User talk:Reda Kerbouche/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fête du Tifeswin a Menâa dans les Aures 2013 - 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fête du Tifeswin a Menâa dans les Aures 2013 - 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) *  Comment even in my house, which is only 100 years old, I have parallelogram issues in different places. --Hubertl 08:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons de Ghoufi, Wilaya de Batna 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soap bubbles in Algerian grassland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments die Überstrahlung paßt hier. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un des anges sur les fenêtres de la cathédrale Pierre-et-Paul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! صورة لنفق القطار.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion en or dans le Musé de Gatchina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Advertising in Saint-Petersburg.JPG

File:Advertising in Saint-Petersburg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 13:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allégorie de l'automne (Bacchus buste dans le jardin d'été).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Hubertl 11:34, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegory of Autumn (Bacchus bust in Summer Garden).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque du pont Malo-Konyushennyy à Saint-Pétersbourg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Caracalla Gatchina palace and estate museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Une des tourelles de la forteresse Pierre-et-Paul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Femme en rose, jardin d'été à Saint-Pétersbourg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophia Charlotte of Hannover (bust in Summer Garden).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me. --Peulle 18:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

You have mail

--Hubertl 17:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manually powered carousel on a playground in Saint-Petersburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaques on Church of the Saviour on the Blood.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! This pictur of Bousaàda 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fishing boats in Jijel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, better now --Hubertl 13:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roses in garden, in Algeria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's a good and sharp image with correct focus, so it's possible to make it a QI, but the description and file name don't make much sense. Please give an accurate description of the image. (I also don't think cropping was neccessary, but it didn't ruin the image, so it's OK.) --Peulle 08:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)@Peulle:  Done.--Reda Kerbouche 06:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Yes, that's OK now. --Peulle 10:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Oran (Médina Jdida).svg

File:Oran (Médina Jdida).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lomita (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Quartier d'Oran (Médina Jdida).svg

File:Quartier d'Oran (Médina Jdida).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Lomita (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Manifestations nationalistes algériens du 8 mai 1945.jpg

File:Manifestations nationalistes algériens du 8 mai 1945.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Daniel*D 10:16, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Tichy (Capritour).jpg

File:Tichy (Capritour).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Houmouvazine (talk) 19:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, Ce n'est pas Capritour. Cette discussion ne changera pas la vérité. — Mouh2jijel ^[Talk] 21:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour si c'est capritour!! J'ai pris cette photos pendant mais vacance a Capritour depuis la plage. je crois pas que la tu est en position de me dire quelle endroit j'ai pris en photos ou pas.--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 05:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

slm

★سلام أخي أنا من الجزاير حبيت نتعرف عليك Nour Alyakine Batoul (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Ibn Khaldun (Casbah of Bejaia, Algeria) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, but still ok --Poco a poco 14:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Ibn Khaldun (Casbah of Bejaia, Algeria with pedestal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Ibn Khaldun (Casbah of Bejaia, Algeria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

contact

salam, win rak ... contacte moi des que tu reçoit le message ... pour wiki con berlin --Bachounda (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Reda Kerbouche,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, Reda Can you add Morocco In participating countries in WLE 2017 here and thank you. --محمد آدم (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Reda Kerbouche, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Zana

Bonjour, je suis historien de la Rome antique et épigraphiste (spécialiste des inscriptions latines), je me demandais si vous auriez une version en meilleure définition de [1] ? Je travaille en effet sur le gouverneur de Numidie qui peut être concerné par cette inscription, je serai intéressé de pouvoir disposer d'une photographie un peu meilleure en définition (et éventuellement qui montrerait aussi l'extrémité inférieure). Cela permettrait peut-être d'améliorer la lecture qui a été proposée dans les années 1930 pour ce texte par Jeanne Alquier. En vous remerciant (y compris pour cette série sur Diana), Rossignol Benoît (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Salut

C'est moi--Marina Shvedova (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

ويكي مساق.svg

السلام عليك. شكرا لك على هذا الرسم الرائع. وددت لو عدلت الملف هذا بجعله يظهر باللغة العربية فقط (أي: مساق ويكي). شكرا لك

--DrFO.Tn (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

.شكرا اخي على الملاحظة حاليا كما قد لاحظت الرسم مستعمل في مشروع مساق ويكي. و لا يمكن القيام بتعديله البتة ربما في النسخة القادمة من المساق السنة القادمة. Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)-شكرا

• شكرًا لك أخي --DrFO.Tn (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Request for Arabic

Would it be okay if you added an Arabic description to File:Bulletin de vote de Abdelaziz Bouteflika 2014.jpg ?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)