User talk:Pudelek/Archive1
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Yann 21:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
aaaapsik
Frydek Mistek
editEch, burdel tu maja - jak chcesz to to przerzuc, ja na razie niestety nie mam czasu. Pzdr AvantaR 10:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Festung_Krakau_-_Wawel1.JPG
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Festung_Krakau_-_Wawel1.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 08:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
{{English}}, {{Polish}}... => {{en|English text}}, {{pl|Polish text}}...
edit
Hi,
I just wanted to inform you that {{English}}, {{Polish}}... templates are nom deprecated : they should not be used any more.
Instead, you can use the following : {{en|your English text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, etc.
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 10:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 20:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Tytul grafiki
editNiestety na chwile obecna MediaWiki nie obsluguje operacji tego typu. Nalezy zaladowac obrazek pod nowa nazwa, a do starego wpisac {{badname|prawidlowa nazwa.jpg}}. Herr Kriss 17:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ten komunikat znaczy, ze jakis admin skasowal grafike z commons. Herr Kriss 18:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
QI - wyjaśnienia
editSo, propozycje na QI może składać każdy - autor zdjęcia również (tak jest najcześciej). Robi się to za pomocą odpowiedniego szablonu (Nomination). Potem dowolny, zalogowany użytkownik może ocenić czy zdjęcie powinno być QI czy nie. Wyraża to za pomocą zmiany szablonu na Decline lub Promotion oraz opisania i uzasadnienia dlaczego tak uważa (każda ocena musi być uzasadniona). Jeśli ktoś się z tą opinią nie zgadza, wówczas może przenieść zdjęcie do tzw. Consensual Review, gdzie głosuje się w trybie większościowym czy przyznac czy nie, tam też czasami pojawiają się opinie co należałoby zrobić żeby otrzymać QI. Dodam jeszcze, że tak naprawde przez Consensual Review Promotion dostaje mniej zdjęć niż mogłoby się wydawać... Jak masz jeszcze jakieś pytania to mów. Pozdrawiam! --Lestat 13:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 20:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Image:Wölfelsdorf.JPG and Image:Glatz - herb.JPG
editCan you write English description? (Copy from nomination is ok?) Thanks --Beyond silence 23:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I understand you, but if you can write some English at nomination please copy that to the image's summary page! Than other people can read it whoes don't speaking your language. Thanks --Beyond silence 08:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower from Silesia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Zdjecia
editOK, jedno usunalem, a do drugiego dalem NSD. Herr Kriss 12:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glatzer Schneeberg 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Planetarium WPKiW1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Planetarium
editW wielu miejscach widać lekkie przesunięcia - jakby obraz był składany z mniejszych części, niedokładnie dopasowanych. Zobacz np. to: http://wafel.com/tmp/Planetarium_WPKiW.jpg - takie rzeczy są w wielu miejscach. --Leafnode 13:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Teraz tych uszkodzeń nie ma, ale z kolei zdjęcie jest krzywe ;) Jeśli byś poprawił, to zmienię głos na QI. --Leafnode 14:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Wyprostowałem to zdjęcie i przesłałem nadpisując Twój plik - zdaję się nic nie jest pocięte. Jeśli chcesz, to je zachowaj, jeśli nie, to cofnij zmianę. Co do QI - jeśli chcesz wrzucić inne zdjęcie, to lepiej pod nową nazwą i wstawić je od nowa na QI. --Leafnode 14:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tęcza Rysiankia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Planetarium WPKiW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kopernik pomnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Proposal regarding Commons Photographers categories
editHi, You are currently using a Commons Photographer user template on your user page. It has been proposed to redefine the templates and a vote is currently on-going. If interested, I encourage you to participate in the voting process. -- Slaunger 13:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower 2007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QIC: Brona 01.JPG
editHi Pudelek, After the rotation adjustment, I noticed that the image became less sharp. It concerned me enough that I tried rotating the original myself in Photoshop and it retained the sharpness. See here: File:Brona 01 edit - Relic38.jpg. You may want to look into why the rotated version became less sharp.
Feel free to update your nomination with this image if you prefer it.
Best regards,
Darren
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brona 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brona 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brona03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! OL - monument1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QI nomination of Image:Cerkiew w Wierchomli1.jpg
editI saw you've moved your QI nomination of that picture to the "Consensual review" without contesting it so I wanted to tell you that's not a thing to do. If you really contest a review, you must be clear about it. If it's just a wish of other people's opinions, it's not following the rules! Indeed, a non-contested reviewed image is automatically declined or promoted (depending on the review of course). The way you behaved could be seen as a way to break the rules by leaving your picture longer than the rules say. Please try not to do that again. Either you accept a review, either you contest it clearly (which was not the case here). Thanks for your comprehension. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shrine in Beskid Sądecki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ochotz - cementery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muzeum Bierkowice-piwnica XIX wiek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muzeum Bierkowice-kuznia 1726.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Muzeum-Bierkowice spichlerz chlopski XVIII-XIX.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bierkowice Muzeum - dwa wiatraki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isergebirge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isergebirge-view from Heufuder.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Street light-hrad bratislava.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QIBot was confused I think and left this for me. -- carol 12:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
It is actually a little late to be asking this, but are these electric lights? -- carol 12:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Willa w Katowicach.
editWitam! Mam prośbę: czy mógłbyś zobaczyć i powiedzieć co sądzisz o tym zdjęciu i głosowaniu? -> [1] Byłbym bardzo wdzięczny, bo jest nie rozstrzygnięte, a moim zdaniem to dobre zdjęcie... Pozdrawiam serdecznie! --Lestat 21:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wielkie dzięki za Twój głos. Mam nadzieję, że pomoże :-) Pozdrawiam i życzę miłej niedzieli! --Lestat 10:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Street in old town in Bratislava.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gross Iser.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isergebirge Carlsthal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schweizerei am Schneeberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Expedition: Everest picture
editHi Pudelek,
You declined one of my images for Quality Image status because it was tilted. However, I've now fixed the tilt, so I was hoping that you would reevaluate the image. Its nomination is at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#Expedition: Everest. Thanks a lot! bdesham ★ 15:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Silesia - Coat of arms in Breslau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tyldy
editNiestety nie wiem co jest grane z tymi podpisami, ale mam ten sam problem... --Lestat 17:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beskid Żywiecki - winter 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ostrau - ulice 28 rijna in the evening.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Babia Góra - view from Hala Miziowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Kezmarok_CoA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Pudelek 10:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Ostrau_-_ulice28_rijna_in_the_evening.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Miniuni Ostrava - train.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Koribelów-orawa 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karwin-Freistadt - foutain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 14:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larix decidua cone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larix decidua cone - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blekitny kwiatek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Schronisko Kamieńczyk
editWitaj,
Zauważyłem, że Siebrand skasował zdjęcie Image:Kamieńczyk schronisko.JPG jako duplikat zdjęcia Image:Kamieńczyk.JPG, jednak załadowałeś je ponownie. Te zdjęcia faktycznie wydają się identyczne. Jest jakiś cel dla którego obydwa mają być na commons? Pozdrawiam Red 81 08:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shrine in Sudetes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Just a thought - if you could identify the mineral of the alrge rocks at the focus of this picture, its encyclopedic value would shoot up - it would be showing mineral X in its natural environment. It might be granite, but I'm no geologist. Adam Cuerden 01:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think Sandstone - sandstone tends to be muich more layered-looking than that. I could believe some sort of Granite, but thn, that's my default guess for any greyish rock. Adam Cuerden 13:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Who am I to argue, then? Let's add it to articles on Sandstone! =) Adam Cuerden 19:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rocks - Große Heuscheuer..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Małe pytanko
editCześć, mam takie małe pytanko. Nie mówie zbyt dobrze po angielsku, a pod moim zdjęciem nominowanym do QI był komentarz w którym nie rozumiem zdania: "But sadly, these images has serious C/A". Mógłbyś mi to przetłumaczyć, żebym wiedział, co jest nie tak? Z góry dziękuję.--Wisnia6522 09:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
OK, dzięki za pomoc --Wisnia6522 07:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rock Twarożnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question: Is Twarożnik/Tvarožník the name of this rock or omething else? Regards --Berru 20:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Mapa
edit...więc wyślij mi na e-maila lub do "fotosika" tę mapę, na której "wyraźnie" jest zaznaczona granica. Wciąż uważam, że Szczyrk to śląska miejscowość. LUCPOL 21:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Napisałeś "to Oświęcim też jest na Sląsku i Siewierz?" - Oświęcim i Siewierz to byłe ważne śląskie miasta i są tym samym co dla Polski/Małopolski - Lwów. Niby Lwów to ukraińskie miasto, dawniej miasto polskie, obecnie bez polskiej ludności którą wysiedlono, lecz wielu uważa to wciąż za polskie miasto - akurat znajdujące się w obrębie Ukrainy. Siewierz i Oświęcim były zbyt ważnymi miastami dla Śląska aby o nich zapomnieć i się ich (wręcz) wyrzekać. To też nasza historia. To tyle jeśli chodzi o te dwa miasta. Jeśli chodzi o Szczyrk to już tak się przyjęło, że to śląska miejscowość. Tak mnie nauczono, znam wielu co myśli podobnie. Czy to zbieg okoliczności? Nie znam się dokładnie na historii Szczyrku - dlatego nie tworzę tu większych wojen edycyjnych - ale dopóki nie poznam w pełni wiarygodnych źródeł lub map (lub twojej szczerej wypowiedzi - na zaufanie) będę się trzymał mojej wersji. Mimo, że już drugi raz dyskutujemy o Szczyrku to wciąż nie podałeś lat w których Szczyrk znajdował się na terenie Śląska. Zapewne masz mapy Śląska i okolic na przestrzeni 1000 lat, więc możesz sprawdzić, może masz gdzieś jakieś książki gdzie ładnie (i kompetentnie) jest to wyjaśnione. Proszę tylko o tą uczciwą odpowiedź: w jakich latach Szczyrk był na Śląsku. W tej chwili nie wiem czy Szczyrk mam uważać za typową śląską miejscowość czy za odpowiednik Oświęcimia (czyli tylko jakiś okres (jaki?) był na Śląsku). LUCPOL 15:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malá Úpa - Klein Aupa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Śląskie Kamienie - Dívči Kameny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal lock in Oppeln1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal lock in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Universitäts_Brücke_in_Breslau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kamienica pod Siedmioma Elektorami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zobtenberg - hostel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roofs in Breslau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Geocoding
editHello Pudelek, I noticed your recent photos from Oslo, you have many nice shots. It is nice that you geocode them, but there are some things that could be improved. One should preferably use the header parameter to show which direction the photo is taken from. And note that you should geocode the location of the camera, not the location of the object you are photographing. See this diff for an example. Regards, --Kjetil_r 07:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oslo - Christian Frederiks plass.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Guardsmans (Hans Majestet Kongens Garde) in Oslo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roundabout in Oslo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oslofjord - view from beach in Oslo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Haakon_VI_Magnusson_statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ship in Oslo harbour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wooden house in Bryggen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hans Majestet Kongens Garde - soldier-edited.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haakon VII of Norway statue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- It is a QI photo but unfortunately under FOP in Norway the image cant have a free license as FOP doesnt permit commercial use of Artworks where its the clearly the main motive. Gnangarra 15:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Haakon_VII_of_Norway_statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Men at the airport - Pyrzowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Water taxi in Oslo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spiterstulen campsite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trail blazing in Jotunheimen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bergen - Lille Lungegårdsvannet .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image:Bridge over Visa river.JPG
editSorry, I made it wrong not intentionnally when I put the link to the french article. Thanks for the corrections. --B.navez (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge over Visa river.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains - view from Spiterstulen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Visa_valley_in_Jotunheimen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi Marcin,
I did some minor tweaks on your beautiful image. Feel free to revert if you don't like them. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 09:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Stained_glass_in_Saint_Wenceslas_cathedral,_Olomouc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Knut Voles hytte1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Knut Voles hytte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Harbour in Hovedøya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jotunheimen mountains3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Churche in Kvam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! New Opera in Oslo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Planetarium Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Motorboat in Oslofjord.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tower in Tønsberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tønsberg - tower and ruins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Visdalen valley in Jotunheimen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Akershus festning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tower in Tønsberg1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jotunheimen - view from Galdhøpiggen1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castle in Olsztyn1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castle in Olsztyn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tønsbergfjorden in Tønsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reenactors in Austerlitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tram in Brünn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mohyla míru - Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Květná zahrada - galerie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Opolska Wenecja - kamieniczki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arcibiskupský zámek Kroměříž -1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Galdhøpiggen to east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatra 603 MB.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stained glass in Saint Maurice churche, Olomouc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Geocoding
editWitam! Rano miałem mało czasu, ale teraz mogę na spokojnie odpowiedzieć. Szczerze powiedziawszy pierwszy raz spotkałem się z czymś takim jak heading w geocodingu. Rano poprostu porównałem swój do Twojego i zmieniłem tak żeby było podobnie, ale nie o to chodziło... Teraz już chyba obaj wiemy w czym rzecz, ale kurcze... czy to naprawdę jest konieczne... ja myślę, że nie ma co przesadzać. Pozdrawiam! --Lestat (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mühlgraben in Oppeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W51.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Branná.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bøvra river.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hi,
I've tried correcting the tilt of Image:Appartment buildings at Praia da Rocha, Portimão.jpg, could you review it again on COM:QIC?
Thanks, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 09:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! River Bøvra in Lom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Image-Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz)1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Stained_glass_in_Katowice_(Kattowitz).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Branná - nova radnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatra T2 603 Rallye.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Joseph in Neisse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Akershus fortress.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Šternberk, Moravia, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gerulata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
MP
editGościowi się coś pokręciło, ale chyba już zmienił głos... --Lestat (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eingang in Neisse Kathedrale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altvater - OT.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Drogi Pudelku
editDziękując za poparcia oraz za konstruktywną krytykę :-) chciałbym dwiedzieć się jak tam twoje umiejętości lingwistycznej. Pod moim zdjęciem pojaił się komentarz, którego nie mogę zrozumieć: Have you got the allowance to take pictures inside the museum? Może jesteś wstanie mi pomóc? Albertus teolog (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dzięki Wodzu i gratuluję kolejnego QI. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pomnik Harcerzy Września 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żywiec Beskids.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pigeon - sculpture in Ober Lazisk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jesień w Sądeckim3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spiterstulen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bergen - Torget panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jesień w Sądeckim1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Visdalen valley, Jotunheimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathedral in Opole (Oppeln).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Opolska Wenecja nocą1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oppeln by night1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Częstochowa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Thanks for the Christmas review!
editHi Pudelek/Archive1. I would like to thank you for the interest you have shown in my request for adminship, and for the time you have taken to review my profile. As a Christmas present I've just been given the admin tools, for which I'm thankful as well. I have understood all the remarks that have been made during the review period. I will take them into account and begin using the tools with much care, until I gain more experience and self-confidence. Thanks again, and Merry Christmas! --Eusebius (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pharmacy in Plzeň.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chrám svaté Barbory - Kutná Hora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Andrzejówka bufet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Zawołanie
editW rzeczy samej :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 09:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
zdjęcie roku
editSzczerze powiedziawszy jeszcze nie próbowałem głosować, więc nie wiem, ale jak to zrobię i mi się uda to dam znać! Pozdrawiam serdecznie i gratuluję ładnego witraża! --Lestat (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prague Castle Guard - winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jacob's and St. Agnes' Church in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St. Vitus Cathedral - Stained glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chata Skalka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Great photos, Pudelek!
Some color corrections
Featured Picture promotion
edit★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viribus Unitis - stained glass in Kutna Hora.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
GnM
editWitam. Rzuciłem okiem na Twoją galerię, uważam, że robisz genialne zdjęcia. Zgłosiłem jeden z Twoich witraży do Grafiki na medal na plwiki. Poza tym, bardzo mi się podoba ten gwardzista, zamierzasz nominować? Pozdrawiam.--Adi (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Praying Virgin
editHi Pudelek, your image of the praying Virgin statue has been used, with many thanks to you, in a video on YouTube:
Prayer to the Virgin
I hope you like the result.
Kind regards
David
Dwsolo (talk) 20:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moravskoslezské Beskydy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|