User talk:Andrei Stroe/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Light cone ro.svg is uncategorized since 20 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:RO Roadsign 12A.svg is uncategorized since 25 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Foto 7. Capela din cimitirul satului Marin, judetul Salaj, sfintita in anul 2001.JPG is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Alexandru Burian.jpg was uncategorized on 25 August 2009.
- Image:Anamariaionescu.jpg was uncategorized on 1 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:T-55_kosovo.jpg
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-55_kosovo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:T-55_kosovo.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 |
File:Bradentonpic1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Category moves
Hello. Regarding your category move request, how would you feel about leaving off "The"? I don't think many of our category names begin with "The". Wknight94 talk 16:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
The wooden church
Hallo, I don't think that "The wooden church in xxx" is a correct syntax (only "the" is too much, the rest is excellent). It is "Roman bridge in xxx", "Stone church in yyy", ""ANcient Greek ...", "Gothic church in ...", "City hall ..." ...--Foroa (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Te rog, la încărcarea automată a imaginilor cu biserici de lemn să adaugi şi categoria "wooden church in ..., ...", vezi exemplul recent al bisericii de lemn din Tătărăşti un am adăugat manual a doua categorie, "Category:Wooden church in Tătărăşti, Hunedoara".Albabos (talk) 06:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO BZ Palat Comunal frontal straight cloudy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
File:ChicagoThomasPainewikiMontage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
re: Romanian language upload form
Hi Andrei, I am no longer an admin, so I'm afraid you will need to find someone else to help you with the localisation. You could post a message at COM:AN? cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 08:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata steel pole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
OI nominations
Hi, Andrei Stroe!
Please, add an original user name in QI nominations. It is now fixed.
You can see it as examples. Thanks.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO IF Mogosoaia Palace watchtower 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![89 Fotografie [[:File:PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg|PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg]]](#Fotografie_%5B%5B:File:PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg%7CPS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO VN Marasesti mausoleum 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Offf, andrei
Pînă și aici am probleme cu fișierele frate! De ce ai șters-o? --Ervin C. (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Bildbeschreibung
Hallo Andrei Stroe, wollte von Mircea Țetcu gerade einige Bilder vom Transfăgărăşan hochladen; dabei habe ich gerade gesehen, dass Du es schon getan hast. Ich werde diese (einige) noch beschreiben. Grüße, --Stoschmidt (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Traducere: Descriere de imagini,
Bună seara Andrei Stroie, chiar vroiam să încarc unele imagini de pe Transfăgărăşan de la Mircea Ţetcu, cînd am văzut că d-voastră faceţi asta. Unele din ele am să le descriu şi pe germană. Cam asta a fost scrisul meu în germană, sorry! Numai bine, salutări --Stoschmidt (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO SB Transfagarasan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll put it to good use.—Andrei S. Talk 16:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Perspective correction
Hi, your current quality image nomination has been declined due to perspective distortion. Do you know how to correct it? If not I could create a corrected version and upload it. In my view your image is otherwise interesting and QI-worthy. Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 07:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I can try to correct it, I've done it before. However, I don't have time to tinker with it until tonight or tomorrow night, so if you think you can do it sooner, please do. Thanks for the message.—Andrei S. Talk 07:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Done and moved to /Discuss. Regards from Berlin. --Iotatau (talk) 08:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO DB Targoviste metropolitan church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO DB Metropolitan church bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO DB Chindia Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Category:Arieşeni, Alba
Buna ziua Andrei Stroie, ai deschis inca o categorie la Commons pentru Arieşeni, Alba. Aceasta nu ar fi fost nevoie, pentru ca din 2007 a existat deja categoria Arieşeni. Poate le-poti aduna. Salutari, --Stoschmidt (talk) 20:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Hanescu Davis Cup.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Stakhovsky Davis Cup.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Kretzulescu church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pravoslavnyi_hram_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna2.jpg
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Dolyna2.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv-3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vokzal_u_Fastovi-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Vagon_zluky.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vagon_zluky.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vagon_zluky.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Znak_Paliyu_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shevchenko_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kostel_Fastiv.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Глиняни._Костел_Святого_Духа.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Глиняни._Костел_Святого_Духа.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Глиняни._Церква_УСПІННЯ_ПР._БОГОРОДИЦІ.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Глиняни._Церква_УСПІННЯ_ПР._БОГОРОДИЦІ.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna3.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna3.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna4.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dolyna5.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dolyna5.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Diagrams of route signs in Romania
