User talk:Ermell/Archive/3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weihersmühle-P4202046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Geisfelder-Strasse-P2137411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I'm surprised - I would have expected a much higher noise level at ISO 1.600 given the small size of the sensor. --Code 10:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment By the way: The title should be fixed. --XRay 10:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242453hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242438hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-Statue-4242463hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242408PSPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242423hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242458hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you sharpen it a bit, please? --ElBute 18:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 22:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ElBute 11:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242398hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 07:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altendorf-Kapelle-P4202076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Bartholomäus-Priesendorf-3270043hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 07:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-Statue-4242428hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Caterpillar 321D-P3209731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Hamm 3414-P3209735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Hamm 3414-P3209763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-BOMAG-roadroller-P3209764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Hamm 3414-P3209751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-4242413hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-arena-4060739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Archi38 10:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-ATLAS AR 65-P3209771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-station-P3209773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Breitengüßbach-P3209772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Caterpillar M318D-P3209749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ICE-Baustelle-Caterpillar M318D-P3209750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Stullendorf-P5022775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Strullendorf-5022778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Strullendorf-5022780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Strullendorf-5022781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Strullendorf-5022782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-Bahnübergang-5022791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-5022819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 10:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Strullendorf- P5022774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but see notes --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-5022820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschhaid-Bahnhof- P5023058PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, clear QI. A bit strange crop IMO (one half window at left and right) -- George Chernilevsky 09:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschhaid-Bahnhof- P5023056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Buttenheim-P5023052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Buttenheim-P5023025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim- P5022999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 09:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Strullendorf-P5022786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim-P5022994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ElBute 12:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim- P5022992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 15:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim-P5022986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim- P5022972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim-P5022938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim- P5022936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Buttenheim-P5022932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit overprocessed, but ok for QI --Hubertl 19:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strassenbrücke-Hirschhaid P5022928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Hirschhaid P5022925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 21:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Underpass-Hirschhaid P5022914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-Bahn im Bahnhof-Hirschhaid-P5022912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-Bahn im Bahnhof-Hirschhaid P5022905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong wide angle perspective is not optimal with the subject, but in all other aspects good quality --Smial 11:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion --A.Savin 13:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC) DoneThanks for reviewing--Ermell 12:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC) OK for me. --A.Savin 11:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-P5083393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschhaid-Bahnhof- P5023057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 14:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviewing--Ermell 22:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 23:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ElBute 17:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinz-Rupprecht-Pavillon-P5083361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you should have used a longer lens, but given what you had to work with, quite good quality. --Peulle 14:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-Sreitberg-P5083363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Decent sharpness. --Peulle 14:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesent-P5083430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-bei-Streitberg-P5083480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In my f 7.1 had been better, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-P5083468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-P5083471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatzer-Linde-5083337-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatzer-Linde-5083332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Aufseßhöflein (Bamberg)

Hast Du noch weitere Fotos vom Aufseßhöflein oder kannst Du noch weitere Fotos von innen und außen machen? Grüße --Reinhardhauke (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Ich hab nur alte von Denkmaltag vor zwei Jahren. Ich kann ja mal wieder vorbeifahren und welche beim WLM Wettbewerb hochladen. Oder ist das dringend? Gruß--Ermell (talk) 07:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Danke, nichts ist dringend!--Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleitertal-Veilbronn-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streitberg-Cliffs-P5083375-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleiter-Tal-5083350-PanoPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleiter-Tal-5083344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-P5083470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leinleitertal-2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB should be fixed, this does not look naturally --Uoaei1 10:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Comment WB is correct.The image was taken after sunset and looks unreal because it is a lightened HDR image--Ermell 20:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC) The snow looks green, which is not a matter of sunset or HDR. Please change this. --Uoaei1 09:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Done o.k.--Ermell 10:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Support --Uoaei1 15:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Buttenheim-P5022933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments COM:OVERCAT --A.Savin 12:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 20:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Somehow we have basic misunderstanding, this Bahnhof is already on this Bahnstrecke, which should maybe applied for ALL your uploads because there are frequently similar combinations (any photo in Category:Eiffel Tower should not be in Category:Paris at the same time) --A.Savin 11:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC) Done o.k.--Ermell 22:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Promoted --A.Savin 14:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz-Kruzifix-P5143753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz-Seigelstein-Kruzifix-P5143770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg-Seigelstein-5143772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg-Seigelstein-5143774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiche-bei-Stuecht--4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz-Linde-P5143752-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice composition, I like it. --Basotxerri 15:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz-Linde-P5143749-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiche-bei-Stuecht-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But needs quercus category --A.Savin 01:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg-Seigelstein-5143778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg-Seigelstein-5143775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-4242360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good, given the difficult conditions. QI for me. --Peulle 08:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweg-Seigelstein-5143784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Seigelstein-P5143786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P1320563-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The atmosphere is wonderful but it is too noisy. Could you fix that? --ElBute 09:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC) Comment It´s quite strong fog and not noise.--Ermell 19:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Maybe you're right. I'm not used to shoot through fog. I'd like some more opinions. --ElBute 07:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Done I did reduce some noise and hope it might be o.k. like this.--Ermell 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)  Support Much better now. Good work. --ElBute 17:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-Kapelle-P5063266-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-cliffs-Kapelle-P5063270-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-Pano-cliffs-Kapelle-P5063287-PanoPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-Kapelle-Blüten-P5063296-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock-Sand-5154047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock-Sand-5154045-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-Blick-nach-Süden-P5063204-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ElBute 14:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßberg-vom-Altenstein-266224-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burglesauer-Tal-5164072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. By the way, one of the categories is a red link. --Basotxerri 14:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burglesauer-Tal-5164068-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, close to overprocessed. --Poco a poco 10:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wattendorf-Marter-5164081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wattendorf-Linden-5164082-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama-Forcheim-P5063199-Pano-PS-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock-Sand-5154043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reifenberg-Ofen-4242363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reifenberg-4242382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reifenberg-4242378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-Herbst-026382-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach-Kraiberg-Pano-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streitberg-Muggendorf-Wald-114600-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walberla-4234844 5 6N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% convinced but will promote it, this version is more realistic then the former ones --Poco a poco 21:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Marter-5224828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatz-P5224621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seigelstein-P5224661-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach-Bahnlinie-5204512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach-Bahnlinie-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quackenschloss 1270087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz-P5224664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seigelstein-P5224638-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesent-P5224800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilbronn-Totensteine-P5224673-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regnitz-Neptun-5194465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition! Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glatte-Wand-Streitberg-P5053166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-Brücke-Haag-P5083466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesenttal-P5083450-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quackenschloss-Aussicht-1270095-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Börstig-Hallstadt-5264871-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-Herbst-026393-PS-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wonderfull light (difficult conditions), however IMO the CAs/purple fringe at top is a bit disturbing, the whole image is maybe a bit too processed too (personal opinion) --Christian Ferrer 11:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC) Done CA removed and hope it works. Thanks--Ermell 21:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC) In my opinion it's an amazing shoot, done under very difficult light - after the slight correcton of CA it is QI for me! --J. Lunau 12:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teuchatzer-Linde-P5224616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsel-with-grape-9283865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-Börstig-P5284926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstadt-Börstig-P5284929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 20:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallersberg-P5214608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 07:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-Mainaue-Augsfeld-5154034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-5295069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinhügel-P5295117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- MJJR 20:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinhügel-Pfad-P5295082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looking good. --Peulle 22:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regnitz-Schwäne-1012088-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where is Lohengrin? Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Nie sollst du mich befrahagen:-)--Ermell 19:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-5295074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:16, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Badangerlinde-Gößweinstein-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 13:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-5295230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-5295231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-Mainaue-Augsfeld-5154038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leutenbach-Kirche-P5063272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leutenbach-P5063259hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschaid-SkulpturP5022886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, sharp enough to be a Q1photo. However IMO the colour blue and green is quiet strong so please reduce Vibrance(De-Dynamik) in Ps -15 --Michielverbeek 15:42, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-5295066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weichenwasserlos-Kruzifix-4242583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-4242571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-4242572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-4242573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weichenwasserlos-4242589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-Pano-5295056-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang-5295236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI but please get rid of that spot (see note) --Poco a poco 21:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-Kruzifix-P5315364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteroberndorf-Marienkapelle-P5315355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Untersteinbach-Marter-125108.jpg

