User talk:Poco a poco/2016-01

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascensor del Monte de San Pedro, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 130.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Grietas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de Galápagos (Microlophus albemarlensis), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a better crop will give a lot to the picture! --~~~~ I don't see room for improvement of the crop Poco a poco 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)  Support Good enough 4 QI. --Palauenc05 23:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libélula (Tramea sp), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment cut away 50 % on the left and on top and the picture will win a lot! --~~~~  Cropped Poco a poco 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now --Elrond 11:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Have a great 2016. -- Colin (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrega de Premios Wiki Loves, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-05, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 89.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Lázaro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Castle of Alhaurín el Grande

Hola poco, feliz año nuevo! Quería preguntarte sobre esta categoría. El edificio, que parece un castillo, es en realidad un aljibe, por lo que me extrañaría que sea un BIC, pero no he encontrado ninguna información al respecto. Me preguntaba si tú has conseguido alguna referencia. Saludos, tyk (talk) 12:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hola tyk, mis mejores deseos también para ti en 2016! Por lo que pude ver se trata del castillo de la Mota (aunque efectivamente sea un aljibe) y excluyendo los otros dos castillos de Alhaurín el Grande (de los que pude encontrar imágenes o descripciones), llegué a la conclusión de que tenía que ser el Castillo de la localidad. Desgraciadamente no he encontrado una referencia que pueda zanjar el tema al 100%. ¿Qué sugieres? Poco² 17:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Dejémoslo como está entonces. Yo tampoco he podido encontrar nada definitivo. Por descarte es lógico que sea ese. Saludos, tyk (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitad del Mundo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Laugarvatn, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 075.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota negruzca (Larus fuliginosus), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice animal-in-environment shot; could be sharper, though (crop in) --Daniel Case 07:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Wirst du dich da melden? Dann lasse ich es nämlich sein ;) --Ralf Roleček 10:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf, sowie du habe ich kein grosses Problem damit, in ein Flugzeug einzusteigen und irgendwohin für die Bewegung hinzufliegen. Ich bin aber Ende Januar/Anfang Februar wieder für 2 Wochen in Südamerika auf Fototour unterwegs, und kann nicht gleich wieder ein paar Tage darauf schlagen. Wäre diese Veranstaltung Freitag bis Sonntag, dann würde ich es mir überlegen. Das frage ich nach, darüberhinaus, frage ich mich, was ich länger als 2 Tagen unterrichten könnte??. Ich habe die Zeitspanne und das Programm nicht verstanden, und wenn es keins gibt, dann ist das Ganze nicht überzeugend. Poco² 13:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Touzrimounir, thanks for your proposal. I am a person who likes travelling, meeting people, teaching, photography and the free knowledge, so, from that point of view I could be a valid candidate, but the fact that this event is pretty short-term considering that you are asking for 5 days raises some questions: how did you come to 5 days, that is far longer that what I would expect of such an event? I participated e.g. in this event and with one day and a half (Saturday + half Sunday) we managed a bunch of things, and that would sound reasonable to me. Could you please set up a page here in Commons where you answer this question and provide additional information, such like: what level of photography bring the expected participants? how many are they? what is the target of the event? what is the sofar foreseen programme? where is all this happening -one fixed location or several-? is it only theory or also practical exercises e.g. excursions? what is the language of the trainings (we have some good french-speaking photographers here, so if the participants are not fluent in English, you rather need one of them)...If you set up that information page then you can ping those that haven't declined and give them in that way more information. Btw, you should consider arraning 2 people (backup). Regards, Poco² 13:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

thanks for your question, you will find there many answer about your questions here Grants talk:PEG/UG TN/Quality images training --Touzrimounir (talk) 13:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

I have tghe same questions ;) Thanks. --Ralf Roleček 13:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

also the training is theoretical and practical, with medium level photographers, knowing that the training duration is 2.5 days with two days of travel from your country to Tunisia --Touzrimounir (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Touzrimounir, I looked into the grant and checked some flights. I can offer the following schedule: Thursday from Munich 18:20 arriving in Tunis at 23:25 (via Paris CDG) and Sunday from Tunis 17:25 arriving in Munich at 22:30 (again via Paris CDG) with a price (today) just in your budget (500 USD). That means that I could be on-site from approx Friday 9:00 until Sunday 12:30. I don't know to which extend this suits your plans. The big question to me is the language. I speak some French and understand it pretty good but by knowledge is by far not good enough to hold a 2,5 days workshop / training where lots of interaction is required. I could prepare a presentation in French and hold the talks in English (or Spanish / German if that's better), but if that isn't enough you will have to look for somebody else, sorry. As said, we have some quality photographers here from France. Poco² 14:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

I have look because flight from Berlin to Palermo (130 Euro) and Ferry (80 Euro). But i have really ar-0 and fr-0. I think also, a french phptographer is better. --Ralf Roleček 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear @Ralf Roletschek: and @Poco a poco: the training will be in english and about the flight we will find and arrangement --Touzrimounir (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