Hi Andrei, I would like to ask whether I can substitue the your diagrams of road numbers in Romania with the diagrams with correct font (SNV) - which is used in Romanian signage. Thanks for reply. --Rl91 (talk) 15:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sure you can. I couldn't find the exact font at the time. Also, if you would like to redo them, maybe you'll also make the letter smaller (for roads such as 1B), as the Romanian signage is made.—Andrei S. Talk 11:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for permission :)--Rl91 (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! PL DW Wroclaw town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CZ Prague funicular.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HU Budapest Parliament.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi, this QI of yours doesn't show Libellula quadrimaculata but a different species, probably Orthetrum cancellatum. Could you please check/correct this? Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- If you believe the species is different, you can change it, I don't mind.—Andrei S. Talk 14:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is your responsibility to make sure the species is correct, especially since this one is supposed to be a quality image. I cannot surely identify the species from this angle since I am no expert for the dragonflies of Romania. But I can say for sure that this is not L. quadrimaculata since it shows only one spot per wing (compare Libellula quadrimaculata). Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction, I asked for a second opinion and this is indeed probably an aged female of Orthetrum cancellatum. I requested a rename of the file. Sincerely, --Quartl (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO MM Sapanta merry cemetery 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO SV Vatra Dornei railway station 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Cornelchiriac.jpg
also, wie beim bild beschrieben, von WP.ru- über die dortigen lizenzen kann ich nat. gar nix sagen..., wäre schade, wenn´s bild weg wäre!gruß,--Hungchaka (Diskussion) 17:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC),--Hungchaka (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
|
|
File:PL_DW_Wroclaw_cathedral_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B triumphal arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Category names
Hi Andrei! Please look around before you create a new category! „Chimindia“, „Hărău“, „Brănișca“, „Baia de Criș“ had already existed. There is no real need to add „Hunedoara“, these locality names being unique, but now you created duplicates... --Oguszt (talk) 00:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO GR Comana monastery church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Transfagarasan view towards the north from Balea Lake 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO SB Balea cabin clouds 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Renaming of "File:Bistriţa River in Colibita.jpg"
Hi. You have asked for "File:Bistriţa River in Colibita.jpg" to be renamed to remove the diacritical because it is causing some sort of problem at ro.wikipedia. Can you be more specific about the problem? Other language projects do not seem to be having a problem, and it is better for file names to be as accurate as possible. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 05:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. At ro.wp, so far, we've been using the diacritical characters ş and ţ instead of the Romanian ș and ț due to missing font support. Right now, we are switching back and every character in every page is automatically switched between the former set of characters to the latter, unless surrounded by <span lang="tr"></span>. This has an impact on some images that contain these diacriticals in the file name, as they cannot be used in pages. The file whose rename I requested has already been uploaded back to ro.wp as a workaround.—Andrei S. Talk 20:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- I see. Would you like me to rename the file using "ţ" (which I presume is "t" with a cedilla), or just remove the diacriticals altogether? — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 08:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- For sake of simplicity, removing the diacritics altogether would be great. I do that with all the files I transfer to Commons from ro.wp without much loss of file name descriptivity.—Andrei S. Talk 08:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your input. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 19:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO AG Mateias mausoleum 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
|
File:Sanja_papic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
rugaminte
Buna ziua Am o intrebare legata de una dintre imaginile Dvs, va rog sa-mi spuneti o adresa de mail unde va pot contacta, sau scrieti-mi pe adresa design@edituragama.ro Va multumesc
- Dacă e vorba de o imagine a mea de aici, îmi puteţi scrie chiar în această pagină. Dacă sunt chestiuni confidenţiale, vă rog să vă creaţi un cont şi să scrieţi un e-mail folosind linkul din stânga paginii („E-mail this user”). Dacă doriţi să folosiţi o imagine de a mea într-o lucrare, o puteţi face fără probleme în condiţiile licenţei (să scrieţi cine este autorul şi, chiar dacă o modificaţi, să o puneţi la dispoziţie sub aceeaşi licenţă - CC-BY-SA).—Andrei S. Talk 12:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
PI memorization
Andrei:
I have an edit I'd like to make to the table you submitted to wikipedia about PI memorization history. It's not clear to me how to proceed. Can you give me any advice on who to talk to, or how to submit an edit and information?
Regards, Brian iiyt@comcast.net Iiyt (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what edit you're talking about exactly. For hints about editing Wikipedia, see en:Wikipedia:How to edit a page.—Andrei S. Talk 12:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- The graphs and data at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PiDigits.svg were transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by User:Andrei Stroe using CommonsHelper. There also appears to be a bot that is keeping several sites synced. So, it's not clear to me where I should make the change -- wikipedia, wikicommons, some other database elsewhere, or all of the above. I was the record holder at date 1973.75, at 956 digits, and I'd like to get that event recorded in the public domain. Thank you for your continued advice / assistance. <brian
Salut!
Te-am propus ca administrator pe commons aici. Consider că meriţi, eşti destul de ocupat cu ro.wp, însă sunt sigur că-ţi vei putea face treaba şi aici. Io zic să accepţi. Baftă :) Memo18 (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B male and female duck in Titan Park 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO OT Slatina St Nic church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO OT Slatina center from Gradiste hill 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO OT Slatina bridge over Olt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
andrebot
Hi, please check andrebot. As can be seen in File:RO MM Ruscova 3.jpg, it often inserts sequences like |}[[Category:Ruscova, Maramureş]], which makes in many cases that the category is not properly interpreted. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 08:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll look into it, but this image seems ok. Is there any example where the sequence is actually badly interpreted? |} is the end of the ro.wp contributions list. Maybe I should add some newlines in between, and I will, but other than that I don't see the problem.—Andrei S. Talk 08:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- It has probably more to do with the bad interpretation of the categorisation bot. Plenty of examples in Special:Contributions/Haros but I guess that it is related equally to categorisation bot that since a couple of weeks don't count non existing cats anymore as valid categories. To add to the confusion, several "non existing" categories do exist now as they pop up in Special:WantedCategories and get created soon. Anyway, an additional new line before the category would not harm I guess. --Foroa (talk) 09:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO IF Pantelimon Lebada restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Problem
I-am scis un mesaj lui Strainu pe ro, poate poţi rezolva tu. Cezarika1 (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Photos from Romania
Hi Andrei, I see that you are taking many photos in Bucharest, and I was hoping you may be in the position to be able to help with getting photos from Romania as outlined at en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Romania - basically the Russian embassy in Bucharest, and the Russian consulate in Constanta - if you know of anyone in Constanta I could approach for assistance, I'd be most appreciative. Cheers, russavia (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I know where the Russian embassy in Bucharest is and I'll keep your request in mind. In the next week I'll try to go there and snap some photos of some historic buildings in the area, including the embassy (I hope they will let me). About Constanţa, I'm not sure, but you can ask at the Village Pump from ro.wp.—Andrei S. Talk 08:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! PL GMB Malbork castle .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO GJ Tg Jiu Holy Voivods church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Re: Monument tag
Foto is in Category:Malbork Castle and there is a Template: {{zabytek}}. Bartek444 (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Patriarchy belfry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Bucur church 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn St Nicholas church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn city walls towers 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO CL Plataresti monastery church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hala Traian
Hello! Regarding the category of File:Hala Traian (1).jpg, I'm not sure if it's correct to include it in the Markets in Bucharest category. It's true that it used to be a market, but now it is only a Mega Image store. Razvan Socol (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It's fine by me if you want another category. I was just trying to clean up an overcrowded category (Category:Buildings in Bucharest).—Andrei S. Talk 17:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! PL DW old city hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO BZ Pietroasele winemaking research center 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Stavropoleos church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO BZ Courthouse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EE HJ Tallinn Orthodox St. Nicholas church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! BG TX Balchik queen Maria castle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! PL KR Wawel thieves tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
|
Dear Andrei Stroe,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
|
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
rotation tag at File:Manastirea Rameti vara 4.jpg
Hallo Andrei Stroe, you rotation tag at File:Manastirea Rameti vara 4.jpg was incorrect. Please always specify the rotation based on the thumbnails and/or try to use the RotateLink.
By the way: the RotateLink gadget can be translated to Romanian - would you like to help? :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thank you! :-) Is "imagini cerere de rotaţie" correct? Or do you have a better translation for the label/link text: "request rotation"? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:58, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- It should be "Cerere de rotaţie a imaginii" or better just "Cerere de rotaţie".—Andrei S. Talk 07:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! - I have updated it to Cerere de rotaţie. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 18:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Village museum Dumbraveni homestead 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! RO B Patriarchy belfry 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
  and WP:DACIA  to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!
|
... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:Uwlsubst/ro
Hallo Andrei Stroe, thanks for translating Template:Uwlsubst/ro! A question: Did you intentionally not link Commons:Marcaje pentru drepturi de autor instead of Commons:Copyright tags? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, but I'm not sure which would be best. The English language list is far more comprehensive.—Andrei S. Talk 16:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, okay. Then maybe the English is better. The Romanian version is linked at top anyway. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC) PS: no talkback please :)
File:An-124 a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa.jpg
Hallo Andrei Stroe, can you help me? Does the text at File:An-124 a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa.jpg "An-124 la Platforma avioane grele a Aeroportului Internațional București Bǎneasa - Aurel Vlaicu în data de 02.02.2007, poza realizatǎ imediat dupǎ parcarea aeronavei, asteptându-se incarcarea aeronavei LearJet." mean that it is Self-photographed / Own work? I was a bit too fast in transferring it to Commons - I thought I have found a upload by the same user with the same camera (according to EXIF) from a different place but it turned out to be the same place so he simply could have downloaded three images from one source in the internet. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- It means "An-124 at the heavy airship platform of the Bucharest-Băneasa Aurel Vlaicu International Airport on 02/02/2007, picture taken immediately after the airship was parked, waiting to load the LearJet airship." It is implied, apparently, that it was self-taken, but not explicitly stated.—Andrei S. Talk 09:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I think it is assumable then - also was uploaded only 18 days after capture (according to EXIF). However he uploaded also many files which were not by him... What is your feeling? Thanks for your help! --Saibo (Δ) 14:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- My feeling is he didn't know he was supposed to state explicitly that the image was taken by him (it was a dark time in the ro.wp image management). He's providing enough detail as to the circumstances the image was taken to lead me to believe it's his own. Since the image doesn't appear to be taken from anywhere else, I think it's safe to be kept.—Andrei S. Talk 16:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you very much for your comment, Andrei! File:Aerogara_Baneasa_fata.jpg and File:Aerogara_Baneasa.jpg were taken (apparently) with the same camera but some month earlier. Yes, think it is assumable unless there is any other spark of something to the contrary. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Andrei. Would you be so kind to look at File:PaoloBorsellino.jpg and see if you can find further information. At this stage it is more likely to be deleted due to it not being demonstrated as being pre 1976. That being the case, you may look to having the photo undeleted at itWP. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Coa Amara IL RO.png
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coa Amara IL RO.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Prof. Professorson (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:RO GJ Tg Jiu Endless Column park.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
|
|
File:RO_GJ_Tg_Jiu_Endless_Column_park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
 |
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:002 State and party leaders celebrating May 1.jpg
- File:005.Un grup de revolutionari de la Tatar-Bunar din timpul rascoalelor de la 19.jpg
- File:007 - Snagov communist reception.jpg
- File:007 Ceausescu mug shot Targoviste police 1936.jpg
- File:012.La invitatia lui Todor Jivkov, prim-secretar al C.C. al P.C.Bulgar, presedintele Consiliului de Stat.jpg
- File:012.Participants at the May 1st reception in Bucharest.jpg
- File:015.Snagov reception 19650501 Ceausescu.jpg
- File:016.Vacanta-pentrecuta-in-Moldova-1976.jpg
- File:019.Vacanta-pentrecuta-in-Moldova-1976 (1).jpg
- File:025 11th RCP Congress.jpg
- File:025.ddd.jpg
- File:049. 8th UTC Congress.jpg
- File:059. Tito and Ceausescu at the Romanian-Yougoslav friendship meeting.jpg
- File:105 Red Army soldiers in Bucharest 1.jpg
- File:303 Plecarea spre tara a lui Wladislaw.jpg
- File:367 Prezentarea scrisorilor de acreditate.jpg
- File:381. Gheorghiu Dej birthday.jpg
- File:382. Gheorghiu Dej 60th birthday.jpg
- File:420 Conducatorii de partid si de stat.jpg
- File:545.Ceausescu family.jpg
- File:Adunare Piaţa Palatului August 1968.jpg
- File:CeausescuKim1971.jpg
- File:Dej cropped.jpg
- File:E165 meeting with agricultural workers.jpg
- File:E395 End of collectivization meeting medals.jpg
- File:Elena Ceausescu portrait.jpg
- File:Genscher-Ceausescu.jpg
- File:IICCR 017 Romanian communist leaflet.jpg
- File:IICCR A273 Communist party leaders Gheorgheni.jpg
- File:IICCR A472 Communist leaders Marasesti monument.jpg
- File:IICCR A473 Communist leaders Marasesti mausoleum.jpg
- File:IICCR B001 Romanian participants October Russian revolution 1917.jpg
- File:IICCR B006 Tatarbunary peasants.jpg
- File:IICCR B007 Tatarbunary peasants.jpg
- File:IICCR BA269 Mladenov Ceausescu 1978.jpg
- File:IICCR C022 Stoica and Apostol greeting Red Army.jpg
- File:IICCR C057 Red Army Bucharest.jpg
- File:IICCR D036 Alexandru Moghioros.jpg
- File:IICCR DA023 Craiova prison Dej Stoica Vasilichi Doncea Petrescu Rozemberg.jpg
- File:IICCR E428 Ceausescu visiting agricultural farm 1963.jpg
- File:IICCR FA007 Dej Patrascanu Georgescu Ralea.jpg
- File:IICCR FA147 Dej Nicodim Mihai I reception.jpg
- File:IICCR FA186 Dej post 1946 elections meeting.jpg
- File:IICCR G005 May 1st rally in Bucharest.jpg
- File:IICCR G023 Gyanendra arriving in Romania.jpg
- File:IICCR G027 Chivu Stoica and Gyanendra.jpg
- File:IICCR G148 Ceausescu in Sighisoara.jpg
- File:IICCR G156 Ceausescu in Sibiu.jpg
- File:IICCR G240 Ceausescu Coanda crop.jpg
- File:IICCR G240 Ceausescu Coanda.jpg
- File:IICCR G539 Ceausescu Dubcek Svoboda.jpg
- File:IICCR G539 Dubcek crop.jpg
- File:IICCR L008 Ceausescu IAS Amzacea.jpg
- File:IICCR L038 Nicolae Ceausescu with Lina Ciobanu.jpg
- File:IICCR L155 Ceausescu Timis County corn farm.jpg
- File:IICCR LA230 Ceausescu IUT Buzau.jpg
- File:IICCR N014 Ceausescu playing billiards.jpg
- File:IICCR N155 Ceausescu hunting boars.jpg
- File:IICCR NA026 RO anticollectivization uprising killed peasant.jpg
- File:IICCR W059 RO VS Rascani collective farm.jpg
- File:IICCR W077 RO BH collective farmers 7 Noiembrie.jpg
- File:IICCR W086 Scanteia 19620428.jpg
- File:IICCR Z224 Ceausescu visiting Buzau steel wire plant.jpg
- File:IICCR Z350 Ceausescu and Cristescu 1971.jpg
- File:Lucretiu Patrascanu 2.jpg
- File:Nicolae Ceausescu.jpg
- File:Nicolae e Juan Carlos.jpg
- File:Nicolae Samora Graça.jpg
- File:Regiunea Autonoma Mures, delegatia PCR si Ceausescu.jpg
- File:Scornicesti-Ceausescu.jpg
- File:SulzbergerCeausescu.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:105_Red_Army_soldiers_in_Bucharest_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fotografie [[:File:PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg|PS_Corneliu_al_Husilor.jpg]]
Draga Andrei,
In primul rand eu sunt nou pe Wiki. Daca am gresit te rog sa ma ajuti ca sa remediem situatia.
Lucrurile au stat in felul urmator:
1. Am gasit poza pe: http://www.basilica.ro/ro/stiri/ps_corneliu_episcopul_husilor_la_11_ani_de_arhierie_9174.html 2. Am modificat-o in Photoshop, pastrandu-l doar pe Episcopul Corneliu. 3. Atata timp cat El este o persoana publica si faptul ca am modificat-o, consider ca sunt autorul acestei noi opere. Este foarte posibil sa gresesc.
Daca incalca drepturile de autor, crezi ca putem modifica licentierea? Eu nu stiu cum sa o fac. Te rog sa ma ajuti. --Seminarx (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Prin modificarea imaginii, se obţine o operă derivată. Drepturile de autor în cazul operelor derivate sunt împărţite de autorii modificărilor şi de cei ai operei iniţiale, indiferent ce reprezintă ele. O operă derivată nu poate fi liberă decât dacă toţi autorii consimt la aceasta. Singura modificare ce ar putea duce la păstrarea ei ar fi o dovadă clară că autorii ei au publicat-o sub o licenţă liberă.—Andrei S. Talk 14:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Ca sa dovedesc acest lucru, cred ca ar trebui sa ma adresez site-ului Basilica.ro si sa-i intreb daca au publicat-o sub licenta libera, fara drept de autor. Corect? Si daca am raspunsul lor scris as putea sa il postez aici sau sa va trimita un mail? --Seminarx (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Da. Aveţi instrucţiuni la commons:OTRS, inclusiv adresa la care trebuie trimis răspunsul şi ce trebuie să conţină - anume o declaraţie explicită din care rezultă că respectiva persoană a înţeles ce înseamnă o licenţă liberă (anume, că oricine poate folosi imaginea respectivă în orice scop, inclusiv cel comercial, şi că poate realiza şi opere derivate care să fie publicate sub o licenţă similară) şi că acceptă publicarea sub această licenţă.—Andrei S. Talk 15:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
copyrighted logo
Salut!
Intradevar acest logo are copyright, dar am drepturi pe el.
Cum pot dovedi acest lucru, cat ami simplu ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Creat2010 (talk • contribs)
- Dacă sunteţi sigur că vreţi să-l publicaţi sub o licenţă liberă, trimiteţi un e-mail, de pe o adresă direct asociată entităţii pe care o reprezintă, conform instrucţiunilor de la Commons:OTRS. Adăugaţi {{OTRS pending}} pe imagine şi lăsaţi o notă şi la propunerea de ştergere, ca să se ştie.—Andrei S. Talk 10:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Intrebare copyright
Buna ziua
Reprezint o firma mica din Romania care produce (in scop comercial) magneti turistici. Am folosit imaginea "http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:RO_B_triumphal_arch.jpg" intr-um montaj. La un numar de magneti am uitat sa adaugam autorii fotografiilor (printre care se afla si poza "http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:RO_B_triumphal_arch.jpg"). Putem sa vindem magnetii la care am uitat sa adaugam sursa foto?
Multumesc O zi buna— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan P BP (talk • contribs)
- Dacă numărul celor fără autor specificat este puţin semnificativ în raport cu numărul celor la care este specificat (să zicem, cel mult 1:3), din partea mea îi puteţi comercializa şi pe cei fără autor specificat.—Andrei S. Talk 09:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Va multumesc
Buna ziua
Va deranjez din nou cu o clarificare in legatura cu nespecificarea autorului pe magnetii turistici. Nu mai colaborez cu acea firma, insa la data la care am incetat colaborarea, numarul magnetilor vanduti fara sursa foto era de aproximativ 400, iar al celor cu sursa foto era de doar aproximativ 120. Cei fara sursa au fost facuti in graba si vanduti cu ocazia finalei UEFA Europa League. Initial am mizat pe faptul ca voi colabora pe termen lung cu firma respectiva si vom vinde mult mai multi in continuare. Sa imi spuneti daca aveti vreo pretentie materiala.
Multumesc O zi buna— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan P BP (talk • contribs)
- Nu, nu am niciuna.—Andrei S. Talk 12:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Multumesc— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.156.140.4 (talk • contribs)
| |
File:Terry riley.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:PragueSpring.jpg
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PragueSpring.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:PragueSpring.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Bz nicu constantinescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Simoneweil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:RO B triumphal arch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Palatul Navigatiei.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:RO SM Satu Mare city hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
128.250.5.250 04:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Andrei Stroe, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
|
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 19:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Giovanni Falcone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:GreecefightsonBig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
DR restart
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
I restarted your DR, since you hadn't informed the user of its existence --Vera (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:RO HR Odorheiu Secuiesc szekler heroes monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Majic6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 16:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
See User_talk:Strainu#Category:Pages_using_Information_template_with_syntax_errors. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Budva-Muntenegru-„Balerina” si Orasul vechi vazute dinspre plaja Mogren.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:42 (UTC) 22:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Palatul Elisabeta din Bucuresti vazut peste gardul ce-l desparte de Muzeul Satului..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:46 (UTC) 22:46, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Mausoleul din Parcul Carol cu hemiciclul-panorama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Thursday, 21 November 2013 22:52 (UTC) 22:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Constantin I. Istrati - Parcul Carol-2013-cod LMI B-III-m-B-20007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Friday, 22 November 2013 11:55 (UTC) 11:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bucharest Geology Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Friday, 22 November 2013 13:10 (UTC) 13:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Andrei Stroe, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
#invoke:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:WLM 2013 survey thank you
Template:Autotranslate Yann (talk) 09:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate TLSuda (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Commons bot inactivity
Hello! Your bot User:Andrebot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag_3 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. --Dschwen ([[User talk:Dschwen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven ([[User talk:BrightRaven|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Stergere fisier
Draga Andrei, te rog sa initiezi si procedura pentru stergerea fisierului File:ROU CJ Cluj-Napoca CoA.png, din aceleasi motive ca cele care au stat la baza fisierului similar in format .gif. Multumesc! --Mihai Andrei ([[User talk:Mihai Andrei|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 14:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted
--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted
--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Removal
Are you sure about this one? A number of over 150 individual graves are also listed as monuments in the list, not just the cemetery as a whole. Salutări, --Mihai ([[User talk:Dan Mihai Pitea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Quite sure. It's an ensemble, of which each tomb is an element. It's the same categorization decision as for the subcategories of Category:Alba Iulia Fortress or Category:Princely Court in Curtea de Argeș. The subcategories are already in the historical monuments tree by being a part of the larger site and should not be placed in the level above.
- It's particularly important for the Bucharest category, which is terribly overcrowded and should be somehow broken down (I don't know how, yet).—Andrei S. Talk 12:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but by this line of reasoning the graves of Adrian Păunescu or V. Tudor — to name but a few recent ones — would also be historical monuments, which I doubt. If the Commission had intended that, they probably wouldn't have bothered to list the individual ones. If overcrowding is a problem, we might create a subcat titled Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest--Mihai ([[User talk:Dan Mihai Pitea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Well, they are not historical monuments by themselves, but they are part of one, so I wouldn't go out of my way to try to remove images of tombs in Bellu that are not historical monuments themselves from the historical monuments tree. A different example would be the Dumbrava cemetery in Buzău: only a few elements are listed as historical monuments, while the cemetery in its entirety is not, so the Dumbrava cemetery category should not be in the tree.
- Or, we could categorize everything in Bellu that is not a historical monument under a subcategory of Bellu cemetery dedicated to tombs not listed as historical monuments themselves. But I still think they should be in the tree while the entire cemetery is listed.—Andrei S. Talk 15:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- I totally agree that every picture of the cemetery should also remain in the tree, as a member of the Bellu Cemetery category. In order not to overcrowd Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, what would you think of the option to file Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery both under Category:Bellu Cemetery and Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, while keeping them close to each other by using the same sorting key? That would surely be a bit redundant, but it would highlight the individual ones while not overcrowding the Bucharest category.--Mihai ([[User talk:Dan Mihai Pitea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- For now, I'm organizing the counties' categories, hopefully collecting wisdom about how to organize Bucharest's category, so I don't have an opinion for now.—Andrei S. Talk 06:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- I totally agree that every picture of the cemetery should also remain in the tree, as a member of the Bellu Cemetery category. In order not to overcrowd Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, what would you think of the option to file Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery both under Category:Bellu Cemetery and Category:Historical monuments in Bucharest, while keeping them close to each other by using the same sorting key? That would surely be a bit redundant, but it would highlight the individual ones while not overcrowding the Bucharest category.--Mihai ([[User talk:Dan Mihai Pitea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but by this line of reasoning the graves of Adrian Păunescu or V. Tudor — to name but a few recent ones — would also be historical monuments, which I doubt. If the Commission had intended that, they probably wouldn't have bothered to list the individual ones. If overcrowding is a problem, we might create a subcat titled Category:Historical monuments in Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest--Mihai ([[User talk:Dan Mihai Pitea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)