User talk:Cccefalon/Archives/2015

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalabakan Sabah Ladang-Cenderamata-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Kg-Loro-Kecil-03a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Masjid-Asy-Syakirin-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Smooth color rendition, subtle details, perfect composition. --Johann Jaritz 08:57, 01 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Building-Jalan-Datu-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Malaysian-Scouting-Association-District-Kudat-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect details, gorgeous composition. --Johann Jaritz 09:08, 01 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keningau Sabah ChoHuanLaiMemorial-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Lau-San-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 06:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Masjid-Al-Khauthar-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Frank Schulenburg 06:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bingkor Sabah RumahBesarSedomon-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 02 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah LapanganTerbang-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:55, 03 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donggongon Sabah StMichaelSchool-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penampang Sabah Sabah-Cultural-Centre-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:55, 03 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunak Sabah KunakHarbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 10:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah OldGovernmentBuilding-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xian China Terracotta-Army-Museum-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Masjid-Al-Khauthar-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah UiTM BangunanAkademik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Skyline-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bingkor Sabah RumahBesarSedomon-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Yi-People-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find beautiful.--Famberhorst 07:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BatuPutih Sabah AgopBatuTulug-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau-District Sabah Logging-Camp-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau-District Sabah Logging-Camp-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau-District Sabah Logging-Camp-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Jinsha-Jang-Bridge-at-Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, but please fix the upper left corner.--ArildV 09:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, ArildV, I fixed the untilting leftover. --Cccefalon 22:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)  Support --ArildV 09:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah OldJapaneseCemetery-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 21:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah PerpustakaanNegeriSabah-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Overall good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:07, 08 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Tawau Sabah Road-works-at-Kalabakan-Sapulut-Road-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Tawau Sabah Menggaris-tree-at-Sapulut-Kalabakan-Road-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SK-St-Francis-Convent-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Eastern-Plaza-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Rugading-Power-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC) The image tilts to the left. --Steindy 21:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Sekolah-Tinggi-Cina-Sabah-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC) The image tilts to the left. --Steindy 21:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau-District Sabah Logging-Camp-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:16, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanoi Vietnam Waiting-at-the-red-lights-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Significant image, perfect quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Da-Nang Vietnam Fisher-boats-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Too bad that the point of the boat right there do not get up.--Famberhorst 07:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Da-Nang Vietnam Coracles-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Chinese-gate-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Peak-Nam-Tong-Temple-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 20:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Universiti-Malaysia-Sabah-Masjid-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jawi-Jawi Sabah Rice-paddies-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 08:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taun-Gusi-2 Sabah Ploughing-the-rice-paddies-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Peak-Nam-Tong-Temple-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Tudong

Tudong has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mabalu (talk) 11:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Pinangsoo-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Radio-KKFM-Kota-Kinabalu-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Natural colour rendition, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Universiti-Malaysia-Sabah-Recital-Hall-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Perpustakaan-Negeri-Sabah-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau-District Sabah Logging-Camp-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Anglican-Church-St-Paul-Sin-San-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tajau Kudat Sabah Surau-Tajau-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah Farmhouse-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah HarrisonsBuilding-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NorthBorneoRailways-FreightCar-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Masjid-Al-Khauthar-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Kudat Sabah Federal-Route-1-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shangsongyuan Yunnan China Weighbridge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Tawau Sabah Road-works-at-Kalabakan-Sapulut-Road-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah SMK-Agama-Kota-Kinabalu-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Sekolah-Tinggi-Cina-Sabah-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Peak-Nam-Tong-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Tawau Sabah Road-works-at-Kalabakan-Sapulut-Road-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah DewanMasyarakatSandakan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau sabah Malaysian-Red-Crescent-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Masjid-Bandar-Lama-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Gereja-Basel-Tawau-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SabahStateRailways DepotTanjungAru-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Majlis-Daerah-Tenom-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah WismaPersekutuanTawau-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telupid Sabah GerejaKatolik-SantoMartin-Telupid-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guamautang Sabah GomatongCaves-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semporna Sabah MajlisDaerahSemporna-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah WismaKhooSiakChiew-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks :-)

Hi, I wanna thank you for having promoted my picture "Antiphonale Cisterciense, miniature of Archangel Michael, Abbey Bibliotheca of Rein abbey", though it's not my best one - I know ... I'm very happy about this promotion! Kind regards --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. Sometimes, the encyclopedial value is valuable enough to compensate minor photographic shortcomings of a photo :) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keningau Sabah ChoHuanLaiMemorial-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Lau-San-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah UiTM MainGate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taun-Gusi-2 Sabah Ploughing-the-rice-paddies-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Pinangsoo-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petagas Sabah Railway-Crossover-Sign-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Borneo-Safari-2014-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petagas Sabah Sabah-Heritage-Steam-Train-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah 1borneo-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Centre-Point-Mall-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perhaps a tiny bit of pincushion to be corrected --DXR 09:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah UMNO-Building-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC) Please remove color noise --DXR 06:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Taxi-stand-in-Sinsuran-Complex-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kota Belud District-Council-Building-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah High-Court-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst 06:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia-Department-of-Survey-and-Mapping-Malaysia-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great image. --Johann Jaritz 06:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your very interesting criticism

Vos remarques pour mes dessins et photos ne me posent aucun problème. C'est grâce à des gens comme vous que l'on peut améliorer ce qui ne va pas. Vous n'avez donc pas à vous excuser pour cela. Poursuivez !

(Sorry for my english ; Google is my friend for the translation) Feedback for my drawings and photographs may ask me any problems. It is thanks to people like you that we can improve what is wrong. You do not have to apologize for it. Continue!--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Merci bien, cela m'encourage beaucoup. Quoique beaucoup de temps se soit écoulé - il y'a maintenant plus de trente ans depuis mon bac -, je peux lire le Francais, ainsi n'hésitez pas d'ecrire en votre langue. Cordialement, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Cela me rassure. Je suis très limité en anglais. Oui je vous confirme, que pour des gens comme moi, la critique est nécessaire pour avancer. quand on soumet une image, c'est certes pour qu'elle soient promue, mais dans mon cas, c'est aussi surtout pour améliorer ce qu'il ne va pas. La critique constructive n'est jamais blessante. Les gens qui ne la supporte pas, sont souvent trop fier pour admettre qu'ils ont des lacunes. Si au contraire, tout le monde comprenait que cela aide à avancer, beaucoup pourraient s'améliorer. Donc je vous le redit, n'arrêtez jamais de dire ce qu'il ne va pas à vos yeux. Si certains le prennent mal, c'est leur problème ; pas le vôtre.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong China Children-with-almond-eye-snowman-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Thank you for that awesome image of those three Chinese boys! Venerable! --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong China Jiuzhaigou-Huanglong-Airport-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WOW! --Johann Jaritz 07:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Woman-in-traditional-costume-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect ethno-folk photograph. Stunning! --Johann Jaritz 07:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Another gorgeous photograph. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Jiuzhaigou-Tibetan-Mystery-Theater-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Delightful, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Stunning colours, beautiful motive. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent colour rendition, perfect saturation. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect view, very good quality. --Dnalor 01 07:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalian China Ship-Yu-Kun-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Man-in-traditional-costume-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Panda-Lake-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Jiuzhaigou-Tibetan-Mystery-Theater-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Road-workers-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong Sichuan China Multicolored-ponds-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice and good, maybe it would be better to crop a bit at bottom --Christian Ferrer 09:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China National-Defense-Mansion-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan Government-Building-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Marina-Court-Resort-Condominium-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs (see notes) and the left is leaning in a very little bit --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)  Done I removed the CA and updated slightly the perspective. A 100% solution is not possible, as there are obviously some competing "verticals" at the left side. --Cccefalon 16:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 18:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah GurudwaraSahib-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia UTM-Campus-Kuala-Lumpur-03a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala-Lumpur Malaysia Berjaya-Times-Square-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Masjid-Al-Bukhary-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Centre-Point-Mall-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kota-Belud Sabah Town-Mosque-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Shop-in-Sinsuran-Complex-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Shangsongyuan Bridge

The reason why I categorized the weigh station image under Jinsha River Bridges is because the station is used to prevent overweight trucks from passing over the Shangsongyuan Bridge and therefore relates to bridges over the Jinsha River. ContinentalAve (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

That's a reasonable categorization then. However, it might be not obvious to all people and it should be explained within the image description. Thank you, for notifying me! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Borneo-Safari-2014-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Hotel-Promenade-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia-Department-of-Survey-and-Mapping-Malaysia-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala-Lumpur Malaysia Berjaya-Times-Square-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah POIC-Liquid-Bulk-Terminal-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China Yunnan-Provincial-Museum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some strange elements in the upper right side. Looks like a painting. --Halavar 12:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, Halavar, for the hint. It was too much filter; I removed it. --Cccefalon 13:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Ok for me. Mattbuck 22:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Amiens France Tour-Perret-01.jpg

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 10:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Long-Distance-Bus-Terminal-Leetat-Industrial-Estate-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Best-Western-Sandakan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah SPC-Biodiesel-Sdn-Bhd-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Dataran-Deasoka-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Buddhist-Temple-Pecky-Valley-Road-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 10:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Taxi-waiting-for-passengers-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentI think that houses are leaning,--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, Pierre, you are right. I fixed this issue. --Cccefalon 19:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah General-Post-Office-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Buddhist-Temple-Pecky-Valley-Road-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Victoria-Institution-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Victoria-Institution-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Phone-boxes-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Federal Territory Mosque, Kuala Lumpur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Wisma-Felda-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Flock-of-sheep-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ein schwarzes Schaf muss es immer geben. --Hubertl 09:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Cologne-Ship-Scenic-Ruby-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Petronas-Twin-Towers-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pahu Sabah Rice-farmers-in-their-paddies-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia rapidKL-bus-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Chan-She-Shu-Yuen-Clan-Association-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kimanis Sabah Sawit-Kimanis Estate-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamalang Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Tamalang-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Wisma-OCM-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Hong-San-Tze-Temple-01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thibaut120094 03:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chuanzhusi Sichuan China Hotel-Chuanlong-Villa-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chuanzhusi Sichuan China Open-air-pharmacy-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China Yunnan-Provincial-Museum-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good composition --Tsui 07:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Stadium-Negara-00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Kenanga-Wholesale-City-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 03 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Guan-Di-Temple-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments big, sharp, interesting --Tsui 05:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Federal-Territory-Mosque-05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Federal-Territory-Mosque-05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Pinangsoo-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 05 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah SPC-Biodiesel-Sdn-Bhd-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Borneo-Safari-2014-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah GurudwaraSahib-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petagas Sabah Petagas-War-Memorial-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia PULAPOL-Police-Academy-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah TelukSapanggar-SabahPorts-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepanggar Sabah Sepangar-Chemical-Industry-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Chan-She-Shu-Yuen-Clan-Association-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow. Slight whitish halo around the stones, but nothing that should stand in the way of promotion. Jakec 00:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China-Chinese-boy-eating-local-delicassy-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 07 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 01:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 01:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Long-Distance-Bus-Terminal-Leetat-Industrial-Estate-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Kudat Sabah Parapat-Limau-Limauan-Road-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikuati Sabah Missionary-Station-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:29, 06 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Kudat Sabah Road-Kilometer-Sign-at-Federal-Route-1-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pahu Sabah Rice-farmers-in-their-paddies-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:27, 06 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Flora-Köln-Detail-View-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rösrath Germany Lindenhof-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rösrath Germany War-Memorial-Forsbach-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wesseling Germany LyonellBasell-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 08 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten Germany Xanten-Cathedral-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and a very nice picture. --Code 08:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah LD-Flour-Mill-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia PULAPOL-Police-Academy-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Marina-Court-Resort-Condominium-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong Sichuan China Multicolored-ponds-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 11:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong Sichuan China Doppelmayr-Ropeway-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong Sichuan Tourist-Cabin-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing mood --DXR 11:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanglong Sichuan Tourist-Cabin-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sürth Cologne Germany Church-St-Remigius-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rösrath Germany Hauptstrasse-44-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Direction-sign-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Centre-Point-Mall-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rösrath-Forsbach Germany-Forsbacher-Hof-after-renovation-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany KölnTriangle-Tower-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah ThirumuruganTemple-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Eastern-Plaza-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petagas Sabah Sabah-Heritage-Steam-Train-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Ibu-Pejabat-Polis-Kontinjen-Sabah-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Ar-Raudah-Mosque-01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Lahad-Datu-Port-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Petronas-Twin-Towers-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Diocese-Of-Sandakan-Administrative-Building-021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Courthouse-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lijiang Yunnan China-Evening-atmosphere-in-old-town-Lijiang-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Air-Traffic-Control-Center-Kota-Kinabalu-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Shansov.net 03:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Menara-Rickoh-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RiversOfSabah Sungai-Tempasuk-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah FatherMuldersCentre-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 06:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rösrath Germany Hauptstrasse-with-Church-seen-from-Sülztalplatz-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamenohl Germany Christine-Koch-Grundschule-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidenheim Germany Altes-Forsthaus-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wesseling Germany LyonellBasell-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2014 Parade-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Foochow-Association-Kota-Kinabalu-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Masjid-Asy-Syakirin-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah POIC-Dry-Bulk-Terminal-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Chinese-Cemetery-Tawau-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Sayfol-International-School-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia-Dewan-Bahasa-Dan-Pustaka-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Unloading-Tuna-in-Benoa-Harbour-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Fish-Trawlers-in-Benoa-Harbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Flora-Köln-Detail-View-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2014 Parade-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Chinese-Cemetery-Tawau-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hints of CA, but overall okay --DXR 19:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Images Belgenmoment

Hello,

You noted that I should crop the noisy part out of my image. I did this, can you kindly check again and maybe promote it?

Best, Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 20:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenom Sabah Funeral-motorcade-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Padang-Merdeka-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Universiti-Malaysia-Sabah-Masjid-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Kompleks-Sukan-Tawau-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Unloading-Tuna-in-Benoa-Harbour-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 11:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quarzwerke

Hallo! Vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen bei meinen Werkzeugfotos aus Haltern am See. Fototechnisch ein toller Termin, aber leider habe ich keine genaue Ahnung von den Details. So bin ich für jede Erweiterung dankbar. (Immerhin kenne ich als Fachfremder den grundsätzlichen Produktionsvorgang.) --XRay ^talk 20:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Gerne doch :) Mir ist bei der Gelegenheit aufgefallen, das Commons viel zuwenige Photos von sicherheitstechnischen Einrichten aus dem Bereich des Wasserrechts hat. Da muss ich mal schauen, was ich bei Gelegeneheit mal bei meinen Kunden photographieren darf. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China Yunnan-Provincial-Museum-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Attributes-of-a-prosperous-and-happy-CNY-2015-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Dragon-used-for-traditional-dragondance-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hue Vietnam Citadel-of-Huế-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalabakan-Utara Sabah Pondok-Polis-Bantuan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Holy-Trinity-School-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamalang Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Tamalang-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah General-Post-Office-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanten Germany Xanten-Cathedral-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Universiti-Malaysia-Sabah-Chancellory-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marina-Bay Singapore Firework-launching-CNY-2015-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality now. --C messier 20:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kota-Marudu Sabah Tomb-of-Syarif-Osman-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Menara-Selborn-and-Menara-Marinara-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Sabah Foochow-Association-Kota-Kinabalu-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Sulfur-Miner-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Acidious-Lake-at the-floor-of-the-crater-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Rickshaws-waiting-at-level-crossing-for customers-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Steam-Engine-Monument-at-Tugu-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Train-at-Tugu-Railway-Station-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Eastern-Plaza-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some magenta CA. See the note. --Halavar 12:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, Halavar, I forgot to switch on CA removal in LR. --Cccefalon 04:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 12:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Borneo-Safari-2014-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Borneo-Safari-2014-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malaysia Traffic-signs Taxi-Stand-Sign-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Mewah-Datu-Sdn-Bhd-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Mewah-Datu-Sdn-Bhd-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 011:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Loke-Yew-Cemetery-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu-Universiti-Malaysia-Sabah-Masjid-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Yi-People-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine picture, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 07:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Ministry-of-Railtransport-Sanatorium-Lintong-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintong Xian China Huaqing-Pool-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah SJK(C)-Lok-Yuk-Pinangsoo-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikuati Sabah UMS-Medical-School-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamalang Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Tamalang-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penampang Sabah Hongkod-Koisaan-Unity-Hall-02a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 13:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Kg-Loro-Kecil-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Holy-Trinity-School-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jawoll! --DXR 11:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Artefacts

lb uwe, nach ca 1000 Objekten, welche ich letztes Jahr in diesem Museum fotografiert habe, war mein Lichttisch schon derartig ruiniert, dass wohl die Objekte scharf zu bekommen waren (was wohl keine Kunst war, in diesem Fall mit dem Aufbau), aber der Untergrund quasi zum Wegwerfen. Ich nehme an, dass du das mit den Artefakten gemeint haben könntest. Dazu kam auch, dass wir unter großem Stress waren, die Sammlung innerhalb von drei Tagen fertig zu bekommen (insg. 2000 Teile). An einen weiteren Termin war nicht zu denken, denn der Eigentümer war dran, das ganze zu verscherbeln und wir - als Freiwillige - am Rande des Möglichen. Ich werde wohl die Anfangsbilder nehmen müssen und auf die Bilder zum Schluss verzichten für die Nominierung. --Hubertl (talk) 11:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Nein, nein, Hubertl, es war ein Scherz, der sich auf die Dateikategorie "Small ceramic artefacts" bezog. So scharf schiessen die Preussen nicht. --11:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuta Bali Indonesia Pura-Dalem-Kampial-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Besakih Bali Indonesia Pura-Besakih-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would brighten the shadow. --Hockei 08:17, 28 February 2015 (UTC)  Done I brightened a little bit. More brightening was not possible, it turned out to rise big problems with colour noise. --Cccefalon 08:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Yes. --Hockei 08:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muncan Bali Indonesia Rice-paddy-along-Jalan-Raya-Muncan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good picture. --Hockei 08:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taman Serinsim Sabah Ford Ranger-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Catholic-Church-of-Mary-Immaculate-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Sekolah-Tinggi-Cina-Sabah-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Radio-KKFM-Kota-Kinabalu-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinangsoo Kudat Sabah Gereja-Basel-Malaysia-BCCM Pinangsoo-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulong Sabah Murut-Cultural-Center-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratan Bali Indonesia Grandfather-and-grandson-after-Puja-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good, but some purple fringe on the hat, and have you space at bottom for to not cut the arm? --Christian Ferrer 10:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Support QI anyway --Christian Ferrer 08:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, Christian, for review. I forgot the defringing. For the crop, unfortunately, I haven't a single pixel more at the bottom, --Cccefalon 08:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mendut Java Indonesia Candi-Mendut-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mote the right of the center (top) but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC) Thank you for reviewing; the blurry bird will be removed this evening. --Cccefalon 08:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantan Bali Pura-Ulun-Danu-Bratan-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition, QI --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ubud Bali Indonesia Pura-Dalem-Puri-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 02 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brantan Bali Pura-Ulun-Danu-Bratan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kindle-Reader-Inside-view-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Jakarta-Cathedral-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 09:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Jakarta-Cathedral-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow! Gorgeous image. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 03 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Istiqlal-Mosque-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 03 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawau Sabah Sekolah-Tinggi-Cina-Sabah-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malaysia Traffic-signs Regulatory-sign-02c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thailand Traffic-signs Regulatory-sign-01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Zentralbibliothek-Köln-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany St-Peter-Köln-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Weltstadthaus-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany MediaPark-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Sulfur-Miner-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Sulfur-Miner-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escape-filter Fluchtfilter Dräger-Parat-3200-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3Com-Etherlink-Network-Interface-Card-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Review of the nomination of two files

Hello Cccefalon, could you please review the nomination of File:Khafre's Pyramid 001.JPG, as you indicated before that there were two dust spot, and i removed them and i fixed its colours, is it better now with the colour fixed or i have to revert to the original one with removing the dust spot, and also this file. Thanks you in advance.--لا روسا (talk) 12:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Zoom-Lens EF 70-200 F2.8L IS II USM-02a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few dirty ,but good --Livioandronico2013 09:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Sulfur-Miner-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia The-sulfur-mine-at the-floor-of-the-crater-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special image.--Famberhorst 18:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Baskets-with-native-sulfur-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mendut Java Indonesia Candi-Mendut-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jext300-Autoinjektor-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Berthold Werner 09:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 08 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Bessamatic-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Zoom-Lens EF 70-200 F2.8L IS II USM-01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Chinese inscriptions in Malaysia

Hi, if you feel that Category:Chinese inscriptions in Malaysia should not be categorised under Category:People of Malaysia of Chinese descent, what would you suggest to link Chinese inscriptions to the actual ethnic group in Malaysia? Should Category:Chinese culture in Malaysia be created? And categorised into Category:Chinese culture by country and Category:Culture of Malaysia? - Takeaway (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Comparing with others categories like Category:Chinese inscriptions in China or Category:English inscriptions in Jerusalem, I think, that this category is exclusively for language purpose and not about persons. You never now, WHO inscribed the inscription. Just follow the systematic for similar language categories. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

I have this thing about "loose" categories. It just doesn't seem right having Chinese inscriptions in Malaysia without a direct link to Chinese people/culture in Malaysia. I'll go ahead with the Chinese culture thing as I lined out above. - Takeaway (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Chinese culture in Malaysia might work for me. Go ahead. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:39, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Bessamatic-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawah-Ijen Indonesia Ijen-Sulfur-Miner-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borobudur-Temple-Park Indonesia Stupas-of-Borobudur-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indonesia Farmer-on-a-bicycle-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Bessamatic-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabanan-Regency Indonesia Rice-paddies-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baron Nganjuk Java Indonesia Baron-Railway-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia TM-Multimedia-College-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baron Nganjuk Java Indonesia Baron-Railway-Station-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

QI promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Jiuzhaigou-Tibetan-Mystery-Theater-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

This appeared on my talk page on the 7th. Sorry for stealing it! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

No worries, it also appeared in my list of promoted images and I applied my user categories already yesterday. But thank you for your kind notification, Matt. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Bessamatic-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kampial Kuta Indonesia Kampial-Hindu-Cemetery-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabanan-Regency Indonesia Rice-paddies-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baron Nganjuk Java Indonesia Baron-Railway-Station-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muncan Bali Indonesia Bridge-over-Tukad-Yeh-Unda-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 13:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Indonesia

Shame you didn't mention you were in the Yogyakarta area. I'd have liked to buy you a drink or two for your fantastic contributions from Malaysia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I haven't noticed that you are Yogya based until you uploaded the photos of the parade on Jalan Sudirman but at that day, I already was in Singapore. If I were aware of your whereabouts earlier, for sure I had notified you. Too bad, it is a missed opportunity for meeting up. However, you will see some more photos of my Yogyakarta experience the next months, when I am catching up with the postprocessing of the photos. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• When you took that Tugu picture, I'd actually just gotten back to Yogya after two months in Canada. If you're in the area again, drop me a line. I'll do the same if find myself on a trip to Malaysia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Usually, you will find me in Cologne, Germany and if it happens that you are in Germany, I will be happy to welcome you. My next Malaysia schedule to catch up with my Sabah photo documentation is set for April/May. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• Excellent. Anywho, thanks for the great photographs. Shame you had to come during the rainy season; skies should clear up a bit in a few months. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I only had one rainy day and the sky was acceptable to excellent all other days. I don't mind to travel during rainy season, because the air is purified due to the rain showers and usually you have good conditions during the morning. Well, unless my Sabah travels, the Indonesia travel was not especially for photography but for relaxing purpose. However, it happened, that more than 4000 images ended up in the camera during those three weeks. Fortunately, not all are dedicated for Commons. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

• Fair point about the mornings; I've been so busy with work that I haven't had a chance to enjoy them. If you are in the area for a bit longer next time, you might enjoy going to Ganjuran Church (a bit far out of the way for a short trip), and there are some fairly beautiful mosques around here. There's also quite a few more minor temples to be enjoyed (and those would be free to upload). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Scope must linked to something. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Lens Super-Dynarex-1-4-135-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 07:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Denpasar Bali Indonesia Vihara-Satya-Dharma-Chinese-Temple-02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denpasar Bali Indonesia Vihara-Satya-Dharma-Chinese-Temple-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This version is much better. --Halavar 12:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah Railbus-of-Sabah-State-Railway-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RiversOfSabah Sungai-Kinarom-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malaysia Traffic-signs Warning-sign-09c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Tugu-Yogyakarta-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia -Commuter-at-Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guang-Tong Yunnan China Railway-Car-GC-270-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xian China Cultural-Performance-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for me but the white is really bright though. --Ximonic 02:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marak-Parak Sabah Old-Jalan-Marak-Parak-Bridge-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support That`s adventure! Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Seal-of-Nerother-Wandervogel-Heidenheim-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support the contour on the top of the object is maybe not pronounced enough IMO but otherwise it's fine. --Christian Ferrer 06:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Zoom-Lens EF 70-200 F2.8L IS II USM-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escape-filter Fluchtfilter Dräger-Parat-3200-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan China Monument-to-Policemen-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostentrop Germany Building-St-Lucia-Street-No1-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Semporna Sabah City-Mosque-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Semporna Sabah City-Mosque-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3Com-Etherlink-Network-Interface-Card-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK – losing a bit of sharpness toward the upper left though, and I’d like all four sides to be straight --Kreuzschnabel 06:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voigtländer-Lens Super-Dynarex-1-4-135-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudat Sabah Garbage-Collection-Truck-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kimanis Sabah Sawit-Kimanis Estate-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Menara-CELCOM-and-Menara-Marinara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indonesia Traffic-signs Regulatory-signs-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanah-Lot Bali Indonesia Pura-Tanah-Lot-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Gamelan-players-with-gendèr-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jiuzhaigou Sichuan China Jiuzhaigou-Tibetan-Mystery-Theater-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Train-at-Tugu-Railway-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agfa-Optima-1A-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Taman-Sari-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gilimanuk Bali Indonesia Gilimanuk-Harbour-Ferry-terminal-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Tolles POY #4