Hallo Reinhold, zeigt Dein Foto von dem Bildstock in Untersteinbach die richtigen Farben? Ich habe den Eindruck, es sollte ein bisschen Magenta reduziert werden; aber ich kenne die Wirklichkeit an dem Ort und vor allem das Licht zum Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme nicht. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Spurzem, ich habe mal bei beiden Magenta rausgenommen aber geändert hat sich da nicht viel. Für mich sahen die vorher auch ganz ordentlich aus aber nicht optimal wegen des Dämmerlichts. Gruß von Reinhold--Ermell (talk) 20:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weichenwasserlos-4242590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschhaid-townhall- P5022885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strassenunterführung-Hirschaid-P5022882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022876-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak Pro b/c its noisy and shadows are a bit strong. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muschelquelle-Streitberg-P5053148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems about tightened, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Frauendorf-5295078-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach-5204547-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good image but I see some dust spots in the sky. --Peulle 21:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC) It´s true, there are some cloneable spots in the sky, but no dustspots. The sensor seems to be clean. --Hubertl 01:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)  Support Well, you should probably edit them out. But it gets my vote. --Peulle 18:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steppach-Bahnhof-6045696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Wegweiser-125129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steppach-Bahnhof-6045695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. You should fix that red category link, though. --Peulle 21:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untersteinbach-Marter--125127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinhügel-P5295210-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesentmühle-Hausfigur-P5063247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muschelquelle-Streitberg-P5053151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Wustviel-125043-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untersteinbach-Marter-125108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stettfeld-Bahnhof-6045700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop is a little tight on the right side, but otherwise good. --Peulle 13:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your review. The train on the left is part of the compo as well.--Ermell 14:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Yeah, that just makes it tight on both sides. Take a step backwards, bro. ;) --Peulle 18:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steppach-Bahnanlage-6045697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Peulle 15:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinhügel-Aussicht-P5295092-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too much tone mapping IMHO, sky looks unreal. --C messier 09:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Done Sky workover.Thanks for the review--Ermell 09:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)  Support QI. --C messier 12:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-5295071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Sambach-P6055932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Sambach-P6055927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnbrücke-Sambach-P6055923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnbrücke-Sambach-P6055922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 22:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinhügel-Richtung-Staffelberg-P5295103-Pano-PS-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a very fine picture it deserves FPC imo --Moroder 06:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnbrücke-Sambach-P6055924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Sambach-P6055931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Sambach-fP6055928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Bartholomäus-Priesendorf-3270053hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 14:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but see note --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Münchner-Ring-5194254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Forchheimer-Straße-5194268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regnitzbrücke-Bug-5194452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz-Marter-5143829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz-Marter-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brose-Arena-5194283-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 12:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Forchheimer-Straße-5194295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Bahnunterführung-Forchheimer-Straße-5194375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz-Marter-5143833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

QI - Island of Faial, Azores

Ich nehme an, dass ich Dich in Deutsch ansprechen kann. Vielen Dank für Deinen Kommentar zu meinem Bild von der Insel Faial auf den Azoren. Ich habe versucht, die eigentümliche Stimmung im Küstenbereich bei schlechtem Wetter einzufangen. Aber meine Frage zielt eigentlich auf Deinen Hinweis, die CA zu entfernen. Dieser Mangel ist unbestreitbar links oben an der Bergkante zu erkennen. Ich besitze nur Photoshop als Software, kann man das damit machen?--Christof46 (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Christof. Am einfachsten ist es wenn du die Bereiche mit den CA entsättigst (kleine Pinselspitze). Du kannst aber auch über Auswahl, Farbbereich mit der Pipette den Bereich auswählen und dann in einer Einstellungsebene "Farbton und Sättigung" den Schieber bei "Sättigung" nach links ziehen. Gruß von Reinhold

Danke, ich habe es mal versucht. Ich hatte gehofft, es gäbe einen schnellen eleganten Weg ohne die mühsame Pinselarbeit.--Christof46 (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Alles Übungssache. In Lightroom ist das etwas komfortabler.--Ermell (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein-Aussicht-P5224723-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenpölz-Marter--2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Sebastian-Bamberg-P6096730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Oberndorf-P6055938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak support, shadows could be deduced. --Hubertl 04:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ermell, i would like to use your photo of the "Burg Hiltpoltstein" for an non-commercial Branchenverzeichnis. I hope this is ok, of course you will be noticed in the Impressum. Best regards, Felicia Winterstein

