User talk:IamMM/Archive 1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by IamMM in topic Unblock
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IamMM!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Asiyab badi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Asiyab badi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pyrit-with-hematite-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrit-with-hematite-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:1. কান্তনগর মন্দির.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1. কান্তনগর মন্দির.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Hi @Jeff G. and Hanooz: , I was traveling for a few days and now I have the opportunity to explain. First of all, I want to make it clear that Mardetanha is using admin access to harass me. This person has called me Suckpupet six times so far, and I have reminded him on a case-by-case basis that it is rude to repeat false claims, and I have asked him to provide evidence for his claim or to avoid repeating it to destroy my character. Even now, calling me suck master in the commons, despite six previous warnings (plus one complaint on the admins noticeboard and one protest explanation in fawiki vp), is a red line, and I complain about him abusing management access for personal purposes.

If you look at my user page in Meta, you will notice that months ago I warned about the campaign of insulting and harassing Persian wiki administrators led by Mardetanha. He has a personal grudge against me because he allows his friends (including real life friends) to use the Persian Wikipedia environment to insult and humiliate his own critics, and I loudly objected. Even when the administrators of the Persian wiki decided to prevent this practice, he emailed them and wanted them to deal with only one side of the dispute (me) and ignore the personal attacks of the other side, this is exactly what happened!

He mentions that I was shut down on the Persian wiki, but he does not mention that it happened exactly like this block by himself and for protesting the bullying and repeated insults of his friends. He promises in the Persian wiki that if you stop criticizing me and my friends, I will open your account, but at the same time he blocked me in the commons indefinitely and even deprived me of the possibility of editing the discussion page. After months of playing, I'm sure there is no honesty or compassion for the foundation projects in this user 's behavior and speech with me, a pure personal pony. I want a fair review of this case and I have evidence for all my professions.
"
Decline reason: "Per comments below. COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Questions below, which sought to measure against these criteria, were not rhetorical and have gone unanswered. Эlcobbola talk 16:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)"Reply
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

