Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bow shipwreck Nea Artaki Evia Greece.jpg

File:Bow shipwreck Nea Artaki Evia Greece.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2016 at 17:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shipwreck in Greece. Find the fishes ! -- Jebulon (talk) 17:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 18:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting pic with fishes and those sea creatures straight out of Avatar, but I don't think it's sharp enough for an FP. Sorry. w.carter-Talk 19:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for interest. Do you think that what is under water should be as sharp as what is over water ? It is simply impossible, due to rules of optics !--Jebulon (talk) 23:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The weird thing is that on my screen the object under water in front of the bow actually looks sharper than most of the boat above water. The rusty chain is sharp, but the sides of the boat and the barnacles are just a bit unfocused. Guess the chain and the things under water in front of the bow are at the same distance from the camera. But if that slight unfocus is generally accepted in FPs, I'll be happy to change my vote to support because of the interesting object. w.carter-Talk 11:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, don't change anything, you vote is welcome, even opposing. I understand what you mean and I agree for part, maybe the DoF was a bit too short. My goal was to empasise the front part of the bow, with the chain, indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you take it that way. I guess I'm sometimes too influenced by my work (publicing company) where all close range pics have to be knife sharp. I also know what you mean about opposeing votes, those are the ones that have taught me most here and I always welcome them myself for that reason. w.carter-Talk 15:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I think it's sharp enough. The part above the water is clear, and water is sometimes cloudy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Christian Ferrer: what do you think now ? Ce ne sont pas des aberrations chromatiques à proprement parler, car ça ne vient pas de la lentille. C'est l'effet de prisme dû à la décomposition de la lumière sous l'eau, vu de l'extérieur. C'est visible à l'oeil nu. C'est corrigé. Merci de ta remarque.--Jebulon (talk) 08:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed this is a kind of purple fringing, thank you for the correction, this is indeed better now although being fussy we can still find but it does not really matter. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 09:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing outstanding. I find it difficult to understand what put so many positive votes. JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a random something ... see nothing featurable here. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too harsh comment, IMO...--Jebulon (talk) 18:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you are trying to put pressure on voters. JukoFF (talk) 20:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - It does not matter. ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- And so what ? 😳🙃 Even if, I hope that reviewers are adult and strong enough to resist...And I'm sure my old fellow Alchemist-hp is.--Jebulon (talk) 02:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects