User talk:Joydeep/Archive 4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
iBall CR222 Memory Card Reader.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 31122014 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 31122014 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorola Moto E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 18:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A Memory Card Reader without cover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 02012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 03012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 03012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A USB Memory card reader without cover.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes patula 05012015 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Over-saturated. --Yann 13:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Reduced saturation. --Joydeep 15:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) OK now. Yann 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes patula 05012015 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Over-saturated. --Yann 13:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Reduced saturation. --Joydeep 15:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) OK now. Yann 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes patula 05012015 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes patula 05012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Over-saturated. --Yann 13:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Reduced saturation. --Joydeep 15:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) OK now. Yann 19:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 31122014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 02012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Hockei 10:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 07012015 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 07012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes erecta 23122014 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's better, though it feels a bit tilted anticlockwise. --Mattbuck 21:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tagetes patula (French Marigold) Flower (Red and Yellow variant).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 07012015 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 07012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia Santa's Helper 09012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:33, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia Santa's Helper 09012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dahlia 'Golden Torch' flowerbud.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 12012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 12012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 'Harlequin' flowerbud 09012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 12012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 09:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 14012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Joydeep! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 16012015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 16012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dahlia 'Harlequin' flowerbud.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Seems good for VI--Jebulon (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 19012015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but first you should cloned out some element. See the note please. --Halavar 13:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done. --Joydeep 14:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 14:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 19012015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but first you should cloned out some element. See the note please. --Halavar 13:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done. --Joydeep 14:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 14:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia flowerbud 9012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 19012015 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 27012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and QI -- Spurzem 08:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia Pollen 27012015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calendula officinalis 27122014 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 19012015 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)