Max Ryazanov

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Max Ryazanov!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 06:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 07:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Pobedy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 20:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good but you forgot the geotag on this :-) --Moroder 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)  Done ;) Max Ryazanov 17:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki park 19.08.2012 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 14:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churiliha River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best (only) in scope, meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 16:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 478 Crete Panorama 14.09.2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 23:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pahia Ammos 2012-09-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. - A.Savin 23:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachia Ammos, Lasithi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zolotye kljuchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality--Llorenzi 19:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)  CommentNo FOP in Russia and the building is new.--ArildV 17:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of the Iberian Icon of the Mother of God.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquadrom waterpark 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The vertical lines of the left half are tilted. It needs perspective correction. Too tight at bottom IMO--Lmbuga 21:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)  Done fix --Max Ryazanov 18:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me--Lmbuga 01:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novodevichy Convent night view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. :-) --XRay 19:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aminevskoye.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aminevskoye.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Kotelnicheskaja.jpg
• File:Kuzminskaja street.jpg
• File:Kuzminskaja street 1.jpg
• File:Novodevichy Convent night view.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimini 2013-09-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a mild tilt correction, but overall a good quality. --Cccefalon 08:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria Alberto Sordi 2013-09-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittoriano Altare della Patria 2013-09-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not pin sharp everywhere, not perfectly centered, but nice typewriter, and QI nevertheless--Jebulon 15:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Peter's Basilica 2013-09-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel il muraglione.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Godenzo 2013-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fassade is burnt out (fixable in RAW?). You can better work on the straight verticals. --Tuxyso 22:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Better? --Max Ryazanov 10:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC) Unfortunately not. I added two notes. Have you applied a lens corrections profile during RAW development? --Tuxyso 10:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done ok? --Max Ryazanov 20:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Much better now. There are still very bright areas on the fassade but imho QI in this version. --Tuxyso 11:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment I tried to make a darker, but only get worse. Thanks for the notes. --Max Ryazanov 17:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Teatro Strehler (Milan) 2013-09-18.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Strehler (Milan) 2013-09-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is CA at the left side of the building. Also tiny perspective correction is necessary (building inclining inwards). Both flaws are fixable. A partial sharpening of the left part of the building eventually could solve the missing sharpness in that area. --Cccefalon 17:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)  Done --Max Ryazanov 18:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence 2013-09-17 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some sky noise and low resolution, but it's ok for me. --The Photographer 12:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Marino panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 17:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Cathedral at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment who left the first comment? :) I think with the noises all right. --Max Ryazanov 17:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC) OK for me. Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue to Cosimo I by Giambologna 2013-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop too tight at the top. --NorbertNagel 21:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)  Done better? --Max Ryazanov 01:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Crop is better now, but still two other issues: CA and the buildings on the far right are leaning in. Can you fix? --NorbertNagel 19:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)  Done tried to fix --Max Ryazanov 20:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Acceptable now. --NorbertNagel 10:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Fortress of Guaita 2013-09-19.jpg

Hi! I nominated your image on the Featured picture candidates page. Good luck, --Ivar (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has already 7 support votes and that means it will be probably featured picture. You can also vote on FP candidates page for images you like. Good luck, --Ivar (talk) 09:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Guaita 2013-09-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support (with minor fix). Very nice, you could even try to put it on FPC list. Good luck, --Iifar 19:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fortress of Guaita 2013-09-19.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fortress of Guaita 2013-09-19.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations! --Ivar (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Max Ryazanov⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuskovo-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Max Ryazanov,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius 08.03.2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --J.-H. Janßen 19:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius 08.03.2014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction and handling of the CA. --Cccefalon 05:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)  Done--Max Ryazanov 17:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 22:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius 08.03.03014 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki greenhouse (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 14:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki greenhouse (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective correction needed. --P e z i 21:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)  Done--Max Ryazanov 11:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Support Still slightly leaning in, but QI now IMO. --P e z i 09:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuzminki greenhouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective correction needed. --P e z i 21:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)  Done--Max Ryazanov 11:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Support Still slightly leaning in, but QI now IMO. --P e z i 09:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 10:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I had reduced the magenta saturation a bit (lot of magenta in the branches) but anyway, it's QI. --Cccefalon 08:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 11.10.2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 11.10.2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 11.10.2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 11.10.2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 00:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Teatro Strehler (Milan) 2013-09-18.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Фото

Доброго времени суток!
Ваши фотографии в номинациях можно улучшить в графических редакторах.
1. Исправить перспективу, когда стены складываются гармошкой.
2. Убрать шумы (зернистость) на небе, выделив соответствующую область и применив сглаживание.
Это доступно в разных редакторах, в т.ч. и в бесплатных. Для съемки на будущее рекомендую использовать фокусное рассторяние не 17 мм для архитектуры, а 40-50 мм, если есть возможность отойти подальше. Тогда геометрических искажений почти не будет. Я понимаю, что это может быть авторский художественный приём, но для номинации на качественное это недостаток. Особенно, если здание снято не снизу от земли, а просто сбоку широким фокусом.
Желаю Вам творческих усаехов! С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 23.09.2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyazma 23.09.2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad. But it needs a bit vertical and a bit perspective correction. --Hockei 19:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)  Done--Max Ryazanov 22:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Both not yet quite enough.--Hockei 07:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)  Done--Max Ryazanov 13:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)  Support This is good. --Hockei 15:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Sant%27Ignazio_Church_2013-09-16

Dear Max Ryazanov, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sant%27Ignazio_Church_2013-09-16.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 11:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 11:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)