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh-mountain-1060957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansberg-Kirchentür-P6127132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prächting-Kruzifix-6127108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prächting-Schulhaus-6127106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prächting-Fachwerkhaus-6127110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Oberndorf-P6055937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments House on the right is leaning, plus many bird spots in the sky I would remove --A.Savin 13:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 21:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 01:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegen-Porsanger-P1270871-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ein gutes Bild, du hast aber offensichtlich die Grenzen der Kamera und des Objektivs gut aufgezeigt. --Hubertl 09:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Ebensfeld- Prächting-6127100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Ebensfeld- Prächting-6127099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Ebensfeld- Prächting-6127097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Die Kamera macht offenbar doch einen Unterschied aus - siehe vorherigen Kommentar. --Hubertl 09:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC) Comment Die letzten Investitionen haben sich auf jeden Fall gelohnt. Danke für die Beurteilungen.--Ermell 11:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brose-Arena-5194279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 14:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aufseßhöflein-6096742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Sambach-P6055936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Wingersdorf-P6055921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Sambach-P6055934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-P6055918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Strullendorf-Schlüsselfeld-P6055915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Strullendorf-Schlüsselfeld-Wingersdorf-P6055917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-P6055919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahnstrecke-Strullendorf-Hirschhaid P5022931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-5295068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prächting-Fachwerkhaus-6127109-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better, ok for QI now --Poco a poco 11:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-organ-loft-9203430-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Stolzenroth-6055941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Schlüsselfeld-Nebenfahrzeug-P6055961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the spot --A.Savin 13:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks--Ermell 21:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 02:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-memorial-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-Haus-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-Haus-45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-Haus-43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-Bahnhof-P6055960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen-Bahnübergang-6055945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition! There are two dust spots, though, could you remove them? Perhaps I would remove also the bird on the top edge. --Basotxerri 08:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Done All birds remove. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Schlüsselfeld-P6055966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-Bahnhof-P6055957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Stolzenroth-6055940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-farmhouse44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-Breitengüßbach-280216-2288485-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen-Bahnhof-6055943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice mood --Dirtsc 07:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Linden in Teuchatz

Hallo Ermell,

in Teuchatz gibt es drei Linden, die als Naturdenkmal geschützt sind, siehe Anlage zur Verordnung über Naturdenkmale, Nummern 34 bis 36. Die hier File:Teuchatzer-Linde-5083332.jpg hat eine ganz andere Kronenform als die eher hochgewachsene in Category:Große Linde bei Teuchatz. Die angegebenen Koordinaten sind aber dieselben, auch eine Sitzgruppe steht jeweils darunter. Laut der Verordnung steht die "Große Linde" aber östlich von Teuchatz, nicht südlich (dort stehen zwei andere Linden). Ich bin jetzt genug verwirrt, kannst Du für etwas mehr Klarheit sorgen? Viele Grüße, --Blech (talk) 22:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Blech,

die von dir angesprochene Linde ist laut Koordinaten die mit der Nummer 35 an der Abzweigung nach Zeegendorf. Von diesem Baum hab ich auf Wikicommons keine weiteren Bilder und auch keine Kategorie gefunden. Mir ist schon klar das die Bezeichnung "große Linde" schon für Verwirrung sorgen kann. Beste Grüße--Ermell (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Verglichen habe ich wohl mit File:Teuchatzer-Linde-5083337-PS.jpg, das ist laut Koordinaten auch die Nr. 35 an der Abzweigung nach Z. Das Bild ist in der Kategorie "Große Linde bei Teuchatz". Entweder sind die Koordinaten nicht richtig eingetragen oder es ist die falsche Kategorie. Blech (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Oha da ist mir wohl ein Sychronisationsfehler unterlaufen. Ich hab das gleich berichtigt. Danke für deinen Hinweis. Gruß von Ermell--Ermell (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litzendorf-overview-6116998-pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litzendorf-Marter-6116987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litzendorf-Marter-6116988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-6117007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-P6187531-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 13:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremmeldorf-Lange-Strasse-6117031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köttensdorf-Fachwerkhaus-6117041-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremmeldorf-church-6117037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-fountain-6117024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me. Good composition. --Peulle 14:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremmeldorf-church-6117033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a little noise, but good composition. --Peulle 13:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-Haltestelle-6117018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-6117016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-Litzendorfer-street-6117015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-Kremmeldorfer-Strasse-6117020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-war-memorial-6117014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-church-6117013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schammelsdorf-church-6117012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Deine Reviews auf QIC

