Image:Mural made by Van Meegeren 1913.jpg

edit
Pay attention to copyright Image:Mural made by Van Meegeren 1913.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Cancre 08:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

edit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content , Kreuger, biographer of Van Meegeren, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

edit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content , Frederik H. Kreuger, biographer of Van Meegeren, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Dag

edit

Dag, welkom hier op de commons. Ik ben een werkje aan het schrijven omtrent eerste indrukken, zwakheden en mogelijke verbeteringen aan de Commons in het algemeen. Daarbij zou ik flink geholpen zijn door de impressies en ervaringen van een nieuwkomer. Ikzelf had al een flinke wiki-ervaring en had nooit licensie of beeldproblemen, dus iedere bijkomende visie helpt me zeer. Dit kan hier of op mijn talkblad. Indien ik ergens kan helpen, dan roep je maar. Beste groet. --Foroa 15:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

En ja, er zijn hier ook een aantal heel vriendelijke Nederlanders. Schijn bedriegt: het is niet omdat User:Deadstar dergelijke lelijke lappen tekst op je talkblad zet dat hij niet aanspreekbaar is: een heel vriendelijke mens. --Foroa 15:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ja, ik ben inderdaad een nieuwkomer op Wikipedia en Wikimedia. Met vallen en opstaan begin ik een beetje te begrijpen hoe het hier toegaat.
Een handleiding met een begin v/e handeling (wat is het doel) een voorschrift (hoe dan te handelen) en een paar waarschuwingen (wat wel of niet kan), zou zeer welkom zijn. Het zou zelfs aanbeveling verdienen om een gewoon papieren boek uit te geven waarin een aantal basishandelingen beschreven staan. Zoals dat ook voor Word bestaat (en vroeger een hele goede voor Word Perfect).

Maar wie, o wie, neemt die moeite?

Maar zelfs een korte beschrijving hoe zet ik een foto op wikimedia en hoe krijg ik hem in een categorie waar hij volgens mij thuishoort zou al heel welkom zijn.
Primasz 21:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Primasz!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Talmudreader by Van Meegeren.jpg

edit

Hi Primasz,
if the reproductions of Van Meegeren-works that you have uploaded are by "Han van Meegeren", they are still copyrighted as he died only in 1947. Copyright lasts +70 years after death = 2017. Of course, if you are his biographer, you could ask his heirs for permission; see Commons:Email templates. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Beachlife by Van Meegeren.jpg

edit
 
File:Beachlife by Van Meegeren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Bluemask (talk) 08:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply