User talk:Tuxyso/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Hallo, bin bei der Kategorisierung von Special:ListFiles/Fernost auf dein Bild und die 2. Bildversion gestoßen. Wollte schon {{Split}} reinsetzen aber hab dann gesehen, dass die Bilder identisch sind (Motiv) und es würd vielleicht komisch aussehen (Uploader/Urheber?) Das aktuelle Bild (1. und 3. Version) zeigt ja am linken und rechten Rand weniger als das größere "Originalbild" von Fernost. Hast oder hattest du die größere und weniger knallige Version, die Fernost da einen Tag später als Test hochgeladen hatte, noch woanders stehen? Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Holger1959! Ich kann mich erst in ein paar Tagen um deine Frage kümmern. Ich habe die Originaldateien auf jeden Fall als RAW-Dateien zur Verfügung. Vermutlich hatte ich seinerzeit eine Originalversion zu Demonstrationszwecken in meine private Dropbox kopiert. Warum der Benutzer Fernost die Datei ohne meine Einverständnis (ich kann mich zumindest nicht daran erinnern) einfach hochgeladen hat, weiß ich nicht. Was ist denn genau der Hintergrund deiner Anfrage? Möchtest du selbst einen Bearbeitungsversuch vornehmen? --Tuxyso (talk) 21:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Mir war das nur aufgefallen und ich wollt wissen ob "split" sinnvoll wär (mach ich öfter bei größeren Abweichungen zwischen den Versionen, und eigentlich immer bei wirklich verschiedenen Motiven wenns vom gleichen Uploader ist). Aber es konnt ja auch sein, dass die 2. Version unter anderem Namen vielleicht noch auf dewiki liegt und ich die nur nicht gefunden hab, dann wärs ja überflüssig oder aber die 2. Version könnt auch gelöscht werden. Wir haben natürlich eine Menge Bilder von Zollverein, da kommts auf eine Variante mehr oder weniger nicht so an. Dacht jedenfalls es ist besser dich einfach zu fragen, ob/was zu tun ist. Bearbeitungen fremder Bilder überlass ich lieber anderen, hab ich nicht so das Händchen für. Holger1959 (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anartia amathea 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anartia amathea 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Papilio lowi 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Doelen Hotel Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm Teilansicht 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Theater Schouwburg Het Park 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Purmerends Museum Stadthuis 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Autofähre Dokter Wagemaker in Den Helder 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bus Linie 29 auf Texel 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hervormde kerk, Den Burgh 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junge Silbermöwe im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Autofähre Dokter Wagemaker in Den Helder 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Purmerend Pferderennen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stenenplaats Den Burg Texel 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 02 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Please remember to move the nomination page too while moving the file. Otherwise it creates some strange results. :) Jee 07:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jee! Thanks for your information. I've just forgotten to move the nom page after renaming. I will remember for the next time. Thanks for your work. Kind regards, --Tuxyso (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Egmond aan Zee Leuchtturm 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ford Fairlane Victoria Sedan 1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
I'd like to Reverts Colin for back to version MerveillePédia (adding very little blurry pixels that are interesting). MerveillePédia (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Please keep the photo as it is, MerveillePédia. It became featured in the version without the tiny area at the right and it is a bad idea to recover any previous (non-featured) versions. Accept the current crop as individual decision of the creator (me!). I think it is a bad habit to do reverts without asking the creator as you've done it here. Thus, thanks Colin for the revert of the revert. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung NW 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung NW Crop 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hervormde kerk, Den Burgh Unteransicht 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QICbot confusion
Ich will jetzt nicht auch noch Öl aufs Feuer gießen, aber vielleicht kannst Du Herrn Böhringer mitteilen, dass es auch für einen erfahrenen Commoners mit 14000 Bildern nicht geht, dass er einfach Photos, die bereits in CR sind, einfach nochmals tagesaktuell nominiert. Das kann der Bot überhaupt nicht auseinanderhalten. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Vielleicht schaut sich die ganze Sache mal ein Admin wie z.B. Steinsplitter an. Ich verliere bei der Angelegenheit langsam den Überblick. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- mach ich jetzt nur noch Fehler? Die Bilder wurden vom bot nicht mangels QI entfernt sondern wegen der einseitigen Diskussion die 2 Tage dauerte. Ich kenne auch keine Regel, trotz erfahrener Usertätigkeit, die eine erneute Nominierung untersagt. Ich habe aber kein Problem damit, wenn sie entfernt werden. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Man braucht hier keine Regel, sondern schiere Logik: Wenn eine Diskussion unter CR läuft - und einige deiner Bilder dort haben ja bereits reviews dort - dann werden sie erst abschließend ausgewertet, wenn mindestens 2 Tage nach der letzten Meinungsäußerung jemand manuell den QICresult-Tag setzt. Gleichzeitig wird aber der Bot automatisch zwei Tage nach einem gültigen Oppose oder Support bei den regulären Nominierungen tätig. Das heisst, es kann folgendes passieren: Ein Bild wird in der regulären Review abgelehnt. Gleichzeitig läuft aber noch die CR und - sagen wir mal zwei Wochen später - wird das Bild mit 3:2 Stimmen angenommen. Das ist überhaupt nicht Sinn der Sache. Gewertet wird entweder im regulären Review oder im Consensual Review, aber nicht gleichzeitig in beiden Institutionen. Wenn dafür keine explizite Regel aufgestellt wurde, dann wahrscheinlich, weil bisher noch niemand drauf gekommen ist, dass jemand das Quality Assessment zweigleisig durchlaufen wollte. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- danke für die Erklärung. Ist halt doch ein Urwald,diese Commons. --Böhringer (talk) 12:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- mach ich jetzt nur noch Fehler? Die Bilder wurden vom bot nicht mangels QI entfernt sondern wegen der einseitigen Diskussion die 2 Tage dauerte. Ich kenne auch keine Regel, trotz erfahrener Usertätigkeit, die eine erneute Nominierung untersagt. Ich habe aber kein Problem damit, wenn sie entfernt werden. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Tuxyso, new version uploaded a bit more dramatic... have a nice day.-- Christian Ferrer Talk 12:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 03 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim am Morgen 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haus Ruhrnatur am Morgen 01 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 02 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casino Mülheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stadthalle Schlossbrücke Mülheim am Morgen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo
Tuxyso, hab mir gerade ein paar Bilder auf commons von dir angesehen. Respekt, auch zu deiner Ausrüstung (bes. Objektive). Ich bin auch Nikonianer;-) und hab mir vor 3 Monaten die D800 geleistet (vorher D200), Vollformat hat schon was, die passenden Objektive fehlen mir aber noch. --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Hannes 24! Schön, dass dir meine Fotos gefallen. Mit dem Vollformat liebäugele ich auch schon längere Zeit. Mit dem kürzlichen Kauf der D7100 habe ich mich aber erst mal wieder für längere Zeit dagegen entschieden. "Notfalls" habe ich über einen befreundeten Fotografen Zugriff auf eine D800, die natürlich eine ganz herausragende Kamera ist, Glückwunsch zu dem Kauf! Ich bin allerdings immer noch glühender Anhänger des DX-Formats. Für mich lässt das DX-Format momentan keine Wünsche offen(Ok zwei vielleicht: es gibt momentan von Nikon de facto kein vernünftiges DX-Standardzoom und T&S-Objekive sind nicht sinnvoll an DX nutzbar). Selbst bei verschiedenen Hochzeiten von Freunden, die ich fotografiert habe, bin ich super mit meiner DX-Ausrüstung ausgekommen - mit dem AF-S 85mm f/1.8 und einem gute 2.8er Tele bekommst du auch an DX gute Porträts hin. Richtig begeistert bin ich momentan von dem Sigma 18-35 f/1.8, das eine herausragende Bildqualität liefert - die D7100 ist hinsichtlich ihrer Pixeldichte ja sogar noch eine größere Objektivdiva als die D800 :) Naja eine "FX-Objektivliste" für deine D800 hätte ich schon im Sinn:
- Holy Trinity:
- Nikom AF-S 14-24 f/2.8
- Nikon AF-S 24-70 f/2.8
- Nikon AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 VR II
- Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8 - für sein Geld ein super Objektiv, steht dem 1.4er in der Schärfe nicht nach
- Nikon PC-E 24mm f/3.5
- und noch ein schönes Macro :)
Welche Objektive hast du denn bisher und in welche Richtung möchtest du aufrüsten? --Tuxyso (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Ich hab noch ältere "gute" Objektive, mit denen ich mit FILM fotografiert habe: Nikon 80-200/2,8 ohne AF, 300/4,0, das vorige 24-120 ohne VR, 18-135, 28/2,8, Sigma 400/5,6... Zur D800 hab ich mir als Universalzomm das 24-120/4 VRII genommen, (wenn ich für die Pfarre fotografiere). In letzter Zeit beschäftige ich mich mehr mit Digiskopie (bin auch Amateur-Ornithologe), aber da bekommt man nur Belegfotos (sehr selten gute Aufnahmen - wenn das Licht passt). Ich hab das KOWA 883 + Pana G1+Standardzoom. Aber da gibt es auch schon viel bessere Systemkameras (G4 oder dvon Sony) und Spektive (das neue Swarovski ATX95). Alles sehr teuer;-) Das 24-70/2.8 werd ich einem Kollegen abkaufen, ein lichtstarkes Weitwinkel möcht ich mir auch zulegen. Alles eine Finazierungsfrage lool --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Du bist thematisch ja sehr breit aufgestellt. Deine Liste der Artikel über Adelsgeschlechter ist beeindruckend. Kennst du dich dementsprechend auch gut mit Herladik aus? Ein (nach dem ersten Eindruck) sehr gutes und erschwingliches Tele-Zoom für deinen Vogel-Anwendungsbereich ist sichherlich das nagelneue Tamron 150-600. Ich konnte damit einige Fotos auf der Photokina machen und was insbesondere von der tollen Verarbeitung und Mechanik sehr angetan (ansonsten habe ich eine ziemliche Tamron-Phobie). Hast du dieses schon auf dem Radar gehabt? Wenn du bei Nikon bleiben möchtest wird es leider schnell sehr teuer. Für Weitwinkel wird wohl kein Weg am 14-24er vorbeiführen :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- (sorry, schau nicht täglich hier vorbei) Bei mir ergibt sich immer aus einem Projekt (100 Punkte für Unterbringung dieses Wortes;-) das/die Nachfolgeprojekte (nochmals 50 Zusatzpunkte). Bei mir war es die Pfarrkirche meiner Heimatgemeinde => Franz Anton Pilgram, deren Entwerfer => die Vorfahren von FAP => das Adelsgeschlecht Pilgram => österreichischer Adel + derjenige der Habsburgermonarchie => protestantischer österreichischer Adel um 1620. Da hab ich mich jetzt verbissen. Das ist ein herrlich komplexes Thema. Spannend ist, dass man richtig Detektiv spielen kann/muss, um Zusammenhänge zu finden, da Literatur und Quellen über die evangelisch-österr. Adeligen sehr verstreut sind.
- Ja das neue Tamron soll toll sein. Ich steh normal auch mehr auf Sigma, wenn Fremdobjektiv. --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junge Silbermöve im Flug bei Texel 01 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sint Agneskerk Egmond with shopping Street 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Protestantse kerk Egmond 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung S 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinruhrzentrum Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Eigenwillig
Hi,
schon eine sehr eigenwillige Auslegung, ein klar unterbelichtetes und durch die Wolken sehr schattiges Objekt wie in diesem Bild als FP zu bewerten und im Falle von Schloss Lenzburg wenige Schattenpartien zum Problemfall zu erklären. Übrigens warst du auch der einzige, der die angenehme Herbstsonne für ungeeignet erklärt hat. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Taxiarchos228, wenn du mit meine Einschätzung zu einem Bild nicht einverstanden bist, kommentiere das bitte an passender Stelle und nicht hier auf meiner Talk-Seite. Ich habe einfach keine Lust mehr mit dir zu diskutieren. Deinem Unmut hast du ja (zum wiederholten Male) Luft gemacht. Akzeptiere doch einfach mal, wenn jemand eine andere Meinung hat als du. Bedenke bei deinen (nicht selten überheblichen) Kommentaren, dass die ganze Sache hier ein Hobby-Projekt ist, bei dem der Spaß im Vordergrund stehen sollte und man Leuten auch schnell den Spaß verderben kann. Dazu gehört unter anderem auch, dass man seinen Mitstreitern freundlich und vor allem mit Respekt begegnet, auch wenn man sie (bis auf 4-5 User, deren Bilder man bewundert) allesamt für dümmer hält (bzw. unterbelichteter, um im Foto-Jargon zu bleiben) als man selbst.
