User talk:Famberhorst/Archive 19

Famberhorst/Archive 5 2017 Vijfde deel.

Famberhorst/Archive 5 2017

vijfde deel van 2017.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Albertina' Flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia View over Val di Venezia from Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I don't know whether there are additional photos on Commons that aren't properly included in Category:Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia, but it's hard to argue that this FP isn't best in scope, regardless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Posto Avvistamento Pian Venezia Information board Val Venezia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peio Paese Authentic house in Peio Paese in the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lago Covel View over Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Looks to be best in scope, although File:Bergtocht van Peio Paese naar Lago Covel (1,839 m) in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië). Lago Covel (1,841 m).jpg was featured, and this photo is currently a QI only. I think it's certainly featurable, though, unless enough judges decide it's too similar to the other photo (which I think it is not). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Bijorewa Loraja' Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Military cemeteries in Italy Information Sign on church and cemetery. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - But not used on any non-Commons page. So if you think that's a problem, consider what to do about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
• I will  Oppose for the sake of discussion. Famberhorst, is there a Wikipedia or Wikivoyage (etc.) article that would benefit from using this photo? If so, please insert it there, so that we can promote this photo to VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Note; the photograph could be placed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Military_locations_of_Italy --Famberhorst (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I've lifted my oppose vote, based on my reaction to User:Slaunger's argument at Commons talk:Valued image candidates. However, I will await a policy decision before actually voting to support this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support as best in scope, following the discussion on the talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Lago di Pian Palù Information about artificial lake Lago di Pian Palù (1800m) in Italy..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Unique in scope and useful, but I'd like to ask User:Archaeodontosaurus whether it would be a breach of procedure for me to support a VI designation for this picture before it's been used on any page outside of Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
• No there is no rule, only common sense. Our work must be useful to the community. The promotion of images that do not serve, devalues the label. If we believe in our images it is easy to find them at least one article where they are useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm not sure it's common sense, because a valuable photo might be used in an article that doesn't exist yet. But I'd also point out that File:Informatiebord over kerk en begraafplaats. Locatie. Kerk van San Rocco met daaromheen de militaire begraafplaats in Peio Paese.jpg, which you supported, is not currently used on any non-Commons page, either. I made a note of that on its VIC page and changed its status to "discussed", and I would suggest that its fate - either promoted or not - should be the same as for this file, if the circumstances don't change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment If people want to promote images that are not used, then they have the opportunity of creating an article, then go for VI status. I'd support a change in the rule to say any VI must be used in at least one Wikipedia article. Charles (talk)

•  Comment - If so, any sister-site article. Wikivoyage and other Wikimedia sites count, too. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

• • •  Comment Yes absolutely --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment the picture could be placed on https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lago_di_Pian_Palù --Famberhorst (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Bornemann's Beste' Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only photo in its category on Commons, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lago di Pian Palù View of Lago di Pian Palù in front of the dam..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lago di Pian Palù Tunnel is the path to the artificial lake..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)  Support --Tiven2240 (talk) 03:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Götenborg'. Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lago Covel Information about the Stelvio National Park on the fragile environment around lago Covel (Italy)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to be unique in scope. Useful. (Unrelated: You left one photo caption in w:Stelvio National Park in Dutch. Someone should translate that.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
  ::Information: We have six mountain hikes made in Stelvio National Park. This was the only time we have such a board encountered. It was at Lake Covel.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Theo Jeukens' Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Rose of Denmark' Flowers and knops..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 16:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Mina Knudde' Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Big Slim' Flower buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Charelke Dop' Flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Helena' flower buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment pods? Charles (talk) 10:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Sorry, flower buds. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Seems useful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Martin Beije' Bud..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Narcissus 'Ice Follies' Flower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This image is already QI and while there's another one in this scope that could IMHO give it competition for VI, I have to give this one the edge. PumpkinSky talk 23:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Henkelly's Consiva' Flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I feel tempted to argue that I like your other image better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Answer: I had it chosen to the number of supply pixels. If desired, I pull this nomination. What do you propose?--Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Sorry, Famberhorst, I forgot to answer. Since you're the photographer of both images, I suppose you've had your good reasons for choosing this one. So I'll support. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Coralle' Flowers and flower buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support as useful, but a lot of these are unopened buds. I think the scope could be better illustrated with a photo of a group of fully opened flowers, and then the buds could be another scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Gartenmeister Bonstedt' Flowers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langweer Bridge over the Slingerrak in the Huiberweg. West side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eucomis montana Inflorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agapanthus 'Windlebrook' flower bud..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support as the nominator took all the pics available, I'll follow his judgement --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agapanthus 'White Heaven' flower bud..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Close-up photographs of Cirsium vulgare flowers flowers and buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxodium distichum (cultivated; knees) Pneumatophore of a cypress..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I'm sorry, I can't deal with that scope, there's too much text.--Peulle (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 Done. Adapted. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support It does look good as a thumbnail.--Peulle (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia 'Twinny' flower buds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - This and the 02.jpg version of the photo are pretty much equally good, so I defer to your opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), budding umbel..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is overly complicated: Of course it's a close-up, how else would you create a useful image of flower buds?. The "beautiful" is something that typically does not belong in a VIC scope at all. On the other hand, it's missing the English name in parantheses. Propose to use the following instead: Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), flower buds. --El Grafo (talk) 09:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done. Corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

• Sorry, mild  Oppose because I think File:Суса́к зо́нтичный ( Bútomus umbellátus).JPG is most useful in this category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
• Counter- Support too keep this open for discussion: @Ikan Kekek: what I like about this one is that it shows the complete en:Inflorescence. What if we changed the scope one more and replaced "flower buds" by "immature inflorescence"? --El Grafo (talk) 06:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I really don't see any substantial difference. Maybe this photo is just slightly further on in the process, but not so that the difference is marked. I really don't see differentiating the scopes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

• What I was trying to say: Your counter-proposal shows a bunch of buds, and might indeed be better suited for such a scope. This one shows the whole inflorescence (= arrangement of flowers/flower buds) and is thus suitable to illustrate that it is organized in an en:Umbel. That seems to be an important feature of this species, as it made its way into the scientific name (B. umbellatus). --El Grafo (talk) 07:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

• OK, I'm understanding now. But then what scope are you proposing? "Butomus umbellatus flower buds in an umbel"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

• "to bud" can also be used as a verb, so why not simply "Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush), budding umbel"? --El Grafo (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

• That makes sense. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

• Famberhorst, would you like to make the scope change El Grafo suggests? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done. Corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

• There's a procedure for changing the scope, but anyway,  Support in the new scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teroele Windmill, southeast side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Looks like the best in scope.--Peulle (talk) 10:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformierte Kirche Praden Kirche Praden South side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment At a second view, I think that criterium 4 is violated (There should be a full and informative description of what the image depicts). The image does not show a "Mountain trip from Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier and Praden towards Tschiertschen." --Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

 Support Good now --Capricorn4049 (talk) 09:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC).

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vögele vehicles Driver's side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vögele vehicles Front. (asphalt tray).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Takeuchi TB216 Picture front and left side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Filippo e San Giacomo Church in Cogolo in the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Präzer Höhi Wooden cross on the ridge between Tguma and Präzer Höhi. West side cross. Looking east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Maybe add the viewing direction? File:Summit cross of Präzer Höhi (Mutta).jpg looks like a VI from the other direction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
   Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It looks like a painting by Friedrich. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Thank you. Small edits to scope. Valuable picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagi Tschiertschen Wood sawing machine, built in 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagi Tschiertschen Detail machine to saw wood construction year 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good detail, best image in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagi Tschiertschen Detail machine to saw wood construction year 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Not used but obviously useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Präzer Höhi View from Präzer Höhi (2119m.) To the north..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagi Tschiertschen Detail machine to saw wood construction year 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and interesting image. Perhaps soon we will have an article in Wikipedia to use it. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scheideggseeli Scheidegg Seeli (2080 meters). View from the north-east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sagi Tschiertschen Detail machine to saw wood construction year 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and very good image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:18, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sarner Alp (1853 meter) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meter) naar Tguma (2163 meter) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit grainy but OK for me. Very nice mood. --Basotxerri 19:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I don't know what happend. I added a note to the image. There are some blue parts between the branches at the right. It looks like a wrong mask during development. --XRay 09:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews. Better now?--Famberhorst 17:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you! :-) --XRay 09:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via de vlinderroute naar Furgglis 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sarner Alp (1853 meter) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meter) naar Tguma (2163 meter) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. why b&w? --Livioandronico2013 08:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC) ::@Livioandronico2013 and Livioandronico2013: Answer: sometimes a photo in color is a bit disappointing. With black white the photo is often more beautiful because then you can insert some drama by making the rain clouds darker.--Famberhorst 17:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sarner Alp (1853 meter) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meter) naar Tguma (2163 meter) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen. Weg tussen Tschiertschen en Molinis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treinstation van Bad Camberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Taunus-Residence in Bad Camberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omkromte Broek, gemeente De Fryske Marren 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen (1350 meter). Zicht op bergen vanaf het balkon van het hotel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 19:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 19:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Middletones IMO little bit to bright (Grass and forest) but perfect White at the Church! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 16:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sarner Alp (1853 meter) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meter) naar Tguma (2163 meter) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit soft. --XRay 08:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC) Note: Thank you for your comments. Do you want me to change the photo?--Famberhorst 16:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment No, I think it is not necessary. Thank you. --XRay 06:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen. Weg tussen Tschiertschen en Molinis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Sarner Alp (1853 meter) via Präzer Höhi (2119 meter) naar Tguma (2163 meter) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Nothing is fully sharp, but that's natural because it's foggy, rainy weather. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtzagerij Sagi Tschiertschen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen (1350 meter) in Graubünden 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen. Weg tussen Tschiertschen en Molinis 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen (1350 meter) in Graubünden 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Runcaspinas naar Alp Farur (1940 meter) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen (1350 meter) in Graubünden 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO tilted CCW or leaning out. Please have a look to the window. --XRay 06:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 07:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)  Support Thank you! --XRay 07:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschiertschen (1350 meter). Zicht op bergen vanaf het balkon van het hotel 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Taunus-Residence in Bad Camberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Taunus-Residence in Bad Camberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Taunus-Residence in Bad Camberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Authentic and warm Colour of Heide (Heidegrass, too)--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 16:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Churwalden Mittelberg (1500 meter) via Ranculier en Praden naar Tschiertschen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Indeed, quality high enough for Q1; Verticals well done and not deformed --Michielverbeek 07:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Forgotten to promote this one --Michielverbeek 07:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Also a Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky a bit blown but the rest is very nice. PumpkinSky 18:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) naar Tschiertschen 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Runcaspinas naar Alp Farur (1940 meter) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weilheim an der Teck. Rathaus, Marktpl. 6, 73235 (Nationales Denkmal) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but I think there is too much sky in the top --Michielverbeek 07:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 16:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Het wad valt droog. Het wordt eb. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The horizon is tilted, please fix. The foreground is a bit unsharp, IMO the image would result better if you cropped out a bit. --Basotxerri 19:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst 06:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC) @Famberhorst: I really don't see any need for withdrawing. The unsharpness in front is only a comment, if you only remove the tilt, I'd like to promote the image. --Basotxerri 18:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC) :@Basotxerri:  Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 06:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) zw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weilheim an der Teck. Rathaus, Marktpl. 6, 73235 (Nationales Denkmal) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image seems slightly tilted clockwise. Could you check that, please? --Basotxerri 18:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 06:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC) OK for me but still a bit noisy (sorry I didn't mention it yesterday). If you can remove a bit or maybe darken the shadows a bit, it would be better. --Basotxerri 16:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 17:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden cross on the ridge between Tguma and Präzer Höhi zw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Voormalig Postkantoor. Midstraat 24-26 (Rijksmonument) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you correct the perspective, please? --Basotxerri 18:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small corrections. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 06:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kroon berk bij tegenlicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herfstwandeling door het Wijnjeterper Schar 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weilheim an der Teck. Rathaus, Marktpl. 6, 73235 (Nationales Denkmal) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Note added.--Famberhorst 05:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, regarding the lighning conditions --Llez 17:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel naar Löser (1680 meter) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. NH kerk- Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke. Midstraat 67 (Rijksmonument) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A shame that the door is renewed in a modern style. --Ermell 07:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Unfortunately!--Famberhorst 07:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:07, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Johann Jaritz: Hi Johann, it seems that you've promoted this one. However, something has gone wrong with your signature. Good quality anyway. --Basotxerri 08:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Thanks for fixing the mess I made anyway, Basotxerri.  Support -- Johann Jaritz 10:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. NH kerk- Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke. Midstraat 67 (Rijksmonument) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kroon van eik in herfsttint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Doopsgezinde kerk. Midstraat 70 (Rijksmonument) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments After adding a cat about the subject --Poco a poco 09:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for adding a category.--Famberhorst 10:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouwsterhaule. Hervormde kerk. Jetze Veldstraweg 31 (Rijksmonument) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouwsterhaule. Hervormde kerk. Jetze Veldstraweg 31 (Rijksmonument) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. NH kerk- Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke. Midstraat 67 (Rijksmonument) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO a Q1 if it would have had a little bit more bottom so I hope you have another version. --Michielverbeek 09:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Answer: I do have other pictures of the tower, but from a different angle.--Famberhorst 17:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Okay I have changed my mind and I am curious to see the other ones, I give a weak  Support --Michielverbeek 21:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. NH kerk- Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke. Midstraat 67 (Rijksmonument) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 19:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Objecten om getijdestromen te beheersen. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great composition and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouwsterhaule. Hervormde kerk, toegangshek. Jetze Veldstraweg 31 (Rijksmonument) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A difficult perspective, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouwsterhaule. Hervormde kerk. Jetze Veldstraweg 31 (Rijksmonument) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Het wad valt droog. Het wordt eb. Locatie, kweldergebied. Locatie Noarderleech 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:46, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. Kerktoren van Westermeer. Geert Knolweg 4 (Rijksmonument) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweer. Hervormde kerk en toren, Oasingaleane 9 (Rijksmonument) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this is OK for QI but you could try to apply a horizontal correction to get the horizontals straight, too. --Basotxerri 21:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst 06:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joure. NH kerk- Hobbe van Baerdt Tsjerke. Midstraat 67 (Rijksmonument) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouwsterhaule. Hervormde kerk, toegangshek. Jetze Veldstraweg 31 (Rijksmonument) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Minor sky parts are overexposed. The perspective works for me (worm's-eye view). --XRay 06:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Alp Farur (1940 meter) via Stelli (2383 meter) naar Gürgaletsch (2560 meter) ZW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is really an unusual image! Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Tschiertschen (1350 meter) via Ruchtobel richting Ochsenalp zw 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teroele. Windmotor bij Troelstraweg 27 (Rijksmonument) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments PumpkinSky 13:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kop Blokslootpolder (Bloksleatpolder) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel zw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berkenzwam (Piptoporus betulinus) op afgebroken berkentak in een natuurlijk biotoop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000-gebied provincie Friesland zw 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. It's the right moment for B&Wphoto and sky is not noisy --Michielverbeek 07:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)