Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lindau - Hafen6.jpg

File:Lindau - Hafen6.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2011 at 09:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jebulon (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed. See the tower, a big part is all white (255). Very slight tilt CCW. Yann (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

both easy correctable, but IMO not really a problem for this picture because all details are visible --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 06:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann + a bit noisy and oversatured sky. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FPC is no place for revenge-votings. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry??? 1.) , 2.) . Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological order? --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warum man hier zum wiederholten male Commons-Usern Rachestimmen unterstellt, bleibt mir vollkommen schleierhaft. Das Contra ist mir Fakten am/zum/über das Bild belegt und hier eine persönlich-motivierte Revanche sehen zu müssen sowie in alles und jeden eine hinein zu interpretieren ist sinnlos, heizt höchstens die Stimmung auf und gehört hier einfach nicht hin. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Die Unterstellung, ich hätte das Bild übersättigt ist ebenso unzutreffend wie es fragwürdig ist, für ein 26 Megapixel aufgelöstes Bild ein geringes Rauschen (das zudem behebbar wäre) als Kontra anzuführen. Dass alchemist nach ausgerechnet nach meiner Ansprache hier mit einem Kontra aufschlägt ist keine Unterstellung, mein guter Carschten, sondern für jeden ersichtlich. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Albertus teolog (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe a little overexposed. Also maybe of little off for WB. In the end, trivial shot with trivial centered composition and nothing special. - Benh (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Another revenge-voting. Interesting that there this no better picture of this "trivial object". And the picture is not as trivial as Benh thinks because the bollard disturb the tower and the harbour entrance is rather congested with traffic but if you just give out revenge-voting you don't mind about that. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As above. พ.s. 11:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as above --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Basically, I think Benh is right, but in my opinion this picture is at least on par with our average architectural FPs. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --AM (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support changing level in order the image to be a little more dark.. and may-be some more space to the right (not being a centered composition) will enhance the image. Ggia (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Correct picture, good enough quality though a bit overexposed for my taste. What I don't like is the composition/framing which seems to isolate the subject from the environment. Overall nothing extraordinary. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with Ggia and Alvesgaspar. Can you fix the slight overexposure? Getting more of the RHS would help esp as the shadow is truncated. I appreciate that subjects sometimes have distracting elements nearby which necessitates cropping. However, there's loads of detail in this image which for me helps sway me towards weak support. Colin (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Don-kun (talk) 10:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture