Komencanto~commonswiki
Hello Komencanto, and welcome to the Commons! Please provide more information about Image:Rhossili-RaisedBeach.jpg and other photos you've taken from that book. Where did you get the photo from, on the web (give a link!), or did you scan a printed book? Also, why do you think the book is cc-by-2.5? Could you provide a link to a copyright statement, or some other evidence he actually gave permission? For example, if he sent you an email, you could copy it (with email addresses removed!) to User:Komencanto/Codrington permission email. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 3 July 2005 18:40 (UTC)
Done.
GOOOD ! edit
Image:Sunset in South African national park.jpg It would be although this splendid photography is on the photographs of quatlities. Commons:Featured pictures 80.200.163.198 7 July 2005 15:51 (UTC) I thank google for the translation.
- I've added it to the nominations list at Commons:Featured_pictures_candidates#Image:Sunset_in_South_African_national_park.jpg --Komencanto 8 July 2005 01:17 (UTC)
Do you still want to have this photo deleted? What's the name of the replacement? You can either leave me a message or write {{redundant|[[:Image:Name of new photo.jpg]]}} on the image description page. Thuresson 01:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Misnamed pic edit
The picture Image:PortHacking-Sydney-Ria.jpg is incorrectly named. It is in fact the George's River which makes the northern border of the sutherland shire, whilst Port Hacking makes the southern border. Could you please correct this, rename the image tag, inform the owner of the pic and fix any articles that link to it. Thanks Witty lama 09:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:AIDS_sign_in_Tanzania.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
It concerns all media uploaded under the "Codrington permission". Teofilo (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license edit
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
- File:Walkway along Avila Wall.jpg
- File:The Town Wall of Avila.jpg
- File:Countryside view near Alcazar.jpg
- File:Segovia from the top of the Alcazar.jpg
- File:Catedral de Segovia during afternoon.jpg
BotMultichillT 20:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Pro-natalist_poster_in_Singapore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 06:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg edit
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Urban expansion in Dubai.jpeg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:YehliuTaiwan-HoneycombWeathering.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Your account will be renamed edit
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Komencanto. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Komencanto~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed edit
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
03:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)