User talk:Spurzem/Archive 32

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Henri Pescarolo in 1973, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose The image from 1974 is better. We don't need a scope for every year of someone's life. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Thank you, great master, for your evaluation. In private, I would say more. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Historical view --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment so you now recommend @Archaeodontosaurus: we should have have a scope for every year of some minor celebrity's life? Crazy idea in my opinion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
• As little systematism as possible: each image must remain a particular subject. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
•  ok for me --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: Sanctuary lamp.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pendulum regulator, made by Kieninger, around 1999/2000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water tender based on Mercedes-Benz LK 917 by Ziegler in 1988, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water tender based on Magirus-Deutz Rundhauber, built in 1959.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Detail "Steppenelefant" of Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment We need to have the current recognised taxonomy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

What's going on again? A monument is not a biological textbook. For a while I thought the bullying was going away. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

If you choose to use an obsolete taxonomy, please use correct spelling. @Archaeodontosaurus: Can you advise whether an obsolete taxonomy is suitable for this VI please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

The taxonomy was taken from a 1981 publication by a local archaeologist. In order to avoid a dispute about possible new scientific terms, I have reduced the scope to a neutral formulation. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is out!

Please help translate to your language

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 8,584 images represented on commons in over 92 countries. Kindly see images here

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Gaurav Gaikwad, Communication officer

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Frage? Mercedes-Benz R107

Lieber Lothar, ich habe eine Frage an den besten KFZ Experten den ich auf dieser Plattform kenne. Diesen Mercedes-Benz R107 mit den integrierten Nebelleuchten kann ich nirgendwo finden. Leider habe ich keine Aufnahme von der Rückseite des Autos machen können was vielleicht zur Klärung beigetagen hätt. Hast Du einen Tipp um welches Modell es sich handelt? Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe im Voraus und beste Grüße von Reinhold Ermell (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhold, der beste Kfz-Experte bin ich sicher nicht. Vor allem was Typenkenntnis betrifft, kommst Du bestimmt bei de:Portal:Auto und Motorrad/Typenbestimmung besser zurecht. Ich habe mal bei Werner Oswald nachgeschaut. Demnach ist es, wie Du schreibst, ein R 107, der ab 1985 gebaut wurde. Ob es ein E 30, E 42 oder E 50 ist, lässt sich bei der Frontalansicht wahrscheinlich nicht sagen, es sei denn, dass das Gitter unter der Stoßstange Auskunft gibt. Es sieht nämlich bei dem im Buch abgebildeten Wagen ein bisschen anders aus, da sind auch die Nebelleuchten anscheinend an der Stoßstange befestigt. Doch unabhängig von diesen Fragen: Dein Foto ist wie die meisten anderen hervorragend. Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 11:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Lothar, vielen Dank für die prompte und kompetente Antwort. Da habe ich schon den Richtigen gefragt ;-) Dank auch für die Blumen. Deine Bilder brauchen sich ebenfalls nicht zu verstecken, ausgezeichnet! Herzliche Grüße zurück.--Ermell (talk) 14:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomäus (Kettig) in 2009, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Pankratius (Kaisersesch), view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of Georgskapelle in Karden, built around 1340.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torah scrolls in the Synagogue of Koblenz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Georgskapelle in Karden, built around 1340, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rosenkranzkirche (Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler), built 1899–1901, view from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winegrowing in Treis-Karden: pest control.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good image and only in scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Question: Featured picture candidates for a pictures

Hello, do you think this image could be presented for the Featured picture candidates label? My objective is to give visibility to the superbly restored building. And I am not party to this restoration. Merci d'avance (Google translate). File:Vevey - Château de l'Aile - 2022-06 - 07.jpg. H₂O^(talk) 14:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello H₂O, I haven't participated in FP for a long time because I will not expose myself to nagging. Whether your photo of the castle will be rated positively is difficult to say. I like it, but it can happen, for example, that others say the part of the building on the right in the picture seems too bulky. But try and look what the critics write. Greetings -- Spurzem (talk)

Thanks. --H₂O^(talk) 15:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winegrowing in Treis-Karden: historic wine press from around 1910, exhibited at Karden train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbara-Denkmal (Koblenz) by Georg Schreyögg, overall view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historiensäule in Koblenz by Jürgen Weger, view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Koblenz: Coenen'sches Haus, built in 1713/14.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too wide, there are too many disparate elements, and this image is therefore not representative. --H₂O^(talk) 14:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