P.s: My only other account that was lost due to password forgetting is User: MMjex and I announced this from the beginning. IamMM (talk) 10:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing I can do but point out that I see no warning or evidence of personal attacks here on Commons.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
thank you. I may not be very familiar with commons rules, but I do not think Mardetanha, who is very involved with me, is allowed to use his access in this case. As I said, there is a personal animosity towards me, otherwise why did he personally act instead of raising the issue on the noticeboard and waiting for a neutral admin to check? And why indefinite? As far as I know, useful users are never blocked forever without warning. Note that the same disaster happened to me in the Persian wiki and deprived me of editing in the native language wiki forever. I want nothing more than a fair review IamMM (talk) 14:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • @Mardetanha: I'm not finding the personal attacks referenced in the block rationale. Could you please provide diffs so we can evaluate this request? This is the only comment critical of others that I see at all proximate to the block (and even then two weeks removed); if that is the edit at issue, I am hard pressed to see it deserving of an indefinite block. Эlcobbola talk 17:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes, main diff is this, This sock master (which claims to have another account but all of sudden forgot its password and even can't retrieve it through his email )was given second chance to edit in fawiki, but he misused this window of opportunity to attacked many users , so he got himself an indef block on fawiki, after the block he brought the same attack to commons, using commons as an stage to attack fawiki, we have been dealing with him for couple of months for now. I think his tone is very clear and evident of what kind editor we are dealing with him, anyhow I have no issued him being unblocked on commons but if he continues such disruptive edits, he might get another indef blocks. Mardetanha talk 07:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm totally okay with checkuser anytime, anywhere. Some very noteworthy points: When Behzad39 a real-world friend of Mardetanha, who lost his admin access to fawiki for violating users' privacy, called an old checkuser (Ladsgroup) a sponsor of MEK (a hated terrorist organization in Iran), I complained to noticeboard and it was here that Mardetanha personally lobbied and emailed the admins to save her friend. In connection with the link you provided, Mardetanha attached the suckpupet charge to user:^^Arsam and blocked him indefinitely with a direct command to Gnosis. User ^^Arsam had rollbacked the Mardetanha edit at the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence (وزارت اطلاعات) before it was blocked. I told Mardetanha on the Arsam talk page that naming suckpupet and blocking users without any evidence is not the right thing to do. He was unhappy, called me another suckpupet and tells a user with four months of life and more than 700 edits, because you know rollback tool, so you are definitely a suckpupet!(See) Eventually, he got stuck with the user and did not even review any of the 7 user unblock requests so far. Elsewhere, in justifying his behavior, he explicitly states, "Every wikipedian looks at newcomers with a suckpupet eye. From the point of view of a real wikipedian, everyone is a suckpupet except himself"[1]
Again, Mardetanha's use of admin access on me to indefinite block is a clear violation of the rules and illegal use of admin access in commons and also fawiki. It should be noted that this suspicion of users and their suckpupet claims depends on how much they criticize him, otherwise he will never recognize you as a suckpupet and block you until you have nothing to do with his performance, even now he has given me a conditional opportunity, open my account for not criticizing him and his friends, I reject that, I am subject to wiki policies not forceful and threatening deals.
I used Google Translate, sorry for any typos in the text. IamMM (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I was inclined to unblock, indeed also per Mardetanha's comments above; however, IamMM may have shot themselves in the foot with the preceding comments. IamMM, you are blocked for personal attacks, and COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Can you explain why you think accusing Mardetanha of collusion, canvassing, meatpupptry, corruption, etc. ("Mardetanha personally lobbied and emailed the admins to save her friend"; "their suckpupet claims depends on how much they criticize him"; etc.) is acceptable? How do you reconcile those claims with COM:AGF? Are you aware that blocks are for "behaviour that has the potential to damage Commons or disrupt its collegial atmosphere"? Do you think such comments are collegial? Why do you think it is appropriate to bring these issues to the Commons? Эlcobbola talk 15:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear @Elcobbola: I am human and have feeling, unfair behavior made me angry. There were many insults against me that were not addressed, for example, they called me "black-hearted" and "insidious" and repeatedly slandered me suckpupet, and finally blocked me indefinitely but did not say anything to the other side.
Anyway, I fully understand what you are saying and I know there is no acceptable justification for such an edit in the commons, I guarantee I will not make any personal attack on the commons and in case of violation, I accept all the consequences. In fact, the edit I was blocked for was done two weeks before I was blocked (February 5).
Whether I was right or not, the fawiki adventures are over for me and I have a great thirst for learning the rules of copyright and constructive participation in a peaceful and respectful commons environment, and I also have good friends here who always help me to be a better editor. IamMM (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I've unblocked you per "I fully understand what you are saying and I know there is no acceptable justification for such an edit in the commons, I guarantee I will not make any personal attack on the commons and in case of violation." We are indeed all human, but be mindful going forward that this is not a venue for venting frustrations or for the importation of sister project issues. Эlcobbola talk 17:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

سلام. شما مشارکت مفیدی در انبار داشته‌اید. حیف است که به خاطر ویکی‌پدیای فارسی خرابش کنید. حواستان باشد در آینده در پروژه‌های خواهر (متا، انبار و...) چیزی ننویسید که تعبیر به تهدیدی قانونی شود (که بندایش سراسری به همراه دارد). Hanooz 17:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Elcobbola: I appreciate your goodwill. I am committed to what I said and Im sure there will be no problem in the future. Thanks again
@Hanooz: سلام دوست عزیزم، شما به بنده بسیار لطف دارید. ماجرا ویکی فارسی برای من تمام شده، اختلافات تند و تیزی وجود داشت اما همه چیز فقط و فقط داخل ویکی‌ها است. تهدید قانونی به خاطر قطع دسترسی؟ چنین کاری جدای بندایش سراسری از لحاظ اخلاقی هم بسیار ناپسند و عبور از خطوط قرمزه، دیگه مایی که در این مملکت زندگی میکنیم بهتر از بقیه نسبت به حساسیت موضوع آگاهیم اگر ویرایشی از من دیده‌اید که چنین شائبه‌ای ایجاد میکند فوراً واگردانی کنید به من هم خبر بدید ببینم چیه ماجرا. حالا اگر جیب یاری کند به زودی دوربین آبرومندی میخرم و خودم با مشتی سوال ناشیانه خدمت خواهم رسید :) ارادتمندم IamMM (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
خواهش می‌کنم. عالی. Hanooz 18:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "IamMM/Archive 1".