The arrival of the flight from Berlin via Paris may be at Friday at 23:25 and departure Tuesday 10:40. --Ralf Roleček 19:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna de Yahuarcocha, La Dolorosa del Priorato, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 27-29 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna Lagunillas, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 119-121 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (though garbage in the foreground is unfortunate) --Óðinn 00:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunas de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 12-15 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de San Cristóbal (Microlophus bivittatus), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It`s a tough business to take photos of lizards. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excavaciones, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesús, Plaza de Armas, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de Galápagos (Microlophus albemarlensis), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigua farmacia municipal, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 85-87 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 19:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio, Tulcán, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 70.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 19:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 71.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Ruinas_y_restos_Arqueológicos_del_Cerro_de_la_Concepción

Ruinas y restos Arqueológicos del Cerro de la Concepción has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Nanosanchez (talk) 23:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hola, te he respondido en la página de discusión de la categoría. NO sé si es lo correcto. --Nanosanchez (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roque Agando, Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sádaba, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 61-64 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC) I hate to interfer, but I have to ask a third opinion: This wonderful pano is a composita of at least three images whereas one of them has a considerably different focus which makes me see the image boundaries. --Cccefalon 12:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC) True, the second frame (Uwe, you can figure out the number of frames out of the title) was blurry. I have uploaded a new version (downsized) Poco a poco 14:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Please verify, if the upload was successful. I still see only the initial version. --Cccefalon 14:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Ah, now it is visible. I checked again, and the new frame fits in. --Cccefalon 14:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urna funeraria, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 94.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Bahía Tortuga, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 01:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! León Durmiente, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Paredones, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento al Inca, Plaza de Armas, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 154.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, too much sky. Otherwise, QI. --C messier 17:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Same as C messier --Hasenläufer 19:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Cropped Poco a poco 12:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Now good quality. --Hasenläufer 07:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cementerio de San Diego, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 56-58 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cementerio de San Diego, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 56-58 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Borgarbyggð, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 081.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisajes en las cercanías de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia echios, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, see note --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)  Done, thanks, Poco a poco 16:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorámica cerca de Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 04-07 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Villavicencio, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Bahía Tortuga, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 32.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Bahía Tortuga, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 32.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fragata común (Fregata minor), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 88.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 82-84 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Rosa, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 81.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 99-101 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would like to see this as FPC --Uoaei1 11:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Promised! :) Thank you Poco a poco 11:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 74-79 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 129-131 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco romano, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azanuy, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Plaza de Armas, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 102-104 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagartija de lava de Galápagos (Microlophus albemarlensis), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escolta presidencial, Plaza de Armas, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Partially unsharp, may be movement. And magenta fringes at the gloves at the left man. Please check your image. --XRay 07:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Will rework it shortly Poco a poco 18:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)  Support Better. Thanks. --XRay 07:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Help decide the future of Wikimania

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central térmica, Escatrón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, slightly tilted CW, and the top of the sky needs denoise. --C messier 17:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 12:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 19:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco romano, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Almazán, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcubilla de las Peñas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 81.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 118-120 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 99-101 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Miguel, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 99-101 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañamaque, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 96.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruz en la calle Gil, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 98.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 115-117 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy. --XRay 17:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be nice at night too. --XRay 17:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alconchel de Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegiata, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abión, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adradas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 78.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isla Seymour Norte, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 92.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ablanque, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Magaña, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco romano, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 106.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 21:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco árabe, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carabantes, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frechilla de Almazán, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Perspective correction

Hello again! Please, help me here. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Arion, today was definitely a better timing for this request :) I've uploaded a new version Poco² 15:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anquela del Ducado, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coscurita, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Humilladero, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegiata, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alentisque, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 90.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cihuela, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabolafuente, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --DKrieger 13:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 140.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 24-26 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañamaque, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 95.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --DKrieger 13:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anquela del Ducado, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 140.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Difficult. Very bright, IMO too bright around the animal. May be very sunny. IMO natural surroundings. --XRay 06:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borobia, Soria, España, 2016-01-02, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 126-128 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatuas de San Félix y Santa Régula, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 114.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Top of belltower not as clear as lower portions, but that is to be expected from this perspective. --Michael Barera 02:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 129-131 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 129-131 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baniel, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardallur, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berdejo, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, good--Lmbuga 20:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Búho chico (Asio otus), Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borobia, Soria, España, 2016-01-02, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Possible FP nomination