I think you are seeing or reading incorrectly. Or may I understand your negative assessment as harassment against me? If so, please tell me why. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Spurzem: The picture must be the most valuable illustration of its kind on Wikimedia Commons (the scope). There are 242 files and 45 subcategories in Category:Buildings in Koblenz. So, I think the scope is too wide to make this picture to be the most valuable illustration of the scope. --H₂O^(talk) 14:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Jmh2o: Thanks for the insightful instruction. But I see only one photograph of the Coenen'sches Haus (home of a Mr. Coenen) in the Commons. I am very surprised that you see this house 242 times. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Sorry, I misunderstood what a scope is. I thought that was the whole category. I undo my review. --H₂O^(talk) 15:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Jmh2o: Misunderstandings can happen. But it seems you're not ready for a positive vote, are you? -- Spurzem (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support (Après les explications) best in scope. --H₂O^(talk) 15:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frame of the central ground floor window of the villa Heerstraße 54 in Vallendar, early 19th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 01:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Heerstraße 54 in Vallendar, early 19th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enamel sign from the office of the formerly independent community Kärlich in the Stadtmuseum Mülheim-Kärlich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basalt cross from 1662 at the church of monastery Maria Martental.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --H₂O^(talk) 15:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Consecration of the altar of the Wallfahrtskirche Maria Martental in 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Very rare historical image. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Veil of Veronica over the old portal of St. Mauritius Kärlich, 15th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Palauenc05 (talk) 22:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of MG B Roadster from 1979, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapelle Am Guten Mann (Mülheim-Kärlich), built in 1838, view from northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of 1968th BMW R 69 S with velocity stack carburetor tuned for racing, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard engine of BMW R 69 S, built in 1963, left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Detail „Bauer mit Pflug“ of the Historienstein in Kärlich, 1985 by Paul Milles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Moselkern: basalt cross from 1766 with sculptures of Jesus and Our Lady of the Seven Sorrows.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monuments in Moselkern: door beside the church covered with copper plates by Adolph Steines 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Question Do you mean next to (beside) the church? "Besides" with an S isn't used for direction but to mean "another thing". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your note. Without the s it should be correct now. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Great. Thanks for the photo and the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain in Mülheim-Kärlich on the Platz Chateau-Renault, detail of crafts: blacksmith, wainwright and spinner by Paul Milles 1985.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles 1985: detail Schöffensiegel (seal of the mayor).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles 1985: detail Kapelle am Guten Mann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sint-Joriskerk (Amersfoort), view from west around 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Image of documentary value. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain in Mülheim-Kärlich on the Platz Chateau-Renault by Paul Milles 1985, detail: carneval.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achim Hütten, Mayor of Andernach from 1993 until retirement in 2022.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
External stairway at the Kaiserpfalz Goslar, view from southeast (1992).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain by Albert Schmitz in Mülheim-Kärlich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Valuable, but scope should include sculptor Albert Schmitz. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done. I feared it would be too much if I would name the sculptor. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment We always have to have creator for a work of art VI. in the street Im Grünen Meer could be dropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

We have several fountains in Mülheim-Kärlich, and the street where they are says more to most readers than the sculptor's name. But since you like it better, I'll leave out the street. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lotus 72D of Emerson Fittipaldi in 1971 at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Simulation of a barn find in the former Automuseum Busch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image crops too much of the subject. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Honorable Charlesjsharp, I missed your devastating judgment and reasoning. Now it's finally here. Sincere thanks! My intention was to give an impression of one part of this beautiful museum and not to present a car. But this was the badest idea I could have. -- Spurzem (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Please note that I have posted [a request for comments] on the behaviour of Spurzem on the main discussion page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would wish to have a better perspective of this. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: I thought the picture gave a good impression of an interesting museum that unfortunately closed a few years ago. I hadn't considered that it wouldn't meet the high demands on image composition in VI. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historienstein Raiffeisenplatz Kärlich by Paul Milles, detail Franz-Josef Pey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems

Following the discussion on the VI talk page I am going to post a complaint on behalf of a number of VI contributors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Spurzem,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please help me with the BMW 502

The photo you made of the 195? Baroque Angel looks a lot like a car I just inherited. Same color, cabrio, 4-door. Not to many of these cars around. I will check the last German registration. If it turns out to be the same car it would be great if I could have a chat with you. Danke! 89.205.140.150 16:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

I am excited. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 10:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Standard, Bj. 1950 (2009-05-01 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-09-08 2655 Borgward Hansa 1800, Bauzeit 1952-1954 (ret).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt 308 LSA, Bauzeit 1991 - 1996 (Spu 2008-08-17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Maria Engelport (2013-07-09 01) Kirche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-04 (9613b) Jaguar SS 100, Bj. 1938.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 350 S, Bj. 1956 (rechts).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Spurzem,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)