User talk:Wasiul Bahar/Archive 1

Only two Nominations

Please, you can just add two nominations on Featured Pictures Candidates. Wilfredor (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wilfredor Thanks for mentioning. I will remember this in future. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I let you a note in each nomination too Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wilfredor Should I try again after the two active nomination ended? Wasiul Bahar (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Also please read carefully Commons:Featured picture candidates. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat in Notre Dame college.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! সিরিয়ার দেবশিশু ০১.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 19:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Dhaka Railway Station VIP Gate.jpg

File:Dhaka Railway Station VIP Gate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

QI reviews

Thank you for reviewing some of the images I nominated. I am a bit confused however, that you are asking for a "Wow-factor" for one image, when this is explicitly something that is needed for FI and not for QI. Similarily I am not sure an "ordinary setup" should be considered grounds for rejecting an image as QI. Could I ask you to please reread the image guidelines and reconsider your votes accordingly? Thank you very much, Kritzolina (talk) 19:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kritzolina

Thanks for reaching to me about that. I have rechecked those and have updated some votes. Please let me know if there is any other problems. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for checking the guidelines and changing your votes accordingly. I know I am being a bit testy now, but could you look into it a bit more and change "decline" to "review" when you change your actual vote from decline to neutral? Also please check the Megapixels and not the Megabytes, thank you. --Kritzolina (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Most memorable shot 2022 / Wikimania 2023

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I wish you a Happy New Year! As it has been our tradition at the beginning of the new year for a while, we're sharing our most memorable shots of the past year with each other. I invite you to share a picture that is particular meaningful to you and to describe why that's the case. Also, as Wikimania 2023 will be here before we know it (August 16 to 19), please consider adding your thoughts on our planning page, where we gather ideas for how we can make Commons photography more visible than in the years before.

All the best to you, your family, and friends! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Memorandum at Bangladesh Agricultural University(BAU).jpg

File:Memorandum at Bangladesh Agricultural University(BAU).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Hi, You may be blocked if you abuse multiple accounts. Yann (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello @yann

why do you think that I am abusing multiple account?

Me, my brother and 2 of my friends live in the same place. Me and my brother always use the same pc and we, sometimes share pcs among us. Just for example, in this image, me, my brother and one of my friends, mong is using my pc to complete the organizers' lab course; me and my brother was helping him out in his tasks. You can reach out to the leads or organizers'lab to get proofs of mong's identity.If any kind of proof of our real life identity is needed, we are always ready to provide that. P.S.- you'll find me, my brother and mong in this and this image also.--Wasiul Bahar(talk) 19:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

See Commons:Requests for checkuser#Wasiul Bahar. Yann (talk) 21:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Эlcobbola _talk 15:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, You can request unblocking here. Yann (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I have unblocked you, as per information I received by email. I believe you are in good faith, and the votes on FMC are newbies' mistakes. I suggest you avoid voting for each other's nominations in the future. Yann (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@Yann Thanks a lot for your kind consideration. In future I will be more careful with the COI issues which was confused with meatpuppetry. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cute little boy on book fair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 19:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street photography in bookfair 2023,Dhaka 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 21:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CUET Canteen 3 front window wall painting 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emergency road barrier 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, enter at least one category about what we see here --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco Done-- Wasiul Bahar 16:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Java apple 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Add proper categories --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC) @Fabian Roudra Baroi Done.  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 7.jpg

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—MdsShakil (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 6.jpg

File:National Museum of Science and Technology 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—MdsShakil (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Beauty lachchi.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned lock at Burdhwan House, bangla academy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)