Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg

File:Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2017 at 20:37:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Cathedral-Basilica of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal, Canada. The construction of the cathedral, ordered by Ignace Bourget, began in 1875 in order to replace the former Saint-Jacques Cathedral which had burned in 1852. The building is a scale model of Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome and the new church was consecrated in 1894. In 2000 the cathedral was designated a National Historic Site of Canada. Poc o² 20:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Prismo345 (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 00:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice. You really help your nominations by providing background. Would you consider adding it to the file description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan: Done, that is not something I have to consider, but something I've always done :) I didn't manage in the last weeks, so I fixed that for my last 30 FPs adding the description in English and in my mother tongue (that's why it took me longer to answer) Poc o² 17:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 06:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 07:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite the sleeping guy at the right, or just because of him :) --A.Savin 14:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support PumpkinSky talk 15:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support So that's what you were off doing during Wikimania ... didn't hurt that it was across the street. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel: If I had visited this church or other churches during the Wikimania programme they would have been crowded. So I woke up earlier that day to be the first in Notre Dame cathedral and after that visited this church. I managed to be on time for the first conference that day. The say for evening shots. The best lighting is anyhow early in the morning or in the evening, so no timing issue here :) Poc o² 12:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --fedaro (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If you do PD then do it correct (pillars are not straight). Despite i dont like huge PD (circles of roof became elliptic) i would crop some above (anoted). You could retushe man out, so would be good FP. --Mile (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That person really looked like a homeless, why should I clone it out? As said, a pattern between my noms and your votes. That doesn't really speak for you. Poc o² 16:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thats the reason, if this would be someone praying that would be surplus. Now seems too odd, unless you try to show church as place where homeless sleep. I never saw that here. It speaks for me, sometime you have to put more time and energy into picture, to be true keeper and shot you enjoy while watching. I made retush, merely 5 min od edit. If i made few hours editions for many of them, i hope your "FP" is worth of that. --Mile (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 12:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support The two persons are a bit disturbing, but nevertheless --Llez (talk) 10:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings