Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:12-01-03-akt-lowkey-by-RalfR-06.jpg

File:12-01-03-akt-lowkey-by-RalfR-06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2017 at 23:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info all by -- Ralf Roleček 23:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ralf Roleček 23:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I understand that low-key photography is a technique, but I think it's not being applied effectively in this case. What's the point in photographing a nude woman and including her face, if you can't see half of it because it's too dark? I think the unintentional effect is to objectify the woman more, because we can see her breasts well but can't see much of her face and hair at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very artful, I will support if the noted bugs are fixed. This kind of photography usually works better with a woman than a man because of more curves and long hair. Looks like from a croquis session. --cart-Talk 08:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different, fresh and interesting art work --The Photographer 01:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 10:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Banding, maybe in BW would be better. --Mile (talk) 07:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 16:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light does not highlight the shape of the breasts but deform its. Maybe it lacks another light source. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[[[reply]
Oppose Per other opposers - other low-key portraits that we've promoted here have been better. -- Thennicke (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We have better low-key portraits. The lighting here is inconsistent (e.g. some hair lit, some not). Rim lighting ineffective. Too much of the body/head is just dark. And posterisation issues with the background. Very low EV. -- Colin (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per opposers. --B dash (talk) 10:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]