User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive15

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 20, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 20, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 20, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 20, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Royal Palace (Prague Castle), gilding over main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Town Hall (Prague), windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kanał Młynówka, northern part, evening view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spalona, powiat kłodzki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wójtówka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chata Cyborga in Bielice, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
42 Market Square in Ziębice, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
42 Market Square in Ziębice, arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran church in Ziębice, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artificial nails, before being glued.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Info I inserted a "being" into the scope. Doesn't really count as a scope change, imho, but notifying @Medium69: nevertheless. --El Grafo (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok for me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Ziębice, windows and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- WikiPedant (talk) 07:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Ziębice, stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Ziębice, windows.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Ziębice, wooden relief on the door.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 09:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

--Llez (talk) 07:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Nowej Rudzie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Maybe is it a bit more contrast in the sky? but it's Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

to give me the hint for the cut out of the World Ware I - Poster.

I wish you a very pleasent and healthy 2016, with the hope of another year of good collaboration! Thanks for all your friendly promotions and - your very interesting pictures! Greetings from Vienna, Hubertl 10:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please specify species. Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sony Walkman NWZ-S765.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a studio shot at its best, but EV and quality good enough for QI --Cccefalon 13:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Maszyna do szycia Łucznik 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Hi, Jacek We have a problem that it is currently discussing Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list. Since you are the victim it would be good that you give your opinion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 01:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 00:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good now. --Hubertl 11:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 09:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łucznik sewing machines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Walkman, NWZ-S765.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quiet sharp, a good quality --Michielverbeek 00:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dominican monastery in Ząbkowice Śląskie, chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 07:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dominican monastery in Ząbkowice Śląskie, scuplpture of Saint Paul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Rafaell Russell (talk) 12:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dominican monastery in Ząbkowice Śląskie, sculpture of Saint Peter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thank you so much for your wonderful improvements to my photographs of the Interurban Railway Museum and Leonard Pharmacy. I'm at nowhere near your level of ability when it comes to manipulating photos, so I really, really appreciate these major fixes. Please accept this barnstar as a small token of my gratitude. All the best, and thanks again! Michael Barera (talk) 05:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dokument odpustowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 32, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 27, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
34 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
37 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indulgences, document establishing the indulgence to the faithful who visit the chapel of St. Jacob's in parish church in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 11:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica cmentarna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica cmentarna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica cmentarna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 11:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
39 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
40 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Ziębice, corbels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
33 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Paczków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Paczków, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments unknown Object at the roof - see note --Rolf H. 11:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC) This is the end of lightning rod. --Jacek Halicki 11:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Maybe you can try to fix it a little bit, because it looks like a violet CA --Rolf H. 13:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 19:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Thank you - QI now --Rolf H. 03:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality;--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
38 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Suszyna, widok z wieży.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 02:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 02:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 21, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 21, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I annotated it. --Hasenläufer 10:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Now fine. --Hasenläufer 11:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Monitor calibration Michielverbeek

Hi. In my opinion you are wrong calibrated monitor. All your pictures are too dark and look unnatural, dirty colors. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Hello Jacek, thanks for your comment. You are not the first person who is telling me this. I realize this is the way how I develop the raw photos. Since 26 September I am using Photoshop (instead of 100% Lightroom) for changing the colours and I think my photos became a bit brighter; however I won't redeveloped most photos from before that day. Also my unnatural colours might be my style, ..... just like a painting. --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
48 Market Square in Paczków, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Nyska Street in Otmuchow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Otmuchów, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Market Square in Otmuchów, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dokument odpustowy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dokument odpustowy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 25, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 34, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 34, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 39, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 39, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 39, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 03:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 03:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 14:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although a small roof inappropriate culture.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków Brama Wrocławska, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little cramped up, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 i 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 10:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 5 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 5 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 6 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 7 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 7 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.However, I propose a tighter crop at the bottom to avoid a half cut signboard. --Cccefalon 09:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC) --Cccefalon 09:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 7 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 7 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 7 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 8 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 8 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 9 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 9 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 9 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 14 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 16 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bird in the air for me a little distracting, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 14 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 14 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Filtr powietrza DEMCiflex.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Filtr powietrza DEMCiflex.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 20 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Modding komputera 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Modding komputera 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 20 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 20 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 25 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 25 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 25 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 29 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 29 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 27 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 27 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 27 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 28 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 28 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Modding, wires reacting to UV light.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful ... to anthropology. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 31 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 33 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 33 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could use a lick of paint. Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Preview photos 30 January

Hello Jacek, I have nominated two photos for promotion to Q1. You have told me to improve the white balance. I have redevelopped the two photos but I did not get any reaction. So do I get promotion or a decline? Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Oeps......., I forgot to upload new version --Michielverbeek (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 40 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 40 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 44 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 38 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 38 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 39 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 39 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 39 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 44 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 48 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 40 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 43 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 48 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 01:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 44 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 48 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 48 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 RTG stopy z płaskostopiem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, kościół śś. Mikołaja i Franciszka Ksawerego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 09:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zamek 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I believe, that the subject itself is tilted --Hubertl 09:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, park 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, studnia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 4 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the dust spot. Elsewhere good quality. --Cccefalon 09:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two dust spots, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 09:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, ratusz 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 3 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, Rynek 3 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 019.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 020.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 022.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 031.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 032.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 042.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 035.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 027.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 028.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 029.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 030.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)