User talk:Nino Verde/Archive 1

File:View to Moscow river from Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge.jpg

Здравствуйте! Мне очень понравилась ваша панорама с Москворецкого моста, я её выдвинул в кандидаты в избранные изображения. К сожалению, не сразу заметил там нескольких ошибок в склеивании. Если вам интересно, прошу принять это во внимание, а также попытаться подретушировать те места. Спасибо --A.Savin 16:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

• Здравствуйте. Я пробовал переклеивать эту панораму и все эти ошибки не очень хорошо исправляются. Возможно с новыми версиями ptgui у меня и выйдет что-то более приличное, но на это надо время :) А его нет. --Nino Verde (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  Может быть, теплоход получится клонировать с оригинала? Всё остальное уже не так сложно, имо --A.Savin 16:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  Я посмотрел еще, там ошибка склейки только на парапете получается. Пароход такой и есть в оригинале, на нем нет ошибки. --Nino Verde (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  Хм? Сзади он и флаг однозначно выглядят так, как будто кто-то ластиком потёр. Только что ещё одну несостыковку обнаружил: у одного из троих прохожих слева от угловой башни нет головы. Советую всё же попробовать поклонировать. Есть несколько дней, но кандидатуру можно в крайнем случае и позже заново попробовать. --A.Savin 18:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  Пересобрал новым PTGui с масками и залил новую версию. Должно стать получше. --Nino Verde (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

  Действительно, лучше. Спасибо --A.Savin 10:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision history of "User talk:Nino Verde"

Hi Nino Verde, Please do not remove text and warnings from your talk page. You're welcome to archive your talk page. You can have this done automatically for you - simply place {{subst:User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). Yours sincerely --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

• Ok, i'll do. --Nino Verde (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View to Moscow river from Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View to Moscow river from Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HongKong view from Victoria Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and moodful view. --Tuxyso 10:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havana street view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unknown building in Camagüey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukhumi Botanical garden entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment Checked, the image can be used here. This entrance created at 1949. --Nino Verde 15:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diveyevsky Convent bathhouses right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diveyevo church and bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Kungur city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 14:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View to the Big Utrish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 12:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Kanavka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 10:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serafimo-Diveyevsky Convent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK to me, best if sharpened --A.Savin 10:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden horn view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danilishe lake winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Rjcastillo 19:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone town market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kideksha ss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Zaozerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really fond of the crop, but ok --Poco a poco 19:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC) The crop is not good, but it is really hard to find place to photo church and not trees. --Nino Verde 10:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danilishe lake view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support wow, really nice, FPC? --A.Savin 20:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CableCar21 powell end.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedro IV square Lisbon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merdeka Square Malaysia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 13:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Radio Zanzibar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, but the shadows has a bit of noise and chromatic noise (not disturbing IMO)--Lmbuga 00:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cienfuegos town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vieussan, Hérault 05.jpg

You declined this image on grounds of very bad sky. I've tried to improve it, would you take another look? -Christian Ferrer (Talk) 18:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

sure, I'll check it. --Nino Verde (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

him, from mobile phone I cant't see much difference. I'll check it again tomorrow from my laptop. --Nino Verde (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

ok, the laptop view, definitely better. I saw difference, now voted for support. --Nino Verde (talk) 10:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial Jose Marti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havana aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but have you downscaled the image? --Tuxyso 22:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Yes, i downscale images to make them sharper and clearer. When i shoot with 5DmII, the images scaled to 36 cm x 24 cm 300dpi, and this image shot with 300d scaled down to 18 cm x 12 cm 300dpi. --Nino Verde 09:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC) It is always a hot discussion on Commons. IMHO downscaling does not make an image sharper, but reduces information. Everyone can create a smaller image from the original data. I would suggest not to downscale. --Tuxyso 11:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ElTemplete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paseo del Prado Cine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 20:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paseo del prado building 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camara de Lobos lagoon view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks nice for me. :) QI. --Florstein 17:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Consistorial Holguin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really sharp, but useful. --JLPC 17:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostroma in flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not bad --A.Savin 21:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View to Bolotnaya square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Basil and Kremlin wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support wow, really nice mood - some minor tilt on the tower is excusable imo --A.Savin 18:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Basil Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Florstein 17:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Transfiguration (Diveyevo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novodevichy Convent Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not as sharp as I'd wish, but nonetheless very nice --A.Savin 18:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

File:St Matthew's Church - Paisley - Interior - 1.jpg

Thanks for reviewing this for QI. I've reprocessed the image a different way, which has kept the shadows. Could you have another look. Thanks. Colin (talk) 18:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ipatiev Monastery from Volga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 19:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ipatievsky Monastery inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden fire depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 16:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:PW first cd.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PW first cd.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PW first cd.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

MainFrame (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Nino Verde, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Nino Verde, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Church Zelenchuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oversatured green and maybe also yellow IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)  DoneYes, looks like there was yellow tone. Also, played with saturation a bit. Is it done? --Nino Verde 08:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Indeed I think it's better --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durasov Serf Theater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too much processing for my taste, but QI overall --DXR 12:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durasov Palace 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechatniki buildings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durasov Palace 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 23:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durasov Palace Spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyublino pond spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA / Too much magenta. Can be fixed. --Cccefalon 14:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)  Done Is it better now? --Nino Verde 14:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC) Yes! QI for me now. Sorry for delay, I was on holidays during Easter. --Cccefalon 16:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi!

I would like to ask for permission to use your photo of the Metro Manila skyline for an article I am writing. I've read the attribution instructions and it is assured that I will follow. Hope to get a response! :)

* Sure, you can use it. Thanks for asking :) --Nino Verde (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)