Hello. I understand you and Diego Delso are the same. I'm thinking of nominating this photo for FP. Would you encourage or discourage me from doing so? I quite like it, but I'm uncertain whether others might nitpick it to death or complain about how the sky looked. What do you think? Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, sure, it's me :). You are welcome to try to get that one through but maybe you'd like to know what was the outcome of this similar FPC. To be honest, when I was standing at that spot I really enjoyed the view, but according that that FPC I didn't manage to bring that feeling over... IF you still think of nominating that one, I can always introduce some slight improvements. Anyhow, thanks a lot for your proposal! I was maybe not that wrong :) Poco² 13:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Ikan and Poco, I like the image for the diagonal lines especially of the lamps and wooden posts. The previous nom had some distracting foreground which took away from the abstract focus on geometry. This pic has too much white sky, which I think you incorporated to try to get the top diagonals to reach the corners (not entirely successfully on the left corner). Can I suggest you take a 16:9 crop of the lower portion to reduce the white sky and get those lamps directly in one's line of sight. -- Colin (talk) 14:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, this is getting interesting. I've uploaded a new version with the crop suggested by Colin. To give to both of you a glance of the whole thing I have also included the window I cropped in the first version. Ikan, Colin, what do you think now? Poco² 17:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Poco. Please give us a link to the new version. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Ikan, I had uploaded a new version of the same file. You'll probably have to clean your cache to see the new version. I just uploaded a second one following a note of Colin.

Colin: I see your point and have tried a new crop which is not exactly the one you suggested but not far to it. What do you both think now among all versions? Poco² 19:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hmm. You cropped another "window blank" off the right which places the converging perspective point closer to the centre. But you weren't central so it just looks like you weren't quite central. Whereas the crop suggestion had that point closer to 1/3 in so making it clear this is a deliberately asymmetrical composition. It also has the same number of blanks on each side, which is again looks deliberate. So, what were you trying to achieve with your variant? -- Colin (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Colin: Two things why I chose this crop, firstly the fact that the picture is getting IMHO too small (17MP from the full version to 8.5MP of the current one, your crop choice has a resolution of maybe 7 MP). I also tried to give to the viewer the feeling that he/she is standing over the "invisible" platform provided by the posts. The 16:9 fix frame made the rest. I've upload one more version holding the rule of thirds, that's a valid point of yours. Poco² 19:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I don't like the cropped version as much because you cut off the top of the structure on both sides. Would you consider a slightly less extensive crop of the top? Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I am afraid that you 2 have different expections about the best crop. I have a proposal, would you Ikan try it in FPC with the version from May 11th and you Colin add an alternative version with the last version (or something similar)? I am curious to see which crop (if any) has more acceptance. Poco² 19:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Looking at that version again, I guess I oppose any crop at all. I can't nominate another photo until my two current nominations (one successful, the other one unsuccessful and withdrawn) are closed, I think. Is there an easy way for me to link to the May 11, 2014 version for the purposes of a FP nom? It might be easiest if that pic and your new version were saved as 2 different filenames. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, I've reverted back to the May version. You can use it now. I checked your noms in FPC and only saw one (Holstentor), which is already over. You can actually start 2 new noms. Poco² 21:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The nom is up. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 135-137 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 63-65 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well lit, good depth of field, and good color balance. - Balon Greyjoy 19:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Búho chico (Asio otus), Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special colours, sharp and good perspective so a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Búho nival (Bubo scandiacus), Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! --Uoaei1 18:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adradas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 79.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afilador, Mercado de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 35.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 35.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Santa Catalina, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 18:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Formaciones rocosas, Selas, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coscurita, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 18:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Magaña, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alentisque, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 91.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antiguo convento de las Siervas de María, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 109.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (The man at the right is a good example that horizontal stripes are not a good choice for beefy men) --Cccefalon 21:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco en la Plaza Alta, Algeciras, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueductos subterráneos de Cantalloc, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support God (sorry, good) quality--Lmbuga 20:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Buzón en Correos y Telégrafos, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 106.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buzón en Correos y Telégrafos, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 106.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Mayor Prioral, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper up top, but we have the doors and the symmetry and that's what matters --Daniel Case 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting angle, in focus --Daniel Case 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise in the ocean, but could be a lot worse at ISO500. Nicely handled. --Daniel Case 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las dos columnas de Hércules - Ábyla y Calpe, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 58-60 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice juxtaposition with the clouds --Daniel Case 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte del Sarchal, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Muley El Mehdi, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 31-33 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañamaque, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 94.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Rocío, El Rocío, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You had me until I saw the CA and unsharpness on the top; I really wish I hadn't had to decline this. --Daniel Case 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)  New version Hey, you don't have to. I think that this version does deserve QI, but I couldn't see any CA Poco a poco 09:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC) OK, better. Daniel Case 17:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro del cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Continental, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good perspective, but I would only remove the most obvious flying birds --Michielverbeek 21:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo del Antiguo Legado Estadounidense, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Jerez, Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Santa Catalina, Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuevas de Hércules, Cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio en la plaza del 9 de abril de 1947, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 69-71 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardallur, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The whites are overexposed, otherwise good. --C messier 18:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 22:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 14:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antecabildo, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 118-120 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeropuerto, Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aldealices, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bordejé, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 74.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio judío, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 33-35 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 06-08 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see what you were trying to do. --Daniel Case 06:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Alcubilla de las Peñas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 82.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Right side leaning in. --Jacek Halicki 23:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 23:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC) * SupportGood quality. --A.Savin 20:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco árabe, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 17:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabina telefónica, Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sala Capitular, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 121-123 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sala Capitular, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 121-123 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)