 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Jebulon 08:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Wittmoor FFH-Gebiet Nordteil 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Jebulon 08:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Wittmoor FFH-Gebiet Nordteil 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd decrease contrast, but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 09:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schnaakenmoor FFH Gebiet 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schnaakenmoor FFH Gebiet 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringwall Otzenhausen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Francop Gutsbrack 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Francop Gutsbrack 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality., the noise in the sky is acceptable. --Hubertl 22:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schnaakenmoor FFH Gebiet 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but you should identify the species.--Jebulon 15:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Done. As best as I can. ;-) --Dirtsc 06:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC) O.K. now. -- Spurzem 10:11, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelmoor Quickborn Abend 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood, although it could have been sharper around the sun (I think) --Daniel Case 16:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achterwasser Usedom Dewichow Nacht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Niiiice. The long exposure, done right, captures the subtlety of this dusk --Daniel Case 16:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cscl indian ocean 07022016 Bagger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cscl indian ocean 07022016 Steuerbord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, but ok --Poco a poco 17:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sophien Hamburg-Barmbek Innen Pult.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sophien Hamburg-Barmbek Innen Altar 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Kategorien Speicherstadt

Hallo Dirtsc, ich würde jetzt doch mal die Kategorien für die einzelnen Blöcke der Speicherstadt anlegen. Ich bin mir aber noch bei der Nomenklatur unsicher: "Block X (Speicherstadt)" oder "Block X (Speicherstadt Hamburg)". Was meinst Du dazu oder hast Du noch andere Ideen? Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 06:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Ich würde die zweite Variante bevorzugen. Die Hamburger Speicherstadt ist zwar bei weitem die bekannteste, aber wer weiss, auf welche Idee die Leute beim Kategorisieren kommen. Wenn jemand nach "Block" und "Speicherstadt" sucht, sollte er m.E. Kategorien so finden, dass aus der Bezeichnung klar wird, wo dieser Block liegt. Dann können weniger Fehler auftreten. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Für das alte Freihafenamt habe ich mit "Bei St. Annen 2" eine eigene Kategorie angelegt. Ich will mich mal an einem Artikel über das Gebäude versuchen. Quellenlage ist zwar schlecht aber der Bau interessiert mich. Und wie üblich ärgere ich mich, dass ich keine Fotos gemacht habe, als das Ding nach dem Auszug der letzten Zollstelle total leer war... ;-) --Dirtsc (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Dirtsc,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Good morning Dirtsc,

I am deeply ashamed for the confusion of the species!
Sincerely,
Dominicus Bergsma, Famberhorst.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Hope you know, I was just kidding! Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stmaxkolbe wb aussen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Kruis blurred with the pigeons, but otherwise okay for me.--Famberhorst 16:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stmaxkolbe wb aussen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stmaxkolbe wb innen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissen johanniskirche aussen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissen Johanneskirche aussen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Dirtsc!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf friedhof kapelle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf friedhof kapelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf friedhof kapelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, the left side has a clear drop of quality, though --Poco a poco 21:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf friedhof kapelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf friedhof kapelle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Far left is a little bit unsharp, but given the very good quality of the rest of the pic, QI. --W.carter 19:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Code (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaswerk bahrenfeld kohlenturm 01 38892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaswerk bahrenfeld kohlenschuppen nord 13 17762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaswerk bahrenfeld gasreinigung süd 07 17759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaswerk bahrenfeld kohlenschuppen nord 14 17762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Dirtsc!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bf woyrschweg 6 18375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bf gasstr 24 2 18323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf dürerstr 7 17913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf wolfsloh 5 17920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Posterisation, possible as a consequence of excessive NR. Could you try to fix it? --Basotxerri 14:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC) I tried to use a set of filters in my software. Now I made a version without that. Better? --Dirtsc 19:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment OK, that's much better and OK for a QI. One more thing, please excuse me because I should have told you before, perhaps you could remove the branch of the tree on the upper left corner (by cropping or spot removal). Could you try that? This should be all. --Basotxerri 20:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot to crop during the rework. Thanks! --Dirtsc 15:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC) No, problem. It's OK now. --Basotxerri 17:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf beselerstr 2 18045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissen schule iserbarg 09 30480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gb holunderweg 25 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gb weg beim jäger 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though I would prefer a version without fence ;-) --Smial 09:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissen siedlung mechelnbusch haus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissen siedlung mechelnbusch haus 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo,

hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichten Deine obigen tollen Fotos Plätze unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Als Preis erhältst Du einen Foto- oder Buchgutschein im Wert von 20 Euro. Daher bitten wir Dich, eine E-Mail an communitywikimedia.de zu schicken, in der Du Deinen Benutzernamen und Deinen Klarnamen angibst. Gibt dort bitte auch an, ob du lieber einen Foto- oder lieber einen Buchgutschein per E-Mail zugeschickt bekommen möchtest.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gf dürerstr 5 18060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 2 bis 4 04 21860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 09 21863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 8 02 21862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cn new york ring 2 21102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cn kapstadtring 5 04 21863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)