Ich bin übrigens kein Herdentier und vertrete eine eigene Meinung, s. z.B. mein Kommentar zu deine Pucki-Nominierung bei den KEBs. Verschone mich zukünftig schlicht mit vagen Vermutungen über mein Abstimmungsverhalten und Motiven, die diesem zu Grunde liegen. Um noch mal auf dein Bild zu kommen, bei dem dich meine Contra-Stimme scheinbar schwer getroffen hat: Mir gefallen deine Schattenfotos einfach nicht. Dabei ist es für mich unerheblich, ob das nun weiche oder harte Schatten sind. Da du dich selbst als Architekturfotograf bezeichnest, wirf mal einen Blick in das wirklich lesenswerte Buch von Adrian Schulz über Architekturfotografie. Dort wirst du nicht ein einziges Bild finden, bei dem die Hälfte eines Gebäudes im (weichen) Schatten liegt. Er setzt auch Schatten und Schattenwurf ein, aber viel gezielter als das bei deinen letzten Schattennominierungen, bei denen ich jeweils mit Contra gestimmt habe, der Fall war. Freue dich doch lieber, dass du wieder ein FP-Siegel mehr hast trotz meiner Contra-Stimme statt dich über einzelne Stimmen aufzuregen. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)- In deinem eigenen Sinn und im Sinne eines gesitteten Umgangs mit mir sei folgendes angeraten: Löse dich von der Vorstellung, ich würde hier irgendwelche Dinge als Unmutbekundung deiner Person gegenüber durchführen. Hätte ich ein generelles Problem mit dir oder deinen Bildern würde ich mich aktuell wohl kaum gegen die Löschung deines Luftbildes aussprechen. Ich habe auch keinerlei Problem damit, wenn stichhaltige Argumente ins Feld bezogen werden oder ein schlichtes "spricht mich nicht an" geäußert wird. Auch Bauchentscheidungen wie diese halte ich für durchaus legitim.
- Womit ich dann aber schon ein Problem habe und das muss ich auch nicht auf der Kandidatenseite thematisieren: Wenn jemand sachlich nachweislich falsche Aussagen trifft um damit seine Meinung zu begründen. Es ist schlichtweg sachlich nicht haltbar, dass mehr als 50% von Hügel und Bauwerk im Schatten liegen würden. Die Bereiche mit Schatten einzukringeln und im Dreisatz das Gegenteil zu beweisen ist mir wahrlich zu blöde. Aber du wirst selbst wissen, dass dein Argument nicht haltbar ist. Dass du hier völlig Banane argumentierst merkt man nicht zuletzt daran, dass du der einzige bist der Schattenpartien zu erkennen glaubt wo keine sind sondern auch daran, dass Colin (als kritischer Bewerter bei FP bekannt) trotz Kontra gerada die herausragende Lichtsituation würdigt.
- Ganz generell: Wo Licht ist, ist auch Schatten und erst das gefällige Wechselspiel von beidem macht ein Bild interessant. Sicher können durchaus auch interessante Objekte komplett ohne Schatten auch punkten. Aber du weißt so gut wie ich, dass gerade in der Architekturfotografie praktisch nie ein Bauwerk ohne irgendeinen Schatten ablichtbar ist. Gerade du, der völlige Schattenfreiheit zu propagieren scheint nominiert übrigens auch Bilder, die sehr häufig zumindest von einem Teilschatten bedeckt werden. Manchmal geht das auf, manchmal nicht. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Im Gegensatz zu deinen Aufnahmen befindet sich "mein" Schatten allerdings auf irgendeiner Wiese oder einem davor liegenden Platz (s. z.B. Aalto-Theater). Warum du dort beispielsweise den Schatten als ernsthaftes Contra-Argument anführst, wenn das Hauptobjekt in toller Abendsonne erscheint, kann ich echt nicht verstehen. Schatten und insbesondere Licht sollte die Aufmerksamkeit auf dein Hauptmotiv lenken - beim Aalto-Theater gelungen, bei deiner Burgaufnahme aus meiner Sicht nicht. Und noch mal: Mir ist es völlig egal, ob andere das auch so sehen oder nicht - es ist eine Meinung von etlichen anderen, also so what? Das Licht deiner Aufnahme mag schön sein, für die Betonung deines Motivs ist es aber unvorteilhaft. Den Begründungen dazu (und den dortigen Hinweisen auf simple Mathematik) ist nichts hinzuzufügen. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Warum schönes Licht und eine klare Aufnahme eines Bauwerks unvorteilhaft sein soll bleibt dein Geheimnis. Beim Aalto-Bau in Essen war es 1. Schlagschatten was sicher nicht als schönes Licht gelten kann und 2. haben mich dort die Mülltonnen massiv gestört. Es geht bei deiner Stimme auch nicht um fehlende Konformität sondern objektiv falschen Tatsachenbehauptungen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Im Gegensatz zu deinen Aufnahmen befindet sich "mein" Schatten allerdings auf irgendeiner Wiese oder einem davor liegenden Platz (s. z.B. Aalto-Theater). Warum du dort beispielsweise den Schatten als ernsthaftes Contra-Argument anführst, wenn das Hauptobjekt in toller Abendsonne erscheint, kann ich echt nicht verstehen. Schatten und insbesondere Licht sollte die Aufmerksamkeit auf dein Hauptmotiv lenken - beim Aalto-Theater gelungen, bei deiner Burgaufnahme aus meiner Sicht nicht. Und noch mal: Mir ist es völlig egal, ob andere das auch so sehen oder nicht - es ist eine Meinung von etlichen anderen, also so what? Das Licht deiner Aufnahme mag schön sein, für die Betonung deines Motivs ist es aber unvorteilhaft. Den Begründungen dazu (und den dortigen Hinweisen auf simple Mathematik) ist nichts hinzuzufügen. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shopping Center Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Interior of Magna Plaza Amsterdam 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of la Asunción, Cómpeta 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Möbel Ostermann Bottrop Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Für das Bild der Erlöserkirche in Mülheim! Aarp65 (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Für das Panorama des Marktplatzes von Heißen! Aarp65 (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zwillingshaus Bad Mergentheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bananenfalter Caligo memnon 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Südafrika-Kronenkranich im Flug 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Südafrika-Kronenkranich Jungtier im Flug 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:St Diego Skyline Panorama 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Diego Skyline Panorama 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Letterboxes Ocotillo Wells 2013 Crop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Letterboxes Ocotillo Wells 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Deutschordensmuseum Bad Mergentheim 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rothalskasuar Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riesenseeadler Walsrode 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwarzkopfsteinhuhn klein und gross Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basstölpel Walsrode Herbst 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reichsburg Cochem beleuchtet 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
New level {{User PH-4}}
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
- Hi Medium69! Thanks for your information regarding new PH-4 template. Is there a (formal) definition for PH-4? PH-4 = a lot of featured pictures, PH-3 = a lot of quality images? Or is PH-4 only for professional, non-hobby photographers? Probably Alchemist-hp can provide additional information who marked himself as PH-4. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- I would say those who believe take professional quality photos. In your case and the various promotions that should be applicable. Sorry my english ; Google is my friend for the translation --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 20:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rieselfelder Stauwehr 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schuhschnabel Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Happy holidays! 2015!
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * * | ||
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot George for your friendly greetings. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EON Ruhrgas Blaue Stunde Winter 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP
I fixed this image. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Super Ruhr-Fotografie!
Mir sind deine Bild aus dem Ruhrgebiet aufgefallen. Ein Lob hierzu! Super Bilder!
--Andreas V. (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Andreas V.! Vielen Dank für dein Lob - das hört man gerne und motiviert mich weiter zu machen. Bist du auch fotografisch unterwegs? Mein schönstes Foto aus dem Ruhrgebiet aus 2014 ist aus meiner Sicht File:Emscherkunst Tanzender Strommast Zauberlehrling 04 Crop.jpg, falls du es schon entdeckt hast.--Tuxyso (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sehr gerne,Tuxyso! Motivation ist immer gut :-) Viele Artikel bedürfen aktuellerer und besserer Bilder. Dein Bild vom Zauberlehrling gefällt mir gut. Du hast aber auch sehr viele andere gute Bilder! Ich bin fotografisch auch gerne im Ruhrgebiet unterwegs. Es gibt so viel zu sehen und abzufotografieren :) Ich habe ein paar Bilder hochgeladen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Eurext --Andreas V. (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gnadenkirche Mülheim Innenraum 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reitstall Heesen Mülheim Winkhausen Hansberg 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick ueber Essen aus Richtung Muelheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fernblick auf Skyline von Essen und Schönebeck 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kennedy-Tower-Essen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Komplettpanorama-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Kleines-Schloss-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Schule-Muelheim-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dom Maria Himmelfahrt Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ortszentrum Schenna mit Pfarrkirche Rathaus und Tourismusbuero 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ortszentrum Schenna mit Maria Himmelfahrt 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Häuserreihe am Waltherplatz 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Innungshaus Haus des Handwerks Mülheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick auf Kuens und Riffian von Schenna 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Passeiertal von Kuens mit Blick nach Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Passeiertal und Meran von Schenna 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Pforte 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Verwaltungsgebäude 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kornplatz Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Obstmarkt Torgglhaus Bozen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Diakonie Kaiserswerth Mutterhaus 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Ifinger Schenna von Kuens 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Johannesberg Cafe Gilf Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ernst Rasche Brunnen Platzgestaltung ohne Titel 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Mülheim Mosaik 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rembergschule Mülheim 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche St. Nikolaus Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stadtgymnasium Meran 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ensemble-Auerstraße-Georgstraße-Mülheim-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick auf Hohe Wilde Texelgruppe 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Ausgezeichnete Arbeit Ermell (talk) 06:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC) |
- Vielen Dank,Ermell für deine Wertschätzung. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Townhall-Essen-2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hafen Los Cristianos von Montana Chayofita 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Obststand-Mercado de Nuestra Señora de Africa 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Mülheim an der Ruhr vom Bismarckturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Club Nautico Puerto Colon von Playa La Pinta 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gruga Kranichwiese und Dahlienarena von Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Essen City von Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schildkröte auf Kubakrokodil Monkey Park 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Caleta Fischrestaurant 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wellenbrecher Strand Los Cristianos von Hafenmauer 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Universitätsklinikum Essen vom Grugaturm 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hermannsdenkmal-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Figur westliche Plattform Hermannsdenkmal 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gedenktafel Hermannsdenkmal Ernst von Bandel 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fischersteg-02-Poelvenn-See-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fischersteg-Poelvenn-See-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glabbacher-Bruch-morgens-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Infozentrum Krickenbecker Seen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glabbacher Bruch 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ronald Mc Donald Haus 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Flootsmühle 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lichtreflexe und Spiegelungen Krickenbecker Seen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GMC-3100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arcen-Castle-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Zeche Zollverein Schacht 12 Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:45:477A:29F3:25F4:3229:3B1F:1EB7 18:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick-ueber-Gruga-vom-Wasserfall-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haus-Ruhrnatur-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Akadamie-Mont-Cenis-Seitenansicht-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luftschutzbunker-Sodingen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sankt-Peter-Paul-Herne-Sodingen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Besucherzentrum-Buitenzentrum-De-Pelen-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-Meerbaansblaak-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skulptur-Schichtung-Grugapark-2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! De-Groote-Pleen-Landschaft-2015-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Silberpalais-Duisburg-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel-Arosa-Ruettenscheid-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|