#4 POTY 2014

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, tolles Bild. Es gefiel mir schon bei der Nominierung zum FP sehr gut. --XRay ^talk 11:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Dietmar - auch für Deine Unterstützung! Ich bin selber freudig überrascht vom Ergebnis. Das Bild selber ist auch eines meiner Lieblingsbilder. Die Farben - die genauso auch in Lijang an diesem Tag zu sehen waren - hatten mich schon vor Ort fasziniert. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Candi Mendut.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürburgring Germany Ford-Focus-RS-of-Wölflick-Racing-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Jakarta-Cathedral-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Jakarta-Cathedral-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Jakarta-Cathedral-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Railway-Car-JY-360-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Ford Focus RS

Hallo Uwe, falls ich ein bisschen meckern darf: Deinen Ford Focus RS bei den QIC würde ich ein bisschen dunkler machen und ihm ein wenig mehr Kontrast geben. Das Grün und Blau der Motorhaube und am Dachrand wirken für mich ziemlich ausgebleicht. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Ja, das kann ich nach der Arbeit gerne machen. Der letzte Samstag war leider etwas düster in Nürburg (und am Sonntag lag Schnee), deshalb sind die Farben nicht so kontrastreich. Aber das lässt sich leicht reparieren, Danke für den Hinweis. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:57, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done Hab mal eine neue Version mit kräftigeren Farben hochgeladen. Sollte jetzt deutlich besser sein. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Hawkers-in- Glodok-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ok then! --Hubertl 10:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Exit-sign-in-Taman-Sari-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Sunda-kelapa-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Prambanan-temple-complex-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baron Nganjuk Java Indonesia Baron-Railway-Station-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! --Crisco 1492 12:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Voigtländer-Bessamatic-02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Voigtländer-Bessamatic-02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Voigtländer Bessamatic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürburg Germany Fahrsicherheitszentrum-Nürburgring-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps the description should be only "safety training".  Support Fo me QI. -- Spurzem 08:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Zentralbibliothek-Köln-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore SAKAI-W300-Road-Roller-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xian China Cultural-Performance-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 07:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agfa Optima.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürburg Germany Fahrsicherheitszentrum-Nürburgring-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 06:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Mount-Batok-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support.--Famberhorst 06:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Prambanan-temple-complex-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 07:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Horses-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Fog-in-the-Bromo-Caldera-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!

Ein vierter Platz ist ein großartiger Erfolg. Noch dazu, wenn du aus meiner Sicht in der Liste der Gewinner der erste gestandene Wikimedianer bist, der mehr als nur ein paar Highlights zum Projekt beiträgt! Ich bin mir noch nicht ganz sicher, wie ich dazu stehe, dass von den 12 Gewinnerbildern gerade mal drei "Wikimedianer" dabei sind. Ohne jetzt die anderen Gewinner herabwürdigen zu wollen. Aber vielleicht machen sie es eh richtig. Nur die paar allerbesten, damit ersparen sie sich den manchmal sehr typischen Frust der Auswahl in FP und erst recht die Hackel-ins-Kreuz-Werfer in Wikipedia. --Hubertl (talk) 13:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukoharjo-Regency Indonesia PERTAMINA-fuel-station-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Guards-of-Sultan-Palace-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borobudur-Temple-Park Indonesia Stupas-of-Borobudur-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Azamara-Quest-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nusa-Dua Bali Indonesia ISUZU-Fire-appliance-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

your comment

Hello, regarding to your comment here (If you are not Joel Akwevagbe, you cannot just sign with your name), you want to say that i have to write uploaded by user:Joel Akwevagbe and Nominated by: user:لا روسا. yes or not. Thanks in advance.--لا روسا (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, the QIC rules say: "If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}"

Regards, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore John-Deere-1445-Series-II-tractor-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan Yunnan-Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jext300-Autoinjektor-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kindle-Reader-Front-view-with-battery-empty-error-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yunnan China Jinsha-Jang-Bridge-at-Tiger-Leaping-Gorge-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 13:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Marina-Bay-Panorama-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Singapore-Sports-Hub-with-National-Stadium-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Esplanade-Theatres-on-the-Bay-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Bromo-Crater-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Java pony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agfa-Optima-1A-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agfa-Optima-1A-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sukoharjo-Regency Indonesia PERTAMINA-fuel-station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Lady-Christine-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Toyota-Land-Cruiser-in-Caldera-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Prambanan-temple-complex-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakarta Indonesia Immanuel-Church-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Panoramic-view-of-the-caldera-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürburgring Germany TÜV-Rheinland-Tower-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schönes Bild, aber eine geringfügig kürzere Brennweite hätte den wirklichen Eindruck wahrscheinlich besser wiedergegeben.  CommentHallo Anonymus, eine Signatur wäre schön gewesen. Das mit der Brennweite ist Geschmacksache, wenn das Objekt 300 m weit entfernt ist; ich wollte halt den TÜV Turm drauf und nicht das ganze Gelände drumrum. --Cccefalon 09:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Entschuldige bitte die vergessene Signatur. – Ich wollte nicht das ganze Drumherum sehen. Mich stört nur ein bisschen, dass die Gebäude so dicht zusammengerückt sind. -- Spurzem 11:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Ah, verstehe, das wäre ein anderer Aspekt dann. Als ausgewiesener Nürburgveteran siehst Du den Gebäudekomplex sicher eher als Ganzes. Ich wollte speziell die TÜV Inspektionshalle und den Turm haben, deshalb war am hintere Gebäudeabschnitt hinter dem Überweg Schluss für mich. --Cccefalon 11:40, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hockei 16:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nürburg Germany Fahrsicherheitszentrum-Nürburgring-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Warum sieht man nicht das Gesicht des Mannes? Ein Instructor könnte doch auch das Auto fast neben sich beobachten. -- Spurzem 09:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Auch Bilder mit Gesicht habe ich in der Kategorie. ABER: Muss man das Gesicht sehen? Nein, finde ich, das Bild ist so viel aussagekräftiger. --Cccefalon 09:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Na ja, darüber kann man geteilter Meinung sein. -- Spurzem 11:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Betimmt. Ich fand das "dem Instruktor über die Schulter schauen" hier interessant. --Cccefalon 11:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)*  Support Good quality and interesting perspective. QI for me. --Hubertl 05:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah UiTM DormPerempuan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Italy Ponte-Vecchio-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wonderful place. Superb quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shilin Yunnan China Shilin-Stone-Forest-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow! Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Merlion-at-Marina-Bay-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Esplanade-Theatres-on-the-Bay-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunming Yunnan Jinrilou-Southern-gate-of-old-Kunming-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Wegen der möglichen Übersättigung

ich beziehe mich da vornehmlich auf einen Gelbanteil, der das Grün übermäßig zum Giftgrün macht. Ich habe hier vor mir zwei unterschiedliche Bildschirme (manchesmal ist es gut, an sich ja nicht), der eine ist eher kühl und gut zu kalibrieren, der andere (der deutlich billigere) ist warm und lässt so manches übersättigt wirken.

Wenn ich nun wie in diesem Fall mir das Bild auf dem kalibrierten Monitor ansehe, dem Kühlen, dann rege ich dann eine Reduktion an, wenn dieser ebensolches sichtbar macht, den anderen lasse ich da völlig außen vor. Und das war es auch.

Mir sind diese tropischen Gegenden nicht unbekannt, auch deren besondere Lichtverhältnisse. Ich hab mir das Bild runtergeladen und auch mit den der genannten Kategorie verglichen. die beiden anderen sind, was die Grünsättigung betrifft, nicht ganz so ausgeprägt. Dieses meiner Meinung nach eben schon schon. Dein eigener Standort gegenüber der Sonne war auch ein anderer. Kleinigkeiten, aber merkbar. Dem Bild, über das wir sprechen, habe ich in LR bei der Sättigung mit Gelb und Grün jeweils -10 gegeben, was meiner Meinung nach eine korrekte Farbanpassung wäre. Eine generelle Reduktion würde dem Ganzen sofort die Brillanz nehmen. Es ist aber generell so, dass die Bilder dieser Serien von der Lichtsituation eher im oberen Bereich angesiedelt sind. Dass es QI ist, - keine Frage ansonsten. --Hubertl (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den detaillierten Vergleich mit den beiden anderen Photos, Hubertl. Ich reduziere die Sättigung heute abend etwas und danach kannst Du nochmal draufschauen. Es gibt in der Tat Tage in Sabah, da denkt man, man hätte eine Droge geschluckt, so knallen einem die Farben entgegen. Aber im vergleich merkt man dann in der Tat eher, ob was nicht in Ordnung ist. Grüßle, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malaysia Traffic-signs Warning-sign-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Italy Synagogue-of-Florence-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Bangunan-Urusetia-Sandakan-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salarom Sabah Frame-of-a-new-house-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Hubertl 16:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Landrover-Defender-of-JUPEM-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penampang Sabah Unduk-Ngadau-2014-Candidates-02b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taipei Taiwan Taipei-Station-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Germany Badge-of-Nerother-Wandervogel-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limau-Limauan Sabah Stilt-houses-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matunggong Sabah SMK-Matunggong-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goshen Kota-Marudu Sabah Seventh Day-Adventist-Church-Goshen-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District-Kota-Marudu Sabah Jalan-Marak-Parak-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahad-Datu Sabah Ar-Raudah-Mosque-02a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Italy Piazza-Santa-Maria-Novella-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ok for me. --Hubertl 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olpe Germany Hills-of-Sauerland-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Request and question

Hello Cccefalon! Nice photos from Indonesia and Malaysia! Please, you can edit the photo File:Brazil Pará Cumbu Island boathouses 2009.jpg, doing a cut/crop (for eliminate the unsharp area) and reducing the exposure (the photo is overexposed)? I tried doing this (see the history file), but I don't fixed. You can see the cut/crop suggestion in the note. And question: After these edits, the photo can be FP? Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi ArionEstar. I can do crop and enhancement of that photo (though I don't think it will be suitable for FP), but as I noticed, the photographer is Cayambe, so I would only upload a new version with the explicit consent of Cayambe. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

