Trey314159

Dear Trey314159

I wanted to thank you for putting your picture under the public domain. I used it for the cover of my first publication

Here you can find the book and the cover with your picture: http://www.ilv-edition.com/librairie/pasado-presente-futuro-del-jopara-una-investigacion-mezcla.html

Kind regards azafata

--

Mba'éichapa!

You are most welcome! Interesting that your book is on linguistics, since that is also an interest of mine (I'm a computational linguist by day and a satirical linguist by night). One wouldn't have expected a linguistic connection given that the image is of paraguayan lace.

Thanks for letting me know! —Trey

File:Daniel Everett - cropped and black and white.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Daniel Everett - cropped and black and white.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source image speedy deleted as copyvio

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

> persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

@BevinKacon: Thanks for deleting the copyright-violating file. The history is gone, but I'd just like to point out that the file I uploaded was a good-faith edit of another file uploaded by someone else (which I assume was the original copyright violation). Thanks for keeping Commons in good shape! Trey314159 (talk) 17:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic