User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2010/October

photography

you have some very striking images, keep up the good work. cheers WookieInHeat (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

• Sie haben sehr interessante Bilder. Die Bilder sind wirklich sehr gut. Können Sie mir ein Buch empfehlen, damit ich auch gute Bilder machen kann. Ich habe ein Olympus E520. Vielen Dank für Ihre mühe--Gemalmaz ^ileti 06:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Valérie_géry.jpg

File:Valérie_géry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Santosga (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

not my photo --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:10centmonaco2001.gif

You can delete all the images from the series (from here)Ionutzmovie (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Please set DRs, so other users can check this problem, too. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Galerie

Hallo, keine Ahnung, warum es bei Dir nicht klappt - ich kann mir unter Firefox Deine Galerie ohne Probleme anzeigen lassen. Bis es auch bei Dir wieder funktioniert hier der Link - am besten setzt Du Dir den als Lesezeichen. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Danke. Bei mir ist der Kartenreiter verschwunden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerwinkel-101010-18221-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors --George Chernilevsky 07:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerwinkel-101010-18354-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut! --George Chernilevsky 07:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Herzogenriedpark 068.jpg

Thanks for closing this -- I knew that something was being lost in translation, I wanted to keep pushing until we understood it.

I have suggested at User talk:Peter Luschny that he, and perhaps you, might like to improve Commons:Freedom of panorama#Germany to reflect the better translation and knowledge we now have. Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

I will check this later. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I invite you to share this discussion on [1] de.soc.recht.misc Peter Luschny (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Afrika-real-size.png, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 23:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Korrigiert --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:BGWFamily.jpg

Did you intend to keep this one File:BGWHubbaHubbaHwy.jpg?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Didn't I delete it? --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I see it's red now -- sorry for being a little too quick to ask.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

*g* No problem. --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101013-18541-Propsteikirche-Turm-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 10:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

File:COFS.jpg

File:COFS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ 02:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Not my file. --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

You didn't remove the watermark, reduce the border, categorize, and recategorize that file?[2] The consensus of those admins programming MediaWiki:AjaxQuickDelete.js was to notify users who had made such changes to a file - if you disagree, please bring your concern(s) to MediaWiki talk:AjaxQuickDelete.js. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 06:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Take it as a hint to inform the real uploader. (I already did it.) --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101020-18949-Probsteikirche-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hübsches Stimmungsbild mit gut gewählter Komposition. -- Felix Koenig 20:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18718-U.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18722-Harenberg-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Dortmunder U | Ruhr.2010

Wäre es nicht eine gute Idee, alle Bilder zusammenzufassen, die in beide Kategorien gehören? Vielleicht in Category:Dortmunder U (Ruhr.2010)? Dann hätten wir beide Kategorien etwas sauberer und insbesondere Category:Ruhr.2010 nicht so verstopft. -- Ies (talk) 13:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Habe ich auch schon überlegt, aber viele U-Bilder sind vor der Veranstaltungsreihe entstanden. In der Kategorie U würden dann viele Bilder fehlen. Viellleicht trotz Doppelung die U-2010-Bilder als solche zusätzlich unter Ruhr 2010 zusammenfassen oder das Dortmunder U nochmal unter 2010 einhängen, dann könnte die Cat aus den Einzelbildern raus. --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Ähhh, das habe ich jetzt nicht verstanden. Ich würde Category:Dortmunder U (Ruhr.2010) (gibt es nicht einen passenden Eigennamen für die Veranstaltung?) gerne als Unterkategorie von Category:Dortmunder U als auch von Category:Ruhr.2010 sehen. Dann gäbe es keine Dopplungen, nichts würde fehlen, nur alle Bilder die Dortmunder U und gleichzeitig Ruhr.2010 betreffen wären in einer gemeinsamen Unterkategorie. -- Ies (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Axo, mach nur, das hört sich logisch an. --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101020-18980-Friedensplatz-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. French annotations added.--Jebulon 23:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101020-18987-Friedensplatz-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Doesn't the roof need a perspective correction? (not sure) --Jebulon 22:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18826-U-Baustelle-Bagger-cor-Bild-8000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 06:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18725-U-Ostfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18755-U-Ostfassade-Nordstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18754-U-Ostfassade-Spiegelung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-101018-18740-U-Ostfassade-von-unten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 06:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden --Mbdortmund (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)