User talk:JLPC/Archive 5

-- 13:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

User talk:JLPC/Archive 5

File:Massignac 16 Monument 14-18 2012.jpg

File:Massignac 16 Monument 14-18 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magné 86 Entrée château 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pivoine Chine 2 FR 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Modillon c 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Cathédrale Tympan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but could you reduce the darkness of the shadow please? --Selbymay 12:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC) * Why? No issues with dark areas. Please adjust your TFT. Have a look at File:Calibration-test-black.png . -- Smial 18:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks to you both. New file uploaded nevertheless. I hope this one is better. --JLPC 18:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC) * I would support any version. More opinions? -- Smial 21:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC) No need of more opinions, the new version is better for me. Sorry Smial but it's not a matter of screen settings, just a matter of visibility of the whole tympanum. --Selbymay 22:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose trémière Boutons feuilles 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:03, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Cathédrale ravalement 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verteuil 16 Charente aux Cordeliers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly overprocessed? But nice view anyhow. -- MJJR 21:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Bonne année 2013 !

Cher JLPC,
Merci beaucoup de ton message de bonne année. J'y réponds avec un peu de retard (mes meilleurs vieux vœux ;) mais très chaleureusement, en te souhaitant à mon tour une magnifique année 2013, en photographie comme en tous les domaines de la vie. Bien cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 18:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verteuil 16 Vieille porte&escalier 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image and good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 21:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Armoiries marché 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurat 16 Bar-tabac fermé 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Frise avec modillons 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done : new file uploaded. Slight correction on the othe one. -- Thanks a lot for your help. --JLPC 18:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Chapiteau entrée 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too soft now but much better than earlier and good to go. If you apply the same changes to the candidate on the left I'd promote --Poco a poco 17:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Martial Cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ile Madame 17 Passerelle 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapin blanc FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessac 16 Église fortifiée 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montignac-le-Coq Cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood. --Selbymay 21:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verteuil 16 Oie domestique 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Pierre d'Angoulême (France) (typanum).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalais 16 St-Martial façade arcature droite 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalais 16 St-Martial détail archivoltes 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruelle 16 Mascaron&porte 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Séverin 16 Croix-Cimetière 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanesque church of Civray, tympanum..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Wow! Here is a very good job of captioning.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yviers Église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC) But it looks cw tilted to me. --Berthold Werner 18:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)  Improved--JLPC 21:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Amant Automne 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Châtre (France), statue of George Sand..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Others may disagree, but I would think this might be VI if the scope is the entire monument, but File:La Châtre G. Sand 2.jpg might be a better image if the scope is the statue itself. cmadler (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sare 64 Pietà plâtre 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant Croix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurignac Carrefour D10-D107 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Chapiteau&modillons 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Dock in Juangriego bay.jpg

Very nice review!, I uploaded another version maybe fixed. Please tell me if that's okay or if you can see another comment. thank you very much --The Photographer (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 Mairie 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaysersberg Rue Gendarmerie 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good crop. --Selbymay 19:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Problem with a VI

Bonsoir JLCP,

Sorry for my late reply regarding your problem with a VI. As I understand from the file page history another editor helped fix the problem? Seems like the problem was due to an incomplete signature. Best wishes from Denmark, --Slaunger (talk) 21:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romagne 86 Rideau été 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sare Bb2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, but I am missing sharpness, especially on the sheep in the foreground. Is is due to bad lightning conditions? --Tuxyso 22:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)  Improved. --JLPC 18:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Visibly better. --Tuxyso 22:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Laurent-des-Combes Croix 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I also miss sharpness here. Conditions were optimal, but only few sharpness on the cross. One the tiny artefacts from sharpening there but only less details are visible on the cross itself. Possibly a processing problem? --Tuxyso 22:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)  Improved. --JLPC 18:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC) Sharpness at the cross still not optimal, but remarkably better. IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 22:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mortagne-sur-Gironde 17 Port de plaisance 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray La Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kumquats FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crassula ovata fleurs FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 02:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 65 Rue et toits-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montboyer Bannière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême St-André Fresque 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaysersberg 68 Géraniums 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 65 Vers Glère fromages 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Façade of the Dome of the Rock

Hi JLPC- Thanks for your positive review of my VIS. I noticed that your support resulted in the green border on the review page, but not on the main VIC page. I do not want to attempt to transfer you signature as this would not be proper. When you have a moment, could you see if this is something easy to fix. Thanks in advance. -- Godot13 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 22:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Hôt Montalembert Portail 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irun Plaiaundi Vestiaires 2012 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Jean-de-Blaignac 33 Portail église 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charmant 16 Oratoire 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Félix 16 Arc façade 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow is a bit disturbing, but QI nevertheless.Good quality. --Cayambe 12:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortified church of Bessac, France (exterior)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Meets all criteria; best in scope. cmadler (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Yviers, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 11:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abies alba (European silver fur), conical shape.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support imo all criteria met. -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Arthémy, Blanzac, France (tympanum).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gurat Égl Monolithe1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 19:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tube station Saint-Georges (Paris), entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical door, rue Turenne, Angoulême, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Obezine, Angoulême, France (gable].
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Romagne, Vienne, France. Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arradon 59 Chemin côtier 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Véry Aubeterre 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montmoreau-Saint-Cybard, France (panoramic view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good work, and very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Blanzay, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer 44 Cabines de bain 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise in the sky, but ok --Poco a poco 23:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Foins 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments très bien --The Photographer 17:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Bardine, Angoulême, France (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romagne 86 Mascaron 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer Tétraèdres de plage 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Porte carmes 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight blur at top and bottom but ok. --Mattbuck 07:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nonac 16 Remise et treille 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of a halo but ok. --Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Passirac Mairie 2012.jpg

File:Passirac Mairie 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Montmoreau Monument.jpg

File:Montmoreau Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arradon 59 Marée basse 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arradon 59 La côte près Roguedas 2009b2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 18:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer 44 Chemin 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Martial church (Saint-Martial, Charente), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please give the year of construction (or best approximation) and the architect/builder if known, on the file page or category page. I assume this is centuries old? cmadler (talk) 16:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is obviously very old, but I'd like to see a view of the whole church for this scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
    •  Comment : wrong scope corrected, date will be added as soon as possible. --JLPC (talk) 18:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer 44 Grand blockhauss 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer 44 St-Michel 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Plassac-Rouffiac, France, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Léray 86 armoiries 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Musée trois vitraux 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not perfect but good to go. --Poco a poco 22:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Musée Arcades & chapiteaux 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Galerie Vivienne motifs symb 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment slightly bottom part unsharpness imho, but still QI --Rjcastillo 20:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Clocher 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 19:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Rose id

Thanks, I've added my request there: [1] -- CLI (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grésignac Égl St-Jean2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (although too much denoising IMHO). --Poco a poco 21:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Montalembert, Angoulême, France (portal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment The English description for this file does not make sense; a 19th century portal where someone was born in 1714? cmadler (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Natural language doesn't have unambiguous bracketing. The 19th century is attributed to the portal, but his birth was, by common sense, not in the portal, but in the hôtel, whose age isn't mentioned. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sorry for my English. The hotel was sold by Marc-René de Montalembert to Thibaud Galard de Béarn in 1787. That's why this portal and front wall were built (or rebuilt) a long time after Marc-René de Montalembert's birth. Of course the young marquis wasn't born ouside the hôtel, but inside, which wasn't uncommon in French noble families at the beginning of the 18 th century. -- I hope it's clearer now. Scope modified anyway. --JLPC (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Marc-René de Montalembert's birthplace, Angoulême, France to Hôtel Montalembert, Angoulême, France JLPC 2013-01-31 10:24 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support All criteria met with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, Archaeodontosaurus, for your new vote. --JLPC (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 22:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantôme 24 Église-St-Pierre Arcature 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 64 Vue GR10 Tourmalet 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Rjcastillo 18:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantôme 24 Reposoir détail 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Portique Coutan détail 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantôme 24 Plaque brisée 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malaville 16 Portail église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 19:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fer à charbon 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp at a reasonable size. Category fixed. --Jkadavoor 08:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême St-Pierre Enfeu Guillaume 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Alfred de Vigny, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Parc de Bercy2 arbres & fleurs 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Fontaine détail 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 19:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maubourguet 65 Bicyclette Peugeot 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. --Bgag 23:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montbron 16 Église porte latérale 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now ? -- Thanks for the hint anyway. --JLPC 13:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantôme 24 Porte Eglise 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême St-André Ex votos & fleurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Tuxyso 21:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournesols FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbidium FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job (& thanks for the scale :) --Selbymay 19:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose 3 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nucleus silex FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 19:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Malaville (France), portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauge des prés FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Impatience FR 201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Chapelle-Grésignac (France), Saint-Jean church, ruins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlantic Wall in France (concrete tetrahedras).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Being the only image in a category, is not a real reason for nomination IMO. The image has to have particular value too. This one has.  B.p. 12:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantôme 24 Reposoir 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Tombe Ballard 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit sharp but ok. --Mattbuck 11:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lys détails FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 21:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphné FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

VI Change of Scope

The scope for Thatched-roof villa in the Maldive Islands has been modified. Could you please confirm/reconsider your vote. Thanks-- Godot13 (talk) 21:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nabinaud 16 Église 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kayserberg 68 Colombages 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Fausse ambroisie suite

Merci pour toute cette attention portée à ces productions ! J'ai amélioré le détourage mais laissé quelques bractées, bien qu'elles soient dépourvues de fructifications trop séchées. Ercé (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Armoiries ville XIXe 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 20:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Chapiteau portail 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Bgag 20:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Cadran solaire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meux 17 Fonts baptismaux 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit-Bersac 24 Enseigne 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Façade église détail 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Église façade 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 18:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Palais Brongniart détail 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Château gargouille1 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Fontaine Hôt de Ville 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Jonzac (France), C.O.A. and motto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus blancs FR 2013CA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)