User talk:Crisco 1492/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Students of Sebelas Maret University dancing the Jejer Dance, 2015-07-29 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravik Kardisi addressing 8th IIF Conference speakers, 2015-07-29 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 17:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Students of Sebelas Maret University dancing the Jejer Dance, 2015-07-29 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Students of Sebelas Maret University dancing the Jejer Dance, 2015-07-29 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ravik Kardisi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gillette Mach3 razor from Indonesia, 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartasura Fortress, Kartasura, Central Java 2015-07-31 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pacifier for newborn, 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravik Kardisi addressing 8th IIF Conference speakers, 2015-07-29 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, third opinion appreciated! --Hubertl 21:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clip for cartridge of Gillette Mach3 razor, 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day

Hi. Can you tell me the process for getting an FP image chosen as picture of the day, like yours is today. Somewhere I read that you are in charge! Thanks. Charles Charles (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

• I'm in charge on the English Wikipedia, not Commons. On Commons, editors add their own images to the queue (link for September) and one or more blurb. You have to do this several months ahead of time; right now it's already scheduled into November. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cartridge for Gillette Mach3 razor, 2015-08-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Razor Images

I think that there is significant doubt over the Gillette pictures with regards to intellectual creativity and whether the images are valid for the commons media. I intend to request that they be deleted. - Bethayres (talk) 10:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

• You are fully within your rights to do so. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Basement Kitty Barnstar
		for tangling and detangling mighty balls of yarn; for keeping a playful attitude and a sunny-side up; for being involved in Commons; and for remembering - as you obviously do - that the whole thing is a process not a judgement. In purr... Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

• I love that cat. :) Reminds me of the one I had back in Canada. Thanks.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santoso, 2015-08-22 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

understanding copyright

per your comment here [1] it's a drive by, seat of the pants determination, treating every uploader as a vandal; summary dismissal of the no notice license. this is the prevailing culture; who knew that the americans have all these ridiculous rules, not as easy as berne or fop. if anyone says they understand it, you know they're lying. i just wish we could have a culture of collaboration, where we coach about the easy ones, and acknowledge people can differ about the hard ones. Slowking4♡Farmbrough's revenge 17:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• That it is. But, sadly, it's not something we can hope to eliminate. Sigh. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Actually I think we can change it. When I started on Commons the community was much crankier than it is now; I think we've improved and can continually improve more. Shall we make a working group? Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Buckwheat and products from it 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buckwheat and products from it 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dian HP playing the keyboard, 2015-08-22 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Tree in Prambanan

Hi Crisco, I saw several times a very special tree in Indonesia which I cannot identify. Can you help me with that? This one, I saw in Prambanan. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry, I'm not very familiar with botany. It's probably not an uncommon tree; I can try asking my wife when she wakes up. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

That would be great! Thank you, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• She didn't recognize it, sorry. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nephila pilipes, Bangunjiwo, Bantul 2015-09-19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nephila pilipes, Bangunjiwo, Bantul 2015-09-19 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nephila pilipes, Bangunjiwo, Bantul 2015-09-19 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptosia nina, Bangunjiwo, Bantul, 2015-09-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atractomorpha crenulata, Bangunjiwo, Bantul 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 17:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atractomorpha crenulata, Bangunjiwo, Bantul 2015-09-20 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 17:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Google Art Project tool

Hi, Zhuyifei1999‎ created a nice tool to import files from GAP. I think you might be interested: [2]. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

• Nice. Thanks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Atractomorpha crenulata at Sambisari Temple Complex, 2014-09-28 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atractomorpha crenulata at Sambisari Temple Complex, 2014-09-28 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pair of scissors with black handle, 2015-06-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Kaiser Franz Joseph Und Kaiser Wilhelm II

prejudice Mr.Crisco 1492,I am writing to tell you that I had asked in the past two boots about two paintings of 1700 concerning Martin van Meytens, where she has proven very helpful, and very ringrazie,,,, here I am writing this message to ask if this time could upload a photo of google project concerning the two characters,, sending the link that shows the 'image that i would like you google it loaded as project (if it has or has problemmi time) :)?

• link of Image

--87.8.55.99 20:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

• What evidence do you have that this photograph is in the public domain? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

the fact is that the author is anonymous,, and then the picture definitely have the copyright expired for almost 100 years--87.8.55.99 10:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

• And to demonstrate public domain status of a German work which was published anonymously, you count from the year of first publication. Do you have that information? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

look, informing me now I just found the information regarding the exact same photograph,,,, then immediately sending them to tell me if saaa can put on a load :)

Link of information photos --87.8.55.99 12:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

• I asked you how you could be sure that the image was public domain. If that 2014 article is the first publication, it's not. We have to be really careful with works in the late 19th-century and early 20th-century on Commons. There are a thousand and one variables which can affect the status of the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

well I though I found the information about the image,, however I think that should not be copyrighted--95.248.92.137 12:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Ferdinando II de Medici

prejudice Crisco 1492,, I'm writing to ask if you look for this portrait of the second half of the 600 ritrente the Grand Duke Ferdinand II de Medici. the author of the portrait is Valore Casini (1590–1660)

Link of Portrait:http://www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Menu-Utility/Immagine/index.html_645008884.html --82.50.35.170 20:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Have a great 2016. -- Colin (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh dear.

Seems my relationship with Commons may be about to turn nasty. Commons:Village_pump#Commons:User-specific_galleries.2C_templates_and_categories_policy.23Categories. Someone's trying to remove credit from me again... I'm going to insist on a hard policy statement to the effect of that's not allowed, or all my works from not on are getting a {{NotCommons}} on them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I hope this has resolved itself amicably (?). To the extent it has not, please count on my support. KDS4444 (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Fear and Desire (1953).webm

Hi, I got a 1280x720 version in webm: 439 MB. It took 15 hours for transcoding, and I only used 1 Mbs bitrate... (usully 2 to 2.5 Mbs is needed for this size). I don't know if it is useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

• It should be, if it's uploaded. I know... it takes ages. Hence why I wasn't pleased when I found out I had to crop the video. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I finally managed to transcode and upload a high quality version in 1280x720p. You can renominate it. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
    • Impressive. Thank you. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
      • Yann, I've had to revert to the previous version. I didn't realize that you had not removed the interview included before the film, which is quite probably still in copyright — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Portrait of Victor Emmanuel II of Savoy

prejudice Crisco 1492 I am writing to ask if she could load this portrait found on gettyimages made by Michele Gordigiani (1835-1909),is a portrait that I personally can not load, since you can upload photos and paintings of gettyimages,, could charge? please LINK: http://www.gettyimages.it/license/534967555 --Alanbishen (talk) 22:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

your copyright violation notice about the page of artiste Shahabuddin?

Hey Crisco 1492,

I don't understand why you noticed my picture "Le Saut" format jpg as a possible violation of copyright? This photo is from my computer. I already had this kind of discussion with french version of Shahabuddin wikipage, with french wikipedia admin. I'm her elder daughter and I just wanted to improve the page, I don't use wikipédia very often, I wanted to put more updated picture of my dad + (as your colleague SpacemanSpliff just send me a message too about the photo "Shahabuddin" wich is from my personnal collection!) The protection of my dad's privacy, particularly his paintings is my priority. That's why I prefer to download few images rather than other random pictures, by the way I neVer understood, someone from wikipédia community had put one profil picture of my dad? I don't even have this picture which was taken in Bangladesh during his trip in 2010. Anyway, As I told to french admin, those 2 pictures on his page come from my own computer. I don't know why you signaled them as a possible copy right violation? You know we live in France, and here the notion of "Violation des droits de la propriété intellectuelle" it's even more important than US law, as wikipedia deals with US Law is softer, specially from LA! So if you have any doubt about my explanations please feel free to delete those pictures, but it'll be sad because those pictures are authenticly from our familly, artist Shahabuddin's familly. You can even contact the french admin Chaoborus (you can just check to my profile - discussion page with him it's in french) Hope you'll read my message!

Chitro

• Please respond at the deletion nomination, so that the discussion can be centralized. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hans Baluschek - Arbeiterstadt (1920).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hans Baluschek - Arbeiterstadt (1920).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Erythrogonys cinctus - Chiltern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erythrogonys cinctus - Chiltern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Indriati Iskak in a promotional still (c. 1960), by Tati Photo Studio.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Indriati Iskak in a promotional still (c. 1960), by Tati Photo Studio.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 32.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 32.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

File:USS Arizona in New York City.tif

File:USS Arizona in New York City.tif is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:AERIAL VIEW OF USS ARIZONA ON THE EAST RIVER IN NEW YORK CITY NEAR BROOKLYN BRIDGE ON HER WAY TO SEA TRIALS. NOTE THE BIRD CAGE TOWERS, 1918. - USS Arizona, Submerged off Ford HAER HI,2-HONLU,31-1.tif. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Revent^talk 01:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• user:Revent, this file was uploaded 3 years before the other one. The other file is the duplicate. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 02:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

You're right. I just processed it the 'other way' but merged over the bot-imported data. Was trying to sort out the 'several' copies of that image floating around. Sorry about that. Revent^talk 03:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

• No worries. It is a great image. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 03:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Titus Andronicus (1785) - Noel le Mire - Jean-Michel Moreau.jpg

Could you possibly get a better copy of this from the Folger? Mainly asking because it looks so amateurish with the terrible crop...

http://cdm15082.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p252501coll1/id/6075

• Will take a look when I get home. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 06:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
  • It may just be me, but http://luna.folger.edu/luna/servlet/detail/FOLGERCM1~6~6~292059~122029:Titus-Andronicus,-Lucius--O-noble-f?sort=call_number%2Cauthor%2Ccd_title%2Cimprint seems like a better quality copy. There's a export option I'm goign to use as a stopgap, but... much larger on the page, as is often the case. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
    • I've given the Folger a go, but it's not loading the whole thing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
      • Ah, well. It's not so bad since I found the not-full-size-but-at-least-not-horribly-cropped copy. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate to Mangkunegaran Palace (detail), Mangkunegaran Palace, Surakarta, 2016-10-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance to Pendopo, Mangkunegaran Palace, Surakarta, 2016-10-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain statue, Mangkunegaran Palace, Surakarta, 2016-10-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Looking down from the top of Cetho Temple, 2016-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Men washing Cetho Temple, 2016-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the crop should be improved - with the whole feet. --XRay 05:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Raw image doesn't have the whole feet. I've cropped closer. Crisco 1492 07:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Weak  Support I think it's not the best but acceptable. --XRay 09:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Path to Kethek Temple, 2016-10-13 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Find the lizard! Good quality. --A.Savin 05:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Clearer at full-page size than full size, but clear enough at both sizes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 07:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief at Sukuh Temple, 2016-10-13 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laborers at Candi Sukuh, 2016-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think, "white tint is from dust in the air" is plausible - good quality. --Haeferl 00:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Zhang 2014 hi-res-download 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Bechdel 2014 hi-res-download 3 2.jpg

File:Bechdel 2014 hi-res-download 3 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 18:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• I've already shared via FB and am waiting for my wife to come back here with our credit card to donate.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Google Cultural Institute

Back in 2012 a big batch of Google Art images were uploaded. I noticed you uploaded some of the Google Cultural Institute pictures after that. Do you happen to know if anyone synced it to Commons after 2012? I'm wondering how many of these are missing. Multichill (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

• No, I don't think anyone's synched it. The method I used was manual, and getting the images took so much time that I only uploaded requests and/or things that already had English-language articles.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  • That sure takes a lot of time! I'll ask in the village pump, maybe someone has a bot to do it. Multichill (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM

Taken with Canon EOS 60D and Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

grendel|khan 22:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM

Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_100mm_F2.8L_Macro_IS_USM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

grendel|khan 22:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II

Taken with Canon EOS 60D and Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

grendel|khan 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II

Category:Canon_EOS_60D_and_Canon_EF_50mm_F1.8_II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

grendel|khan 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Es Ampiang Dadiah, Pasar Ateh, Bukittinggi, 2017-02-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find the picture quality good enough, though I think that's debatable. This doesn't look like a beverage, which would be something people drink; instead, it looks a whole lot like sago gula Melaka. I never knew anyone milked water buffaloes in the Malay Archipelago. In Malaysia, they use sweetened condensed milk when they make Malay-style sweets with milk. That's pretty interesting that they use susu kerbau - that's what they said they use? -- Ikan Kekek 10:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Yoghurt, actually. My bad. Crisco 1492 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Padang City as seen from the peak of Gunung Padang, 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horizon from Gunung Padang, Padang, 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very empty photo, but good quality. You could add value if you can find out what the island's name is and add that to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 11:01, 5 March 2017 (UTC) The empty composition was deliberate. Island name added. Crisco 1492 11:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seberang Pebayan Village, Padang 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I may be biased, because this brings back a lot of good feelings from my childhood in Malaysia, when loads of Malay villages looked like this, but I think others would agree that the quality is adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batu Malin Kundang, Air Manis Beach, Padang 2017-02-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

File:William Smith, Walter K. Kolomoku - Aloha Oe.ogg

Can you possibly delete my edits and uploads from File:William Smith, Walter K. Kolomoku - Aloha Oe.ogg? They were all test edits.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

• KAVEBEAR, I'm not an admin on Commons. Sorry.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh never mind. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crown of the Virgin of the Immaculate Conception, known as the Crown of the Andes MET DP365520.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crown of the Virgin of the Immaculate Conception, known as the Crown of the Andes MET DP365520.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats on Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nusa Larang Island, Situ Lengkong 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 07:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats on Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead tree at Situ Lengkong, Ciamis 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance to the grave of Prabu Harian Kancana, Situ Lengkong 2017-03-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rice fields in Ungaran, Semarang 2017-03-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Billowing clouds over Ungaran, 2017-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulau Pisang Ketek, Padang 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus on the island seems acceptable to me. By the way, in the file description, if you want to translate the name into English, wouldn't it be "Pisang Ketek (Monkey Banana) Island"? -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC) Ketek is Minang for "small". An island just past this one is "Pisang Gadang" (big banana). Crisco 1492 07:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ngarai Sianok, Bukittinggi, 2017-02-12 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gets less sharp toward the top of the picture frame, but solid, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Barry Docks pano.jpg

File:Barry Docks pano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

PTOD

No more notices for PTOD on EN? --Don (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

• Nothing ATM, but I've been out of town for three days.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I noticed a pic I did as PTOD on Mar 31, and no one ever bothered to mention it to me. Thought that was a bit odd..--Don (talk) 11:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• I don't think you got notifications the last few times, either. I stopped leaving notifications on blocked users' talk pages after being asked to do so a few years back. (I think 2014).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Not true at all, I would always receive notice. Review your FB chat for the history of my requests regarding the last few, In the future please provide such on the site that the photos were uploaded to, commons - ty. --Don (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

• The last POTD notification you got was in 2014. As I said, I stopped leaving notifications on blocked users talk pages after I was asked to do so in 2014. The recent ones (4 July 2016, and two in the last couple of months) had no such notification.

If you're asking a favor, it usually works better when you don't accuse the person you're asking of being a liar first. As things stand, I really have no interest in cross-posting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I was not asking for anything nor did I assert that you lied, I am sorry that you took it that way, not what I had intended. The notice came cross platform via a ping when you used my ID in the notice. After review I noticed that I received the "ping" notice and was looking for nothing more, that same notice. Please, have a nice day...--Don (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Meisje met de parel.jpg

See my comments at the FP. -- Colin (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

• Am commenting now.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

permission to use photo

Hello,

Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, “File:Crijn Hendricksz.jpeg” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.

With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 01:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

• That is not my photograph. It is a public domain scan of a painting.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Voice of Fire photo.jpg

File:Voice of Fire photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish^☎ 11:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'50000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2016 series'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)  Support --Brunei (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Golden hour at bekol savannah.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden hour at bekol savannah.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Gordon Tobing

Just by the way: Interesting to see a German-made guitar being used in Indonesia – a great addition to Category:Hoyer Guitars → File:Gordon Tobing (c. 1960) crop.jpg now being used at en:Hoyer Guitars and its German language cousin! Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

• El Grafo, glad you liked it! I didn't think to check the type of guitar. I wouldn't be surprised if he picked it up in Germany. By this point in his career, he'd travelled to Europe several times.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Merak tarung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Merak tarung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seno Gumira Ajidarma at the KOFI KAFEIN conference, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta, 29-08-2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kala head, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, looks good now, QI for me. Tournasol7 21:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO enough for QI, Tournasol7 13:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swing at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good One (IMO) --Shishir 11:17, 15 September, 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge into mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spire of East Java Christian Church, Mojowarno, Jombang, 2017-09-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kala head, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Quality is OK, but it needs some categories about the relief. --C messier 06:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Done. Crisco 1492 11:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)  Support --C messier 06:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --C messier 06:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple statue (detail), Jombang, 2017-09-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 16:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 16:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Horizontals are not straight (see the note). Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 11:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC) Image is already https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0g8irj2feigi31/Relief.png?dl=0. The relief itself is not ruler straight. Crisco 1492 12:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment I also have a Lightroom and I know that sometimes auto perspective correction is not perfect and I must fix it manualy --Halavar 14:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC) SupportI think it is good enough.--Jebulon 16:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment I know. Hence why the final version was rotated approximately 0.2 degrees in Photoshop to ensure more horizontal horizontals. The lens used is well recognized for its minimal distortion (especially this close to the center of the lens), and every other line in the image is straight. As I said, the relief itself is not ruler straight. Crisco 1492 01:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 16:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 16:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Turkish Friendship Memorial, King's Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)  CommentUmm ... looking closely this also seems to have some stitching issues. --Granada 14:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "Widow and Children", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "The Man with the Donkey", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equestrian Statue of Sir John Monash, Kings Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St Francis of Assisi, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forum Melbourne (clock tower), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Daniel Mannix, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but could you reduce shadows in and around the face a little more? --Michielverbeek 07:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC) Done.Crisco 1492 02:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shakespeare Window, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Sir Redmond Barry, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Call to Arms (detail), Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check the image, it's a little bit tilted CW or needs perspective fix. Please have a look to the bottom line. And please add geo location. --XRay 05:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC) Done.Crisco 1492 02:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of the lions and child, "Patriotism", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. And please add geo location. --XRay 05:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC) Done.Crisco 1492 02:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of John Monash, Monash University (Clayton Campus), Melbourne 2017-10-30 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eureka Tower (top), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Capt. Matthew Flinders, St Paul's Cathedral, Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)