Hello Komencanto, and welcome to the Commons! Please provide more information about Image:Rhossili-RaisedBeach.jpg and other photos you've taken from that book. Where did you get the photo from, on the web (give a link!), or did you scan a printed book? Also, why do you think the book is cc-by-2.5? Could you provide a link to a copyright statement, or some other evidence he actually gave permission? For example, if he sent you an email, you could copy it (with email addresses removed!) to User:Komencanto/Codrington permission email. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 3 July 2005 18:40 (UTC)

Done.

GOOOD ! edit

Image:Sunset in South African national park.jpg It would be although this splendid photography is on the photographs of quatlities. Commons:Featured pictures 80.200.163.198 7 July 2005 15:51 (UTC) I thank google for the translation.

I've added it to the nominations list at Commons:Featured_pictures_candidates#Image:Sunset_in_South_African_national_park.jpg --Komencanto 8 July 2005 01:17 (UTC)

Image:Nowra-BirdsfootDelta.jpg edit

Do you still want to have this photo deleted? What's the name of the replacement? You can either leave me a message or write {{redundant|[[:Image:Name of new photo.jpg]]}} on the image description page. Thuresson 01:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Misnamed pic edit

The picture Image:PortHacking-Sydney-Ria.jpg is incorrectly named. It is in fact the George's River which makes the northern border of the sutherland shire, whilst Port Hacking makes the southern border. Could you please correct this, rename the image tag, inform the owner of the pic and fix any articles that link to it. Thanks Witty lama 09:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image:AIDS_sign_in_Tanzania.jpeg edit

Image deletion warning Image:AIDS_sign_in_Tanzania.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Teofilo (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It concerns all media uploaded under the "Codrington permission". Teofilo (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please help replace this outdated license edit

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Pro-natalist_poster_in_Singapore.jpg edit

 
File:Pro-natalist_poster_in_Singapore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 06:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 16:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:YehliuTaiwan-HoneycombWeathering.jpg edit

 
File:YehliuTaiwan-HoneycombWeathering.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 13:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

21:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

03:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)