Moin Ermell! Danke für die letzten Reviews von meinen Bildern auf QIC. Du hast zwei Mal darauf hingewiesen, dass Bilder auf der linken Seite unscharf sind aber im Rest OK. Das habe ich dann objektiv genauso gesehen. Ich frage mich, ob das wirklich Zufall ist bzw. nur von der Entzerrung kommt. Die Entzerrung könnte aber beim Bild vom Wittmoor keine Rolle spielen, weil ich da keine Perspektivkorrektur gemacht habe, im Gegensatz zum Bild aus der City Nord. Möglicherweise liegt es auch am Objektiv oder an der Kamera. Ich muss wohl mal ein paar Testaufnahmen machen, um der Sache auf den Grund zu gehen. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc (talk) 06:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Dirk. Bei allen Bildern von Dir fällt mir eine leichte Matschigkeit auf, oder ist es vielleicht nicht vorhandene Objektischärfe? Das kann evtl. auch von DXO kommen. Deine Motive gefallen mir durchweg alle sehr gut nicht zuletzt weil sie aus meiner Heimatstadt sind. Bei der Schleuse in Fuhlsbüttel hab ich in meiner Jugend immer geangelt :-) --Ermell (talk) 07:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Die Schärfe ist irgendwie öfter ein Problem, ich habe aber auch noch nicht endgültig gesehen, woran das liegt. Ich werde mal ein paar Testaufnahmen machen, um zu sehen ob es am Objektiv liegt. Ob das DxO ist könnte ich sehen, wenn ich das Original-RAW mit dem JPG vergleiche. Kennst Du sonst noch eine brauchbare Software zum schärfen? Ich bin für Tipps dankbar, bevor ich mich durch alles mögliche probiere. --Dirtsc (talk) 08:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich benutze schon länger Nik Collection und hab bisher nichts besseres gefunden und das gibt es mittlerweile kostenlos. Allerdings läßt sich mangelnde Objektivschärfe nur bis zu einem gewissen Grad kaschieren. Irgendwann sieht man ist man immer an der Grenze. Meiner Erfahrung nach ist es am Besten bei der Aufnahme so viel wie möglich korrekt im Kasten zu haben.--Ermell (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo miteinander und bitte Entschuldigung, dass ich mich einmische. Ich frage mich seit Längerem, ob sich die Leistung eines Objektivs im Laufe der Zeit verschlechtern kann. Ich fotografierte einige Jahre mit einem Canon EF-S 17–85mm, 1:4–5,6 IS USM, und war anfangs sehr zufrieden. In letzter Zeit fiel jedoch auf, dass Personen links in Gruppenbildern regelmäßig unscharf waren. Gibt es dafür eine Erklärung? Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Also dazu kann ich nicht viel sagen weil ich meine Hardware regelmäßig update. Das Geschäft entwickelt sich einfach zu rasant.--Ermell (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Spannender Einwand. Bei mir ist das Problem auch links und es ist auch Canon. Ist aber wahrscheinlich Zufall. Und das fragliche Objektiv habe ich mal gerade etwas länger als 1 Jahr. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-6197709-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-6197708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Bauernhaus-6197704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Fachwerkhaus-6197703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Fachwerkhaus-6197713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hainwehr-6197672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-6197678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 18:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Marter-6197690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Marter-6197691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Marter-6197692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-6197682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litzendorf-Marter-6116993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litzendorf-Marter-6116991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlhausen-Bahnübergang-6055947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Marter-6197715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad, but I think I see some CA on the top left chimney? Can you fix it? --Peulle 13:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 20:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)  Support Looks OK to me now. --Peulle 13:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-6167422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Kapelle-6167448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-6167420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Bamberger-Strasse-6167442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-Kirchturm-47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some chromatic noise in the sky, buit otherwise excellent !--Jebulon 16:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Bauernhaus-167455-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp photo. It might be an improvement to make the sky a bit darker. --Michielverbeek 10:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. Good suggestion, I gave it a try and hope it worked.--Ermell 13:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Bauernhaus-6167454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd crop a part of the sky but anyhow QI --Poco a poco 11:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for reviewing and the hint.--Ermell 13:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-Bahnhof-P6055956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-Kirche-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waischenfeld-Arndthöhe-1170835-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please create/fix the missing category. --XRay 07:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)  Support Category fixed. --XRay 07:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Haus-6167435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Eisenbahnüberführung-6167433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please correct the categorization. --Cayambe 08:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Haus-6167427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 23:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-P6055962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Fachwerkhaus-6167436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Haus-6167428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-6167415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Wohnhaus-6167443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Fachwerkhaus-6167430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 14:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-Bahnhof-P6055958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-Bahnhof-P6055952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Fachwerkhaus-6167429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof-Schlüsselfeld-P6055964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat noisy for only ISO 100 but still  Support good quality IMO. --Code 19:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Fachwerkhaus-6167444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Wohnhaus-6167434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality of the picture is better than the quality of the house.--Famberhorst 15:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Bahnhof-6167414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-6197746-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frensdorf-Kruzifix-6268412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-Marter-6298686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohlmannsgesees-7038947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frensdorf-Scheune-6268408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Kapelle-6167447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühle-6187655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühle-6187668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 09:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-tourist-information-1103416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 11:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenstadt-Town-Hall-1103410-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sambach-Schloss-6268406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapfendorf-Marter-6298684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leaf-veins-7069249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbruch-Kümmersreuth-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruzifix-Hohler-Stein-6187641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, cloudy sky is well done but main object might have been a bit more clear. Quality is high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 14:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-wayside-shrine-6187643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-RAD-lager-6187658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Wohnhaus-6167452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Wohnhaus-6167446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-kruzifix-6197712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zuckerhut--kreuz-1260431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenellern-scheune-6197755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Kirche-6197753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice subject --Poco a poco 11:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frensdorf-Scheune-6268410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitengüßbach-Kapelle-6167450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but improvable. Please see note.--Jebulon 16:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 06:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 08:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiefenellern-scheune-6197754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Gedenktafel-6197724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC) It's tilted in cw direction Poco a poco 17:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-harbor-4070969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sambach-Schloss-6268405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Pferdsfeld-6127175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter-Pferdsfeld-6127173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Kruzifix-6197719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 08:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070909-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birkenreuther Brunnen 1260451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please fix the categories. And please add the name of the stream. Thank you. --XRay 17:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC) Done No name available, too short. Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 22:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Support I think you're right. --XRay 15:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-harbor-4070963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 08:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Rothmannsthal