Maybe you can tell us about this picture you took, that is nominated for FP... and passing already. Thanks.--Hafspajen 08:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benoa Bali Indonesia Azamara-Quest-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 04:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore The-Float-at-Marina-Bay-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 04:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Marina-Barrage-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 04:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulfolane-corrosion-in-a-pipe-reducer-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden-angle-gauge-90-degrees-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-800-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuta Bali Indonesia Pura-Luhur-Uluwatu-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuta Bali Indonesia Pura-Batu-Belig-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Train-at-Kewek-Railway-Bridge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dritter Anlauf: OK, its QI --Hubertl 18:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapadu Bali Carpenter-in-his-workshop-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! High-temperature-sulfur-corrosion-of-a-12CrMo195-pipe-stub-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostentrop Germany VALMET-860-tractor-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AEG-MIGNON-typewriter-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment. It seems to be a reproduction of a book. Is it right? -- Spurzem 09:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Not at all. The machine is located temporarily in my studio. I took B/W for the photo challenge but will release some more colour images soon. --Cccefalon 11:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC) I apologize -- Spurzem 11:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC) No problem. I took it as a laud, that you put it in a line with book quality :) --Cccefalon 11:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laotie-Hill Liaoning China Southernmost-tip-of-Liaodong-Peninsula-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fatigue-fracture-of-a-PI-nozzle-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yogyakarta Indonesia Crossing-keeper-house-at-Tugu-Railway-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annealing equipment-for-ambulant-heat-tratment-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ubud Bali Girl-with-selfie-stick-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Italy Sale-of-belts-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Italy Statues-in-the-Uffizi-outside-Gallery-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiang-Mai Thailand Buddhist-monks-installing-lampioons-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escape-filter Fluchtfilter Dräger-Parat-3200-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escape-filter Fluchtfilter Dräger-Parat-3200-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jext300-Autoinjektor-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe-burst-after-erosion-in-a-steam-pipeline-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stress-Corrosion-Cracking-caused-by-weld-stress-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penang Malaysia Penang-Malay-Chamber-of-Commerce-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penang Malaysia Wisma-PCTH-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penang Malaysia The-George-Town-Dispensary-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penang Malaysia Nagore-Durgha-Sheriff-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penang Malaysia Mini-market-corner-Lebuh-Gereja-and-Lebuh-King-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cologne Germany Pipeline-marker-of-RMR-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 11:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Wisma-Persekutuan-Sandakan-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore CNY2015-Lampioons-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 07:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuta Bali Indonesia Pura-Luhur-Uluwatu-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denpasar Bali Indonesia Denpasar-International-Airport-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Armenian-Church-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemoro-Lawang Indonesia Radio-antennas-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis mit dem Weißabgleich

manchmal frage ich mich wirklich was ich sehe, gerade in einer ganzen Serie. Und übersehe völlig das Wesentliche. Habs gleich bei anderen auch gemacht. --Hubertl (talk) 09:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Man neigt dazu, das gelbliche Licht zu akzeptieren, das einem die Compactkameras andrehen und das man auch häufig in Illustrierten sieht. Aber manchmal enthüllt der WB-Abgleich-Button neue Farbschönheiten :) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Raffles-City-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Central-Fire-Station-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Southbeach-Lifestyle-Quarter-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore POPStation-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Former-Hill-Street-Police-Station-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Cloud-Forest-in-The-Gardens-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Supertree-Grove-in-The-Gardens-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Doosan-DX-225-LCA-excavator-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Marina-Bay-Panorama-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Dragon-used-for-traditional-dragondance-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Old-Supreme-Court-Building-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Elgin-Bridge-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore The-Float-at-Marina-Bay-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuala Lumpur Malaysia PULAPOL-Police-Academy-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandakan Sabah Long-Distance-Bus-Terminal-Leetat-Industrial-Estate-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borobudur-Temple-Park Indonesia Stupas-of-Borobudur-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Cargo-Terminal-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Grey sky but good quality. --Cayambe 19:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Elgin-Bridge-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden-hammer-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitre-rule-for-marking-and-measuring-fixed-angles-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ULMIA-Tracing-stencil-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BASF-magnetic-audio-tape-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saliwangan Sabah Switching-the-locomotive-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singapore Traffic-signs Highway-sign-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 09:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Mykola`s QI Candidates

Dear Uwe, thanks a lot for reviewing my pictures candidates for QI on Commons. I am an amateur with no regular education in photographie. I try to do my best and I understand some of your suggestions. But, also, I have no idea of jpg artefacts - how can I avoid or correct them? Also, I can see slight magenta line on the BVM statue on File:Фігура Божої Матері на Ясній Горі в Гошові.JPG but I have no idea where it appeared from and how I can remove it? By the way, you are taking fantastic pictures, and thanks again for your time. Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 01:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Dear Mykola, most people who participate in QIC are following up photography in their leisure time. Same with me, I am earning my life as an engineer and not with photography. Don't worry, if your first submissions are rejected, this happens often to newcomers but finally, QIC is a good platform to enhance your skills. I will give you some hints:

• I observed, that the settings of your photos are quite unusual (ISO400 at a bright day with 1/4000s). Not a good idea. If ever possible, choose ISO 100 to get a fine grain. When I was young, I hadn't the chance to use a photo with automatic light control. I had to estimate the settings. My father teached me a sentence "Die Sonne lacht - Blende acht" (The sun is bright - aperture eight). Try to use f/8-f/11 for your landscapes. To avoid blur, you need 1/125s (with a built-in shake stabiliser and a calm hand you can go down to 1/80s)
• I don't know, if you work with RAW files. If ever you have the opportunity, take the photos in uncompressed RAW mode. It will leave you with much more possibilities to postprocess your images and in the same time avoid to face information loss (which in consequence might be a reason for the jpeg compression artefacts).
• If ever possible, use a tripod for blur-free images.
• To resolve most frequent challenges in the post-processing (Perspective correction, defringing, denoising ...), you should use an appropriate software. My choice is Lightroom. You can get a free 30day-trial at Adobe. I bought the software years ago and I never regretted to spend the money.

Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for cheering me up, Uwe. Now, scrolling trough my pictures, I better see these technical things - artefacts, sensor dirt, dead pixels. I am a slow learner, but about year ago I started whispering numbers while changing settings of the camera. I will definitely use your fathers "Blende acht" rule (it is also a nice story on your user page!). I have to figure something how to switch to Lightroom - not only because of money, but I am so much used to Picasa, it would be hard to change. Also, I am trying to push trough QI procedure my old pictures, which is probably not a good idea. Anyway, thanks a lot for your advises - they will help me to learn something more. And thanks for your patience. Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 06:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KotaKinabalu Sabah UiTM UjanaSarjana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 04:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

QI 4 megapixel

You participated in a very short discussion on file size, and you, with a few others, decided to implement a decision that was undemocratic and irresponsible. It is completely inappropriate for macro photography. How do I complain? --Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Protected QI candidate page

Hi. Can you please explain why the Project Page has been protected since yesterday (no edits are possible), yet some nominators are still posting QI candidate images and voting on them. Thank you. --Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

The nomination page is not protected. Only the project page with the image guidelines. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Rejection of my pictures

Hi. You rejected two my pictures nominated for Quality image: 2TE116-964 TO Tapa - Lehtse.jpg and 60-0412_RO-TFG_Valea_lui_Mihai.jpg. But I don't understand the reason: "Not the work of a WikiCommoner". I'm the author of the pictures, of course. --Cmelak770 ([[User talk:Cmelak770|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

It is not obvious, if you and Petr Štefek are the same person. If you are, the author section schould either be [[User:Cmelak770|Cmelak770]] or [[User:Cmelak770|Petr Štefek]] --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, thank you. I'm going to fix it. --Cmelak770 ([[User talk:Cmelak770|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, the general rule is, that only people which are registered as User at Wikimedia Commons can nominate their own work or the work of other WikiCommoners --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template PH

Hello.

You can use it :

Template:User PH-4

on your user page.

Regards.

--ComputerHotline ([[User talk:ComputerHotline|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you ComputerHotline, I appreciate your kind offer. However, if my images are really of professional quality can only be decided by other people. Using PH-4 might be considered to be boastful. I think, as I am still learning and as I am still on my way to be a good photographer, I better stick to the PH-0 template. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Mosquito Pond

What type of mosquito are there? :D ~ Muffin Wizard ^;) 13:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

It's njamuk sabahensis, as far as I know. :P --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hehe, hope it isn't a type of malaria or aedes mosquitos. :X ~ Muffin Wizard ^;) 02:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

DoF and shallow

DOF and shallow

Hi, thank you for your note on this image and in QI candidate. I couldn't response you there due to too lengthy. I don't know why people decline shallow DoF. I hope you may have answer. Personally I prefer shallow DoF. I can do focus stacking. Stacking of 3 photos seems to me artificial. What do you say? --AntanO 06:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Food photography makes use of a limited DoF for getting the focus on the food and blurring out the background deco. But it is quite unusual to offer just a slice of sharpness. You even "cut" the nut here. In general, the DoF should be good enough to cover the whole object. If you use stacking or not, is depending on the object and your lens. Perhaps a DoF calculator can do an appropriate service for you by pointing out the aperture and distance setting which grants sufficient sharpness over the whole object. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Sibucco River

Finally you found where this river located. I wonder if I can find the river line on the google maps to put the most accurate border for this map. :) — иz нίpнόp ^ʜᴇʟᴘ! 20:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ranking, I always have an exact memory where I took a photo, even when it is in a remote place. I marked the Sungai Sibuco in Wikimapia already some time ago. My reference is the topographical map of Tawau which I got from JUPEM. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, based on the location I think the border is already correct. What about Sungai Pandassan? Did you marked it too? — иz нίpнόp ^ʜᴇʟᴘ! 20:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

No wonder, I could not found it - the river has a lot of names that vary for local and historic reasons: Sungai Pandasan / Pandassan / Sungai Pindasan. The river is located in the plains north of Kota Belud. The coordinates of the estuary are 6.526386 and 116.502644. Perhaps I can take a photo when I go to Sabah for Kaamatan. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

find Sungai Pandasan photos here --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Yep, that's a problem here. Even many island in Sabah been called by the locals with a various name. It's alright, I think that is fine now. Oh, and btw, what about the composite picture? Did you have some more idea to include on the list? :P — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 08:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Not forgotten but not done yet. At the moment, I'm preparing for my flight next week to Sabah. Any requests for photos? If it is on my iterinary, I might be able to capture it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Hee, but I think you will visit the west coast area right? Because the east coast has become a red zone now. As you will visit a Kaamatan festival, can you take the picture of the Kaamatan dance and the traditional musical instrument? — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 09:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

I will be at West Coast, Interior and East Coast. Red zones are only specific areas, so it will be no problem to roam around in the East. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay, take care. Oh, I forgot one more thing. If you found any Sabahan traditional food or drink during your visit, can you take a picture of it? :) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 13:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure, I will keep my eyes open. The problem is, that I won't know, if it is traditional Sabahan food. :) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Nevermind, ah, well, how about your holiday? Did you get something new? Sorry for the late reply as I don't have my main internet right now. :) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 07:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

I took a photo from airplane of Pandassan Estuary but haven't postprocessed it (more than 4000 suitable new photos, the actual uploads are here) so it might take a while. Unfortunately I haven't photos of food ... I always remembered your wish after I finished my meal. I will be in Sabah again in October, I hope, I can be more successful then.

Unfortunately, it happened to me, that one memory stick got lost and more unfortunate: it contained the photos of the opening ceremony of the bobolizan ... it is a heartbreaking loss. Beside that, I took some hundred photos of Kaamatan and Unduk Ngadau at KDCA.

I still have thousends of unprocessed photos on the server, especially buildings and kampung. If ever you are looking for something that isn't covered yet in the Sabah photo stock, let me know, perhaps I either have a photo here or I can see, if I can get it on the next travel. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Wow, nice work! I have try to search for many photos on Flickr to improve some article in the eastern Sabah areas like Semporna, Lahad Datu, Beluran and Kinabatangan. But many people doesn't share their photos freely to Wikipedia. It's ok, I know you are busy capturing many important buildings now as I'm also cannot editing fast like usual. Some of my work here also need to be postponed due to slow internet connection. :(

Oh no, it is really a bad luck during the time, but I see you have taken many great images on the Kaamatan event based on what I see on your gallery. :)

Sure, but do you have any pictures of the road condition in Tawau?

..and sorry if I can't reply to your message quickly because at this place, the internet is currently too slow and I can't upload some image more than 1MB. Sometimes I will get a lost connection too. That's why sometimes I'm too lazy to surfing the internet at this time. :(

— ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 12:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, you need photos from Semporna, Lahad Datu and Beluran as well as from road condition in Tawau (inside town or outside? which roads outside town exactly?). I think I can serve all said requests. Especially the last days I uploaded a lot of photos for Semporna and LD and many more are available after post processing. I will make it a priority. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

I think just inside town as the outside may be difficult to you. Anyway, thanks for the help! ;) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 14:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

I will overlook my archive. Just give me some time, I won't be able to do that before next week. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok. ;) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 12:50, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

about CA and flares

Hi Cccefalon, in File:Pont Aigues Vertes02 2014-09-27.jpg‎ you have pointed out CA at the left side. Well, I know that my G12 lense has off-center CA, and the best thing for panoramics is to use only the image centers for stitching. When you say, CA, easy to fix, then how? (I am not naive, but this is an honest question.)

Hallo Klaus, ich antworte mal in unserer Muttersprache :) Ich habe mir mal das EXIF angeschaut, daraus geht allerdings nicht hervor, welche Software Du zur Nachbearbeitung verwendest. Ich selber benutzte Lightroom. Die meisten umfangreicheren Softwarepakete, die von Photografen genutzt werden, haben heute eine Funktion eingebaut, mit denen farbige Ränder und chromatische Aberrationen ausgeglichen werden können. Beim genannten Bild ist die chromatische Aberration äußerst gering, deshalb habe ich auch nur einen Hinweis gemacht. Aber da Du sicher daran interessiert bist, Deine Bilder noch weiter zu perfektionieren, solltest Du Dir die grundlegenden Nachbearbeitungstechniken auf jeden Fall zulegen. Für Adobe Lightroom wäre die Arbeit damit getan, indem das Häkchen für "Chromatische Aberrationen entfernen" setzt und eventuell den Regler für die Inensität der Abweichungsfarbe magenta/rot auf 1 oder 2 setzt. (siehe zB http://urban-base.net/2014/01/farbsaeume-chromatische-aberration-in-lightroom-entfernen/)

The flares in File:Pertes de la Valserine13 2015-04-12.jpg‎‎, one can cover the lense from sunlight. Given the rainbow, glass is involved, hence lense construction. What can be done in post-processing? -- KlausFoehl ([[User talk:KlausFoehl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Bei den Lens Flares ist es schwieriger. Am besten vermeidet man sie von vorneherein durch geeignete Abschattung der Linse (also lens cover oder ggf. die schwarze Seite eines Faltreflektors). Wenn es dann doch passiert hilft eigentlich nur noch ausklonen. Die hellere, größere Stelle rechts kann man noht durchgehen lassen, aber die beiden kleineren zeigen schon Regenbogenfarben, da muss was gemacht werden. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Also, ich bin Hobbyfotograf, und zur Nachbearbeitung nutze ich eigentlich keine kommerziellen Programme. Und wenn ich meine Kamera zum Skifahren mitnehme, dann ist die Canon G12 schon am oberen Ende, was Volumen, Gewicht, und eben auch die nicht vorliegenden Reinraumbedingungen betrifft. Bei Streulicht habe ich das kleine Problem, dass meine Linse nicht immer komplett staubfrei ist. Wenn ich Sonnenreflexe bemerke, schatte ich mit der freien Hand die Sonneneinstrahlung ab. Ich hatte auch schon überlegt, mir noch was besseres zuzulegen, aber das wäre dann eine Kamera, die ich nicht immer dabei hätte, eine Kamera, die in unpassenden Momenten Spiegelgeräusche von sich gäbe. Klar kann ein Objektiv fixer Brennweite besser gerechnet werden, die CA bei der G12 ist sicher nicht Unvermögen seitens Canon.

Thema Nachbearbeitung, ich nehme meist direkt die Fotos als JPG aus der Kamera, obwohl ich meistens auch noch RAW mit abspeichere. Was mir bei dem verlinkten lightroom-Beispiel nicht gefällt, ist das black-box-Vorgehen. Und am Beispiel Stein sieht man den blauen Rand verschwunden, während der orange-rote komplementäre Rand im Stein, Grenze Schatten-Licht, eben nicht korrigiert wurde. Da ist mir das Vorgehen der software zu undurchsichtig.

Thema software, für normale Dinge nehme ich gimp, zum Panorama zusammenbauen hugin. Ich hatte sogar mehrmals schon Photoshop zur Verfügung, aber dann immer das Programm verloren, als der jeweilige Rechner kaputtging beziehungsweise der Umstieg auf einen anderen Rechner anstand. Da macht es dann nicht einmal Spaß, sich in so ein Programm einzuarbeiten.

Wertvoll sind natürlich für mich die Hinweise auf Unvollkommenheiten, weil man selbst nicht für alles einen Blick entwickelt hat. Bei Panoramaaufnahmen schaue ich gerne auf die Vermeidung von sichtbaren Parallaxenfehlern, weil ich eben oft die Fotos frei aus der Hand mache und allermeist eben kein Stativ mit Panoramakopf dabei habe. Aber dafür gibt es dann die Bilder. Grüße -- KlausFoehl ([[User talk:KlausFoehl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Hello

Hi. This is regarding your review of my submission today for QI (Sheikh Chilli's Tomb, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India). You have written that it can be salvaged with reprocessing. This is my first nomination and I know very little how can I reprocess the same. Will be thankful if you can guide me, please. Thanks. --Manoj Khurana ([[User talk:Manojkhurana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC) P.S.- I have uploaded the original photo as it is. No processing/tinkering has been done.--Manoj Khurana ([[User talk:Manojkhurana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

On second look, I noticed, that it was taken with a cellphone. That means, that you don't have better base material at hand. Unfortunately, this leaves no chance to get rid of the artefacts and I have to decline. My advise is, that for taking good photos, do not use a cellphone - you won't get a good quality. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your feedback. I'm not a professional photographer & don't have any technical knowledge. It was my first nomination and what I've understood from your feedback is that I need to have advanced equipment before I nominate pics here. Please correct me if i'm wrong. I sincerely thank you for your valuable time.--Manoj Khurana ([[User talk:Manojkhurana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Please Review

Mana Village, Badrinath, Uttarakhand, India

Hi. Sorry to disturb you again. This one I took with a digital camera. I consider this as one of my best photos till date, but seeing the quality of other pics here I'm not having enough courage to nominate this. This picture is looking quite dark. I noted that you already have so many selected pics, can you help in processing this one if possible. Thanks and Regards. --Manoj Khurana ([[User talk:Manojkhurana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

You commented on my picture in the quality images discussion. After having had some run-ins with some of the people here and another careful look at what exactly it is that is considered high quality here I have decided not to contribute anymore. You made an effort to write a useful critique (and I don’t even agree with you on some points but that doesn’t matter) and I wanted to thank you for that.
I will not make any changes to my pictures anymore and will let them and my account rot. --Nubero ([[User talk:Nubero|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Erosion

At this time "erosion" is a category related to earth sciences, have you some purpose on how categorize the two files about pipelines? Regards. --Ciaurlec ([[User talk:Ciaurlec|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Erosion is not only related to earth science but t. As an employee of a german Notified Body, I am also involved in damage and corrosion assessment. Those photo comes from a stock of damage cases in the industry. Please google for "steam erosion steel" to get an idea --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I agree with the fact that "erosion" has a larger meaning, but here there are nothing related to what you need for. Surely "corrosion" is more similar to the signifiance of theese photos. If don't please create a new useful category, but don't put images in "erosion". --Ciaurlec ([[User talk:Ciaurlec|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Corrosion and erosion are two complety different mechanism. Erosion is a mechanical process, while corrosion is a chemical process. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

I understand, because theese words are used in the same way even in geosciences. But here the problem is about the categorization. I mean that mixing such different matters would creat difficut in searching files. I suggest that 1) create a new category i.e "Erosion(engineering)", 2)or to leave the current one for engineering purposes and move all the present files and categories to a new category i.e. "Erosion(earth sciences)". A third option is to create a disambiguation page. Feel free to act as you prefer. Regards. --Ciaurlec ([[User talk:Ciaurlec|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I will find suitable categories later. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

I moved again your photos from the Category "Erosion" because i'm trying to categorize better all the erosion landforms that are there. So excluding the less specific images (as yours) is important in simplyfing the recognition of various objects. This is not an editwar, nore a misrecognizion of your work (your photos are all of great quality), but i really please you to find or at least suggest a more suitable category; if don't i will try to create a new one by myself. Regards. --Ciaurlec ([[User talk:Ciaurlec|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I already confirmed May 16 that I will resolve the category. But I don't understand why you are pushing this through in a moment, while I am guarding the bed with fever. Is a fucking category now more important than my health? Nothing will change if you just calm down and wait until I'm back to my full capabilities. --11:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your attention and your continuos, indefatigable work. Recover soon. --Ciaurlec ([[User talk:Ciaurlec|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xian China Cultural-Performance-02.jpg

Hi Cccefalon, I do not know if you saw but I nominated one of your picture. Some users asked for a correction of the WB. For me the WB is certainly not far to be fine and this impression comes certainly from the lighting of the show and is visualy not bad. If you want or not apply a small correction, the both are fine for me. Moreover you are not obliged to answer here nor on the nomination page if you do not want. Cordially. -- Christian Ferrer 18:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Christian! First of all: thank you for nominating the image, I was happy to notice it this morning. I also saw the comments about WB and I am pretty undecided, if the light should be changed. The directors of the performance decided to use very strong coloured lights for their show and the photo is showing exactly this situation. Changing the light situation would change the original atmosphere. I think, that all our event photographers would decline to alter a event photo in a way, that is depriving the event of its artificial lights and just pretending a 5500K atmosphere. I am a little bit surprised, that the reviewers do not take that into consideration. Perhaps, I should add this explanations to the FP section. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

I totally agree, that's why I had nominated without even thinking it needed a correction and if this is the case it is only a very slight correction to not affect the original atmosphere. There is a lot of exemples [1] [2] [3] where the "true" WB is hard to find...-- Christian Ferrer 05:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

I took again my RAW of the photo, only to find, that the WB is totally correct. You can see this on the white parts of the background decoration. As soon as you set the WB to get the faces more "natural", the white parts of the background go to blue. After all, I am decided, not to change anything with the WB.

In this series of photos, I have images with other coloured light situations - in green, red, blue etc. The photos all take their power from the blend of costumes and coloured light.--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

File:Kuta Bali Indonesia Vihara-Buddha-Guna-04.jpg

Template:Autotranslate  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

• The image is really good, and it's a shame that I have to do this... but policy just doesn't allow us to push the matter aside. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Sock

I noted that you found a nomination unclear leading to an accusation of a sock. I can confirm that it is not my picture, but that is not a requirement for nomination I assume? Should the nomination process have been made in a different way ? --Pugilist ([[User talk:Pugilist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Exactly. A correct nomination code of another Commoners images should look like this: File:Laya-Laya_Sabah_Tuaran-Futsal-Arena-01.jpg|{{/Nomination|Kg. Laya-Laya, Tuaran, Sabah: Tuaran Futsal Arena (by [[User:Cccefalon|CEphoto, Uwe Aranas]]) --~~~~|}}
Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I have corrected the nomination code. --Pugilist ([[User talk:Pugilist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

File:Taipei Taiwan 228-Monument-01.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Taipei Taiwan 228-Monument-02.jpg

And also:

• File:Taipei Taiwan 228-Monument-03.jpg

Yours sincerely, Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image

Good morning;
I'm sorry to disturb you by nominations photos,I will not nominate photo any more, I am sorry to waste of your time --Touzrimounir ([[User talk:Touzrimounir|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

The right way would be: Read the image guidelines and choose the nominations carefully upon elegibility and quality. It is unedifying, to decline a that high percentage of your nominations because they were too small or of a considerably bad quality. Thank you and take my words as a challenge, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Sortierkriterium

Hallo! Ich hoffe, du siehst es mir nach, wenn ich bei einer deiner User-Kategorien ein Sortierkriterium nachgetragen habe. Ich versuche, ein wenig Ordnung in meine QI-Kategorien zu bekommen und dabei war mir aufgefallen, dass es fehlte. Viele Grüße, Dietmar. --XRay ^talk 16:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Dazu kann ich nur "Danke" sagen, das war eine gute Idee! Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Maischberger

... Du hast recht, das Bild war gar nicht für QI geeignet, da stark verkleinert. Bei der Frage Auflösungsreduzierung contra "Makroaufnahme der Hautstruktur" entscheide ich meist für ersteres ;-) --Superbass ([[User talk:Superbass|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Ja, ist ja nicht schlimm. Manche Bilder sind ja trotzdem so gut, dass sie außerhalb von QIC eine anderweitige Anschlussverwendung finden. Ich entscheide mich auch gelegentlich, einen Ausschnitt eines Bildes für Commons bereitzustellen, wohl wissend, dass ich ihn nicht nominieren kann. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Übrigens: Für mich ist das hier der Favorit aller Bilder der gestrigen Parade, vielen Dank für diesen Upload!

P.S. Wie integrierst Du eigentlich die Geokoordinaten? GPS in der Kamera, parallel laufende Handy-App oder manuelle Suche auf der Karte? --Superbass ([[User talk:Superbass|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Bei meinem Sabah-Projekt habe ich eine interessante Gabe entdeckt: Ich kann innerhalb von 15 Sekunden auf wikimapia den Ort wiederfinden, an dem ich photographiert habe. Diese Koordinaten übernehme ich dann. Beim ColognePride habe ich es mir ein bisschen einfacher gemacht, da ich mich innerhalb eines Strecke von 300 m bewegt habe, habe ich nur eine Koordinate für alle Bilder genommen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Du hast es richtig angeführt

und um Exifs angefragt. Man sollte User:Lzy881114 genau beobachten. Seine ganzen Montagen sind aus meiner Sicht sehr verdächtig (und nicht nur diese).--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Leider ist auch die "Qualität" weit davon entfernt, dass er damit bei mir einen Blumentopf gewinnen kann. Suspekt sind mir übrigens Leute immer dann, wenn sich die Fehler exakt wiederholen (wie im Bild "Music theme park Harbin"). Das bedeutet, dass man es mit Unbelehrbaren zu tun hat und das kann ich überhaupt ab. Ich helfe gerne und teile mein Wissen, aber es gehören immer zwei Seiten dazu. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

QIC kaki

Cccefalon, its was not necessary a wider crop here: , I had uploaded a wider one: , yeap, I screw up heheheh, totally forget what I did... -- RTA 09:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you for the feedback. In general, if the crop at a studio shot is too wide, it is of course not that big problem, because the enduser can apply additional crop upon his needs. However, I feel that I should hint the fact, that a balanced view is desirable. Your second photos is almost balanced. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Humm.. I quite like this poster kind of look that this crop brings, see here: w:pt:Caqui, that's why I prefer fill 2/3 the photo with the main object. -- RTA 19:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Guten Tag, User Cccefalon,

bei meinen Versuchen, Quality images anerkannt zu bekommen, sehe ich immer wieder Ihren Namen. Offensichtlich sind Sie der aktivste Photograph auf Commons. Ich danke Ihnen dafür, dass Sie sich die Mühe gemacht haben, einige meiner Photos zu begutachten.

Heute habe ich eine Frage: Wie beurteilt man "Color aberations" ? Dies ist das größtes Problem bei meinem Lernvorgang, RAW-Photos zu "entwickeln". Hier beziehe ich mich auf das Photo

Nomination: The new building of Leica Camera in Wetzlar, by new user User:Hanneke Heinemann --Emha 11:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Ich interessiere mich auch für Buchtitel, in welchen Fragen der digitalen Photographie jenseites von Schiebereinstellungen behandelt werden.

Heute haben mich die beiden Photos einer Tempeltüre in Ubud von Ihnen besonders berührt. Es ist da die Athmosphäre eingefangen, wie ich sie vor 45 Jahren in Ubud selbst erlebt habe.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

--ArishG ([[User talk:ArishG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke für die nette email. Ich heisse Uwe und bin nur einer von vielen Menschen, die WikiCommons ihre Bilder zur Verfügung stellen. Der aktivste bin ich sicher nicht. Zu meinen Aktivitäten findest Du [[4] etwas.

Zu chromatischen Aberrationen (CA) findest Du in der englischen Wikipedia einen guten Artikel. Für die Beseitigung derartiger "Farbsäume" gibt es in Netz sehr viele Anleitungen. Ich empfehle Einsteigern in die Bildbearbeitung immer, sich einmal mit LightRoom zu beschäftigen. Ich halte es für das Beste Programm, da je auf den Markt gebracht wurde, da es den klassischen workflow der Bildentwicklung sehr gut abbildet. Adobe stellt eine kostenlose 30-Tage-Vollversion des Programms zur Verfügung. Für CA und Farbsäume hat LightRoom sehr gute Möglichkeiten zur Entfernung; es gibt dazu unzählige Anleitungen im Netz, zB http://www.gizmag.com/remove-chromatic-aberration-color-fringing-lightroom-5/31174/

Mit Photoliteratur kann ich nicht wirklich weiterhelfen, wenn ich etwas wissen will, stöbere ich im Internet. Meine Literatur zu Hause beschäftigt sich eher mit Studiobeleuchtung.

Viel Erfolg und Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2015

hello there! could you please check you email inbox? I have sent a letter to you. thank you! --アンタナナ 06:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Antanana, I will answer one part of your letter in a private email, but I want to clarify my position also here (as usual, I expect that some people will throw daggers after me after reading my harsh comment on QIC).

I have no problem, to review much more images than I nominate myself, although it is taking a lot of my time. But the least I can expect, is, that the nominator is crosschecking the images against the most common issues that will prevent a promotion. Among this issues are:

• Too small images (below minimum size requirement or button size landscape photos)
• Oversharpened images with clear signs of oversharpening
• Images with artefacts and posterization
• Images with strong chromatic aberrations
• Images with Dust spots
• Images with notable distortion

It is not too much, if I ask mass nominators to abstain from posting such images in QIC. I am aware, that WLE has the honorable expectation that at least 1% of the images can acquire QI status. But some images are far from QIC, although people might raise the "I like" flag. Such images should not enter QIC and as a nominator you should facilitate the review process with a careful pre-choice of the nominations.

If someone is nominating his own images, I usually make a strict difference between issues that can the resolved and unresolvable issues. For resolvable-only issues, I give a 7 day schedule for fixing the issue. But I stopped to do that favor for mass nominations of other authors. The statistics proves, that the probability of getting a feedback is very low.

Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:20, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

well, I can agree with the last statement. that's why I am contacting the uploaders/authors myself and ask them to do it. I have asked the author to upload the bigger file here File:Осінні фарби в долині Привидів.jpg, she hasn't responded yet, but I haven't seen her online in facebook (and sorry, but it is a bit confusing that there is no clear rule about higher resolution for landscape photos on the project page). I have written to the author of this picture File:Neckertal 20150527-6384.jpg on her talk page (as I am not acquainted with her/him and (s)he seems to be more active Wikimedia Commons user (a lot of WLE/WLM contributors do not pay attention to the talk pages, so writing to them via e-mails or social media is more effective)). I have contacted the WLE Russia team to make the best out of their winners, and they have tried to do it: File:Айсберг в районе ЗФИ.jpg, File:По гротам пещеры 1.jpg, File:Обнажение с.Танцыреи.jpg, File:Lena Delta B.Lyakhovsky Island 2010-09-28 Boris.jpg, and now we have more nice pictures (contests also motivate people to do more and in time). but it actually happens that people do not respond. though it does not mean that I do not care --アンタナナ 07:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

hello there! could you please look at these images? File:Спокій вічності - Карадаг - Calmness of eternity - Karadag, Crimea.jpg, File:Тумманний світанок на Південному Бузі - околиці с. Самчинці.jpg and File:Світанок на Південному Бузі - район с. Самчинцi.jpg (the last one became QI even though it was small,I believe). and do please write me back in a private email --アンタナナ 22:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Unbelievable bad quality

Dear Cccefalon,

Could you please be carefull with comments like "unbelievable bad quality"? Even when a photograph is not of a good quality we should be carefull with labels like that because it can offend the photographer. There are other ways to express that an image fails the quality image criteria. I understand that it is frustrating when people nominate several files that fail the QI criteria but that is not the photographers fault in this case isn't it? Natuur12 ([[User talk:Natuur12|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I disagree. The photographer sent this photo to WLE, so he was aware that people will judge the photo. I hope, he will read my comment and take this it as an opportunity to think about, how he can enhance his skills. Though the flaws are obviuous, he even can ask me if he wants to know details about my harsh judgement. I know, that it is sometimes hard to swallow a bad judgement, but overall it can help to change the view on one's images. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - July - Unfamiliar Vehicles

I'm afraid I have to remove File:SabahStateRailway-SpecialCars-Railjeep9-04.jpg from the challenge as it was first uploaded to Commons before the challenge. I know you reworked it, but it is still the same photograph. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Colin, thats not a problem. It was my own fault that I forgot, that it should be a first upload and not a rework upload. However, it is not a big loss, as this challenge got a lot of good nominations. CHeers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Singapore Miniature-photography-01.jpg

Template:Autotranslate    FDMS  4    21:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Koblenz, Affection - Lucien Wercollier (2015-08-12 75).JPG

Hallo und vielen Dank für das Decline. So etwas nennt man echte Kollegialität. Ein Hinweis auf den zugegebenermaßen schwerwiegenden Mangel, den ich übersehen hatte, wäre allerdings noch netter gewesen. Aber wie gesagt: Es wäre wahrscheinlich wirklich am besten, nicht mehr bei QIC mitzumachen. Manchmal kann man sich nur wundern, was durchgewinkt wird, während ein anderes Mal Bilder wegen geringster korrigierbarer Mängel abgeschmettert werden. Auf die jetzt eingeleitete Diskussion können wir meinetwegen verzichten; denn da tut sich erfahrungsgemäß meistens nichts mehr. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Man kann mir möglicherweise viel nachsagen, aber nicht, dass ich Bilder durchwinke oder unfair bewerte. Ich habe mir den dritten Korrekturversuch gerade angeschaut und würde das Decline aufrechterhalten. Ich verzichte darauf, erneut eine Annotierung anzubringen, denn ich will kein Öl auf's Wasser giessen, aber sowohl an der linken Seite ist ein Teil der Linie immer noch da als auch eine geometrische Bearbeitungsfläche an der rechten kugeligen Form der Skulptur. Ganz rechts sieht man, dass die Fläche "gewischt" wurde.

Für mich sah es erst mal nicht so aus, als wäre es reparabel. Wenn doch, umso besser. Wenn die Bearbeitungsfehler weg sind, werde ich das Photo promoten. Das alles ist doch jetzt wirklich kein Grund, mir im Ärger Pest und Cholera auf den Hals zu wünschen oder es persönlich zu nehmen. Gute Nacht, schlaf gut --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Noch mal zur „Affection“: Ich habe nicht gesagt, Du würdest leichtfertig „durchwinken“. Es gilt allgemein, und ich habe mich manchmal gewundert, wenn zum Beispiel ein Hintergrund absolut nicht zum Motiv passte, ein Auto in einem Museum mit Seil davor oder auf einer Wiese mit Zettel in der Windschutzscheibe aus viel zu kurzer Entfernung mit Weitwinkel aufgenommen wurde usw. und es dann hieß: „Es ist aber doch scharf.“ Ich habe „Affection“ jetzt noch einmal vorgestellt, weiß allerdings nicht, ob es nach meinem Rückzieher erlaubt ist. Das ist jetzt keine weitere Bearbeitung, sondern ein Foto, das ich unmittelbar vor dem ersten machte. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

QIC

Sorry, der Kandidat scheint bereits archiviert zu sein. Aber ein Wort zu "nitpicking". Ohne irgendeinem der Fotografen oder Beurteiler auf QIC persönlich zu nahe treten zu wollen, scheint mir dort seit langem eine außerordentliche Schieflage eingetreten zu sein, weshalb ich mich auch nur noch selten beteilige. Aber ich fand deine Beurteilung tatsächlich sehr pingelig angesichts der Tatsache, daß reihenweise Bilder wie z.B. dieses anstandslos durchgewunken werden. Ich bemühe mich derzeit, die /recently promoted-Seite ein wenig abzuarbeiten und stoße da auf eine Menge Bilder mit wesentlich groberen Fehlern als bei dem von dir bemängelten, die selbst ich mit meinen gewißlich geringeren Ansprüchen nicht promoted hätte. Frühere Diskussionen auf QIC zum Thema vergleichbarer/einheitlicher/reproduzierbarer Kriterien sind regelmäßig entweder schlicht versandet oder haben zu unfröhlichen Streitigkeiten ohne Konsens geführt. Nein, ich habe keine Lösung in der Tasche, aber ich weiß, daß sowohl übermäßige Penibilität als auch Gefälligkeitsbeurteilungen nach Nasenfaktor das Projekt ziemlich absurd gemacht haben. -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Dass die einzelnen Reviewer durchaus unterschiedliche Bewertungskriterien haben, ist mir durchaus bewusst. Einiges, was da promoted wird, hätte von mir keinen Support gekriegt. Zwar erlaube ich mir, die bereits promoteten Bilder zufälligen Stichproben zu unterziehen, aber es ist mir zeitlich nicht möglich, ALLE Nominierungen durchzusehen. Auch würden massenhafte "Zweitgutachten" durchaus das Potential zu weiteren unfröhlichen Streitigkeiten nach sich ziehen. Ich kann nur für mich selber sprechen und ich gebe mir größte Mühe, alle Bilder - egal ob von alten Hasen oder Neulingen - hier gleich penibel zu beurteilen. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Ich wollte damit nur deutlich machen, daß mein erbsenzählender Einspruch nicht als persönliche Kritik gedacht, sondern durch die m.E. häufig widersprüchlichen Bewertungen motiviert war, die man auf QIC so finden kann. -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke für die Klarstellung, Rainer. Wahrscheinlich sind wir mit unserer Auffassung von Bewertungskriterien - von Detailfragen abgesehen - nicht so weit voneinander entfernt. Ehrenamtliche Tätigkeiten, zu der Dutzende von Diven ihren Beitrag leisten, sind auf Dauer immer nur durch eine riesige Portion Durchhaltewillen zu ertragen Template:Smile --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Ich bin halt bereit, über kleinere Mängel hinwegzusehen, wenn zu erkennen ist, daß jemand mit einer nicht ganz so dollen Ausrüstung "alles richtig" gemacht hat, also das Optimale aus seiner Einsteiger-DSLR oder auch mal einer Kompakten herausgeholt hat. Hingegen werde ich zum Elch, wenn Leute mit 5.000-EUR-Ausrüstung unerklärliche Einstellungen wählen, die zu offensichtlichen Fehlern führten, und das dann auch noch wortreich mit dicker Lippe bis zum PA abstreiten. Dabei schaue ich grundsätzlich nicht auf Namen. Ja, wir haben Diven im "Personal", aber wir haben glücklicherweise auch wirklich gute Fotoknipser, die Kritik annehmen können oder aber unaufgeregt erklären können, weshalb sie dieses oder jenes so gemacht haben, wie sie es gemacht haben. -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:FPC-notice -- Christian Ferrer 04:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Das Problem mit dem Stacking-Fehler

lb Uwe, ich habe gestern in meinem Workflow ein grundsätzliches Problem erkannt und - wie ich hoffe - dann mit einer Ablauf-Umstellung behoben. Muss aber die Arbeit des gestrigen Tages gleich noch einmal machen. Aber besser am Anfang als später. --Hubertl 11:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Und das hat die gezackten Linien bei schwachen Kontrasten ausgelöst? Wie hast Du das in den Griff bekommen? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

IWL Links

About IWL links

The purpose of that was actually not IWL links per se, but to have any text in non-English script so that it's easier for people of non-English speaking languages to find the page.

I'm not saying one shouldn't use the special IWL template. That is fine, but it's not helpful to remove the content that I put there. It would be helpful to change it into sentences introducing Kota Kinabalu. WhisperToMe ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

The selection of links in the text is just a repetition of what everyone can find in the left menu. Selecting just three language could easily be seen as a discrimination of the other languages. As English is the prevailing language of commons, an introduction in English - which is more than just a repetition of the IWL link - is considered to be ok. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I brought it to discussion. If there is an agreement to your actions, go on. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Sabah railjeeps

I was wondering if you ran across any local sources for the term (that would be accessible on the internet, preferably)? A user is attempting to introduce a journalistic joke for these as the lemma on de.wikipedia. Anmccaff ([[User talk:Anmccaff|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

K.G. Tregonning referred to them only as jeeps (North Borneo, p. 103), but I will ask historian Ross Ibottson, who is preparing a book about the history of North Borneo Railways. Just give me some time to get the information. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Heat_blur

Template:Autotranslate El Grafo ([[User talk:El Grafo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Diskussion Commons Quality Bild 'Haselnüsse'

Hi, Deine Argumentation bezüglich des Schärfeverlaufs kann ich so nicht nachvollziehen. Wenn Du Dir Lehrbücher zur Photographie anschaust, wirst Du fast immer sehen, daß der Vordergrund unscharf ist, der Mittelteil scharf und der Hintergrund wieder unscharf, eine Suche in einer Suchmaschine mit Bildersuche wird Dir ein ähnliches Ergebnis zeigen. Deine Definition ist mir so noch nie unter die Augen gekommen, woher hast Du sie?! Das Gleiche gilt dann auch für das andere Bild mit den Mandeln. Das dritte Bild mit den Wattwurmspuren erscheint auch erst mal unscharf, schaut man sich die weißen Steine an, meine ich zu sehen, daß die scharf abgebildet sind. Woher der Eindruck er Unschärfe kommt ist mir allerdings nicht so klar, die Linse war jedenfalls sauber. --Elrond ([[User talk:Elrond|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Dies sollte eigentlich auf com:qic besprochen werden, dafür gibt es den Abschnitt consensual review. Aber da es einmal hier gelandet ist: Die Nüsse sind nirgendwo wirklich scharf abgebildet, es mag daran liegen, daß das verwendete Objektiv bei Offenblende nicht so doll scharf zeichnet, es könnte auch eine leise Bewegungsunschärfe als Ursache infrage kommen. Egal, was Ursache ist: Die beabsichtigte Bildwirkung funktioniert nicht, wenn es keine Übergänge zwischen "knackig scharf" und Unschärfeverlauf gibt, weil eben nichts im Bild knackig scharf ist. Wenn ich mir Fotolehrbücher anschaue, finde ich übrigens nichts von "vorne und hinten unscharf, Mitte scharf". Wenn man mit der Tärfenschiefe gezielt arbeiten will, lenkt man damit gewöhnlich den Blick des Betrachters auf das wesentliche Element, das man hervorheben möchte. Das kann sowohl ganz vorn im Bild als auch ganz hinten sein. Ich hätte tatsächlich bei den Nüssen auf einen Bereich sehr weit vorn scharfgestellt, wo die Dinger am größten abgebildet und daher am besten als Nüsse erkennbar sind und die Unendlichkeit der Menge halt im Hintergrund verschwimmen lassen. Dazu muß latürnich auch die Beleuchtung passen. Es ist nebenbei auch so, daß der vordere und der hintere Unschärfenverlauf bei "normalen" Aufnahmeentfernungen (nicht im ausgesprochenen Makrobereich) optisch druchaus unterschiedlich wirken, vorn ist der Übergang gewöhnlich "springender" als im Hintergrund, wo die Unschärfe allmählicher zunimmt. Bis zum Extremfall, bei dem die Schärfe hinten eben bis "unendlich" reicht, vorn aber beispielsweise erst bei zwei, drei Metern anfängt. -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

tschuldigung, bin noch nicht so lange hier aktiv. Was bitte ist com:qic? Hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/de stand Bei einer Ablehnung hinterlasse bitte den ausführlichen Kommentar auf der Diskussionsseite des Benutzers. was ich aber nicht erhalten habe, daher war ich aktiv und habe nachgefragt. Bei den Lehrbüchern biete ich die 'Meisterschule der Fotografie' von John Hedgecoe oder 'Die Kamera' von Ansel Adams oder Andreas Feiningers Große Fotolehre. Dass ich nicht der einzige bin der so arbeitet, zeigt ein Blick auf das Ergebnis der Suche bei einer Suchmaschine. https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1600&bih=770&q=sch%C3%A4rfeverlauf&oq=sch%C3%A4rfever&gs_l=img.3.1.0i24l4.5626.12242.0.15015.10.8.0.2.2.0.82.604.8.8.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..0.10.613.Xx_0Lxw-EJ8 von den ersten 40 Ergebnissen sind über 30 so gefertigt. Aber unabhängig von irgendwelchen Lehren oder Vorgaben habe ich dieses Bild so gestalltetwie ich es getan habe weil ich es genau so tun wollte . Es gab zwar auch Sachzwänge wie relative wenig Licht und kein Stativ, aber auch bei mehr Licht hätte ich nur die Verschlusszeit verringert. Beim Weißabgleich gab es etwas Probleme, weil es eine Mischinstallation gab. Der Mittelteil ist scharf, bei beiden Bildern. Auch bei voller Auflösung. Ich verlange nicht, daß Dir oder anderen die Bilder gefallen, nur ungerechtfertigte Kritik mag ich genausowenig und die geäußerte Kritik ist m.E. nicht gerechtfertigt. --Elrond ([[User talk:Elrond|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, aber du kannst jetzt noch hundert Fachbücher zitieren - davon wird das Bild nicht besser. Wenn Du meine und Smials Kritik als ungerechtfertigt empfindest, steht dir der Weg des Consensual Review offen. Die hier gelebte Praxis ist es, den Kommentar zur Ablehnung direkt unter dem Bild zu hinterlassen, was ich getan habe. Der zur Verfügung stehende Platz lässt elaborierte Ausführungen, wie die von Rainer nicht zu; das gehört dann wie gesagt ins Consensual Review. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Es geht jetzt nicht darum, mein Bild besser darstellen zu lassen, sondern um die Aussage Wenn ich mir Fotolehrbücher anschaue, finde ich übrigens nichts von "vorne und hinten unscharf, Mitte scharf" und die ist nicht korrekt, was ich eben mit Beispielen belegt habe. Sowohl mit Lehrbüchern als auch mit dem Zitat eines Links. Mehr nicht. --Elrond ([[User talk:Elrond|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wie ich schon mal gesagt habe, habe Dir auf QIC einen Tip gegeben, wie Du die Dir selbst gestellte Aufgabe hättest lösen können. Es gibt noch andere Möglichkeiten, die Smial freundlicherweise ausführlich beleuchtet hat, wobei auch er Dir sehr deutlich gesagt hat, dass Deine Ausarbeitung "vorne und hinten unscharf, Mitte scharf" in keinem Lehrbuch zu finden ist. Deinem beleidigten Kommentar auf QIC nach, kann ich Dir nur empfehlen, QIC zu bemühen. Der Thread hier ist hiermit geschlossen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

dass Deine Ausarbeitung "vorne und hinten unscharf, Mitte scharf" in keinem Lehrbuch zu finden ist Du hast also keinen meiner Hinweise gelesen (die zitieren Bücher) und den Link nicht angeklickt? OK, dann ist auch für mich die Diskussion beendet, wenn die gegebenen Informationen geflissentlich ignoriert werden. Schade! --Elrond ([[User talk:Elrond|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe mir die Googlesuche-Beispielbilder durchaus angesehen. Die unterstützen jedoch exakt meine Argumentation. In den allermeisten Fällen wird bei den Suchergebnissen durch den Schärfeverlauf ein zentrales Motiv hervorgehoben. Das kann sich naturgemäß räumlich links, rechts, weiter vorn, weiter hinten im Bild befinden, dementsprechend kann der Schärfenverlauf mal so und mal anders ausfallen. In allen anderen Fällen liegt die Schärfe entweder sehr weit im Vordergrund oder aber ist im Goldenen Schnitt bzw. ist nach der Drittelregel angeordnet - und eben nicht in der Bildmitte. Und: Ziemlich alle weisen eine ausgespochen knackige zentrale Schärfe und mithin eine deutlich erkennbare Hervorhebung des "interessanten" Bereichs auf. Btw.: Mein Kommentare hier beziehen sich ausschließlich auf die Haselnußschüttung. -- Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Nymphaea_(park_Tivoli).jpg

I see some remarks for photo. Both cases wrong, no sharpening applied. That fring, I check original, take it as reflection of red flower. The edge is original burnt. --Mile ([[User talk:PetarM|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, might be, the reason for the artefacts isn't sharpening. Might be, it is a stacking issue. But nethertheless, there are artefacts and you should remove them. Also, a red flower is not reflecting in magenta color. It is not severe, but as you work with Adobe LR, you can easily set the defringing amount to +2 and it will be resolved. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Cirebon station

Have you seen your file: File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-02.jpg and File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-03.jpg? The picture shows Taksaka train hauled by CC 206 13 31 class locomotive that stopped in Cirebon Station, not Gambir Station. This is because the "canopy" (platform roof) of the platform doesn't like Gambir Station, but like Cirebon station. See also: File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg. Thank you.

Terjemahan dalam bahasa Indonesia:

Mohon dicek lagi kedua berkas tersebut. Gambar yang Anda potret itu menampilkan kereta api Taksaka yang dihela lokomotif CC 206 13 31 sedang berhenti di Stasiun Cirebon, bukan Stasiun Gambir. Terima kasih. Alqhaderi Aliffianiko^Wicara 12:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I turned 180 degree on my heels and shot this: File:Jakarta_Indonesia_-Commuter-at-Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg (please refer to the shooting time to compare). For me, it is Gambir or the board is wrong --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

There's a difference of 3 hours between the photos File:Jakarta Indonesia -Commuter-at-Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg and File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-02.jpg. --Magnus ([[User talk:Tsungam|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I was referring to the one minute difference between Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg and Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-01.jpg ... But for the other two, you are right, there is something fishy, also with the overall atmosphere at the rail. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I trust your expertise, Wicara and will rename the files. Especially, as on that day, I took the train form Jakarta to Yogyakarta and Cirebon is on the way. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Done; also replaced geocode. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

After I examine those files, this is not Taksaka train, but Argo Dwipangga train.

• The train departs from Gambir station at 8:00 am, West Indonesian Time and Taksaka departs at 08:50 am, West Indonesian Time, but your camera date and time is belong to Malaysian time (+1 hour 21 minutes, see: File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Gambir-05b.jpg).
• The interior (see: File:Central-Java Indonesia Inside-CC206-rail-car-01.jpg doesn't like Taksaka train. The coach is for Argo class train that used by Argo Dwipangga.
• The front-most coach is a baggage car.

I'm sorry for that. Thank you.

Please just trust the date, not the time. The camera time was perhaps not set up properly. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Terjemahan dalam bahasa Indonesia: Setelah saya teliti, ini bukan Taksaka, melainkan Argo Dwipangga.

• KA ini berangkat dari stasiun Gambir pada pukul 08.00 WIB, sedangkan Taksaka berangkat pukul 08.50 WIB, namun tanggal pemotretan menurut waktu Malaysia (selisih waktu 1 jam 21 menit).
• Interior kereta api tersebut tidak seperti Taksaka, karena lebih menyerupai kereta Argo (seperti Argo Dwipangga dll.)
• Kereta yang paling depan (di belakang lokomotif CC 206 13 31) adalah kereta bagasi. Umumnya apabila kereta api Argo Dwipangga dari Jakarta ke Solo, kereta terdepannya adalah kereta bagasi.

Saya memohon maaf atas kesalahan ini. Terima kasih. Alqhaderi Aliffianiko^Talk 12:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:FPC-notice --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Très gentil, Christian. Je suis heureux ... --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

QIC

Please do not remove my nominations just because the signature mechanism didn't work. --Jakob (talk) 12:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your nomination was not removed. It was marked as inelegible, because it is not signed. It is an primary duty in WikiCommons to sign ANY entry, see Commons:Signatures. This is repeated at the top of the QIC project where you also find the procedure, who to manually sign when you have JavaScript not available.

As soon as you properly signed, your nomination will be valid an the oppose will be revoked.

--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Apparently, JavaScript has stared working for me. Can you please finish what you started and give this a review? (for the record, removing the oppose was an IAR thing. I would obviously not have done that to a review that addressed the merits of the picture). --Jakob (talk) 11:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

CA

20150516 ESC 2015 Måns Zelmerlöw 9989

Hi CCcfalon, bist Du sicher, dass der Fehler in meinem Foto und nicht in der fotografierten Projektion ist? Im Fernsehen sah es ähnlich aus [5]... --Ailura ([[User talk:Ailura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Chromatische Aberrationen sieht man in jedem Kino- oder TV-Film. Es wäre viel zu aufwendig, jedes Bild einzeln nachzubearbeiten. Bei QIC wird allerdings erwartet, dass die CA-Problematik auch gelöst wird, um QI-Status zu erlangen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Das ist kein Fehler in meinem Bild (und auch nicht in der Fernsehaufnahme). Damit auch nicht mein Problem. --Ailura ([[User talk:Ailura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Es ist nicht unbekannt, dass Du versuchst, Fehler wegzudiskutieren, anstatt sie zu lösen. Chromatische Aberrationen sind eindeutig in den Image Guidelines referenziert. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Da geht es eindeutig um CA, die der Fotograf oder die Kamera verursacht, nicht um welche, die im Motiv sind. Ich weiß schon warum ich an dem QI-Theater nicht freiwillig teilnehme. --Ailura ([[User talk:Ailura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Milvus

Moin,

Würde mich freuen, wenn du auf File:Zeiss Milvus 14 50 1.jpg in der QI erneut einen Blick werfen könntest, hab es erneut überarbeitet. Gruß, Denis Barthel ([[User talk:Denis Barthel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen, Denis. Deine Bearbeitung ist substantiell besser als die vorigen Versionen; gratuliere, es war sicher viel Arbeit, aber es hat sich auch gelohnt. In dieser Version würde ich das Photo sofort promoten. Ein sehr gutes Studio-Photo! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Danke, Uwe, das freut mich sehr. Entscheidend war die richtige Software, die Bordmittel von Capture One und Gimp sind dafür einfach unzureichend, damit wurde es dann immer schlimmer. Mit Akvis war es dann einfach. Ein schönes Wochenende noch, Denis Barthel ([[User talk:Denis Barthel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Ja, das macht total viel aus. Ich habe lange Zeit ausschliesslich mit LightRoom gearbeitet und habe das dann wegen einiger spezieller Retuschier- und Freistellungswerkzeuge vor einem Jahr auf das Photographenpaket von Adobe (Lightroom plus Photoshop) erweitert. Speziell das Stempelwerkzeug ist ein unschätzbares Hilfsmittel, um Fasern und Kratzern beizukommen. Wobei ich mich Hubertl vorbehaltslos anschliesse, dass die richtige Vorarbeit - Entfusseln und Reinigen mit Bürste - viel Nachbearbeitung erspart. Bei Kratzern hilft das allerdings nicht. Für die Rechenmaschine, die auf meiner Userpage vorne drauf ist, habe ich allein etwa 5 Stunden nur damit verbracht, Kratzer zu retuschieren. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Sabah railjeeps

I was wondering if you ran across any local sources for the term (that would be accessible on the internet, preferably)? A user is attempting to introduce a journalistic joke for these as the lemma on de.wikipedia. Anmccaff (int:Talkpagelinktext) 22:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

   K.G. Tregonning referred to them only as jeeps (North Borneo, p. 103), but I will ask historian Ross Ibottson, who is preparing a book about the history of North Borneo Railways. Just give me some time to get the information. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (int:Talkpagelinktext) 04:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, and my apologies for such a late response. Anmccaff ([[User talk:Anmccaff|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

It is not forgotten. I already sent an email to my contact, but didn't received an answer yet. I will follow up. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality images from Tunisia

Dear Cccefalon and Template:Ping
Saturday, October 24, 2015 I organized a training about quality photos in Tunis, and it was very beneficial for photographers, as you can see Mohamed El Golli as an example,there will be other training and other photographers from Tunisia who nominate her photos,can you be more Patient with him ? because his first experience, and he don't know how to fix photos, and I will need your help for next training --Touzrimounir ([[User talk:Touzrimounir|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

While I appreciate your efforts in training the Tunis photographers, I am a little bit confused, about the meaning of being "more patient". The rules are clear and I cannot give excemptions for obvious non-QI images. I am also surprised, that my vote on Hubertls page - regarding the wrong white balance - was just ignored and the image was nominated. When a photogapher has a repeating problem with certain issues, he FIRST should learn how to fix BEFORE he is nominating on QIC. Usually, I am giving detailled hints, why I decline a photo, but it is frustrating when the photographer is nominating photos with the same issue one day later. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Touzrimounir, as Uwe just told, before nominating pictures, every photographer has to do his homeworks, the following list has to be done, when preselecting his own pictures for QI. The second is, to respond, what reviewers are asking for.

1. perspective distortion, the images must be aligned straight
2. check for over- and underexposed areas
3. check, if there are some dustspot left from the sensor
4. check for so called jpg-artefacts and posterized areas
5. Sometimes, you can see some vignettations.
6. Blurryness, sharpness, oversharpening, brightness...
7. Color abbreviations and overprocessed, unnatural colors (oversaturation)
8. White balance check.
9. Checking for possible lens flares
10. looking for disturbing elements, composition.
11. Check, if the picture have the minimum size and the photographer is a WikiCommoner.

But this is not all, there is a lot more to do:

• Checking, if the picture is properly categorized
• If the file has a proper, meaningful filename
• is there an good description of the subject (eventually in english too - but this is not mandatory!)
• If there are geo coordinates (useful, but not mandatory too!)

This all can make a quite normal image to a Quality Image!

For every point above, you will find Videos on YouTube how to do it properly. Mostly in english.

It´s not so difficult to make good pictures. The best I can recommend: Just do it! It needs some time during the Quality image process, maybe 2-3 month, but the difference is enormously then! And you will see after this time, every experienced photographer will do all this I mentioned above automatically after a while. Without thinking about.

The first is: Use the AV-Programm, but not any automatic program. ISO 100-200, in general, f/8. Then check the metering mode which refers to the way in which a camera determines the exposure. Most beginners are starting with the Automatic Multi-Pattern metering. More experienced photographers use the spot-metering-Method.

Thats almost all for a good start.

And, as I have analysed the pictures of Mohamed El Golli, he has to upload his pictures including Exif-Data. So we can see, where the problems are. In my opinion, he is using his wide angle lens, because it´s a wide angle lens and he is maybe proud of it. That means, that he can avoid to go back a few meters. Going back a few meter is - in every case - much better than useing wide-angle-lenses down to the edge. The same with all zoom lenses. Try to make a session with a 50mm prime lens, then you will understand, what I mean.

Greetings from Vienna. --Hubertl 11:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

November Photo Challenge

Sorry I didn't get organised enough with the October challenge themes. I've proposed a couple of themes for November and it would be good to agree and translate these + watchlist soon. Hope you can help. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Die Küchenfotos:

Eines ist zumindest sicher, es sind keine professionellen Bilder von einem Einrichtungshaus, das Geschirr im Spüler ist tatsächlich schmutzig, leider kann ich die Biermarke nicht erkennen um festzustellen, ob das Bier aus der Gegend des Fotografen ist. Aber ich habe nach Durchsicht seiner Bilder Zweifel, dass er technisch in der Lage war, Bilder dieser Qualität zu machen. Aber man kann sich ja überraschen lassen. Wenn es geklaut wäre, dann wäre es schon ziemlich dreist. --Hubertl 10:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Mich hat die massenhafte Verwendung "seiner" Photos im Internet ohne jegliche photographer credits überrascht. Dass er diese Tatsache - und auch dass boompict für die Bilder copyright beansprucht - so ohne weiteres hinnimmt, überrascht mich doch sehr. Wenn man derart philantropisch veranlagt ist, dann besser gleich public domain. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Soutien

For you : Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#El_Golli_Mohamed. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Panoramics in Le Lioran

• 
• 

Thank you for your very useful critics and for labelling the issues in the pictures! Trace ([[User talk:Trace|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

QI follow-up question

Hi there,

Thanks for taking the time to review QI candidates. I'm just hoping to follow up regarding one of your reviews today. For the image File:Seattle greatwheel 20130701.jpg you wrote 'Decline The "black bar" destroys the image.' This is indeed a good point. Accordingly I've cropped and reuploaded the image (old new). I don't know how the QI review process works, so this may not be possible, but would you reconsider given the update?

Thanks for your time. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Appreciated. And thanks for the pointer re: Template:Tl. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Schau mal

hier. Ich gehöre ja zu denen, die ziemlich viel Geduld gerade mit Neulingen haben. Aber irgendwann fragt man sich schon, was in deren Köpfen passiert. Und sie nach einer Nominierung nicht nachschauen, ob alles in Ordnung ist. --Hubertl 11:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

jaja, von dem user hab ich gestern und heute eine derartige Nominierung mit dem comment "removed misplaced nomination" entfernt. Ich habs bereits aufgegeben, belehrend zu sein. Ausserdem ist mir die blosse Fülle an schlechten Bildern inklusive der Marotte, vermehrt Smartphone-Schnappschüsse einzustellen, mittlerweile zu einem Dauerärgernis geworden. Was mir auch noch aufgestossen ist, ist dass Ralf letzthin ziemlich viele Bilder promotet, die technische Fehler aufweisen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Ja, der Ralf. Ich glaube, ich muss nächste Woche mit ihm ein ernstes Wörterl reden müssen, er besucht mich in Wien. ;-) Aber er ist sooo ein sturer Sack... --Hubertl 13:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Schau mal hier - insbesondere der Himmel. Das ist peinlich, sowas als QI durchzuwinken ... Nachdem ich das gestern durch Zufall gesehen habe, habe ich mir vorgenommen, alle Promotionen zukünftig gegenzuchecken .... --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

The Sundering of the Elves

Hi. I've uploaded higher resolution. Agnaton ([[User talk:Agnaton|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

As mentioned in QIC, the new upload lacks quality. I agree, that the better format would be svg. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Cocktails

Ich wurde da um Hilfe gebeten, weil sie keinen Fotografen hatten. Ich habe von diesen Getränken NULL Ahnung und ich kann kaum Englisch. Sie haben mir jedes Glas einzeln beschriftet, das Einzige, was ich machen konnte, war, den Namen in die Beschreibung einzugeben. Wir haben zwar vereinbart, daß die "Wissenden" die Kategorisierung nachholen, ist aber noch nicht passiert. Ich kann es wirklich nicht. --Ralf Roleček 23:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Ach Ralf, diese Cocktails haben jeweils einen eigenen deutschen Wikipedia-Artikel (z.B. Old Cuban), der genügend Ideen vermittelt, was man da eintragen könnte. Bleiben wir als Beispiel beim Alten Kubaner. Der Artikel erklärt, dass der Hauptbestandteil Weißer Rum ist. Für die bereits vorhandene Kategorie "Cocktails with rum" reicht Dein Englisch. Da in dieser Unterkategorie noch kein "Old Cuban" ist, legst Du diese Unterkategorie an. Für jemand, der angeblich seit 2003 bei Wikipedia mitwirkt, sollte das doch kein Problem darstellen. Also hör auf zu jammern Template:Smile. Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Beim Cubaner hab ich es gemacht aber der nächste hat keinen Artikel, der übernächste die Info "Spirituose". Sour oder Distilled beverage gibts nicht als Untercat. Im vierten ist Champagner, gibts auch nicht. --Ralf Roleček 09:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

The women of Cameroun...

New chance

I suggest to open the consensual review again, as I have seen, your complaints were more or less just the categorization. We withdraw the todays nomination, Yann can give his Template:S-vote as he want to. --Hubertl 15:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

My complaint was purely about poor categories. The photographic value is undoubted for me. Yann can renominate tomorrow, after the QICbot processed CR. I am not fond of baking an extra cookie for everyone who is just too late. Closed is closed. Where do we end the exeptions for delayed voters? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for removing. I checked categories and it is ok. Renominate after QICbot did his work and I will not oppose a promotion. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok for me. --Hubertl 15:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)