Rothmannsthal has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reguyla (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-Kruzifix-6197722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 22:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-statue-6197723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Northernmost traffic light in North America, Inuvik, NT.jpg QIC

Thanks for promoting it. Your comment about the unfamiliar light and sky color might be explained by the fact that it was in the Arctic during polar day. The light is coming from the north at that time of day and year, right behind me (see the other image I nominated). I noticed during the two weeks I was up there in the continuous sunlight that, at midnight sun, if the south side of the sky was clear it was usually that lovely shade of blue, or close to it, perhaps because the terminator is not far beyond the horizon. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hy Daniel, that`s what I meant with the time of the day and the light. It appears unreal but it is not. I have been to northern Norway and found similar light situations up there. Regards --Ermell (talk) 07:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retterner-Kanzel-P5063195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Leaning clockwise --A.Savin 16:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 07:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 18:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Altar-Engel-123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice :-( --Cayambe 15:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühler-6187645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 20:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Barockhaus-93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Haus-97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Pfarrhaus-104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Vogtei-106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Fachwerkhaus-111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montevideo-Pferdewagen-1030797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blattadern-wein-P7089798-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful image. --Peulle 13:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Kirche-Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Gruft-6045787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Orgel-6045800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Kirche-6045713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Kirche-6045711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Kreuz-Aussichtsturm-P7038846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Gasthof- Goldener-Anker-54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz--Gasthaus-Zur Schwane-53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Schloss-P6045807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinblatt-P7089806PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Grtek 21:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nice-Cimetière-du-château-4070901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Mühle-6045708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Schlosstor-6045721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Pfarrhaus-6045702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traktor-Fendt-mit-Egge-5022829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, and lack of english description but OK for me Ezarate 20:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Rathaus-6045715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühler-6187648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Verum 19:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Ermell,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebermannstadt-DFS-VT 133001-7109827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-overview-4070945PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-4070924-PanoPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebermannstadt-DFS-VT 133001-7109937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-Schießgraben-101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a very nice view but the photo is a bit too grainy and there is CA in the trees, sorry. W.carter 11:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Tried to fix. Maybe you take a look again. Thanks for the review--Ermell 19:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Amazingly, you actually fixed it! Good enough for me now. :) W.carter 07:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Bildstock-7039125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Bildstock-7039123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Wegkapelle-7039091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit bright in the bottom area, but good quality --Carschten 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Wegkapelle-7039090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments compared to the trees in the background, the chapel semms to be tilted in reality. The interior of the chapel around the statue is noisy (vielleicht kannst du den Bereich noch etwas entrauschen). Overall good for QI. --Carschten 22:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Untersteinbach-Zunftzeichen-7039143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Untersteinbach-Linde-7039134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Untersteinbach-Denkmal-7039136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Marter-Falsbrunn-7039128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubürg-Wonsgehaig-P7100027-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwald-Untersteinbach-Gasthaus-7039142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Neubürg-P7100006-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Neubürg-P7100015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Neubürg-Semence du temps-P7100020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Neubürg-Lebenrad-P7100022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mistendorf-Bildstock-P7241653-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Kreuz-11-Aussicht-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Neubürg-Semence du temps-P7100019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Kreuz--13-Engelhardsberg-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberailsfeld-Steinsäule-7109957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm-Löhlitz-7109967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm-Löhlitz-7109966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waischenfeld-Sägewerk-7109965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe WB is too much on the yellow side, but acceptable. --Uoaei1 15:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-P7109987-Pano-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 14:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Roman Piscina and Hotel Elaphos

I am encouraged by your promotions. Very many thanks for taking the time to help us all take better photos Notafly (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Good photos are always welcome.--Ermell (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-church-P7171162-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but you should check the WB, the picture looks quite yellowish. --Uoaei1 22:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-Aussichtsturm-P7171111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg--Pfarrhaus-P7171109-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mistendorf-P7241716-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you find any proper category? There is no wayside shrine on the picture --A.Savin 18:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Mistake. Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 20:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Good qual. --A.Savin 13:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-church-P7171110-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kemitzenstein-Detail-P6187473-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wonsgehaig-Aussicht-Fichtelgebirge-P7109993-Pano-PS-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-Neubürg-aussicht-P7171128-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-Neubürg-P7171133-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. special mood --Hubertl 20:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-church-P7171172-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberailsfeld-rocks-7109948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberailsfeld-rocks-7109953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkendorf-Kapelle-6157181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohes-Kreuz-Blick -nordost-12-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohndorf-house-6197699-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenmirsberg-steinbruch-P7171126-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesslitz-St.Kilian-109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, okay now! --DXR 10:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Kirchendecke-7313289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit warped but ok --Uoaei1 20:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Ehrentafel-7313302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Tor-7313313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Church-7313311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Ezarate 22:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG Trockenhänge um Pottenstein-P7171207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ühleinshof-Kapelle-7313233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ühleinshof-chapel-7313237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Verum 18:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanndorf-Felsen-7313319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein-Kruzifix-7313231-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein-Gedenktafel-7313229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some spots in the sky, could you remove them? --Basotxerri 17:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 14:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein-Altar-7313209-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Verum 19:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein-Organ-7313224-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Grabplatte-7313309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-7313308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ühleinshof-7313242-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trockenhänge-Pottenstein-7171195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-train-staion-7313136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-train-station-7313131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-Kirche-P8053773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-Kirche-P8053778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-Höfen-P8053775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-Ponsse-P8053659-PS-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-fire-station-P8053767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-train-station-7313138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-Seehaus-P8053765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruderwald-Höfen-P8053771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-Stegaurach-P8053776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Fuchsenhaus-7313116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Mühle-7313123-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höfen-fire-station-P8053769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-station-7313127-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 06:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Haus-7313106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Haus-7313164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Haus-7313153-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Fuchsenhaus-Nebengebäude 7313117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-fire-station-7313140-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a bit noisy, have you applied NR? Could you try with a bit more? --Basotxerri 14:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Done New version.Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Much better now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reifenberg-Backofen-4242372hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wichsenstein-Mariengrotte-7313187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Statue-7313110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Hubertl 01:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Gedenktafel-7313113-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Skulptur-7313115-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Fachwerkhaus-7313152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 07:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Brose-Tony-Cragg-Skulptur-9110119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-050020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-050022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberküps-Kirche-8155756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 05:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)